Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
46,151
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
46,151 results for “Safety”
IODP Expedition 368X Gas safety report
<p>This composite report returns data from two different gas chromatograph configurations (GC3 and NGA). Each row combines data from several measurements made on the same sample at the same time for a particular headspace or vacutainer sample. If data do not exist for a particular expedition, the column does not appear. Gas samples were measured by gas chromatography and either flame ionization detection (GC-FID) or thermal conductivity detection (GC-TCD). Reported analytes may include methane, ethane, ethene, propane, propene, n-butane, i-butane, n-pentane, i-pentane, n-hexane, i-hexane, n-heptane, i-heptane, nitrogen, oxygen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen sulfide. When data are available, methane to (ethane + ethene) ratio (C<sub>1</sub>/C<sub>2</sub>�ratio) is reported. To identify individual samples and tests, see each separate analysis (GC3, NGAFID, and/or NGATCD).</p>
Universal safety distance alert device for road vehicles - Testing videos
<p>Testing the Universal safety distance alert device for road traffic in simulated and in real traffic.</p>
Updated list of QPS-recommended microorganisms for safety risk assessments carried out by EFSA
<p>The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) asked the Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ) to deliver a scientific Opinion on the maintenance of the list of qualified presumption of safety (QPS) biological agents. The QPS approach was developed by the EFSA Scientific Committee to provide a harmonised generic pre-evaluation to support safety risk assessments of biological agents intentionally introduced into the food and feed chain, in support of the concerned scientific Panels and Units in the frame of market authorisations.</p> <p>The taxonomic identity, body of knowledge, the safety concerns in relation to pathogenicity and virulence, and the safety for the environment of those microbiological agents are assessed. Safety concerns identified for a respective taxonomic unit (TU) are, where possible and reasonable in number, reflected as ‘qualifications’ that are assessed at the strain level by the EFSA’s scientific Panels.</p> <p>The<strong> “list of microorganisms with QPS status”</strong> first established in 2007, has been revised and updated annually until 2014 via <strong>QPS</strong> <strong>Opinions</strong>; since 2014 the updates are carried out and published every 3 years. If new information is retrieved from extended literature searches (ELS) that would change the QPS status of a TU or its qualifications, this is also published in the Panel Statement covering the previous 6-months period. The <strong>ELS </strong><strong>protocol</strong> can be found at <a href="https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fzenodo.org%2Fdoi%2F10.5281%2Fzenodo.3607188&data=05%7C02%7C%7Ca719c81b95134433fddc08dc112814e1%7C406a174be31548bdaa0acdaddc44250b%7C1%7C0%7C638404111040390688%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=FaY3tbLnn%2BB%2BDu3PrtEzJR0zPa14z%2FpoKWUBBOaHk34%3D&reserved=0">https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.3607188</a> and the <strong>Search</strong><strong> strategies</strong> are available at: <a href="https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.5281%2Fzenodo.3607193&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ca3e4d3a851c84defc2a008d7aa44f9e5%7C406a174be31548bdaa0acdaddc44250b%7C1%7C0%7C637165085527347066&sdata=tCzKMQLR2I%2BZBr%2F0sOXPDoPitdjQyqKdlVqDqwigA%2Bo%3D&reserved=0">https://doi.org/</a><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3607192">10.5281/zenodo.3607192</a>.</p> <p> </p> <p>The <strong>QPS Panel Statement</strong> also includes the evaluation of microbiological agents notified to EFSA within the 6-month period for an assessment for feed additives, food enzymes, food additives and flavourings, and novel foods or plant protection products for a possible QPS status. The new QPS status recommendations are incorporated into the 2022 updated<strong> “list of microorganisms with QPS status</strong>” is available in this upload. The list of “<strong>Microbi</strong><strong>ological agents </strong><strong>as notified to EFSA</strong><strong>”</strong> from 2007, in the context of technical dossiers to EFSA Units, for intentional use in feed and/or food or as sources of food and feed additives, enzymes and plant protection products (PPPs) for safety assessment can be found at <a href="https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.5281%2Fzenodo.3607184&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ca3e4d3a851c84defc2a008d7aa44f9e5%7C406a174be31548bdaa0acdaddc44250b%7C1%7C0%7C637165085527357024&sdata=%2Fe7qiRXiuKQi%2FBvK5S%2F7undYHv7ibxBlLEHPcSlRz24%3D&reserved=0">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.