Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
108
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
108 results for “Ancorabolidae”
Figure 17 in New representatives of the genus Ancorabolina George, 2006 (Copepoda, Harpacticoida, Ancorabolidae) including remarks on ancorabolid phylogeny
Figure 17. Ancorabolina galeata sp. nov., female holotype. A, antennule, dorsal; B, antenna; C, mandible.
Figure 16 in New representatives of the genus Ancorabolina George, 2006 (Copepoda, Harpacticoida, Ancorabolidae) including remarks on ancorabolid phylogeny
Figure 16. Ancorabolina galeata sp. nov., female holotype. A, habitus, dorsal; B, furcal setae IV and V; C, habitus, lateral.
Figure 14 in New representatives of the genus Ancorabolina George, 2006 (Copepoda, Harpacticoida, Ancorabolidae) including remarks on ancorabolid phylogeny
Figure 14. Ancorabolina anaximenesi sp. nov., male allotype. A, antennule (armature of segments 3 to 7 omitted), ventral; B, segments 3 and 4 of antennule, ventral; C, segment 5 of antennule, ventral; D, segments 6 and 7 of antennule, dorsal; E, segment 7 of antennule, ventral.
Figure 13 in New representatives of the genus Ancorabolina George, 2006 (Copepoda, Harpacticoida, Ancorabolidae) including remarks on ancorabolid phylogeny
Figure 13. Ancorabolina anaximenesi sp. nov., male allotype. A, habitus, dorsal; B, first to third urosomite, ventral; C, fifth thoracopod.
Figure 18 in New representatives of the genus Ancorabolina George, 2006 (Copepoda, Harpacticoida, Ancorabolidae) including remarks on ancorabolid phylogeny
Figure 18. Ancorabolina galeata sp. nov., female holotype. A, first thoracopod (P1) [armature of endopod-3 (enp-3) omitted]; B, P1 enp-3; C, maxilliped; D, syncoxa of maxilliped; E, maxilla; F, maxillule.
Figure 11 in New representatives of the genus Ancorabolina George, 2006 (Copepoda, Harpacticoida, Ancorabolidae) including remarks on ancorabolid phylogeny
Figure 11. Ancorabolina anaximenesi sp. nov., A–C, female holotype; D, E, female paratype (SMF 34168). A, fourth thoracopod (P4); B, endopod of right P4; C, telson and furcal ramus, lateral; D, rostrum, dorsal; E, process on cephalothorax, dorsal.
Figure 9 in New representatives of the genus Ancorabolina George, 2006 (Copepoda, Harpacticoida, Ancorabolidae) including remarks on ancorabolid phylogeny
Figure 9. Ancorabolina anaximenesi sp. nov., female holotype. A, mandible; B, maxillule; C, maxilla; D, maxilliped; E, first thoracopod.
Figure 8 in New representatives of the genus Ancorabolina George, 2006 (Copepoda, Harpacticoida, Ancorabolidae) including remarks on ancorabolid phylogeny
Figure 8. Ancorabolina anaximenesi sp. nov., female holotype. A, antennule, dorsal; B, endopod of antenna; C, allobasis of antenna; D, process on cephalothorax, dorsal; E, rostrum, dorsal.
Figure 6 in New representatives of the genus Ancorabolina George, 2006 (Copepoda, Harpacticoida, Ancorabolidae) including remarks on ancorabolid phylogeny
Figure 6. Ancorabolina belgicae sp. nov., female holotype. A, urosome, ventral; B, fifth thoracopod (tube pore on exopod arrowed); C, telson and furcal ramus, lateral.
Figure 4 in New representatives of the genus Ancorabolina George, 2006 (Copepoda, Harpacticoida, Ancorabolidae) including remarks on ancorabolid phylogeny
Figure 4. Ancorabolina belgicae sp. nov., female holotype. A, first thoracopod (P1); B, right P2 (endopod-2 omitted); C, left P2 endopod.
Figure 2 in New representatives of the genus Ancorabolina George, 2006 (Copepoda, Harpacticoida, Ancorabolidae) including remarks on ancorabolid phylogeny
Figure 2. Ancorabolina belgicae sp. nov., female holotype. A, segments 3 to 5 of right antennule, ventral; B, rostrum and left antennules (armature of segments 3 to 5 omitted), dorsal; C, antenna.
Figure 9 from: George KH (2020) Restructuring the Ancorabolidae Sars (Copepoda, Harpacticoida) and Cletodidae T. Scott, with a new phylogenetic hypothesis regarding the relationships of the Laophontoidea T. Scott, Ancorabolidae and Cletodidae. Zoosystematics and Evolution 96(2): 455-498. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.96.51349
Figure 9 P1 of A.Laophontodes monsmaris George, 2018, B.Ancorabolina divasecunda Gheerardyn & George, 2010, C.Arthropsyllus serratus Sars, 1909, D.Ancorabolus chironiSchulz and George; 2010. Modified from George 2018 (A), Gheerardyn and George 2010 (B), Conroy-Dalton and Huys 2000 (C), Schulz and George 2010 (D). No scales.
Figure 10 from: George KH (2020) Restructuring the Ancorabolidae Sars (Copepoda, Harpacticoida) and Cletodidae T. Scott, with a new phylogenetic hypothesis regarding the relationships of the Laophontoidea T. Scott, Ancorabolidae and Cletodidae. Zoosystematics and Evolution 96(2): 455-498. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.96.51349
Figure 10 Cuticular body processes of A.Arthuricornua anendopodia Conroy-Dalton, 2001, B.Dorsiceratus ursulae George, 2006, C.Breviconia australis (George, 1998), D.Ancorabolus inermis Conroy-Dalton & Huys, 2000. Modified after Conroy-Dalton 2001 (A), George 2006b (B), George 1998a (C), Conroy-Dalton and Huys 2000 (D). No scales.
