Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0May 2010View details →

Figs 9a–b in Development And Morphology Of Unduloribates Undulatus (Berlese, 1914) (Acari: Oribatida) And Some Remarks On The Unduloribatidae

Figs 9a–b. Interference contrast micrographs of egg exochorion structure: a = Unduloribates undulatus, b = Eupelops sp.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2016View details →

Fig. 2 in First record of the genus Phauloppia Berlese, 1908 (Acari: Oribatida: Oribatulidae) with description of Phauloppia lucorum (C.L. Koch, 1841) from Korea

Fig. 2. Phauloppia lucorum (C.L. Koch, 1841). (A) Prodorsum and anterior part of notogaster. (B) Genital region with setae. Genital setae: g1, g2, g3, g4, g5; Aggenital seta: ag. (C) Sensillus (ss) and bothridium (bo). (D) Exobothridial seta (ex). (E) Porose area Aa. (F) Notogateral setae: c1, c2, da.

Plate 1. Lasioseius kichozii Faraji, n in A new species of Lasioseius Berlese (Acari: Mesostigmata: Blattisociidae) from Kenya

Plate 1. Lasioseius kichozii Faraji, n. sp. (Female): (A) Sternal shield; (B) Spermathecae II; (C) Chelicerae.

Figure 3. Lasioseius kichozii Faraji, n in A new species of Lasioseius Berlese (Acari: Mesostigmata: Blattisociidae) from Kenya

Figure 3. Lasioseius kichozii Faraji, n. sp. (Female): (A) Leg I (tarsus not depicted); (B) Leg II; (C) Leg III; (D) Leg IV; (E) Peritreme, peritremal plate and exopodal plate.

Figure 4. Lasioseius kichozii Faraji, n in A new species of Lasioseius Berlese (Acari: Mesostigmata: Blattisociidae) from Kenya

Figure 4. Lasioseius kichozii Faraji, n. sp. (male): (A) Idiosoma, dorsal view; (B) Idiosoma, ventral view.

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2019View details →

Table 1 in A new species of Olopachys Berlese (Acari: Pachylaelapidae) from Iran with a key to the world species

Table 1 Checklist of the Iranian Pachylaelapid mite species (described species are marked by an asterisk above their names).<table><tbody><tr><th>No.</th><th>Species</th><th>Related references</th></tr></tbody><tbody><tr><th>1</th><td>Olopachys caucasicus Koroleva</td><td>Ahangaran et al. 2010</td></tr><tr><th>2</th><td>Olopachys compositus Koroleva</td><td>Kazemi and Ahangaran 2011</td></tr><tr><th>3</th><td>Olopachys iraniensis n. sp. *</td><td>This study</td></tr><tr><th>4</th><td>Onchodellus alpinus (Willmann)</td><td>Rahmani et al. 2006</td></tr><tr><th>5</th><td>Onchodellus glandularis (Moraza and Pe&ncaron;a)</td><td>Ahadiyat and Cheraghali 2012</td></tr><tr><th>6</th><td>Onchodellus hispani (Berlese)</td><td>Ahmadi 2002</td></tr><tr><th>7</th><td>Onchodellus karawaiewi (Berlese)</td><td>Khanjani and Kamali 2000a, b</td></tr><tr><th>8</th><td>Onchodellus procerus Ma&scaron;án</td><td>Nazari-Tajani et al. 2012</td></tr><tr><th>9</th><td>Onchodellus siculus (Berlese)</td><td>Ahmadi 2002</td></tr><tr><th>10</th><td>Onchodellus squamosus (Koroleva)</td><td>Mojahed et al. 2017</td></tr><tr><th>11</th><td>Onchodellus strigifer (Berlese)</td><td>Ahadiyat and Cheraghali 2012</td></tr><tr><th>12</th><td>Pachylaelaps brachiosus Hirschmann and Krauss</td><td>Jalaeian et al. 2004</td></tr><tr><th>13</th><td>Pachylaelaps costai Hirschmann and Krauss</td><td>Jalaeian et al. 2004</td></tr><tr><th>14</th><td>Pachylaelaps grandis Koroleva</td><td>Ahadiyat and Cheraghali 2012</td></tr><tr><th>15</th><td>Pachylaelaps imitans Berlese</td><td>Ahmadi 2002</td></tr><tr><th>16</th><td>Pachylaelaps magnus Halbert</td><td>Ahmadi 2002</td></tr><tr><th>17</th><td>Pachylaelaps pectinifer (G. Canestrini)</td><td>Jalaeian et al. 2004</td></tr><tr><th>18</th><td>Pachylaelaps resinae Karg</td><td>Kamali et al. 2001</td></tr><tr><th>19</th><td>Pachylaelaps insularis (Berlese)</td><td>Ahangaran et al. 2012</td></tr><tr><th>20</th><td>Pachylaelaps (Longipachylaelaps) vicarius Ma&scaron;án</td><td>Ahadiyat et al. 2014</td></tr><tr><th>21</th><td>Pachylaelaps prodigiosus Ma&scaron;án et al. 2018</td><td>Ma&scaron;án et al. 2018</td></tr><tr><th>22</th><td>Pachyseius angustus Hyatt</td><td>Babaeian & Kazemi 2011</td></tr><tr><th>23</th><td>Pachyseius masanisimilis * Ahadiyat and Ghasemi Moghadam</td><td>Ahadiyat et al. 2016</td></tr><tr><th>24</th><td>Pachyseius persicus * Babaeian and Ma&scaron;án</td><td>Babaeian et al. 2016a</td></tr><tr><th>25</th><td>Pachyseius angustoides * Babaeian & Ma&scaron;án</td><td>Babaeian et al. 2016b</td></tr></tbody></table>

Figure 1 Digamasellus punctum, female. A in Supplementary description of Digamasellus punctum (Berlese) (Mesostigmata, Digamasellidae), and a key to the world species of Digamasellus Berlese

Figure 1 Digamasellus punctum, female. A – Dorsal idiosoma; B – Details of some dorsal shield setae.

