Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
218
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
218 results for “CLASSIFICATION AND TAXONOMY”
FIGURE 8 in The Culicidae (Diptera): a review of taxonomy, classification and phylogeny *
FIGURE 8. Phylogeny of Anophelinae based on morphology (modified from Sallum et al., 2000): strict consensus of 144 MPCs from equal-weighting analysis of 60 anopheline species and 163 anatomical characters. Bootstrap values>50% are shown. Asterisks (*) indicate Species Groups of the Anopheles Series and plus symbols (+) indicate Species Groups of the Myzorhynchus Series. The authors elected to retain Kerteszia, Nyssorhynchus and Cellia as valid subgenera and formally synonymize Lophopodomyia, Stethomyia and Bironella with subgenus Anopheles although the position of the Christya Series (arrow) clearly indicates that all six of these groups fall within the nominotypical subgenus.
FIGURE 15 in The Culicidae (Diptera): a review of taxonomy, classification and phylogeny *
FIGURE 15. Relationships of four generic-level taxa (nine species) of Aedini based on COII sequences (modified from Cook et al., 2005): maximum likelihood tree showing bootstrap values>50%.
FIGURE 19 in The Culicidae (Diptera): a review of taxonomy, classification and phylogeny *
FIGURE 19. Phylogenetic relationships of some Aedini (20 species) based on vitellogenin gene sequences (modified from Isoe, 2000): maximum parsimony tree with all codon positions equally weighted. Bootstrap values>50% are shown. Generic-level names of Reinert et al. (2004, 2006) are substituted for species names of Isoe (2000).
FIGURE 20 in The Culicidae (Diptera): a review of taxonomy, classification and phylogeny *
FIGURE 20. Phylogenetic relationships of Culicini based on morphology (modified from Mallampalli, 1995): strict consensus tree of seven MPCs from parsimony analysis of 43 species (40 Culicini) and 67 anatomical characters using SACW. Bootstrap values>50% are shown.
FIGURE 14 in The Culicidae (Diptera): a review of taxonomy, classification and phylogeny *
FIGURE 14. Relationships of five generic-level taxa (17 species) of Aedini based on COI sequences (modified from Cook et al., 2005): maximum likelihood tree showing bootstrap values>50%.
FIGURE 5 in The Culicidae (Diptera): a review of taxonomy, classification and phylogeny *
FIGURE 5. Phylogenetic relationships of nine genera (13 species) based on nuclear protein-coding white gene sequences (modified from Besansky & Fahey, 1997): SACW maximum parsimony tree with third codon positions excluded. Bootstrap values>50% are shown.
FIGURE 23 in The Culicidae (Diptera): a review of taxonomy, classification and phylogeny *
FIGURE 23. Phylogenetic relationships of Culicini based on morphology (modified from St John, 2007): strict consensus of eight MPTs from maximum parsimony analysis of 43 ingroup species and 64 equally weighted anatomical characters. Clade A indicates that genus Culex is polyphyletic relative to genus Deinocerites. Clade B includes Deinocerites and all New World subgenera of Culex except Melanoconion.
FIGURE 2 in The Culicidae (Diptera): a review of taxonomy, classification and phylogeny *
FIGURE 2. Phylogeny of mosquito genera based on morphology (after Harbach & Kitching, 1998): MPC from impliedweighting analysis (K=1) of 38 genera and 73 morphological characters.
FIGURE 26 in The Culicidae (Diptera): a review of taxonomy, classification and phylogeny *
FIGURE 26. Phylogeny of Sabethini based on morphology (after Harbach & Kitching, 1998): relationships of 13 sabethine genera in MPC from implied-weighting analysis (K=1) of 38 genera and 73 anatomical characters.
FIGURE 25 in The Culicidae (Diptera): a review of taxonomy, classification and phylogeny *
FIGURE 25. Phylogeny of Sabethini based on morphology (modified from Judd, 1996): strict consensus of three MPCs from parsimony analysis of 37 sabethine species and 59 anatomical characters.
FIGURE 11 in The Culicidae (Diptera): a review of taxonomy, classification and phylogeny *
FIGURE 11. Phylogeny of subgenus Anopheles based on morphology (modified from Collucci & Sallum, 2007): strict consensus tree from parsimony analysis of 38 species and 101 anatomical characters using SACW. Clade A = subgenus Anopheles of the authors; clade B = subgenus Anopheles of Sallum et al. (2000).
FIGURE 21 in The Culicidae (Diptera): a review of taxonomy, classification and phylogeny *
FIGURE 21. Phylogenetic relationship of four subgenera (14 species) of Culex based on ITS1 and ITS2 rDNA sequences (modified from Miller et al., 1996): neighbour-joining tree rooted on Melanoconion. Bootstrap values>50% are shown.
