Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
75
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
75 results for “Garypus”
Fig. 3 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.
Fig. 3. Macrobiotus naginae sp. nov. – cuticular structures on legs: A, garter-like structure on leg II under PCM; B, garter-like structure on leg III under PCM; C, garter-like structures and claws III under SEM. Flat arrowheads indicate pores on the leg cuticle, flat empty arrowheads indicate garter-like structures. Scale bars: A–B = 20 μm; C = 10 μm.
Fig. 3. Light photomicrographs from a in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.
Fig. 3. Light photomicrographs from a radial section of the nutria retina. The retina is a 10-layered structure. The pigmented epithelial layer is a brown color. The photoreceptor layer is pink with eosin staining, and the cell nuclei in the inner and outer nuclear layer and ganglion cell layer are stained purple with hematoxylin. Scale bar = 10 µm.
Fig. 2 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.
Fig. 2. Radial section of the nutria eyeball around ciliary body. In the ciliary body, muscles, which should stain with eosin, could not be observed. Ac, Anterior chamber; Cb, Ciliary body; Co, Cornea; Cp, Ciliary portion; Sc, Sclera. Scale bar = 100 µm.
Fig. 1 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.
Fig. 1. Frontal view (a) and lateral view (b) of nutria eyeball. The eyeball of the adult nutria is approximately spherical. The pupil seems to be vertically elongated (a) and the cornea surface is curved convexly (b). The lens is ellipsoidal shape compressed in the axial direction (c). Lateral view of the lens (c). Eyeball diameter was measured in four bearing angles (ED1~ED4). PL, pupil length; PW, pupil width; Ax. L, axial length; LD, lens diameter; LT, lens thickness. D, dorsa; V, ventral; A, anterior; P, posterior.
Fig. 2 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.
Fig. 2. PCR-amplified target segments from genomic DNA, eyeball cDNA, and brain cDNA. (A) LWS-R transcripts of guppy, (B) LWS-R transcripts of green swordtail, and (C) LWS-R intron of guppy and green swordtail.
Fig. 7. Claws IV in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.
Fig. 7. Claws IV of Macrobiotus pseudohufelandi complex species. A, Macrobiotus gretae ZA.373; B, Macrobiotus gr. pseudohufelandi PL.360. Arrowhead indicates lunulae (when present). Scale bar = 20 μm.
Fig. 5 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.
Fig. 5. Topographical maps of photoreceptor nuclei of the nutria retina. In the three retinas analyzed, cell density was not equal for the different retinal areas, and there was no localization of the high-density region. (a) O-A3 right retina; (b) O-A4 right retina; (c) O-A5 left retina. Numbers in parentheses are the cell densities for the O-A5 map. N, nasal; V, ventral. Scale bar = 2 mm.
Fig. 4 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.
Fig. 4. Relative behavioral red sensitivity over the spawning cycle in female stickleback. Statistically significant differences (at p <0.05 Wilcoxon signed-rank test) between pairs of time-points are indicated by * (means ± SE; n = 7). The detail statistic results are given in the text.
Fig. 3 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.
Fig. 3. qPCR-determined expression ratios of (A) LWS-R:GPHN for eyeball and brain samples and (B) intron-free LWS-R to total LWS-R for eyeball samples from guppy and green swordtail. The box boundaries indicate the median (—), 25th and 75th percentiles (boxes), 95% range (|), and outliers (•).
Fig. 3 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.
Fig. 3. Mean behavioral red sensitivity of female stickleback in the spawning phase (0, 6, 72 and 96 h) and inter-spawning phase (24 and 48 h) (means ± SE; n = 7; p <0.028 Wilcoxon signed-rank test).
Fig. 2 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.
Fig. 2. Relative mRNA levels of retinal lws (A), rh2 (B), sws1 (C) and sws2 (D) (means ± SE; n = 6; *p <0.05 one-way Kruskal-Wallis test). Statistically significant differences in plasma testosterone and estradiol levels (at p <0.05 one-way Kruskal-Wallis test) are indicated by letters.
