Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
61
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
61 results for “Cetartiodactyla”
Figure 5 in Molecular taxonomy and population structure of the rough-toothed dolphin Steno bredanensis (Cetartiodactyla: Delphinidae)
Figure 5. Intra- and interspecific genetic distances (Kimura two-parameter, K2P) in the cytochrome b sequences of delphinids, and the divergence between Steno bredanensis in the Atlantic and Pacific/Indian Oceans.
Figure 7 in Molecular taxonomy and population structure of the rough-toothed dolphin Steno bredanensis (Cetartiodactyla: Delphinidae)
Figure 7. Intra- and interspecific genetic distances (Kimura two-parameter, K2P) in the mitogenomes of delphinids, and the divergence between Steno bredanensis in the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans.
Figure 4 in Molecular taxonomy and population structure of the rough-toothed dolphin Steno bredanensis (Cetartiodactyla: Delphinidae)
Figure 4. Phylogenetic neighbour-joining (NJ) tree of delphinid cytochrome b sequences. Numbers above branches indicate bootstrap/posterior probability values>75% (NJ, Kimura two-parameter/Bayesian, Hasegawa-Kishino-Yano + gamma + invariant sites).
Figure 3 in Molecular taxonomy and population structure of the rough-toothed dolphin Steno bredanensis (Cetartiodactyla: Delphinidae)
Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree (neighbour-joining, Kimura two-parameter) showing the genetic divergence between sequences of the control region of the Atlantic (ES, Espírito Santo State; RJ, Rio de Janeiro State; SC, Santa Catarina State; RS, Rio Grande do Sul State) and other regions analysed (Pacific and Indian Oceans). Numbers at nodes correspond to bootstrap values>75% (10 000 replicates). CS Pac, central southern Pacific; ET Pac, eastern tropical Pacific; NW Pac, northwestern Pacific; CE, Ceará State; Sb, Steno bredanensis. MQ and BG are field codes for samples from RJ. The scale bar shows the length of branch that corresponds to a Kimura two-parameter distance of 0.005.
Figure 11 in Morphology and phylogenetic relationships of the earliest known hippopotamids (Cetartiodactyla, Hippopotamidae, Kenyapotaminae)
Figure 11. Biogeographical background and evolutionary scenarios for the emergence of Kenyapotamus and Hippopotaminae. Abbreviations: 1 and 2, see text for comments; archaic bothrio., archaic bothriodontines (excluding Brachyodus); Pleis., Pleistocene; Siva. – Afro., group of advanced bothriodontines including the African Afromeryx and the Afro-Asian Sivameryx. Maps indicate known distribution areas of taxa at approximate regional scale. Distributions for: Libycosaurus from Lihoreau et al. (2006) and Boisserie & Lihoreau (2006); Merycopotamus from Lihoreau et al. (2007); Sivameryx– Afromeryx from Lihoreau (2003); Elomeryx from Ducrocq & Lihoreau (2006); archaic bothriodontines from Ducrocq (1997).
Figure 9 in Morphology and phylogenetic relationships of the earliest known hippopotamids (Cetartiodactyla, Hippopotamidae, Kenyapotaminae)
Figure 9. Strict consensus tree of the 14 most parsimonious phylogenetic trees (289 steps; consistency index = 0.474; retention index = 0.724) obtained by cladistic analysis (heuristic search) of the complete matrix (24 taxa and 87 characters; see Appendices and Supporting Information). Numbers at nodes are: Bremer index/ bootstrap index (1000 replicates,> 50% occurrences). CB, crown bothriodontines; Hid, Hippopotamidae; Hoid, Hippopotamoidea; Hin, Hippopotaminae; K, Kenyapotaminae; MMK, middle Miocene kenyapotamines; LMK, late Miocene kenyapotamines.
Figure 6 in Morphology and phylogenetic relationships of the earliest known hippopotamids (Cetartiodactyla, Hippopotamidae, Kenyapotaminae)
Figure 6. Lower premolars of Kenyapotaminae. A, Kenyapotamus coryndonae, KNM-BN 1483/1487, right P2 (left, occlusal view; right, lingual view). B, K. coryndonae, KNM-BN 1490, right P2 or P3 (left, occlusal view; right, lingual view). C, K. coryndonae, KNM-NA 194, right lower premolar, most probably P4 (left, occlusal view; right, labial view). D, K. coryndonae, KNM-NA 246, right P4 (left, occlusal view; right, lingual view). Localities: BN, Ngeringerowa; NA, Nakali. Scale bars = 1 cm.