</a><a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3607183">3607183</a>.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Useful links on EFSA QPS</strong></p> <p>EFSA topic on QPS: <a href="https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.efsa.europa.eu%2Fen%2Ftopics%2Ftopic%2Fqualified-presumption-safety-qps&data=02%7C01%7C%7Ca3e4d3a851c84defc2a008d7aa44f9e5%7C406a174be31548bdaa0acdaddc44250b%7C1%7C0%7C637165085527366985&sdata=TlcglouTWhBY24K5ApAoawNpADKgyl%2FefxVUEbxjQo0%3D&reserved=0">https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/topics/topic/qualified-presumption-safety-qps</a></p> <p>Link to the virtual issue on QPS on Wiley Online Library: <a href="https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fefsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com%2Fdoi%2Ftoc%2F10.1002%2F(ISSN)1831-4732.QPS&data=02%7C01%7C%7C7f88eba744034d83233b08d7a8cd3c1c%7C406a174be31548bdaa0acdaddc44250b%7C1%7C0%7C637163471731831002&sdata=AiprIUek%2B%2But46VabBGk0IMIgLR98CDmxoINYPkKBbs%3D&reserved=0">https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/toc/10.1002/(ISSN)1831-4732.QPS</a></p> <p><strong>Versions history:</strong></p> <p>Versions 1 and 2 were substituted by version 3 – all are associated with the QPS Panel statement EFSA 7: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until September 2017: <a href="https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5131">https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5131</a> </p> <p>Version 4 is associated with the QPS Panel statement EFSA 8: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until March 2018: <a href="https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5315">https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2018.5315</a> </p> <p>Versions 5 and 6 were substituted by version 7 – all are associated with the QPS Panel statement EFSA 9: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until September 2018: <a href="https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5555">https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5555</a> </p> <p>Version 8 is associated with the QPS Panel statement EFSA 10: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until March 2019: <a href="https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5753">https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5753</a> </p> <p>Version 9 is associated with the QPS Panel statement EFSA 11: suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until September 2019: <a href="https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5965">https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5965</a> and with the Scientific Opinion on the update of the list of QPS-recommended biological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA (2017-2019): <a href="https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5966">https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.5966</a> </p> <p>Version 10: updates version 9 following the update of the qualification of <em>Bacillus velezensis</em> as: ‘absence of toxigenic potential and absence of aminoglycoside production ability’ - applied in the QPS Statement part 11 (ON-5965) and in the 2019 Scientific Opinion (ON-5966).</p> <p>Version 11: updates version 10 following the addition of the <em>Bacillus circulans</em> ‘for production purposes only’ - applied in the QPS Statement part 13 (ON-6377) and in the 2019 Scientific Opinion (ON-5966).</p> <p>Version 12 updates version 11 following the addition of the <em>Bacillus paralicheniformis</em><strong> </strong>with the qualifications 'absence of toxigenic activity’ and ‘absence of genetic information to synthesize bacitracin';<strong> </strong>and adding <em>Schizochytrium limacinum</em>, which is a synomym for <em>Aurantiochytrium</em> <em>limacinum,</em> - applied in the QPS Statement part 14 (ON-6689)<strong> </strong>and in the 2019 Scientific Opinion (ON-5966).</p> <p>Version 13 updates version 12 following the addition of <em>Haematococcus lacustris</em> synonym <em>Haematococcus pluvialis</em>, recommended for QPS status with the qualification ‘for production purposes only’. Some other changes related to taxonomy and qualifications are described in the QPS Statement part 15 (ON-7045)<strong>.</strong></p> <p>Version 14, update of version 13, is related to QPS Statement part 16 (ON-7408)<strong>.