Fig. 1 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.
Fig. 1. Relative mRNA levels of retinal double cone opsins (lws and rh2) and single cone opsins (sws1 and sws2) in the spawning phase (0, 6 and 72 h after spawning; n = 18, note n refers to samples, each of which is pooled from two fish) and inter-spawning phase (24 and 48 h after spawning; n = 12) (means ± SE; *p <0.05 Mann-Whitney U test; the detail statistic results were shown in the text).
Fig. 6 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.
Fig. 6. Morphological comparison of fossil (red) and recent (black) dentition of Sparidae. A multivariate correspondence analysis (CA) with Chisquared distance was performed. The number of specimens used is indicated in parenthesis. Dataset is available in table S1.
Fig. 2 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.
Fig. 2. Pagrus major (Temminck and Schlegel, 1843), ASIZF0100141, from the Late Pleistocene Szekou Formation, Hengchun Peninsula, southern Taiwan. A, Lateral view of the nodule. B, Dorsal view of the anterior part of the nodule, note that fragments of the right jaws are exposed. C, Drawing of the recognized skull parts. See text for anatomical abbreviations. Scale bars = 10 mm.
Fig. 6 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.
Fig. 6. Macrobiotus naginae sp. nov. – egg chorion morphology and reproduction: A–B, egg surface under PCM; C, egg process under PCM; D, egg process under SEM; E, chorion surface between processes under PCM; F, chorion surface between processes under SEM; G, in toto egg under SEM; H, orcein-stained sperm inside male gonad under PCM; H, orcein-stained sperm inside female spermatheca under PCM. Flat arrowhead indicates the septum between process trunk and terminal disk: flat empty arrowhead indicates thickenings surrounding the processes; arrows indicate sperm nuclei. Scale bars: A–B, G–I = 10 μm; C–F = 2 μm.
Fig. 2 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.
Fig. 2. Macrobiotus naginae sp. nov. – habitus and cuticular pores: A, dorsoventral view of the body (Holotype; Hoyer's medium, PCM); B–C, cuticular pores on the dorsal part of the body under PCM (B) and under SEM (C). Flat arrowheads indicate pores on the dorsocaudal cuticle. Scale bars: A = 100 mm; B–C = 10 mm.
Fig. 1 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.
Fig. 1. Phylogenetic reconstruction of Macrobiotidae based on four concatenated markers (18S + 28S + COI + ITS2). Boxes delimit species of the Macrobiotus pseudohufelandi complex identified by ABGD performed on the COI alignment. Outgroups not shown. Values above branches represent node posterior probabilities (pp). pp = 1 not shown. All nodes with pp <0.70 were collapsed.
Fig. 1 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.
Fig. 1. Sampling site (A, B) and stratigraphic correlation (C) on the Hengchun Peninsula. (B) Szekou locality (black circle; modified from Chen 2016).
Fig. 5 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.
Fig. 5. Macrobiotus naginae sp. nov. – buccal apparatus and the oral cavity armature under PCM: A, dorsoventral view of the entire buccal apparatus; B–C, placoid morphology in ventral (B) and dorsal (C) view, respectively. D–G, oral cavity armature in dorsal (D–E) and ventral (F–G) view, respectively. Flat arrowhead indicates weak constrictions in the macroplacoids, flat empty arrowheads indicate third band of the Oral Cavity Armature (OCA), arrow indicates cuticular spikes between end of the buccal tube and anterior portion of the pharynx. Scale bars: A = 20 μm; B–G = 10 μm.
Fig. 4 in Garypus sanasai Lin, Huang & Chang 2022, sp. nov.
Fig. 4. Macrobiotus naginae sp. nov. – claws: A–B, claws I and IV, respectively, under PCM; C, claws IV under SEM. Flat arrowhead indicates an abnormal additional spur on the base on anterior claw IV; flat empty arrowheads indicate accessory points on primary branches. Scale bars = 10 μm.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.