Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
66
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
66 results for “Belmonte”
Figure 5 from: Despot-Belmonte K, Neßhöver C, Saarenmaa H, Regan E, Meyer C, Martins E, Groom Q, Hoffmann A, Caine A, Bowles-Newark N, Bae H, Canhos D, Stenzel S, Bowler D, Schneider A, V. Weatherdon L, S. Martin C (2017) Biodiversity data provision and decision-making - addressing the challenges. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e12165. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e12165
Figure 5 - Guiding principles for promoting the application of EBVs for current and future needs of decision-makers - researcher's brief.
Figure 2 from: Despot-Belmonte K, Neßhöver C, Saarenmaa H, Regan E, Meyer C, Martins E, Groom Q, Hoffmann A, Caine A, Bowles-Newark N, Bae H, Canhos D, Stenzel S, Bowler D, Schneider A, V. Weatherdon L, S. Martin C (2017) Biodiversity data provision and decision-making - addressing the challenges. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e12165. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e12165
Figure 2 - From a European perspective, the European biodiversity policy landscape is complex and "data hungry" (Wetzel et al. 2015).
Figure 5 from: Wetzel F, Despot Belmonte K, Bingham H, Underwood E, Hoffmann A, Häuser C, Mikolajczyk P, Vohland K (2017) 4th European Biodiversity Observation Network (EU BON) Stakeholder Roundtable: Pathways to sustainability for EU BONs network of collaborators and technical infrastructure. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e11875. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e11875
Figure 5 - Group 2 discussion: Strategies, Business Plan and EU BON sustainability (Credits: F. Wetzel)
Figure 4 from: Wetzel F, Despot Belmonte K, Bingham H, Underwood E, Hoffmann A, Häuser C, Mikolajczyk P, Vohland K (2017) 4th European Biodiversity Observation Network (EU BON) Stakeholder Roundtable: Pathways to sustainability for EU BONs network of collaborators and technical infrastructure. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e11875. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e11875
Figure 4 - Visualisation of Lepidoptera density occurences: World Map (darker colors indicate a higher number of occurrences) and Lepidoptera occurences chart bar per year, exemplified with the country data of Germany (EU BON European Biodiversity Portal, beta version 11/2016).
Figure 2 from: Wetzel F, Despot Belmonte K, Bingham H, Underwood E, Hoffmann A, Häuser C, Mikolajczyk P, Vohland K (2017) 4th European Biodiversity Observation Network (EU BON) Stakeholder Roundtable: Pathways to sustainability for EU BONs network of collaborators and technical infrastructure. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e11875. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e11875
Figure 2 - Potential organizational structure of a future EU BON, e.g. with a 'core EU BON' (blue rectangle). Presentation Dirk Schmeller (UFZ) in collaboration with Katherine Despot-Belmonte (UNEP-WCMC). (Credits: Pan X., 2015, CC BY 4.0)
Figure 1 from: Wetzel F, Despot Belmonte K, Bingham H, Underwood E, Hoffmann A, Häuser C, Mikolajczyk P, Vohland K (2017) 4th European Biodiversity Observation Network (EU BON) Stakeholder Roundtable: Pathways to sustainability for EU BONs network of collaborators and technical infrastructure. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e11875. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e11875
Figure 1 - How do we get from data to decisions? Extract from a presentation by Lauren Weatherdon (UNEP-WCMC). Credit: Scriberia, CC BY 4.0
Figure 3 from: Wetzel F, Despot Belmonte K, Bingham H, Underwood E, Hoffmann A, Häuser C, Mikolajczyk P, Vohland K (2017) 4th European Biodiversity Observation Network (EU BON) Stakeholder Roundtable: Pathways to sustainability for EU BONs network of collaborators and technical infrastructure. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e11875. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e11875
Figure 3 - Screenshot of the beta version of the EU BON European Biodiversity Portal (biodiversity.eubon.eu).
Figure 4 from: Rose DC, Addison P, Ausden M, Bennun L, Mills C, O'Donnell SAL, Parker C, Ryan M, Weatherdon L, Despot-Belmonte K, Sutherland WJ, Robertson RJ (2017) Decision support tools in conservation: a workshop to improve user-centred design. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e21074. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e21074
Figure 4 - User testing of decision support tools. The list of tools exhibited were as follows: (1) Facilitator (Rowan Eisner), (2) Ecobat (Paul Lintott and Sophie Davison), (3) Local Evidence Assessment Tool (Claire Wordley, (4) IBAT (Kerstin Brauneder and Natasha Ali on behalf of IBAT Alliance), (5) Camgeocon (Dilkushi de Alwis Pitts), (6) Species+ (Kelly Malsch), (7) Protected Planet (Brian MacSharry), (8) TradeMapper (TRAFFIC), (9) LEFT (Peter Long), (10) NaturEtrade (Peter Long and Beccy Wilebore), and (11) WCS Offenders database (Andy Plumptre).
Figure 3 from: Rose DC, Addison P, Ausden M, Bennun L, Mills C, O'Donnell SAL, Parker C, Ryan M, Weatherdon L, Despot-Belmonte K, Sutherland WJ, Robertson RJ (2017) Decision support tools in conservation: a workshop to improve user-centred design. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e21074. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e21074
Figure 3 - Cost v benefit - using a tool takes effort so the benefits of use must clearly outweigh this (credit: Parker).
