Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 6 in Systematic revision of the Plectopylinae (Gastropoda, Pulmonata, Plectopylidae)

Fig. 6. Shells and protoconchs of Chersaecia Gude, 1899. A–B. C. austeni (Gude, 1899), lectotype (NHMUK 1903.06.01.1014.1). C–D. C. brachyplecta (Benson, 1863) comb. nov., syntype (NHMUK 1954.6.2.282). E–F. C. smithiana (Gude, 1897) comb. nov., syntype (NHMUK 1888.12.4.1555). Scale bars: A, C, E = 10 mm; B, D, F = 2 mm. All photos: H. Taylor.

Fig. 1 in Systematic revision of the Plectopylinae (Gastropoda, Pulmonata, Plectopylidae)

Fig. 1. Nomenclature of parietal (A–C) and palatal (D–F) lamellae and plicae of plectopylids. A. Chersaecia Gude, 1899 sp. with a single lamella. B. Chersaecia sp. with two lamellae. C. Plectopylis Benson, 1860 sp. D–E. Chersaecia spp. F. Plectopylis sp. The long arrow shows the order of counting of the plicae. Abbreviations: af = apertural fold; al = anterior lamella; ap = additional plica; ip = intermediate plica; l = lamella; ll = left leg; lp = lower plica; mp = main plica; p = peristome; pl = posterior lamella; rl = right leg; ub = upper branch. Arrows under the numbers indicate the direction of the aperture.

Fig. 11 in Systematic revision of the Plectopylinae (Gastropoda, Pulmonata, Plectopylidae)

Fig. 11. Radula of Chersaecia Gude, 1899. A, C. Central and first lateral teeth. B, D. Marginal teeth. A–B. C. dextrorsa (Benson, 1860) (UF 76385). C–D. C. reversalis sp. nov. (UF 347047). All images: B. Páll-Gergely.

Fig. 28 in Systematic revision of the Plectopylinae (Gastropoda, Pulmonata, Plectopylidae)

Fig. 28. Genitalia of Chersaecia shanensis (Stoliczka, 1873). A. Whole genitalia. B. Male genitalia (penis, epiphallus, vas deferens). C–F. Inner structure of genital organs (C = penis, D = epiphallus, E = vagina, F = diverticulum). G. Spermatophore found in the bursa copulatrix. Scales bars: A–B = 2 mm; C–G = 1 mm. A–E show Specimen 1, PL040, loc. 20091018B, (NHMUK 20170150), F–G show Specimen 2, PL033, loc. 20091018C (NHMUK 20170151). For abbreviations see Fig. 2. All photos: B. Páll-Gergely.

Fig. 19 in Systematic revision of the Plectopylinae (Gastropoda, Pulmonata, Plectopylidae)

Fig. 19. Shells of species of Chersaecia Gude, 1899. A. C. leiophis (Benson, 1860), holotype of P. degerbolae Solem, 1966 (ZMUC-GAS-485). B. C. leiophis from Thailand (UF 346988). C. C. leucochila (Gude, 1897) comb. nov., holotype (NHMUK 1922.8.29.39). Scale bar = 10 mm. Photos: B. Páll-Gergely (A), T. Deli (B), H. Taylor (C).

Fig. 8. A in Systematic revision of the Plectopylinae (Gastropoda, Pulmonata, Plectopylidae)

Fig. 8. A. Shell of Chersaecia densegyrata sp. nov., holotype (UF 347223). B–C. Shell and protoconch of C. reversalis sp. nov., holotype (UF 347046). Scale bars: A–B = 10 mm; C = 1 mm. Images: T. Deli (A–B) and B. Páll-Gergely (C).

Fig. 18 in Systematic revision of the Plectopylinae (Gastropoda, Pulmonata, Plectopylidae)

Fig. 18. Shells and protoconch of species of Chersaecia leiophis (Benson, 1860). A–C. Shells from Myanmar (NHMUK 1888.12.4.1526–1528, two different shells). D. Probable syntype of P. pseudophis Godwin-Austen, 1875 (NHMUK 1903.7.1.754). E. Syntype of P. kengtungensis Gude, 1914 syn. nov. (NHMUK 1903.7.1.750). Scale of shells = 10 mm. Images: B. Páll-Gergely (B–C) and H. Taylor (A, D–E).