Figure 3 from: George KH (2020) Restructuring the Ancorabolidae Sars (Copepoda, Harpacticoida) and Cletodidae T. Scott, with a new phylogenetic hypothesis regarding the relationships of the Laophontoidea T. Scott, Ancorabolidae and Cletodidae. Zoosystematics and Evolution 96(2): 455-498. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.96.51349
Figure 3 Schematic representation of hypothesised groundpatterns for the shapes of the first swimming leg P1 in each proposed taxon. A. Podogennontan (after Willen 2000; Seifried 2003), B.Laophontoidea–Cletodoidea-clade, C.Cletodoidea, D.Cletodidae ●, E.Ancorabolidae ●. Black crosses indicate apomorphies; Roman numerals = outer spines, Arabic numerals = inner setae; ex = exopod, en = endopod. Explanations given in the text.
Figure 4 from: George KH (2020) Restructuring the Ancorabolidae Sars (Copepoda, Harpacticoida) and Cletodidae T. Scott, with a new phylogenetic hypothesis regarding the relationships of the Laophontoidea T. Scott, Ancorabolidae and Cletodidae. Zoosystematics and Evolution 96(2): 455-498. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.96.51349
Figure 4 Antennulae (A1) of A.Enhydrosoma parapropinquum Gómez, 2003, B.Cletodes meyerorum George & Müller, 2013, C.Bicorniphontodes bicornis (A. Scott, 1896), D.Ancorabolina divasecunda Gheerardyn & George, 2010. Arrows indicate gradual elongation. Modified after Gómez 2003 (A), George and Müller 2013 (B), George and Gheerardyn 2015 (C), Gheerardyn and George 2010 (D). No scales.
Figure 1 from: George KH (2020) Restructuring the Ancorabolidae Sars (Copepoda, Harpacticoida) and Cletodidae T. Scott, with a new phylogenetic hypothesis regarding the relationships of the Laophontoidea T. Scott, Ancorabolidae and Cletodidae. Zoosystematics and Evolution 96(2): 455-498. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.96.51349
Figure 1 Representatives of "Ancorabolidae" Sars, 1909, A.Ancorabolus ilvae George, 2001, B.Ancorabolina chimaera George, 2006, C.Ceratonotus vareschii George, 2006, D.Laophontodes typicus T. Scott, 1894, E.Paralaophontodes anjae George, 2017. Modified from George 2001 (A), 2006a (B), 2006b (C), 2017 (D), 2018 (E). No scales.
Figure 8 from: George KH (2020) Restructuring the Ancorabolidae Sars (Copepoda, Harpacticoida) and Cletodidae T. Scott, with a new phylogenetic hypothesis regarding the relationships of the Laophontoidea T. Scott, Ancorabolidae and Cletodidae. Zoosystematics and Evolution 96(2): 455-498. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.96.51349
Figure 8 P1 of A.Enhydrosoma curticauda (Boeck, 1872); arrow points to inner apical seta (element 3), B.Cletodes meyerorum George & Müller, 2013, C.Touphapleura schminkei (George, 1998), D.Ceratonotus steiningeri George, 2006. Modified from Gee 1994 (A), George and Müller 2013 (B), George 1998b (C), George 2006c (D). No scales.
Figure 7 from: George KH (2020) Restructuring the Ancorabolidae Sars (Copepoda, Harpacticoida) and Cletodidae T. Scott, with a new phylogenetic hypothesis regarding the relationships of the Laophontoidea T. Scott, Ancorabolidae and Cletodidae. Zoosystematics and Evolution 96(2): 455-498. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.96.51349
Figure 7 Female P5 of A.Heterolaophonte minuta (Boeck, 1872), B.Cletodes meyerorum George & Müller, 2013, C.Ancorabolus chironi Schulz & George, 2010, D.Calypsophontodes macropodia (Gee & Fleeger, 1986). E.Laophontodes sarsi George, 2018, F.Dorsiceratus wilhelminae George & Plum, 2009. Modified from Willen 1992 (A), George and Müller 2013 (B), Schulz and George 2010 (C), Gheerardyn and Lee 2012 (D), George 2018 (E), George and Plum 2009 (F). No scales.
Figure 5 from: George KH (2020) Restructuring the Ancorabolidae Sars (Copepoda, Harpacticoida) and Cletodidae T. Scott, with a new phylogenetic hypothesis regarding the relationships of the Laophontoidea T. Scott, Ancorabolidae and Cletodidae. Zoosystematics and Evolution 96(2): 455-498. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.96.51349
Figure 5 A. P3 of Tapholaophontodes rollandi Soyer, 1975, B. P3 of Calypsophontodes macropodia (Gee & Fleeger, 1986); dotted circle indicates approximate position and size of coxa; C. P3 of Laophontodes sarsi George, 2018, D. P4 of Probosciphontodes stellata Fiers, 1988. Modified after Mielke 1985 (A), Gheerardyn and Lee 2012 (B), George 2018 (C), Fiers 1988 (D). No scales.
Figure 2 from: George KH (2020) Restructuring the Ancorabolidae Sars (Copepoda, Harpacticoida) and Cletodidae T. Scott, with a new phylogenetic hypothesis regarding the relationships of the Laophontoidea T. Scott, Ancorabolidae and Cletodidae. Zoosystematics and Evolution 96(2): 455-498. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.96.51349
Figure 2 Cladogram visualising the result of the current phylogenetic evaluation. Capitals A–BB refer to the corresponding sections in the text; asterisks (*; **; ***) refer to the respective discussion in Chapters I and II.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.