Figure 3 Digamasellus punctum, female. A in Supplementary description of Digamasellus punctum (Berlese) (Mesostigmata, Digamasellidae), and a key to the world species of Digamasellus Berlese

Figure 3 Digamasellus punctum, female. A – Tritosternum; B – Anterior margin of epistome; C. Subcapitulum; D – Chelicera, lateral view (pd = pilus dentilis); E – Palp.

Figure 2 Digamasellus punctum, female. A in Supplementary description of Digamasellus punctum (Berlese) (Mesostigmata, Digamasellidae), and a key to the world species of Digamasellus Berlese

Figure 2 Digamasellus punctum, female. A – Ventral idiosoma; B – Peritrematal shield; C– Details of some ventral shields setae (pa = paranal seta; po = post-anal seta).

Figure 4 Digamasellus punctum, female. A – Leg I in Supplementary description of Digamasellus punctum (Berlese) (Mesostigmata, Digamasellidae), and a key to the world species of Digamasellus Berlese

Figure 4 Digamasellus punctum, female. A – Leg I, trochanter-genu, dorsal view; B – Leg I, tibia, anterolateral view; C-E – Legs II-IV, trochanter-tibia, dorsal view, except leg IV, posterolateral view.

Figure 2 in Molecular identification of Haemaphysalis sulcata (Acari: Ixodidae) larval stages collected using the Berlese funnel in Northern Iran

Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree generated based on ITS2 sequence data of the Haemaphysalis species of this study and sequences retrieved from GenBank database constructed using Bayesian Inference method. The main clade of tree separated by a yellow rectangular box. The taxa were defined with a name and GenBank accession number and taxa of the present study is bold. Posterior probability values inserted in the place of nodes. Branch lengths are proportional to the evolutionary changes.

Figure 1 in A new species of Eustigmaeus Berlese (Acari: Stigmaeidae) from Brazil

Figure 1 Eustigmaeus crassifolius Bizarro & Johannn. sp. (female) A – Dorsal view of idiosoma; B – Close up to the dimples; C – Ventral

Figure 2 in A new species of Eustigmaeus Berlese (Acari: Stigmaeidae) from Brazil

Figure 2 Eustigmaeus crassifolius Bizarro & Johannn. sp. (female) A – Leg I; B – Leg II; C – Leg III; D – Leg IV; E – Dorsal view of palp.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2017View details →

FIGURE 1. Collecting methods. A–D. Fogging. E. Beating vegetation. F. Berlese funnels. A in Taxonomic Revision Of The Jumping Goblin Spiders Of The Genus Orchestina Simon, 1882, In The Americas (Araneae: Oonopidae)

FIGURE 1. Collecting methods. A–D. Fogging. E. Beating vegetation. F. Berlese funnels. A. The sheets are disposed under the canopy approximately at 1 m above the ground. B. Each sheet was connected to each other with ropes and claspers. C. Setting the machine with a mixture of diesel and pyrethroids. D. The fog is finally directed to the canopy. E. Beating vegetation was the most frequent technique employed during this project. F. Occasionally, some specimens were captured in litter using Berlese funnels. A–D, F. Ecuador. E. Juan Fernández Islands, illustrative image, no specimens of Orchestina were collected there. Credits. C, D. Dimitri Forero. E. Jaime Pizarro.

Figure 25 in Review of Amblyseius Berlese (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in Western Siberia, Russia

Figure 25 Phase contrast (A, B) and DIC (C, D) micrographs ofAmblyseius myrtilli Papadoulis, Emmanouel and Kapaxidi, 2009: A – dorsal idiosoma of adult female, B – ventral idiosoma of female, C – chelicera of female, D – spermatheca.

Figure 21 in Review of Amblyseius Berlese (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in Western Siberia, Russia

Figure 21 Amblyseius myrtilli Papadoulis, Emmanouel and Kapaxidi, 2009, female: A – dorsal idiosoma; B – ventral idiosoma.

Figure 18 Amblyseius omaloensis Gomelauri, 1968a in Review of Amblyseius Berlese (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in Western Siberia, Russia

Figure 18 Amblyseius omaloensis Gomelauri, 1968a, female: left legs I-IV, respectively, excluding tarsus, ventral aspect, macrosetae depicted in solid black.

Figure 12 in Review of Amblyseius Berlese (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in Western Siberia, Russia

Figure 12 Amblyseius ampullosus Wu and Lan, 1991, female: right tarsi I-IV, respectively, macrosetae depicted in solid black. A – dorsal aspect; B – apical sensorial setal cluster area, C–E –ventral aspect.

Figure 10 in Review of Amblyseius Berlese (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in Western Siberia, Russia

Figure 10 Amblyseius ampullosus Wu and Lan, 1991: A – chelicera of female, B – chelicera and spermatodactyle of male, C – anterior margin of epistom, D – dorsal view of left palp tarsus, E – spermatheca, F – subcapitulum, G – left palp, excepting tarsus, dorsal aspect, H – peritrema.

Figure 4 in Review of Amblyseius Berlese (Acari: Phytoseiidae) in Western Siberia, Russia

Figure 4 Amblyseius silvaticus (Chant, 1959), female: right tarsi I-IV, respectively, macrosetae depicted in solid black: A – dorsal aspect; B – apical sensorial setal cluster area, C–E – ventral aspect.