Fig. 7 in Systematic revision of the Plectopylinae (Gastropoda, Pulmonata, Plectopylidae)

Fig. 7. Parietal (A, C, E, G, J, K, M) and palatal (B, D, F, H, I, L, N) plication in species of Chersaecia Gude, 1899. A–B. C. austeni (Gude, 1899) (1903.06.01.1014.1). C–D. C. densegyrata sp. nov. (UF 347223). E–F. C. dextrorsa (Benson, 1860) (UF 346181). G–H. Chersaecia dextrorsa (UF 76507). I–J. C. brachyplecta (Benson, 1863) comb. nov. (after Gude 1914b). K–L. C. smithiana (Gude, 1897) comb. nov. (NHMUK 1888.12.4.1555–1556, two different specimens). M–N. C. reversalis sp. nov., paratype from type locality (UF 347046). Arrows below the letters indicate the direction of the aperture. Not to scale.

Fig. 23 in Systematic revision of the Plectopylinae (Gastropoda, Pulmonata, Plectopylidae)

Fig. 23. Shells and protoconch of species of Chersaecia Gude, 1899. A. C. perrierae (Gude, 1898), holotype (NHMUK 1922.8.29.40). B. C. perrierae, loc. 20091019A, Specimen 2 (coll. PGB). C–E. C. refuga (Gould, 1846), lectotype (MCZ 169335). Scale bar: A–C = 10 mm. Images: B. Páll-Gergely (B–E) and H. Taylor (A).

Fig. 27 in Systematic revision of the Plectopylinae (Gastropoda, Pulmonata, Plectopylidae)

Fig. 27. Genitalia of Chersaecia scabra sp. nov. (NHMUK 20170149). A. Male genitalia. B. Cross sectional diagram of the penis. C. Distal genitalia. D–F. Inner structure of genital organs (D = vagina, E = vas deferens, F = diverticulum). Scale bars: A, D–F = 0.5 mm; C = 2 mm; B not to scale. For abbreviations see Fig. 2. All photos: B. Páll-Gergely.

Fig. 17 in Systematic revision of the Plectopylinae (Gastropoda, Pulmonata, Plectopylidae)

Fig. 17. Distribution of plectopylid species in Northern Thailand. Legends: circle = Chersaecia auffenbergi sp. nov.; triangle = Chersaecia leiophis (Benson, 1860) (empty triangle shows the type locality of Plectopylis degerbolae Solem, 1966); empty square = Chersaecia perarcta simplex (Solem, 1966); cross = Chersaecia perarcta perarcta (Blanford, 1865); filled square = Chersaecia scabra sp. nov.; rhomb = Chersaecia densegyrata sp. nov.; the upper filled triangle also shows the locality of Naggsia oligogyra sp. nov.

Fig. 14 in Systematic revision of the Plectopylinae (Gastropoda, Pulmonata, Plectopylidae)

Fig. 14. Shells and protoconchs of species of Chersaecia Gude, 1899. A–B. C. auffenbergi sp. nov., holotype (UF 345566). C. C. goniobathmos (Ehrmann, 1922) comb. nov., lectotype (SMF 150100a). D–E. C. goniobathmos, paralectotype (SMF 150100c). F. C. feddeni (Blanford, 1865) comb. nov., syntype (NHMUK 1906.1.1.730). G. C. feddeni, holotype of P. ponsonbyi (Godwin-Austen, 1888) syn. nov. (NHMUK 1913.3.14.9). Scale bars: A, C–D, F–G = 10 mm; B, E = 1 mm. Photos: T. Deli (A), B. Páll-Gergely (B–E), H. Taylor (F–G).

Fig. 13 in Systematic revision of the Plectopylinae (Gastropoda, Pulmonata, Plectopylidae)

Fig. 13. Genitalia of Chersaecia reversalis sp. nov. (UF 347047). A. Male genitalia (penis, epiphallus, vas deferens). B. Whole genitalia. C–G. Inner structure of genital organs (C = proximal part of penis; D = distal part of penis; E = epiphallus; F = vagina; G = diverticulum). Scale bars: A–B = 5 mm; C–G = 0.5 mm. For abbreviations see Fig. 2. All photos: B. Páll-Gergely.

Fig. 5 in Not all spotted cats are leopards: evidence for a Hemilienardia ocellata species complex (Gastropoda: Conoidea: Raphitomidae)

Fig. 5. Records of the Hemilienardia ocellata species complex, based on material examined in the present paper. Filled cycles = H. ocellata (Jousseaume, 1884); triangles = H. acinonyx sp. nov.; black square = H. lynx sp. nov.; grey square = H. cf. lynx sp. nov.; diamonds = H. pardus sp. nov.

