Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2021View details →

FIGURE 6 in Inventory of the Carabid Beetle Fauna of the Gaoligong Mountains, Western Yunnan Province, China: Species of the Tribe Omophronini (Coleoptera: Carabidae), with a Key and Review for All Species Recorded from China

FIGURE 6. Male genitalia of Omophron species. A-C. dorsal aspect; D-F. left lateral aspect. A,D. O. pseudotestudo Deuve & Tian (CASENT1012726; Longchuan Jiang, Wuhe Township, Tenchong County, Yunnan, China); B,E. O. pseudotestudo (Paratype; Jianhong, Xishuangbanna, Yunnan, China); C,F. O. testudo Andrewes (Holotype; Ko Kieng, Houaphan Province, Laos). Scale line = 0.5 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2021View details →

Figure 10 in Inventory of the Carabid Beetle Fauna of the Gaoligong Mountains, Western Yunnan Province, China: Species of the Tribe Omophronini (Coleoptera: Carabidae), with a Key and Review for All Species Recorded from China

Figure 10. Male genitalia of Omophron species. A-C. dorsal aspects; D-F. left lateral aspect. A,D. O. gemmeum Andrewes (CASENT1038994; Longchuan Jiang at Xiaojiangqiao, Tenchong County, Yunnan, China); B,E. O. gemmeum (Holotype; West Almora District, Uttarakhand, India); C,F. O. brettinghamae Pascoe (Dinajpur, Bangladesh). Scale line = 0.5 mm.

Figs 15–20 in Four decades after Belton: a review of records and evidences on the avifauna of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil*

Figs 15–20. Photographic documentation for five species added to the main list of birds of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil: 15, Donacobius atricapilla, São Borja, 18 June 2015 (D. Freitas); 16, Catharus cf. swainsoni, Marques de Souza, 18 January 2016 (M. Sand); 17, Tangara ornata, Três Cachoeiras, 30 January 2010 (A. Cardoso); 18, 19, Thlypopsis sordida, Uruguaiana, 12 June 2016 (E. Mandarino); 20, Sturnus vulgaris, male in breeding season, Lavras do Sul, 29 October 2014 (V. Souza).

Figs 30, 31 in Four decades after Belton: a review of records and evidences on the avifauna of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil*

Figs 30, 31. Photographic records of two species added as hypothetical to the list of birds of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil: 30, Progne cf. sinaloae, Coxilha, 24 September 2016 (C. E. Agne); 31, Cyanerpes cyaneus, female, Santo Antônio da Patrulha, 27 July 2015 (R. Kurz).

Figs 7–10 in Four decades after Belton: a review of records and evidences on the avifauna of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil*

Figs 7–10. Photographic documentation for three species added to the main list of birds of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil: 7, Todirostrum cinereum, Palmeira das Missões, 7 November 2015 (C. E. Agne); 8, Pseudocolopteryx acutipennis, Mostardas, 28 December 2015 (P. Fenalti); 9, 10, Tyrannus tyrannus, Mostardas, 7 February 2017 (G. R. Peres).

Figs 1–6 in Four decades after Belton: a review of records and evidences on the avifauna of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil*

Figs 1–6. Photographic documentation for six species added to the main list of birds of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil: 1, Phoebetria palpebrata, Arroio do Sal, 5 October 2016 (M. Tavares); 2, Ictinia mississippiensis, juvenile, Ijuí, 6 November 2016 (C. E. Agne); 3, Heliornis fulica, presumed male, Marau, 17 October 2015 (C. Longo); 4, Tringa inornata, adult nonbreeding, São José do Norte, 17 April 2014 (C. D. Timm); 5, Thinocorus rumicivorus, male (left) and female (right), Tavares, 5 August 2016 (F. Ronaldo); 6, Leucophaeus atricilla, adult nonbreeding, Cidreira, 7 January 2016 (P. Fenalti).

Figs 21–26 in Four decades after Belton: a review of records and evidences on the avifauna of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil*

Figs 21–26. Documentation updates for four species previously included in the main list of birds of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil: 21, Chondrohierax uncinatus, adult female, Tenente Portela, 4 February 2017 (C. Furini); 22, Pseudastur polionotus, Vacaria, 3 May 2015 (E. Rezende); 23, 24, Calidris pugnax, presumed male, Tavares, 15 February 2015 (M. Alievi); 25, Chlidonias niger, molting nonbreeding adult, Mostardas, 8 January 2014 (P. Fenalti); 26, C. niger, adult in alternate plumage, Rio Grande, 8 March 2016 (R. Kurz).

