Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
471
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
471 results for “Cambridge”
Figs. 36–40. Cithaeron praedonius O. P.Cambridge. 36. Left male palp, prolateral view. 37. Same, ventral view. 38. Same, retrolateral view. 39. Epigynum, ventral view. 40 in A Revision Of The Australasian Ground Spiders Of The Families Ammoxenidae, Cithaeronidae, Gallieniellidae, And Trochanteriidae (Araneae: Gnaphosoidea)
Figs. 36–40. Cithaeron praedonius O. P.Cambridge. 36. Left male palp, prolateral view. 37. Same, ventral view. 38. Same, retrolateral view. 39. Epigynum, ventral view. 40. Same, dorsal view.
Figs. 68–72. Zorocrates mistus O. P.-Cambridge. 68. Left male palp, prolateral view. 69. Same, ventral view. 70. Same, retrolateral view. 71. Epigynum, ventral view. 72 in A Revision of the Spider Genus Zorocrates Simon (Araneae, Zorocratidae)
Figs. 68–72. Zorocrates mistus O. P.-Cambridge. 68. Left male palp, prolateral view. 69. Same, ventral view. 70. Same, retrolateral view. 71. Epigynum, ventral view. 72. Same, dorsal view.
Text-fig. 4. Known geographic distribution of Microtscoptini on a modern-day biome map (Arc-GIS feature TNC terrestrial ecoregions). 1 – Ertemte 1 and 2; 2 – Olan Chorea; 3 – Harr Obo 2; 4 – Shala; 5 – Baogeda Ula; 6 – Bilutu; 7 – Kholu (Southern Tuva); 8 – Sarayskoe (Olkhon Island); 9 – Hyargas-nuur; 10 – Petropavlovsk; 11 – Pavlodar; 12 – Akshauli; 13 – Selety 1A; 14 – Kedej 1A; 15 – Makovka; 16 – Cherevychne 3; 17 – Protopopovka 3; 18 – Verkhnya Krynytsa 2; 19 – Vasylivka 1; 20 – Lobkove; 21 – Rome; 22 – Bartlett Mountain; 23 – Bartlett Mountain (General); 24 – Juniper Creek; 25 – Little Valley; 26 – Stroud Claim; 27 – Kelley Road; 28 – Moonstone Formation; 29 – Lemoyne Quarry; 30 – Feltz Ranch; 31 – Cambridge; 32 – Rick Irwin Site; 33 – Rabbit Hole. 1–20, 30–32 – Steppe biomes, 21–29, 33 – xeric shrubland biomes. in Comments On The Age And Dispersal Of Microtoscoptini (Rodentia: Cricetidae)
Text-fig. 4. Known geographic distribution of Microtscoptini on a modern-day biome map (Arc-GIS feature TNC terrestrial ecoregions). 1 – Ertemte 1 and 2; 2 – Olan Chorea; 3 – Harr Obo 2; 4 – Shala; 5 – Baogeda Ula; 6 – Bilutu; 7 – Kholu (Southern Tuva); 8 – Sarayskoe (Olkhon Island); 9 – Hyargas-nuur; 10 – Petropavlovsk; 11 – Pavlodar; 12 – Akshauli; 13 – Selety 1A; 14 – Kedej 1A; 15 – Makovka; 16 – Cherevychne 3; 17 – Protopopovka 3; 18 – Verkhnya Krynytsa 2; 19 – Vasylivka 1; 20 – Lobkove; 21 – Rome; 22 – Bartlett Mountain; 23 – Bartlett Mountain (General); 24 – Juniper Creek; 25 – Little Valley; 26 – Stroud Claim; 27 – Kelley Road; 28 – Moonstone Formation; 29 – Lemoyne Quarry; 30 – Feltz Ranch; 31 – Cambridge; 32 – Rick Irwin Site; 33 – Rabbit Hole. 1–20, 30–32 – Steppe biomes, 21–29, 33 – xeric shrubland biomes.
Text-fig. 2. Stratigraphic ranges of Microtoscoptini-bearing sites. Correlation of ELMA and NALMA with earth years is according to Hilgen et al. (2012). Localities of very broad stratigraphic range (e.g., the entire Turolian or Hemphillian, as for Vasilivka 1, Lobkove, Little Valley, Cambridge), do not contribute to detail the range, and are omitted in this figure. in Comments On The Age And Dispersal Of Microtoscoptini (Rodentia: Cricetidae)
Text-fig. 2. Stratigraphic ranges of Microtoscoptini-bearing sites. Correlation of ELMA and NALMA with earth years is according to Hilgen et al. (2012). Localities of very broad stratigraphic range (e.g., the entire Turolian or Hemphillian, as for Vasilivka 1, Lobkove, Little Valley, Cambridge), do not contribute to detail the range, and are omitted in this figure.