Figure 2 from: Rose DC, Addison P, Ausden M, Bennun L, Mills C, O'Donnell SAL, Parker C, Ryan M, Weatherdon L, Despot-Belmonte K, Sutherland WJ, Robertson RJ (2017) Decision support tools in conservation: a workshop to improve user-centred design. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e21074. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e21074
Figure 2 - Panel session on user engagement. From Left: Melanie Ryan (Luc Hoffmann Institute), Stephanie O' Donnell (WILDABS.NET, FFI), Dr Prue Addison (University of Oxford).
Figure 6 from: Rose DC, Addison P, Ausden M, Bennun L, Mills C, O'Donnell SAL, Parker C, Ryan M, Weatherdon L, Despot-Belmonte K, Sutherland WJ, Robertson RJ (2017) Decision support tools in conservation: a workshop to improve user-centred design. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e21074. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e21074
Figure 6 - Colour branding opportunities, very few in the purple to pink range. (credit: Vizzuality as presented by Craig Mills, CEO, Vizzuality).
Fig. 1 in The geological setting and palaeoenvironmental and palaeoecological reconstructions of the Upper Permian insect beds at Belmont, New South Wales, Australia
Fig. 1. (A) Outline map of Australia; (B) Outline map of New South Wales; (C) Map of Lake Macquarie area. The study area is enclosed in the rectangle.
Fig. 8 in The geological setting and palaeoenvironmental and palaeoecological reconstructions of the Upper Permian insect beds at Belmont, New South Wales, Australia
Fig. 8. Analysis of insect orders by number and percentage of individual insects (not total specimen numbers), Belmont insect beds, based upon new Beattie collection (2002–2004).
Figure 2 from: Gnisci V, Cognetti de Martiis S, Belmonte A, Micheli C, Piermattei V, Bonamano S, Marcelli M (2020) Assessment of the ecological structure of Posidonia oceanica (L.) Delile on the northern coast of Lazio, Italy (central Tyrrhenian, Mediterranean). Italian Botanist 9: 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3897/italianbotanist.9.46426
Figure 2 UPGMA analysis of Posidonia oceanica meadows.
Figure 1 from: Bingham H, Doudin M, Weatherdon L, Despot-Belmonte K, Wetzel F, Groom Q, Lewis E, Regan E, Appeltans W, Güntsch A, Mergen P, Agosti D, Penev L, Hoffmann A, Saarenmaa H, Geller G, Kim K, Kim H, Archambeau A, Häuser C, Schmeller D, Geijzendorffer I, García Camacho A, Guerra C, Robertson T, Runnel V, Valland N, Martin C (2017) The Biodiversity Informatics Landscape: Elements, Connections and Opportunities. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e14059. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e14059
Figure 1 - A non-exhaustive map of the global and European biodiversity informatics landscape.
Figure 1 from: Despot-Belmonte K, Neßhöver C, Saarenmaa H, Regan E, Meyer C, Martins E, Groom Q, Hoffmann A, Caine A, Bowles-Newark N, Bae H, Canhos D, Stenzel S, Bowler D, Schneider A, V. Weatherdon L, S. Martin C (2017) Biodiversity data provision and decision-making - addressing the challenges. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e12165. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e12165
Figure 1 - The main users of biodiversity data.
Figure 3 from: Despot-Belmonte K, Neßhöver C, Saarenmaa H, Regan E, Meyer C, Martins E, Groom Q, Hoffmann A, Caine A, Bowles-Newark N, Bae H, Canhos D, Stenzel S, Bowler D, Schneider A, V. Weatherdon L, S. Martin C (2017) Biodiversity data provision and decision-making - addressing the challenges. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e12165. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e12165
Figure 3 - Discussing the development of the "Red Book" of Brazilian plants - case study.
Figure 4b from: Despot-Belmonte K, Neßhöver C, Saarenmaa H, Regan E, Meyer C, Martins E, Groom Q, Hoffmann A, Caine A, Bowles-Newark N, Bae H, Canhos D, Stenzel S, Bowler D, Schneider A, V. Weatherdon L, S. Martin C (2017) Biodiversity data provision and decision-making - addressing the challenges. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e12165. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e12165
Figure 4b - Developing the brief
Figure 4a from: Despot-Belmonte K, Neßhöver C, Saarenmaa H, Regan E, Meyer C, Martins E, Groom Q, Hoffmann A, Caine A, Bowles-Newark N, Bae H, Canhos D, Stenzel S, Bowler D, Schneider A, V. Weatherdon L, S. Martin C (2017) Biodiversity data provision and decision-making - addressing the challenges. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e12165. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e12165
Figure 4a - Workshop participants
Figure 6 from: Wetzel F, Despot Belmonte K, Bingham H, Underwood E, Hoffmann A, Häuser C, Mikolajczyk P, Vohland K (2017) 4th European Biodiversity Observation Network (EU BON) Stakeholder Roundtable: Pathways to sustainability for EU BONs network of collaborators and technical infrastructure. Research Ideas and Outcomes 3: e11875. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e11875
Figure 6 - Fig. 6: Participants of the 4th EU BON Stakeholder Roundtable (Credits: F. Wetzel).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.