Figs 27–29 in Four decades after Belton: a review of records and evidences on the avifauna of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil*

Figs 27–29. Documentation updates for three species previously included in the main list of birds of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil: 27, Nannochordeiles pusillus, presumed female, Itaqui, 27 November 2011 (D. V. Peixoto); 28, Campephilus leucopogon, male (right) and female (left), Barra do Quaraí, 28 May 2015 (C. E. Agne); 29, Fluvicola albiventer, Uruguaiana, 23 October 2015 (R. O. de Oliveira).

Figure 4 in First occurrence of Panthera atrox (Felidae, Pantherinae) in the Mexican state of Hidalgo and a review of the record of felids from the Pleistocene of Mexico

Figure 4. Potential common prey-size range for Panthera atrox from the late Pleistocene of southeastern Hidalgo, including the herbivores that have been reported at the El Barrio locality (HGO-47). Diamond and line indicate the mean and observed range of body mass (from Van Valkenburgh et al., 2016).

Figure 1 in First occurrence of Panthera atrox (Felidae, Pantherinae) in the Mexican state of Hidalgo and a review of the record of felids from the Pleistocene of Mexico

Figure 1. (a) Index map showing the study area in southeastern Hidalgo, central Mexico; the capital of the state (Pachuca) and the late Pleistocene locality El Barrio (HGO-47) are depicted. (b) Stratigraphic section of the El Barrio locality (HGO-47); the arrow indicates the fossil-bearing level.

Figure 3 in First occurrence of Panthera atrox (Felidae, Pantherinae) in the Mexican state of Hidalgo and a review of the record of felids from the Pleistocene of Mexico

Figure 3. Left fifth metacarpal (UAHMP-4222) of Panthera atrox from the late Pleistocene of southeastern Hidalgo, central Mexico. (a) Ventral, (b) dorsal, (c) medial, (d) lateral, (e) proximal, and (f) distal views. Scale bar equals 2 cm.

Figure 5 in First occurrence of Panthera atrox (Felidae, Pantherinae) in the Mexican state of Hidalgo and a review of the record of felids from the Pleistocene of Mexico

Figure 5. Geographic distribution of Panthera atrox in North America during the late Pleistocene (main source: KurtØn and Anderson, 1980). The gray silhouette indicates the record from southeastern Hidalgo, central Mexico.

Figure 7 in First occurrence of Panthera atrox (Felidae, Pantherinae) in the Mexican state of Hidalgo and a review of the record of felids from the Pleistocene of Mexico

Figure 7. Mexican Pleistocene localities with records of felids. The map is regionalized in the morphotectonic provinces of Ferrusquía-Villafranca (1993). Abbreviations of the morphotectonic provinces as in Table 3. Squares indicate the early Pleistocene localities and circles the late Pleistocene localities. The felid record includes the following species: A: Panthera atrox; B: Panthera onca; C: Puma concolor; D: Puma yagouaroundi; E: Lynx rufus; F: Leopardus pardalis; G: Leopardus wiedii; H: Smilodon fatalis; I: Smilodon cf. S. gracilis; J: Felis rexroadensis; K: Miracinonyx inexpectatus.

Figure 6 in First occurrence of Panthera atrox (Felidae, Pantherinae) in the Mexican state of Hidalgo and a review of the record of felids from the Pleistocene of Mexico

Figure 6. Mexican Pleistocene localities with records of Panthera atrox, considering (a) a hypsometric base and (b) the Mexican biogeographic corridors (sensu Ceballos et al., 2010). Diamond indicates the record from southeastern Hidalgo, central Mexico. Biogeographic corridors: 1, eastern US–Sierra Madre Oriental; 2, western US–Baja California; 3, Rocky Mountains–Sierra Madre Occidental; 4, central US–northern Mexico; 5, Transvolcanic Belt– Sierra Madre del Sur; 6, Tamaulipas–Central America Gulf Lowlands; and 7, Sonora–Central America Pacific Lowlands.

Fig. 5 in Review of marine alien isopods in Türkiye with two new records: of Paracerceis sculpta and Paranthura japonica Abstract

Fig. 5: Body parts of Paranthura japonica (A, first antenna; B, second antenna; C, telson; D, uropodal exopod; E, uropodal endopod; F, fourth pereiopod; G, second pereiopod; H, first pereiopod. Scale bar: 80 µm).

Fig. 1 in Short Communication Westward expansion of the brown shrimp Penaeus aztecus Ives 1891 (Decapoda: Penaeidae) in the Mediterranean Sea: a review on the Mediterranean distribution and first record from Spain

Fig. 1 - Specimens of Penaeus aztecus caught in Spain. a) The specimen caught at Altea. b) The specimen caught at Moraira. c) The specimens caught at Cullera. See site nr. 27 (red circle) in Fig. 2. / Esemplari di Penaeus aztecus catturati in Spagna. a) L'esemplare catturato ad Altea. b) L'esemplare catturato a Moraira. c) Gli esemplari catturati a Cullera. Si veda il sito n. 27 (cerchio rosso) nella Fig. 2.

