Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 22 in Integrative taxonomy of Malagasy treefrogs: combination of molecular genetics, bioacoustics and comparative morphology reveals twelve additional species of Boophis 2383

FIGURE 22. Male holotype of Boophis miadana sp. nov. (ZSM 5107/2005) from Andohahela, 1550 m a.s.l.: (A) dorsolateral view; (B) ventral view.

FIGURE 23 in Integrative taxonomy of Malagasy treefrogs: combination of molecular genetics, bioacoustics and comparative morphology reveals twelve additional species of Boophis 2383

FIGURE 23. Male holotype of Boophis haingana sp. nov. (ZSM 5109/2005) from Andohahela: (A) dorsolateral view; (B) ventral view.

FIGURE 1. Maximum parsimony 16S in Integrative taxonomy of Malagasy treefrogs: combination of molecular genetics, bioacoustics and comparative morphology reveals twelve additional species of Boophis 2383

FIGURE 1. Maximum parsimony 16S rRNA phylogram for species in the Boophis majori and B. microtympanum groups. From 480 total characters, 336 were constant and 129 parsimony informative. MP searches retained 39 trees of which a strict consensus is shown. Consensus support values higher than 50, from 2000 bootstrap replicates, are shown; an asterisk indicates Bayesian posterior probabilities equal or higher than 95%. Species newly described or resurrected herein are in bold.

FIGURE 18. Maximum parsimony 16S in Integrative taxonomy of Malagasy treefrogs: combination of molecular genetics, bioacoustics and comparative morphology reveals twelve additional species of Boophis 2383

FIGURE 18. Maximum parsimony 16S rRNA phylogram for species in the Boophis luteus group. From 470 total characters, 347 were constant and 111 parsimony informative. MP searches retained 60 trees of which a strict consensus is shown. Consensus support values higher than 50, from 2000 bootstrap replicates, are shown; an asterisk indicates Bayesian posterior probabilities equal or higher than 95%. The species newly described herein is in bold.

FIGURE 12 in Integrative taxonomy of Malagasy treefrogs: combination of molecular genetics, bioacoustics and comparative morphology reveals twelve additional species of Boophis 2383

FIGURE 12. Male holotype of Boophis roseipalmatus sp. nov. (ZSM 211/2004) from Montagne d'Ambre National Park: (A) dorsolateral view; (B) ventral view.

FIGURE 3 in Integrative taxonomy of Malagasy treefrogs: combination of molecular genetics, bioacoustics and comparative morphology reveals twelve additional species of Boophis 2383

FIGURE 3. Spectrograms and waveforms of calls of Boophis piperatus sp. nov. from near Vohiparara, Ranomafana National Park (recorded on 28 January 2004, air temperature 20–21°C): (A) call type 1, (B) call type 2 (see text).

FIGURE 16. Maximum parsimony 16S in Integrative taxonomy of Malagasy treefrogs: combination of molecular genetics, bioacoustics and comparative morphology reveals twelve additional species of Boophis 2383

FIGURE 16. Maximum parsimony 16S rRNA phylogram for species in the Boophis albilabris group. From 535 total characters, 445 were constant and 35 parsimony informative. MP searches retained 6 trees of which a strict consensus is shown. Consensus support values higher than 50, from 2000 bootstrap replicates, are shown; an asterisk indicates Bayesian posterior probabilities equal or higher than 95%. The species newly described herein is in bold.

FIGURE 4 in Integrative taxonomy of Malagasy treefrogs: combination of molecular genetics, bioacoustics and comparative morphology reveals twelve additional species of Boophis 2383

FIGURE 4. Dorsolateral view (A) and ventral view (B) of male of Boophis andrangoloaka (FGZC 2139) from Ambohitantely; (C) dorsolateral view of Boophis andrangoloaka (ZFMK 60134) from Ambohitantely; dorsolateral view (D) and ventral view (E) of a dark coloured specimen of Boophis rhodoscelis from Ranomafanakely; (F) dorsolateral view of a light coloured specimen of Boophis rhodoscelis from Ranomafanakely.

FIGURE 24 in Integrative taxonomy of Malagasy treefrogs: combination of molecular genetics, bioacoustics and comparative morphology reveals twelve additional species of Boophis 2383

FIGURE 24. Spectrogram and waveform of advertisement calls of: (A) Boophis miadana sp. nov. from Andohahela National Park, 1550 m a.s.l. (recorded on 26 January 2005, air temperature app. 17.6°C); (B) Boophis haingana sp. nov. from Andohahela National Park, low altitude (recorded on 3 February 2004, air temperature app. 23.2°C).

FIGURE 15 in Integrative taxonomy of Malagasy treefrogs: combination of molecular genetics, bioacoustics and comparative morphology reveals twelve additional species of Boophis 2383

FIGURE 15. Spectrograms and waveforms of calls: (A) call type 1 of Boophis obscurus from near Vohiparara, Ranomafana National Park (recorded on 29 January 2004, air temperature app. 20.5°C); (B) advertisement call of Boophis periegetes from Andohahela National Park (recorded on 27 January 2005, air temperature app. 18°C)

Fig. 17. Lagis koreni Malmgren, 1866 in Taxonomy and distribution of Pectinariidae (Annelida) from Iceland with a comparative analysis of uncinal morphology

Fig. 17. Lagis koreni Malmgren, 1866. SEM micrographs of a small specimen (BIOICE sample 3078, IINH-40486). A. Anterior end, ventral view. B. Cephalic veil, detail. C–E. Uncinigers 1, 4 and 11, uncini. F. Scaphal hook.

