Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2022View details →

Fig. 3 in Fig. 6. A in Parascorpaena poseidon Chou and Liao 2022

Fig. 3. The holotype of Microhyla nakkavaram sp. nov. (ZSI/ANRC/T/14215). A–H: In life: A: dorsolateral view; B: dorsal view; C: ventral view; D: lateral view; E: ventral view of hand; F: ventral view of foot; G: dorsal view of cloacal region; H: posterior view of cloacal region. I–R: In preservation: I: dorsal view; J: ventral view; K: lateral view of head; L: ventral view of hand; M: magnified dorsal view of the third finger tip; N: illustration of the third finger tip morphology; O: ventral view of foot; P: magnified dorsal view of the fourth toe tip; Q: illustration of the fourth toe tip morphology; R: schematic illustration of webbing on foot. Photos and illustrations: S. D. Biju.

opencc-by-4.0Feb 2022View details →

Fig. 2. A–G in Fig. 6. A in Parascorpaena poseidon Chou and Liao 2022

Fig. 2. A–G: Syntype (ZMB 54906) of Microhyla heymonsi: A: dorsal view; B: ventral view; C: lateral view of head; D: ventral view of hand; E: illustration of the third finger tip morphology in dorsal view; F: ventral view of foot; G: illustration of the fourth toe tip morphology in dorsal view. H– M: Diagnostic morphological characters for members of the Microhyla heymonsi species subgroup. Photos and illustrations: S. D. Biju.

Fig. 6 in Parascorpaena poseidon Chou and Liao 2022

Fig. 6. Periclimenaeus cf. ramili sp. nov. from Lanzarote, Canary Islands. Photographic Credits: Leopoldo Moro.

Fig. 4 in Parascorpaena poseidon Chou and Liao 2022

Fig. 4. Periclimenaeus ramili sp. nov., male holotype (RMNH.CRUS.D.57969): A, third pereiopod, mesial; B, same, dactylus and distal propodus, mesial; C, fourth pereiopod, lateral; D, same, dactylus and distal propodus, mesial; E, fifth pereiopod, lateral; F, same, dactylus and distal propodus, lateral. Scale bar: A, C, E = 1 mm; B, D, F = 0.5 mm.

Fig. 2 in Parascorpaena poseidon Chou and Liao 2022

Fig. 2. Periclimenaeus ramili sp. nov., male holotype (RMNH.CRUS.D.57969): A, right mandible; B, left maxillula; C, left maxilla; D, left first maxilliped; E, left second maxilliped; F, left third maxilliped. Scale bar: A–C = 0.5 mm; D–E = 1 mm.

Fig. 5 in Parascorpaena poseidon Chou and Liao 2022

Fig. 5. Periclimenaeus ramili sp. nov and host sponge Spongia sp. A, male holotype (RMNH.CRUS.D.57969) and female allotype [(RMNH.CRUS. D.57970); B, sponge host: Spongia sp.; C, spongin fibers obtained from stomach content of Periclimenaeus ramili sp. nov. Scale bar = unscaled.

Fig. 3 in Parascorpaena poseidon Chou and Liao 2022

Fig. 3. Periclimenaeus ramili sp. nov., male holotype (RMNH.CRUS.D.57969): A, first pereiopod, lateral; B, same, lateral; C, major second pereiopod, lateral; D, same, fingers, lateral; E, same, fingers, mesial; F, minor second pereiopod, lateral; G, same, fingers, mesial. Scale bar: A–G = 1 mm.

Fig. 1 in Parascorpaena poseidon Chou and Liao 2022

Fig. 1. Periclimenaeus ramili sp. nov., male holotype (RMNH.CRUS.D.57969): A, rostrum, lateral; B, frontal region of carapace and appendages, dorsal view; C, same, lateral view; D, pleon, lateral view; E, posterior carapace and first pleonite, dorsal view; F, sixth pleonite, telson and uropod, dorsal view; G, posterior margin of telson, dorsal; H, antennule, dorsal view; I, antenna, ventral view; J, first pleopod; K, second pleopod; L, same, appendices masculina and interna. Scale bar: B–F, H–K = 1 mm; A, G, L = 0.5 mm.

FIGURE 2. Parascorpaena picta. A in Morphological comparisons of the Indo-West Pacific scorpionfish, Parascorpaena aurita, with a closely related species, P. picta, with first records of P. aurita from East Asia (Scorpaeniformes: Scorpaenidae)

FIGURE 2. Parascorpaena picta. A, KAUM-I.10320, 92.9 mm SL, Thailand; B, BPBM17388, 110.1 mm SL, Australia.

FIGURE 6 in Morphological comparisons of the Indo-West Pacific scorpionfish, Parascorpaena aurita, with a closely related species, P. picta, with first records of P. aurita from East Asia (Scorpaeniformes: Scorpaenidae)

FIGURE 6. Relationships of (A) head length, (B) orbit diameter, (C) upper-jaw length and (D) longest pectoral-fin ray length to standard length in Parascorpaena aurita (circles) and P. p i c t a (triangles).

FIGURE 1. Parascorpaena aurita. A in Morphological comparisons of the Indo-West Pacific scorpionfish, Parascorpaena aurita, with a closely related species, P. picta, with first records of P. aurita from East Asia (Scorpaeniformes: Scorpaenidae)

FIGURE 1. Parascorpaena aurita. A, KAUM–I. 8986, 75.9 mm SL, Japan; B, BPBM 14511, 112.8 mm SL, Australia.

FIGURE 4 in Morphological comparisons of the Indo-West Pacific scorpionfish, Parascorpaena aurita, with a closely related species, P. picta, with first records of P. aurita from East Asia (Scorpaeniformes: Scorpaenidae)

FIGURE 4. Dorsolateral views of posterior portion of interorbital space and occipital pit of (A) Parascorpaena aurita and (B) P. p i ct a. A, BPBM 14511, 112.8 mm SL, Australia; B, CAS 41296, 105.9 mm SL, Thailand. IR = interorbital ridge; TS = tympanic spine; OP = occipital pit; PS = parietal spine.

FIGURE 3 in Morphological comparisons of the Indo-West Pacific scorpionfish, Parascorpaena aurita, with a closely related species, P. picta, with first records of P. aurita from East Asia (Scorpaeniformes: Scorpaenidae)

FIGURE 3. Distributional records of (A) Parascorpaena aurita and (B) P. p i c t a, based on specimens examined in this study.

FIGURE 5 in Morphological comparisons of the Indo-West Pacific scorpionfish, Parascorpaena aurita, with a closely related species, P. picta, with first records of P. aurita from East Asia (Scorpaeniformes: Scorpaenidae)

FIGURE 5. Ventrolateral views of suborbital ridges of (A) Parascorpaena aurita and (B) P. p i c t a (skin removed). A, SU 28384, 86.4 mm SL, Philippines; B, CAS 41299, 98.9 mm SL, Thailand. Arrow indicates a gap between the first and second suborbital ridges. LB = lacrimal bone; FSR = first suborbital ridge; SSR = second suborbital ridge; SS = suborbital spines. Bars indicate 5 mm.