Fig. 2 in Short Communication A new record of the rare Hypleurochilus bananensis (Poll 1959) (Actinopterygii: Blenniidae) with a review of its distribution and ecology in Italian seas

Fig. 2 - Individuals of H. bananensis observed in the Tyrrhenian Sea in the present study observed on 30th December 2023 (A and C) and on 29th December 2023 (B). / Individui di Hypleurochilus bananensis osservati il 30 dicembre 2023 (A e C) e il 29 dicembre 2023 (B) e riportati nel presente studio (Mar Tirreno).

Fig. 2 in Short Communication Westward expansion of the brown shrimp Penaeus aztecus Ives 1891 (Decapoda: Penaeidae) in the Mediterranean Sea: a review on the Mediterranean distribution and first record from Spain

Fig. 2 - Known distribution of Penaeus aztecus in the Mediterranean Sea (in chronological order). Black squares indicate published records, the red circle the area of the three records reported in this study: / Distribuzione nota di Penaeus aztecus nel Mar Mediterraneo (in ordine cronologico). I quadrati neri indicano i record pubblicati, il cerchio rosso l'area dei tre records riportati in questo studio: 1) Antalya, Turkey, (Deval et al., 2010); 2) Finike, Antalya, Adama, Mersin, Iskenderun Turkey (Bilecenoglu et al., 2013); 3) Damietta, Egypt, (Sadek et al., 2018); 4) Thermaikos Gulf, Greece (Nikolopoulou et al., 2013); 5) Boka Kotorska, Montenegro (Marković et al., 2014); 6) Corfu Island, Greece (Kapiris et al., 2014); 7) Thermaikos Gulf, Greece (Kevrekidis, 2014); 8) Thermaikos Gulf, Nestos river estuaries, Greece (Minos et al., 2015); 9) Castiglione, Italy (Cruscanti et al., 2015); 10) Kyllini, Greece (Crocetta et al., 2015); 11) Chalki Island, Greece (Kondylatos & Corsini-Foka, 2015); 12) Faliraki Rhodes, Greece (Kondylatos et al., 2020); 13) Gulf of Lion, France and Palmahim, Israel (Galil et al., 2017); 14) Mazara del Vallo, Porto Empedocle e Gela, Italy (Scannella et al., 2017); 15) Ildır Bay, Turkey (Bakır & Aydin, 2016); 16) Golfo di Corigliano, Italy, Kerkyraikos Gulf, Maliakos Gulf, North Ionian Sea, Patraikos Gulf, Saronikos Gulf, South Ionian, Thracian-Limnos, Lakonikos Gulf, Kyklades (Syros Island), Greece (Mytilineou et al., 2016); 17) Mersin Bay-Iskenderun, Turkey (Özcan et al., 2019); 18) Gulf of Gabes, Tunisia (Ben Jarray et al., 2019); 19) Central Aegean Sea, Greece (Kapiris & Minos, 2017); 20) Termoli and Mola di Bari, Italy (Zava et al., 2018); 21) Marzamemi, Italy, Albania, Erakleion Crete, Greece (Kampouris et al., 2018); 22) Augusta, Italy (Stern et al., 2019); 23) Alexandria, Egypt (El Deeb et al., 2020); 24) Umm- Ufayn, Libya (Abdulrraziq et al., 2021); 25) Hvarski kanal, Neretvanski kanal, Viski kanal, Murtesko more, Cavtat, Adriatic Sea, Croatia (Ugarković et al., 2021); 26) Ancona and San Benedetto del Tronto, Roccella Ionica, Italy (Froglia & Scanu, 2023). ed circle indicates the present record: 27) Altea, Moraira, Cullera, Comunitat Valenciana, Spain (present study).

Fig. 1 in Short Communication A new record of the rare Hypleurochilus bananensis (Poll 1959) (Actinopterygii: Blenniidae) with a review of its distribution and ecology in Italian seas

Fig. 1 - Known distribution of Hypleurochilus bananensis in Italian waters updated to January 2024 (records of this study are included). Black circles indicate areas where the species was recorded. For details see Table 1. / Distribuzione nota di Hypleurochilus bananensis nelle acque italiane aggiornata al gennaio 2024 (sono incluse le registrazioni di questo studio). I cerchi neri indicano le aree in cui la specie è stata registrata. Per i dettagli si veda la Tabella 1.