Figure 8 in Morphology and phylogenetic relationships of the earliest known hippopotamids (Cetartiodactyla, Hippopotamidae, Kenyapotaminae)
Figure 8. Metapodials and astragalus of Kenyapotaminae. A, Kenyapotamus cf. coryndonae, KNM-BN 1127, right astragalus (top left, external view; bottom left, internal view; top right, dorsal view; bottom right, volar view). B, K. cf. coryndonae, KNM-BN 1622, distal extremity of metapodial (top, dorsal view; bottom, distal view). C, K. cf. coryndonae, KNM-BN 1621, metapodial missing proximal extremity (top left, volar view; top right, dorsal view; bottom right, distal view). Localities: BN, Ngeringerowa. Scale bars = 1 cm.
Figure 4 in Morphology and phylogenetic relationships of the earliest known hippopotamids (Cetartiodactyla, Hippopotamidae, Kenyapotaminae)
Figure 4. Upper premolars of Kenyapotaminae. A, Kenyapotamus coryndonae, KNM-BN 1717, right P1 (left, mesial view; right, lingual view). B, Kenyapotamus ternani, KNM-FT 17089, right P2 (left, labial view; middle, lingual view; right, occlusal view). C, K. coryndonae, KNM-BN 1715, left P3 (top left, labial view; top right, lingual view; bottom left, occlusal view). D, K. coryndonae, KNM-BN 1802, left P4 (occlusal view). E, K. coryndonae, KNM-BN 1493, left P4 (left, lingual view; middle, mesial view; right, occlusal view). Localities: BN, Ngeringerowa; FT, Fort Ternan. Scale bars = 1 cm.
Figure 10 in Morphology and phylogenetic relationships of the earliest known hippopotamids (Cetartiodactyla, Hippopotamidae, Kenyapotaminae)
Figure 10. One of the eight most parsimonious phylogenetic trees (230 steps; consistency index = 0.470; retention index = 0.724) obtained by cladistic analysis (heuristic search) of the matrix including only cheek tooth characters (23 taxa and 66 characters – character 16 to character 81; see Appendices and online Supporting Information). Three other trees presented a similar topology within Hippopotamoidea, the four others displaying a topology compatible with Figure 9. Numbers at nodes are: Bremer index/ bootstrap index (1000 replicates,> 50% occurrences). AB, advanced bothriodontines; Hid, Hippopotamidae; Hoid, Hippopotamoidea; K, Kenyapotaminae; MMK, middle Miocene kenyapotamines; LMK, late Miocene kenyapotamines.
Figure 7 in Morphology and phylogenetic relationships of the earliest known hippopotamids (Cetartiodactyla, Hippopotamidae, Kenyapotaminae)
Figure 7. Mandible and lower molars of Kenyapotaminae. A, Kenyapotamus coryndonae, KNM-NA 246, right mandibular corpus with P4, M1, distal half of M2, M3 (top, ventral view; bottom, internal view). B, K. coryndonae, KNM-BN 1320, fragmentary right M1 or M2 (left, labial view; right, occlusal view). C, Kenyapotamus ternani, KNM-MB 864, left lower M1 or M2 (occlusal view). D, K. coryndonae, KNM-NA 246, right M3 (occlusal view). E, K. cf. coryndonae, KNM-NA 250C, right M3 (occlusal view). F, K. ternani, KNM-FT 3322, left M3 (occlusal view). Localities: BN, Ngeringerowa; FT, Fort Ternan; MB, Maboko; NA, Nakali. Scale bars = 1 cm.
Figure 5 in Morphology and phylogenetic relationships of the earliest known hippopotamids (Cetartiodactyla, Hippopotamidae, Kenyapotaminae)
Figure 5. Maxilla and upper molars of Kenyapotaminae. A, Kenyapotamus coryndonae, KNM-BN 1321, right M3, holotype with KNM-BN 2075 (left, labial view; middle, mesial view; right, occlusal view). B, K. aff. coryndonae, KNM-NA 251, right M3 (left, labial view; middle, mesial view; right, occlusal view). C, K. coryndonae, KNM-BN 1494, fragmentary palate with left M1 and right M2 (occlusal view). D, K. coryndonae, KNM-NA 188, right M1 (left, labial view; middle, mesial view; right, occlusal view). E, cf. Kenyapotamus, KNM-BN 1618, upper molar fragment (top, labial view; bottom, occlusal view). F, Kenyapotamus ternani, KNM-FT 3934, right M1 - holotype (left, labial view; middle, mesial view; right, occlusal view). G, K. cf. coryndonae, KNM-BN 1601, molar fragment (labial view). Localities: BN, Ngeringerowa, except KNM-BN 1618: lower members of the Ngorora Formation; FT, Fort Ternan; NA, Nakali. Scale bars = 1 cm.