</strong></p> <p>Version 15 is related to QPS Statement part 17 (ON-7746)<strong>.</strong></p> <p>Version 16 is related to QPS Statement part 18 (ON-8092)<strong>.</strong></p> <p>Version 17 is related to QPS Statement part 19 (ON-8517)<strong>.</strong></p> <p>Version 18 is also related to QPS Statement part 19 (ON-8517) with a small correction<strong>.</strong></p> <p>Version 19 and 20 are related to QPS Statement part 20 (ON-8882).</p> <p>Version 21 is related to QPS Statement part 21 (ON-9169)</p> <p>Version 22 is related to QPS Statement part 22 (ON-9510)</p> <p> </p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Note: </strong>As of January 2022 the updated list is provided only as excel file format.</p>
Antimicrobial Stewardship & Patient Safety Improvements: Introducing the NIVAS Line Flushing Guidance
<p>Recent published literature highlights that as much as 35% [1] of medication may remain in the infusion line as residual volume. The line is not commonly flushed outside of paediatric and oncology settings and therefore the total prescribed dose is not administered to patients, and this residual medication is discarded, raising the issue of underdosing. [2]</p><p> </p><p>At Salisbury NHS Foundation Trust, the Medical Device Management Services team is actively working towards improving patient safety and recovery through antimicrobial stewardship and compliance with new NIVAS guidelines [3]. We were keen to understand the implications of current intravenous administration practice at our Trust. We were particularly interested in assessing the prevalence and extent to which patients are underdosed, and the cost implications of discarded medication.</p>
Post-hypnotic safety suggestion improves stress coping with long-lasting effects
<p>Effective coping with acute stress is important to promote mental health and to build stress resilience. Interventions improving stress coping usually require long training periods. In this study, we present a hypnosis-based intervention that produces long-term effects after a single hypnosis session. In that session, we established a post-hypnotic safety suggestion that participants can activate afterwards with a cue. We tested 60 participants in our study who all received the hypnosis session and a stress task. The safety group used the post-hypnotic safety cue during acute stress (Trier Social Stress Test, TSST). The control group used a neutral trigger instead. We measured subjective stress responses via self-reports and physiological stress responses via saliva and blood samples as well as heart rate. One week later, all participants filled in an online survey to measure long-term effects of the post-hypnotic safety suggestion. We found that participants using the post-hypnotic safety cue during the TSST reported significantly lower stress compared to the control group. The safety group also reported significantly fewer negative thoughts concerning their TSST performance than the control group during the stress recovery phase and one week later. All participants indicated that the post-hypnotic safety suggestion still worked one week after its establishment. Suggestibility did not affect the efficacy of the post-hypnotic safety suggestion. Our findings demonstrate that post-hypnotic safety suggestions improve stress coping with long-lasting effects, which makes it a promising intervention to promote mental health and establish stress resilience in just one hypnosis session.</p> <p>The manuscript is published in Scientific Reports on February 12, 2024 and available here: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54071-3</p>
Safety and Efficacy of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Mitochondria Transplantation as a Cell-Free Therapy for Osteoarthritis
<p><strong><span>Abstract</span></strong></p> <p><strong><span>Objective</span></strong></p> <p><span>The inflammatory responses from synovial fibroblasts and macrophages</span><span> and the mitochondrial dysfunction in chondrocytes<span> leading to oxidative stress, disrupt extracellular matrix (ECM) homeostasis</span> and accelerate the deterioration process of articular cartilage<span> in osteoarthritis (OA).<span> </span>In the last years, it has been proposed that mesenchymal stromal cells (MSC) transfer their functional mitochondria to damaged cells in response to cellular stress, becoming one of the mechanisms underpinning their therapeutic effects. </span>Therefore, we hypothesize that a novel cell-free treatment for OA could involve direct mitochondria transplantation, leading to the restoration of both cellular and mitochondrial homeostasis.