Text-fig. 1. Known geographic distribution of Microtoscoptini. 1 – Ertemte 1 and 2; 2 – Olan Chorea; 3 – Harr Obo 2; 4 – Shala; 5 – Baogeda Ula; 6 – Bilutu; 7 – Kholu (Southern Tuva); 8 – Sarayskoe (Olkhon Island); 9 – Hyargas-nuur; 10 – Petropavlovsk; 11 – Pavlodar; 12 – Akshauli; 13 – Selety 1A; 14 – Kedej 1A; 15 – Makovka; 16 – Cherevychne 3; 17 – Protopopovka 3; 18 – Verkhnya Krynytsa 2; 19 – Vasylivka 1; 20 – Lobkove; 21 – Rome; 22 – Bartlett Mountain; 23 – Bartlett Mountain (General); 24 – Juniper Creek; 25 – Little Valley; 26 – Stroud Claim; 27 – Kelley Road; 28 – Moonstone Formation; 29 – Lemoyne Quarry; 30 – Feltz Ranch; 31 – Cambridge; 32 – Rick Irwin Site; 33 – Rabbit Hole. in Comments On The Age And Dispersal Of Microtoscoptini (Rodentia: Cricetidae)
Text-fig. 1. Known geographic distribution of Microtoscoptini. 1 – Ertemte 1 and 2; 2 – Olan Chorea; 3 – Harr Obo 2; 4 – Shala; 5 – Baogeda Ula; 6 – Bilutu; 7 – Kholu (Southern Tuva); 8 – Sarayskoe (Olkhon Island); 9 – Hyargas-nuur; 10 – Petropavlovsk; 11 – Pavlodar; 12 – Akshauli; 13 – Selety 1A; 14 – Kedej 1A; 15 – Makovka; 16 – Cherevychne 3; 17 – Protopopovka 3; 18 – Verkhnya Krynytsa 2; 19 – Vasylivka 1; 20 – Lobkove; 21 – Rome; 22 – Bartlett Mountain; 23 – Bartlett Mountain (General); 24 – Juniper Creek; 25 – Little Valley; 26 – Stroud Claim; 27 – Kelley Road; 28 – Moonstone Formation; 29 – Lemoyne Quarry; 30 – Feltz Ranch; 31 – Cambridge; 32 – Rick Irwin Site; 33 – Rabbit Hole.
Figure 20. Mollemeta edwardsi. A, female habitus. B, epigynum ventral view. C, caudal view. D, ventral view cleared. E, dorsal view cleared. F–J, male pedipalp. F in Systematics of the spider genus Metabus O. P.-Cambridge, 1899 (Araneoidea: Tetragnathidae) with additions to the tetragnathid fauna of Chile and comments on the phylogeny of Tetragnathidae
Figure 20. Mollemeta edwardsi. A, female habitus. B, epigynum ventral view. C, caudal view. D, ventral view cleared. E, dorsal view cleared. F–J, male pedipalp. F, cymbium (bulb dissected). G, expanded. H, dorsal view. I, palpal tibia. J, ventral view. Scale bars 0.2 mm, except in habitus 1 mm.
Figure 22. A–E, Chrysometa maitae. A, female habitus. B, epigynum ventral view cleared. C, dorsal view cleared. D, central view. E, caudal view. F–I, Chrysometa levii. F, male habitus. G, male pedipalp ectal view. H, dorsal view. I, mesal view. Scale bars 0.2 in Systematics of the spider genus Metabus O. P.-Cambridge, 1899 (Araneoidea: Tetragnathidae) with additions to the tetragnathid fauna of Chile and comments on the phylogeny of Tetragnathidae
Figure 22. A–E, Chrysometa maitae. A, female habitus. B, epigynum ventral view cleared. C, dorsal view cleared. D, central view. E, caudal view. F–I, Chrysometa levii. F, male habitus. G, male pedipalp ectal view. H, dorsal view. I, mesal view. Scale bars 0.2 mm; except A 1 mm.