Figure 3 in Morphology and phylogenetic relationships of the earliest known hippopotamids (Cetartiodactyla, Hippopotamidae, Kenyapotaminae)
Figure 3. Lower incisors and canine of Kenyapotaminae. A, Kenyapotamus ternani, KNM-TH 31008, right lower canine fragment (left, lingual view; middle, proximal view; right, labial view). B, Kenyapotamus coryndonae, KNM-NA 247, apical fragment of lower incisor (left, lateral view; right, proximal view). C, Kenyapotamus coryndonae, KNM-BN 1289, lower incisor fragment (lateral view). Localities: BN, Ngeringerowa; NA, Nakali; TH, Kipsaramon (Baringo Paleontological Research Project). Scale bars = 1 cm.
Figure 1 in Morphology and phylogenetic relationships of the earliest known hippopotamids (Cetartiodactyla, Hippopotamidae, Kenyapotaminae)
Figure 1. Occlusal views of upper dentition in Anthracotheriidae, Hippopotaminae, and palaeochoerids. A, Merycopotamus nanus, alveoli of right I1–C, and right P1–M3 (specimen number: Y47189, repository: Geological Survey of Pakistan, Museum of Natural History in Islamabad, Pakistan – GSP). B, Merycopotamus nanus, left* M2–M3 (Y47189, GSP). C, Anthracotherium sp., right P3–M3 (University of Montpellier 2 cast of ACQ 6608, Ecomusée des Phosphatières, Bach, France). D, Hexaprotodon garyam, right M3 (TM059-01-012, Centre National d'Appui à la recherche, Ndjamena, Chad – CNAR). E, Archaepotamus harvardi, left* P2–M3 (KNM-LP 8731, National Museums of Kenya, Nairobi – NMK). F, Ar. harvardi, left* M1–M2 (KNM-LT 23838, NMK). G, Palaeochoerus pusillus, right P4–M3 (Qu 15, Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France – MNHN). H, Schizochoerus vallesensis, right P3–M3 (TRQ 1018, MNHN). I, Doliochoerus quercyi, left* M1? (Qu 7092, MNHN). * indicates reversed images for comparison purposes. Localities: Y, Potwar plateau, Pakistan; TM, Toros-Menalla, Chad; TRQ, Yassiören, Turkey; LP, Loperot, Kenya; LT, Lothagam, Kenya; Qu and ACQ, Quercy, France. Scale bars = 1 cm.
Figure 2 in Selenogonus narinoensis Stirton, 1947 (Tayassuidae, Cetartiodactyla, Mammalia): taxonomic status and paleobiogeographic implications
Figure 2. Geographical location of the MGN 931 (IGM p002118) and fossil records of Platygonus marplatensis in South America.
Fig. 3 in Divergent evolution of mitogenomics in Cetartiodactyla niche adaptation
Fig. 3 Sequence identity plots based on 11 Cetartiodactyla species
Fig. 4 in Divergent evolution of mitogenomics in Cetartiodactyla niche adaptation
Fig. 4 The Bayesian inference tree of Cetartiodactyla based on 13 protein-coding gene datasets
Figure 3. A in Enamel microstructure evolution in anthracotheres (Mammalia, Cetartiodactyla) and new insights on hippopotamoid phylogeny
Figure 3. A, Siamotherium krabiense, vertical section of upper molar. B, Siamotherium krabiense, horizontal section of upper molar, displaying only radial enamel. C, Anthracotherium crassum, vertical section of upper molar, showing the straight and regular Hunter–Schreger bands (HSBs), and the presence of thin bands of radial enamel near the enamel– dentine junction (EDJ) and outer enamel surface (OES). D, Anthracotherium crassum, horizontal section, showing thin bands of longitudinally sectioned prisms and wide bands of truncated prisms. E, Bothriodon velaunus, vertical section of upper molar, showing the inclined and regular HSBs throughout the enamel thickness and the presence of inter-row sheets.
Figure 6 in Enamel microstructure evolution in anthracotheres (Mammalia, Cetartiodactyla) and new insights on hippopotamoid phylogeny
Figure 6. Eight recently proposed phylogenies dealing with the branching of Hippopotamidae within Cetartiodactyla (wide branches), with tree lengths following the distribution of enamel microstructure characters from the matrix presented in the Appendix.
Figure 6 in Molecular taxonomy and population structure of the rough-toothed dolphin Steno bredanensis (Cetartiodactyla: Delphinidae)
Figure 6. Phylogenetic neighbour-joining (NJ) tree of delphinid mitogenomes. Numbers above branches indicate bootstrap/ posterior probability values>75% (NJ, Kimura two-parameter/Bayesian, Hasegawa-Kishino-Yano + gamma + invariant sites).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.