</span></p> <p><strong><span>Methods</span></strong></p> <p><span>Mitochondria<span> were isolated from Umbilical Cord (UC)-MSC (Mito-MSC) and characterized based on their morphology, phenotype, functions, and their ability to be </span>internalized by <span>different articular cells. Furthermore, </span>the transcriptional changes following mitochondrial uptake by chondrocytes were evaluated using an Affymetrix analysis, Lastly, <span>the dose dependance therapeutic efficacy, biodistribution and immunogenicity of Mito-MSC w</span>ere assessed<span> in vivo, </span>through an intra-articular injection <span>in male C57BL6 mice in a </span>collagenase-induced OA <span>(CIOA) </span>model.</span></p> <p><strong><span>Results</span></strong></p> <p><span>Our findings demonstrate the functional integrity of Mito-MSC and their ability to be efficiently <span>transferred into chondrocytes, synovial macrophages, and synovial fibroblasts. </span>Moreover, the transcriptomic analysis showed the upregulation of genes involved in stress such as DNA reparative machinery and<span> inflammatory antiviral responses</span>.<span> </span>Finally, <span>Mito-MSC transplantation </span>yielded significant reductions<span> in joint mineralization, </span>a hallmark of OA progression<span>, </span>as well as improvements in OA-related histological signs, with the lower dose exhibiting better therapeutic efficacy. <span><span> </span></span>Furthermore, Mito-MSC were detected within the knee joint for up to 24 hours post-injection without eliciting an inflammatory response in CIOA mice. </span></p> <p><strong><span>Conclusion</span></strong></p> <p><span><span> </span>Collectively, our results reveal that mitochondria derived from MSC are transferred to key articular cells and are retained in the joint without generating an inflammatory immune response mitigating articular cartilage degradation in OA, probably through a restorative effect trigger by the stress antiviral response within OA chondrocytes.</span></p>
Self-Assessed Radiation Safety Culture Across Sectors
<p>The aim of this work is to compare radiation safety culture in the medical and nuclear sectors, by means of a radiation protection self-assessment tool.</p> <p>This is a programme level assessment, considering the department’s culture to the extent that it exhibits the traits of a healthy safety culture described by the US Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO)<sup>1</sup>. It draws on the levels of radiation safety self-assessment described in Report 162 of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP)<sup>2</sup>.</p> <p>The tool consists of fifteen good practice statements, against which users assess themselves on a five point scale. Each statement is accompanied by prompt questions, to provide evidence for the choice of response.</p> <p>The purpose of the self-assessment tool is to assist employers in taking ownership of radiation protection by recognising the common management tools and processes that apply across departments and modalities. It is also expected to aid recognition of the elements of day-to-day working that contribute to an organisation’s culture and how these express the importance of radiation safety.</p> <p>Data will be presented demonstrating how perceived safety culture varies both within and between sectors, and suggestions made as to how this approach could contribute to improving safety culture in the UK.</p> <p>The work is in keeping with the new ICRP general recommendations in that it incorporates aspects of communications and stakeholder engagement, set out in the overarching considerations in section 3 of the draft report.</p>
Dataset for "Evaluation of Publicly Available Information on Sex-related Differences in the Efficacy and Safety of New Molecular Entities and Therapeutic Biological Products"
<p>Contains our extraction sheets with additional documents/notes on methods used in our study.</p>
Topical Classification of Food Safety Publications with a Knowledge Base – materials
<p>Supplementary material for the article titled "<strong><a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4364-5_48">Topical Classification of Food Safety Publications with a Knowledge Base</a></strong>".</p> <p><strong>Citation</strong></p> <p>If you use this data in research work, please cite this paper:</p> <p>Sowinski, P., Wasielewska-Michniewska, K., Ganzha, M., & Paprzycki, M. (2022). Topical Classification of Food Safety Publications with a Knowledge Base. In <em>Sustainable Technology and Advanced Computing in Electrical Engineering</em> (pp. 673-693). Springer, Singapore.</p> <p>BibTeX:</p> <pre><code>@incollection{sowinski2022topical, title={Topical Classification of Food Safety Publications with a Knowledge Base}, author={Sowinski, Piotr and Wasielewska-Michniewska, Katarzyna and Ganzha, Maria and Paprzycki, Marcin}, booktitle={Sustainable Technology and Advanced Computing in Electrical Engineering}, pages={673--693}, year={2022}, publisher={Springer}, doi={10.1007/978-981-19-4364-5_48} }</code></pre> <p> </p>