Fig. 4 in Not all spotted cats are leopards: evidence for a Hemilienardia ocellata species complex (Gastropoda: Conoidea: Raphitomidae)

Fig. 4. Marginal radular teeth of some species of Hemilienardia. A. H. malleti (Récluz, 1852) (from Kantor & Taylor 2002). B–C. H. ocellata (Jousseaume, 1884). Specimen from the Loyalty Islands, Lifou, Baie du Santal, Atelier LIFOU 2000, stn 1429, 20°47.5' S, 167°07.1' E, 8–18 m, 4.4 mm long. D. H. acinonyx sp. nov. Specimen from the Loyalty Islands, Lifou, Baie du Santal, Atelier LIFOU 2000, stn 1448, 20°45.8' S, 167°01.65' E, 20 m, 5.0 mm long.

Fig. 3 in Not all spotted cats are leopards: evidence for a Hemilienardia ocellata species complex (Gastropoda: Conoidea: Raphitomidae)

Fig. 3. Protoconch and shell morphology in the Hemilienardia ocellata complex. A–C. H. ocellata (Jousseaume, 1884). A. Specimen from the Maldives, Ari Atoll, Maagau Kandu, 25 m, 3.1 mm long. B–C. Specimen from New Caledonia, Expedition MONTROUZIER, stn 1319, 20°44.7' S, 164°15.5' E, 15–20 m, 3.6 mm long. D–E. H. acinonyx sp. nov. Specimen from the Loyalty Islands, Lifou, Baie du Santal, Atelier Lifou 2000, stn 1448, 20°45.8' S, 167°01.65' E, 20 m, 5.0 mm long. F–G. H. lynx sp. nov. Holotype, MNHN IM-2013-5489, Madang District, off Kranket Island, PAPUA NIUGINI stn PP14, 05°12' S, 145°50' E, 100–120 m, 2.75 mm long. H–I. H. pardus sp. nov. Specimen from the Loyalty Islands, Lifou, Baie du Santal, Atelier LIFOU 2000, stn 1454, 20°56.65' S, 167°02.0' E, 15–18 m, 5.2 mm long.

Fig. 2 in Not all spotted cats are leopards: evidence for a Hemilienardia ocellata species complex (Gastropoda: Conoidea: Raphitomidae)

Fig. 2. Species of the Hemilienardia ocellata complex. The SEM image with no letter denoted shows standard measurements. A–D. Hemilienardia ocellata (Jousseaume, 1884). A–B. Syntype, MNHN IM-2000-3128, Mauritius, 4.0 mm. C. Loyalty Islands, Lifou, Baie du Santal, Atelier Lifou 2000, stn 1429, 20°47.5' S, 167°07.1' E, 8–18 m, 4.4 mm. D. New Caledonia, Secteur de Koumac, Expedition Montrouzier, stn 1319, 20°44.7' S, 164°15.5' E, 15–20 m, 3.6 mm. E–F. Hemilienardia acinonyx sp. nov. E. Holotype, MNHN IM-2013-33593, Philippines, 8.1 mm. F. Loyalty Islands, Lifou, Baie du Santal, Atelier Lifou 2000, stn 1441, 20°46.4' S, 167°02.0' E, 20 m, 5.4 mm. G–H. Hemilienardia lynx sp. nov., holotype, MNHN IM-2013-5489, Papua New Guinea, 2.75 mm. I–M. Hemilienardia pardus sp. nov. I. BMOO 17147, Society Islands, Moorea. K. Holotype, MNHN IM-2000-31661, 5.8 mm. L–M. Loyalty Islands, Lifou, Baie du Santal, Atelier Lifou 2000, stn 1454, 20°56.65' S, 167°02.0' E, 15–18 m, 5.2 mm.

Fig. 1 in Not all spotted cats are leopards: evidence for a Hemilienardia ocellata species complex (Gastropoda: Conoidea: Raphitomidae)

Fig. 1. Relationships of the Hemilienardia ocellata complex as inferred by the molecular phylogenetic analysis. A. Bayesian tree based on the analysis of 61 Raphitomidae COI sequences. Black circles indicate nodes with 0.9 0.7.

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2018View details →

Fig. 7. 2D in Notes on Afonsoconus Tucker & Tenorio, 2013 (Gastropoda, Conidae), with description of a new species from the Southwestern Indian Ocean

Fig. 7. 2D Scatter plot of the discriminant function analysis (DFA) for the species A. kinoshitai (Kuroda, 1956), A. bruuni (Powell, 1958) and A. crosnieri sp. nov. The analysis was performed using shell length (SL) and the shell morphometric parameters MD, HMD and SH as variables, and species hypotheses as factor. Both DF1 and DF2 are statistically significant at the 95% probability level (DF1: 69.9 % relative percent, Wilks lambda = 0.0449, χ2 = 138.085, df = 8, p = 0.0000; DF2: 30.1 % relative percent, Wilks lambda = 0.2946, χ2 = 54.38, df = 3, p = 0.0000).