Figure 16. Allende puyehuensis. A, female habitus. B, female frontal view. C, first leg mesal view. D–H, epigynum. D, caudal view. E, ventral view. F, lateral view. G, caudal view cleared. H, dorsal view cleared. I, male habitus. J, male frontal view. K–N, male pedipalp. K, dorsal view. L, ectal view. M, conductor detail. N, ventral view. Scale bars 0.2 in Systematics of the spider genus Metabus O. P.-Cambridge, 1899 (Araneoidea: Tetragnathidae) with additions to the tetragnathid fauna of Chile and comments on the phylogeny of Tetragnathidae
Figure 16. Allende puyehuensis. A, female habitus. B, female frontal view. C, first leg mesal view. D–H, epigynum. D, caudal view. E, ventral view. F, lateral view. G, caudal view cleared. H, dorsal view cleared. I, male habitus. J, male frontal view. K–N, male pedipalp. K, dorsal view. L, ectal view. M, conductor detail. N, ventral view. Scale bars 0.2 mm, except in habitus 1 mm.
Figure 18. Allende longipes. A, C–E, female habitus. B, female frontal view. F, first leg mesal view. G–K, epigynum. G, ventral view. H, vaudal view. I, lateral view. J, caudal view cleared. K, dorsal view cleared. L, male habitus. M, male frontal view. N–Q, male pedipalp. N, dorsal view. O, ventral view. P, ectal view. Q, conductor detail. Scale bars 0.2 in Systematics of the spider genus Metabus O. P.-Cambridge, 1899 (Araneoidea: Tetragnathidae) with additions to the tetragnathid fauna of Chile and comments on the phylogeny of Tetragnathidae
Figure 18. Allende longipes. A, C–E, female habitus. B, female frontal view. F, first leg mesal view. G–K, epigynum. G, ventral view. H, vaudal view. I, lateral view. J, caudal view cleared. K, dorsal view cleared. L, male habitus. M, male frontal view. N–Q, male pedipalp. N, dorsal view. O, ventral view. P, ectal view. Q, conductor detail. Scale bars 0.2 mm, except in habitus 1 mm.
Figure 13. Metabus debilis. A, female habitus. B, epigynum ventral view. C, caudal view. D, ventral view cleared. E, dorsal view cleared. F–G, male pedipalp. F, ectal view. G, ventral view. H, mesal view. Scale bars 0.2 in Systematics of the spider genus Metabus O. P.-Cambridge, 1899 (Araneoidea: Tetragnathidae) with additions to the tetragnathid fauna of Chile and comments on the phylogeny of Tetragnathidae
Figure 13. Metabus debilis. A, female habitus. B, epigynum ventral view. C, caudal view. D, ventral view cleared. E, dorsal view cleared. F–G, male pedipalp. F, ectal view. G, ventral view. H, mesal view. Scale bars 0.2 mm, except in habitus 1 mm.
Figure 11 in Systematics of the spider genus Metabus O. P.-Cambridge, 1899 (Araneoidea: Tetragnathidae) with additions to the tetragnathid fauna of Chile and comments on the phylogeny of Tetragnathidae
Figure 11. Distribution maps: A, Metabus species, Central and northern South America. B, Allende species, Chile. C, Chrysometa species, Chile. D, Mollemeta edwardsi, Chile.
Figure 7. A–E in Systematics of the spider genus Metabus O. P.-Cambridge, 1899 (Araneoidea: Tetragnathidae) with additions to the tetragnathid fauna of Chile and comments on the phylogeny of Tetragnathidae
Figure 7. A–E, male genital anatomy of Mollemeta edwardsi. A, pedipalp ventral view. B, ectal view. C, cymbial basal process. D, mesal view. E, palpal tibia. F, Metellina curtisi pedipalp ectal view.
Figure 14. Metabus ebanoverde. A, female habitus. B, epigynum ventral view. C, caudal view. D, ventral view cleared. E, dorsal view cleared. F–G, male pedipalp. F, ectal view. G, ventral view. H, mesal view. Scale bars 0.2 in Systematics of the spider genus Metabus O. P.-Cambridge, 1899 (Araneoidea: Tetragnathidae) with additions to the tetragnathid fauna of Chile and comments on the phylogeny of Tetragnathidae
Figure 14. Metabus ebanoverde. A, female habitus. B, epigynum ventral view. C, caudal view. D, ventral view cleared. E, dorsal view cleared. F–G, male pedipalp. F, ectal view. G, ventral view. H, mesal view. Scale bars 0.2 mm, except in habitus 1 mm.
Figure 10 in Systematics of the spider genus Metabus O. P.-Cambridge, 1899 (Araneoidea: Tetragnathidae) with additions to the tetragnathid fauna of Chile and comments on the phylogeny of Tetragnathidae
Figure 10. Photos of webs: A, Allende puyehuensis. B, Chrysometa acinosa. C, Mollemeta edwardsi. D, Metabus ebanoverde. Scale lines 10 cm. Photos A–C from Puyehue National Park, Chile. Photo D from Ebano Verde Scientific Reserve, Dominican Republic. (Photos A to C by G. Hormiga).