IODP Expedition 372A Gas safety report
<p>This composite report returns data from two different gas chromatograph configurations (GC3 and NGA). Each row combines data from several measurements made on the same sample at the same time for a particular headspace or vacutainer sample. If data do not exist for a particular expedition, the column does not appear. Gas samples were measured by gas chromatography and either flame ionization detection (GC-FID) or thermal conductivity detection (GC-TCD). Reported analytes may include methane, ethane, ethene, propane, propene, n-butane, i-butane, n-pentane, i-pentane, n-hexane, i-hexane, n-heptane, i-heptane, nitrogen, oxygen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen sulfide. When data are available, methane to (ethane + ethene) ratio (C<sub>1</sub>/C<sub>2</sub>�ratio) is reported. To identify individual samples and tests, see each separate analysis (GC3, NGAFID, and/or NGATCD).</p>
IODP Expedition 374 Gas safety report
<p>This composite report returns data from two different gas chromatograph configurations (GC3 and NGA). Each row combines data from several measurements made on the same sample at the same time for a particular headspace or vacutainer sample. If data do not exist for a particular expedition, the column does not appear. Gas samples were measured by gas chromatography and either flame ionization detection (GC-FID) or thermal conductivity detection (GC-TCD). Reported analytes may include methane, ethane, ethene, propane, propene, n-butane, i-butane, n-pentane, i-pentane, n-hexane, i-hexane, n-heptane, i-heptane, nitrogen, oxygen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen sulfide. When data are available, methane to (ethane + ethene) ratio (C<sub>1</sub>/C<sub>2</sub>�ratio) is reported. To identify individual samples and tests, see each separate analysis (GC3, NGAFID, and/or NGATCD).</p>
Replication Package of the study "Automated Identification and Qualitative Characterization of Safety Concerns Reported in UAV Software Platforms"
<p><strong>Description of the Dataset of the work "Automated Identification and Qualitative Characterization of Safety<br> Concerns Reported in UAV Software Platforms"</strong></p> <p><strong><em>"1_Safety-Dataset" folder: </em></strong>This folder contains the bugs data and row data of all analyzed projects.<br> Specifically, this folder contains the following relevant entries<br> <br> - "bugs" folder: It contains the bugs of all analyzed projects (PX4-merged.json.gz, dDronin-merged.json.gz, ardupilot-merged.json.gz)<br> of all sentences extracted from the project issues<br> - "Dataset-safety-bugs.csv": For all projects, it contains the raw data of the set of sentences classified as safety and non-safety related.<br> </p> <p><em><strong>"2_Scripts-and-generated-data (RQ1)" folder:</strong> </em>This folder contains the scripts and code used to preprocess and analyze the issue data in <br> the context of RQ1<br> Specifically, this folder contains the following relevant entries<br> <br> - "main-program.py" file: Main program executing all subscripts generating the data required for RQ1 (detailed in the following line)<br> - "utilities.R" file: (Utility) R script containing relevant functions for pre-processing/indexing text and issue data<br> - "1_Script-to-create-test-dataset.r" file: R script containing simple code for analyzing issue data<br> - "2_MainScript.r" file: Main R program orchestrating the scripts "utilities.R" and "1_Script-to-create-test-dataset.r" execution<br> - "files-setDirectory" folder: Folder where data are generated and stored from the "main-program.py"<br> - "fasttext" folder: Folder where data used as input from fastText (by "main-program.py") are reported<br> - "cross-project-analysis" folder: Folder with data used for the cross-project analysis</p> <p> - "main-program-grid-search.py" file: Main program executing all experiments for the grid search analysis</p> <p><em><strong>"3_Results" folder: </strong></em>This folder contains the results, scripts and figures used to discuss results of the study.<br> Specifically, this folder contains the following relevant entries<br> <br> - "RQ1" folder: This folder contains the results, scripts and figures used to discuss results of RQ1.<br> - "RQ2" folder: This folder contains the results, scripts and Tables used to discuss results of RQ2.</p>