FIGURE 10 in The Culicidae (Diptera): a review of taxonomy, classification and phylogeny *
FIGURE 10. Phylogeny of Anophelinae based on morphology (modified from Harbach & Kitching, 2005): strict consensus tree from implied weighting analysis (K=1) of 66 anopheline species and 167 anatomical characters. Filled circles indicate Bremer support values greater than 0.8.
FIGURE 7 in The Culicidae (Diptera): a review of taxonomy, classification and phylogeny *
FIGURE 7. Relationships of 9 genera (39 species) based on 18S rDNA sequences (modified from Shepard et al., 2006): maximum likelihood tree showing bootstrap values>50%.
FIGURE 4 in The Culicidae (Diptera): a review of taxonomy, classification and phylogeny *
FIGURE 4. Phylogenetic relationships of four mosquito species based on 18S and 5.8S rDNA sequences (after Miller et al., 1997): A, parsimony analysis tree; B, maximum likelihood tree. Bootstrap values>50% are shown.
FIGURE 18 in The Culicidae (Diptera): a review of taxonomy, classification and phylogeny *
FIGURE 18. Phylogeny of Finlaya and allied taxa based on morphology (after Reinert et al., 2006): strict consensus of four MPCs from implied-weighting analysis (K=1) of 116 species (74 ingroup species) and 232 anatomical characters.
FIGURE 22 in The Culicidae (Diptera): a review of taxonomy, classification and phylogeny *
FIGURE 22. Phylogenetic relationships of some Culicini based on larval mouthpart morphology (modified from Navarro & Liria, 2000): strict consensus of two MPCs from parsimony analysis of 18 ingroup species and 30 characters of larval maxillae and mandibles.
FIGURES 796–809. Habitus. 796–797 Nocarodes scabiosus mistshenkoi, 796 in Pamphagidae (Orthoptera: Acridoidea) from the Palaearctic Region: taxonomy, classification, keys to genera and a review of the tribe Nocarodeini I. Bolívar
FIGURES 796–809. Habitus. 796–797 Nocarodes scabiosus mistshenkoi, 796 male paratype; 797 female paratype. 798–799 Nocarodes balachowskyi, 798 male paratype; 799 female paratype. 800–801 Nocarodes pullus, 800 male holotype; 801 ditto dorsal. 802–803 Nocarodes znojkoi, 802 male holotype; 803 female allotype. 804–805 Nocarodes nanus, 804 male; 805 female holotype. 806–807 Nocarodes ebneri, 806 male holotype, mirror view; 807 female allotype. 808–809 Nocarodes aserbus, 808 female holotype; 809 ditto dorsal.
FIGURES 810–823. Habitus. 810–811 Nocarodes nodosus, 810 in Pamphagidae (Orthoptera: Acridoidea) from the Palaearctic Region: taxonomy, classification, keys to genera and a review of the tribe Nocarodeini I. Bolívar
FIGURES 810–823. Habitus. 810–811 Nocarodes nodosus, 810 male holotype; 811 female. 812–813 Nocarodes crispus, 812 female holotype; 813 ditto dorsal. 814–815 Nocarodes keredjensis, 814 female holotype; 815 ditto dorsal. 816–817 Nocarodes iranicus, 816 male (paratype of N. specialis); 817 female holotype. 818–819 Nocarodes humerosus, 818 male; 819 female holotype. 820–821 Nocarodes urmianus, 820 male holotype; 821 female allotype. 822–823 Bufonocarodes robustus, 822 male holotype; 823 female allotype.
FIGURES 760–781. Body parts and habitus. 760–762 male hind femur, 760 in Pamphagidae (Orthoptera: Acridoidea) from the Palaearctic Region: taxonomy, classification, keys to genera and a review of the tribe Nocarodeini I. Bolívar
FIGURES 760–781. Body parts and habitus. 760–762 male hind femur, 760 Nocarodes corrugatus; 761 Nocarodes scabiosus mistshenkoi; 762 Nocarodes pullus. 763–764 male head lateral, 763 Nocarodes scabiosus mistshenkoi; 764 Nocarodes corrugatus. 765–766 male head dorsal, 765 Nocarodes scabiosus mistshenkoi; 766 Nocarodes corrugatus. 767–768 male habitus dorsal, 767 Nocarodes pullus; 768 Nocarodes balachowskyi. 769–770 longitudinal sulcus of pronotum in female, 769 Nocarodes ebneri; 770 Nocarodes znojkoi, without sulcus. 771–772 female mesosternum, 771 Nocarodes aserbus, holotype; 772 Nocarodes nodosus. 773–774 female hind femur, 773 Nocarodes crispus, paratype; 774 Nocarodes humerosus. 775–776 posterior part of phallus, 775 Nocarodes urmianus; 776 Nocarodes humerosus. 777 Nocarodes keredjensis, female holotype pronotum; 778–780 Nocarodes iranicus, female holotype, 778 pronotum; 779 ditto dorsal; 780 ditto hind femur. 781 Nocarosed humerosus, female holotype pronotum, dorsal view.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.