Figure 2 in Systematics of the spider genus Metabus O. P.-Cambridge, 1899 (Araneoidea: Tetragnathidae) with additions to the tetragnathid fauna of Chile and comments on the phylogeny of Tetragnathidae
Figure 2. Strict consensus of ten most parsimonious cladograms 322 steps in length (CI = 45 RI = 75). Bremer and Jackknife values, respectively, are given beneath each node.
Figure 4. A–E in Systematics of the spider genus Metabus O. P.-Cambridge, 1899 (Araneoidea: Tetragnathidae) with additions to the tetragnathid fauna of Chile and comments on the phylogeny of Tetragnathidae
Figure 4. A–E, female genital anatomy of Metabus ocellatus. A, epigynum ventral view. B, caudal view. C, spermatheca dorsal view. D, fertilization and copulatory ducts. E, accessory gland openings. F, Leucauge venusta spermatheca dorsal view.
Figure 1 in Systematics of the spider genus Metabus O. P.-Cambridge, 1899 (Araneoidea: Tetragnathidae) with additions to the tetragnathid fauna of Chile and comments on the phylogeny of Tetragnathidae
Figure 1. Strict consensus (325 steps CI = 44 RI = 75) of the ten most parsimonious cladograms 322 steps in length (CI = 45 RI = 75). Homoplasious changes are indicated with a white square, non-homoplasious changes with black squares. Discontinuous states are marked as homoplasy. Numbers on the squares refer to the characters in Appendix 1, and state number is indicated beneath the square. Only changes common to all topologies are mapped on polytomies.
Figure 21. Chrysometa acinosa. A, female habitus. B, epigynum ventral view. C, caudal view. D, ventral view cleared. E, dorsal view cleared. F–H, male pedipalp. F, ventral view. G, mesal view. H, ectal view. Scale bars 0.2 in Systematics of the spider genus Metabus O. P.-Cambridge, 1899 (Araneoidea: Tetragnathidae) with additions to the tetragnathid fauna of Chile and comments on the phylogeny of Tetragnathidae
Figure 21. Chrysometa acinosa. A, female habitus. B, epigynum ventral view. C, caudal view. D, ventral view cleared. E, dorsal view cleared. F–H, male pedipalp. F, ventral view. G, mesal view. H, ectal view. Scale bars 0.2 mm; except A 1 mm.
Figure 12. Metabus ocellatus. A, female habitus. B, female frontal view. C, epigynum ventral view. D, caudal view. E, central view cleared. F, dorsal view cleared. G, male habitus. H, male frontal view. I–L, male pedipalp. I, ectal view. J, ventral view. K, mesal view. L, cleared L. Scale bars 0.2 in Systematics of the spider genus Metabus O. P.-Cambridge, 1899 (Araneoidea: Tetragnathidae) with additions to the tetragnathid fauna of Chile and comments on the phylogeny of Tetragnathidae
Figure 12. Metabus ocellatus. A, female habitus. B, female frontal view. C, epigynum ventral view. D, caudal view. E, central view cleared. F, dorsal view cleared. G, male habitus. H, male frontal view. I–L, male pedipalp. I, ectal view. J, ventral view. K, mesal view. L, cleared L. Scale bars 0.2 mm, except in habitus 1 mm.
Figure 9. Spinnerets. A–E, Metabus ocellatus. A, female ALS. B, female PMS. C, female PLS. D, male PLS. G, epiandrous fusules. F–H, Allende longipes. F, female ALS. G, female PMS. H, female PLS. I–J, A. nigrohumeralis. I, male PLS. J, epiandrous fusules. K–O, Mollemeta edwardsi. K, female ALS. L, female PMS. M, female PLS. N, male PLS. O in Systematics of the spider genus Metabus O. P.-Cambridge, 1899 (Araneoidea: Tetragnathidae) with additions to the tetragnathid fauna of Chile and comments on the phylogeny of Tetragnathidae
Figure 9. Spinnerets. A–E, Metabus ocellatus. A, female ALS. B, female PMS. C, female PLS. D, male PLS. G, epiandrous fusules. F–H, Allende longipes. F, female ALS. G, female PMS. H, female PLS. I–J, A. nigrohumeralis. I, male PLS. J, epiandrous fusules. K–O, Mollemeta edwardsi. K, female ALS. L, female PMS. M, female PLS. N, male PLS. O, epiandrous fusules.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.