IODP Expedition 352 Gas safety report
<p>This composite report returns data from two different gas chromatograph configurations (GC3 and NGA). Each row combines data from several measurements made on the same sample at the same time for a particular headspace or vacutainer sample. If data do not exist for a particular expedition, the column does not appear. Gas samples were measured by gas chromatography and either flame ionization detection (GC-FID) or thermal conductivity detection (GC-TCD). Reported analytes may include methane, ethane, ethene, propane, propene, n-butane, i-butane, n-pentane, i-pentane, n-hexane, i-hexane, n-heptane, i-heptane, nitrogen, oxygen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen sulfide. When data are available, methane to (ethane + ethene) ratio (C<sub>1</sub>/C<sub>2</sub>�ratio) is reported. To identify individual samples and tests, see each separate analysis (GC3, NGAFID, and/or NGATCD).</p>
IODP Expedition 351 Gas safety report
<p>This composite report returns data from two different gas chromatograph configurations (GC3 and NGA). Each row combines data from several measurements made on the same sample at the same time for a particular headspace or vacutainer sample. If data do not exist for a particular expedition, the column does not appear. Gas samples were measured by gas chromatography and either flame ionization detection (GC-FID) or thermal conductivity detection (GC-TCD). Reported analytes may include methane, ethane, ethene, propane, propene, n-butane, i-butane, n-pentane, i-pentane, n-hexane, i-hexane, n-heptane, i-heptane, nitrogen, oxygen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen sulfide. When data are available, methane to (ethane + ethene) ratio (C<sub>1</sub>/C<sub>2</sub>�ratio) is reported. To identify individual samples and tests, see each separate analysis (GC3, NGAFID, and/or NGATCD).</p>
Dataset: Safety Shot, Inc. (SHOT) Stock Performance
This dataset provides historical stock market performance data for specific companies. It enables users to analyze and understand the past trends and fluctuations in stock prices over time. This information can be utilized for various purposes such as investment analysis, financial research, and market trend forecasting.
Dataset: Safety Shot, Inc. (SHOTW) Stock Performance
This dataset provides historical stock market performance data for specific companies. It enables users to analyze and understand the past trends and fluctuations in stock prices over time. This information can be utilized for various purposes such as investment analysis, financial research, and market trend forecasting.
Dataset: Safety Insurance Group, Inc. (SAFT) Stock Performance
This dataset provides historical stock market performance data for specific companies. It enables users to analyze and understand the past trends and fluctuations in stock prices over time. This information can be utilized for various purposes such as investment analysis, financial research, and market trend forecasting.
Supplementary file to "Effect of heat treatment on microbiological safety of supermarket food waste as substrate for black soldier fly larvae (Hermetia illucens)"
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Smart Cities-Figure 8. Influence of AI on individual safety by respondents age
<p>On question 11 respondents were asked to consider the influence of AI on individual safety using a 5 points Likert Scale ranging from 1 being “totally unimportant” and 5 being “very important”. The analysis of variance was used to determine the differences by age group and by gender. The analysis shows that no statistical interaction was found between age and gender F=3.081, p=0.08. We found statistically significant differences by gender F=7.639, p<0.05 and age F=6.318, p=.001). Female participants scored significantly higher (M=4.40, SD=.81) than male participants (M=4.00, SD=.60) on question 11 about the influence of AI on individual safety. At the same question: the 41-50 age group scored the highest (M=4.50, SD=.51), followed by the 18-25 age group (M=4.40, SD=.81); the 26-30 age group scored lower than the 18-25 age group and significantly higher than the 31-40 age group (M=3.87, SD=.60) (Figure 8).</p>
Colrobot Safety Sensor Evaluation
<p>Evaluation videos for the IFF safety sensor.</p> <p>The benchmark is divided into two scenarios. In the first one, people walk past the side of the van [scenario 1]. In the second scenario a person moves into the van [scenario 2]. The third video is a reference video to compare the process times.</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.