Fig. 13. Cistenides hyperborea Malmgren, 1866. SEM micrographs from a in Taxonomy and distribution of Pectinariidae (Annelida) from Iceland with a comparative analysis of uncinal morphology

Fig. 13. Cistenides hyperborea Malmgren, 1866. SEM micrographs from a small specimen (BIOICE sample 2041, IINH-40470). A. Anterior end, ventral view. B. Unciniger 2, median uncini. C–E. Unciniger 10, dorsal, median and ventral uncini, respectively. F. Scaphal hooks.

Fig. 7 in Taxonomy and distribution of Pectinariidae (Annelida) from Iceland with a comparative analysis of uncinal morphology

Fig. 7. Amphictene auricoma (O.F. Müller, 1776). SEM micrographs from a small specimen (BIOICE sample 2463, IINH-40481). A–B. Unciniger 1, dorsal and ventral uncini, respectively. C–D. The same in closer view. E. Unciniger 9, ventral uncini, fronto-inferior area.

Fig. 6 in Taxonomy and distribution of Pectinariidae (Annelida) from Iceland with a comparative analysis of uncinal morphology

Fig. 6. Amphictene auricoma (O.F. Müller, 1776). SEM micrographs from a large specimen (BIOICE sample 2998, IINH-40213). A–C. Unciniger 1, ventral uncinus, frontolateral, frontal and lateral views, respectively. D. Scaphe. E. Scaphal hooks (framed in D).

Fig. 5 in Taxonomy and distribution of Pectinariidae (Annelida) from Iceland with a comparative analysis of uncinal morphology

Fig. 5. Amphictene auricoma (O.F. Müller, 1776). SEM micrographs from two large specimens (BIOICE sample 2998, IINH-40213). A. Anterior end, left lateral view (framed: cirri of opercular rim, detail). B. Ventral rows of ciliated tufts (framed: two tufts, detail). C. Notochaetae; distal end. D. Uncinigers 1 to 4. E. Unciniger 2, median uncini (framed in D). F. Unciniger 4, dorsal uncini (framed in D).

Fig. 3 in Taxonomy and distribution of Pectinariidae (Annelida) from Iceland with a comparative analysis of uncinal morphology

Fig. 3. Biometric features of the Pectinariidae specimens in BIOICE samples. A. Amphictene auricoma (O.F. Müller, 1776). B. Lagis koreni Malmgren, 1866. C. Cistenides granulata (Linnaeus, 1767). D. Cistenides hyperborea Malmgren, 1866. Specimens studied under SEM are indicated with black arrows and sample numbers.

Fig. 4 in Taxonomy and distribution of Pectinariidae (Annelida) from Iceland with a comparative analysis of uncinal morphology

Fig. 4. Stereomicrographs of anterior body ends (dorsal view) and anterior end of the tube. A–B. Amphictene auricoma (O.F. Müller, 1776) (BIOICE sample 2946, IINH-40181). C–D. Cistenides granulata (Linnaeus, 1767) (sample 2126, IINH-40466). E–H. Cistenides hyperborea Malmgren, 1866 (E–F: sample 3252, IINH-40477; G–H: sample 2060, IINH-40471). I–L. Lagis koreni Malmgren, 1866 (I–J: sample 2557; K–L: sample 2827, IINH-40485).

Fig. 11. Cistenides hyperborea Malmgren, 1866 in Taxonomy and distribution of Pectinariidae (Annelida) from Iceland with a comparative analysis of uncinal morphology

Fig. 11. Cistenides hyperborea Malmgren, 1866. SEM micrographs from four large specimens (A–D: BIOICE sample 3252, IINH-40477; E–F: sample 3249, IINH-40476). A. Scaphe, left lateral view. B. Anal lobe and anal papilla (framed in A). C–D. Scaphal hooks (framed in A). E. Posterior end (framed: scaphal hooks, detail). F. Scaphe and anal lobe and papilla (framed in E).

Fig. 16. Lagis koreni Malmgren, 1866 in Taxonomy and distribution of Pectinariidae (Annelida) from Iceland with a comparative analysis of uncinal morphology

Fig. 16. Lagis koreni Malmgren, 1866. SEM micrographs from two specimens: large (A, F) and medium sized (B–E), respectively (BIOICE sample 2827, IINH-40485). A. Anterior end, right lateral view. B. Uncinigers 4 to 6, ventrolateral view. C. Unciniger 3, ventral uncini. D. Unciniger 5, dorsal uncini. E. Unciniger 6, median uncini. F. Scaphe and scaphal hooks (framed: scaphal hook, detail).

Fig. 1 in Taxonomy and distribution of Pectinariidae (Annelida) from Iceland with a comparative analysis of uncinal morphology

Fig. 1. Maps of Iceland showing distribution of the species of Pectinariidae found in BIOICE samples. A. Amphictene auricoma (O.F. Müller, 1776). B. Lagis koreni Malmgren, 1866. C. Cistenides granulata (Linnaeus, 1767). D. Cistenides hyperborea Malmgren, 1866. The three main coastal sectors around Iceland are shown in A. The specimens photographed and studied under SEM are indicated with green and red arrowheads, respectively. Abbreviations: H = Höfn; NWF = North-western fjords; RP = Reykjanes Peninsula.