Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
61
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
61 results for “Social Outcome”
Genetic and Social Network Correlates of Rheumatoid Arthritis Outcomes in Hispanic Populations: A Prospective Study
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05457816. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Mitigating Mental and Social Health Outcomes of COVID-19: a Counseling Approach
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06142292. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Improving Adult Protective Services Client Outcomes: A Stepped-Care Social and Mental Health Engagement Program
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06257095. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Social Determinants of Health in Diabetes Outcomes
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01749345. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
The Impact of Frequenting a Social Leg Program on Therapeutic Adherence and Venous Leg Ulcer Wound Healing Outcomes
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04370106. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Social Network Outcomes of a Livelihood Intervention for Impoverished Women in Rural Uganda
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02619305. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Social Prescribing to Improve Adherence and Outcomes in Women With Heart Failure
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06628973. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Evaluating the Impact of Social and Genetic Factors on Outcomes in Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06002828. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Leveraging Social Innovation and Community-Engagement to Reduce Disparities in Outbreak Control Outcomes
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05123729. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Applying Social Comparison Theory to Behavioral Weight Loss: Does Modifying Group Membership Improve Outcome?
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT00716027. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Improving Outcomes in Social Services Through Routine Outcome Monitoring and Systematic Client Feedback
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07303608. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Outcomes of Urological Surgery During Periods of Social COVID-19 Containemnt: is it Reasonable to Limit Access to Surgical Care for All?
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04352699. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Cannabis Use Patterns Among Young Adults and Associations With Social and Health Outcomes.
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07063589. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Pilot-Testing Strategies to Improve Outcomes for Youth With Type 2 Diabetes by Addressing Health-Related Social Needs
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07216118. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Inflammation, Stress & Social Behavior: Using Ecological Assessments & Model Systems to Enhance Relevance to Health Outcomes
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01625793. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Perception of fight outcome is needed to activate socially driven changes in brain transcriptome
GEO Series GSE56549. Danio rerio. 12 samples. Type: Expression profiling by array.
JustConservation - global data of site-level biodiversity conservation and its social-ecological outcomes (1970-2019)
<p>This dataset contains evidence collected from 723 studies published in English-language peer-reviewed journals that describe and explore conservation efforts at a single site in 104 countries (1970-2019). The pool of studies was obtained through a keyword search on Web of Science, which returned 69,246 publications, followed by a screening of titles and abstracts using the open access machine-learning assisted software Colandr (11,100 publications screened; cut-off inclusion rate: 3%) and a data extraction phase (1,054 publications), based on the following criteria for inclusion: (1) the study is about biodiversity conservation; (2) the study describes a deliberate intervention; (3) the study provides empirical evidence; (4) the conservation intervention takes place in a specific site through a specific actor or actors; (5) the study identifies a discernible conservation aim, and; (6) the paper identifies a discernible conservation approach.</p> <p>Curated and compiled dataset with the following columns:</p> <ul> <li><strong>study_id</strong>: unique identifier of the study</li> <li><strong>title</strong>: title of the study</li> <li><strong>year</strong>: publication year of the study</li> <li><strong>authors</strong>: authors of the study</li> <li><strong>name_journal</strong>: name of the journal the study was published in</li> <li><strong>author_affiliation_type</strong>: type of institution the lead author of the study works for (University/Academic; NGO; public/state/UN; think thank/research institute; private company; independent; other). Only lists first affiliation.</li> <li><strong>author_affiliation_country: </strong>country of affiliation of the lead author. Only lists first affiliation.</li> <li><strong>author_continent</strong>: country of affiliation of the lead author. Only lists first affiliation.</li> <li><strong>author_north_south</strong>: indicates whether the lead author is affiliated with an institution in the Global North (N) or Global South (S). Only lists first affiliation.</li> <li><strong>major_funder_ngo</strong>: are any authors affiliated with a major conservation funder or organisation with an interest in the conservation intervention being researched (yes; no)</li> <li><strong>funding_source</strong>: funding source of the paper (not of the conservation intervention)</li> <li><strong>conflict_of_interest: </strong>overlap between the affiliations of authors, the funding source and the conservation intervention being researched (0 = no; 1 = yes)</li> <li><strong>study_country</strong>: country where the intervention was studied</li> <li><strong>study_locality</strong>: locality or region where the intervention was studied</li> <li><strong>study_continent</strong>: continent where the intervention was studied</li> <li><strong>study_north_south: </strong>indicates whether the conservation intervention was conducted in the Global North (N) or Global South (S)</li> <li><strong>primary_ecosystem_type</strong>: type of ecosystem of the intervention (Forest/Woodland; Savanna/Dry forest; Dryland/Semi-arid; Grassland/Shrubland; Rivers/Wetlands; Coastal/Marine; Mountain; Cultivated; Other)</li> <li><strong>name_primary_intervention</strong>: name of the conservation intervention or program</li> <li><strong>year_primary_intervention</strong>: year the conservation intervention or program started (single year; many years)</li> <li><strong>target_type_ecosystem</strong>: the conservation intervention targets ecosystems or habitats (yes; no)</li> <li><strong>target_type_species</strong>: the conservation intervention targets specific species (yes; no)</li> <li><strong>target_type_ess</strong>: the conservation intervention targets ecosystem services or processes (yes; no)</li> <li><strong>target_type_humans: </strong>the conservation intervention targets humans and livelihoods (yes; no)</li> <li><strong>description_primary_target</strong>: short description of the primary conservation target</li> <li><strong>description_secondary_target: </strong>short description of any additional conservation target (if applicable)</li> <li><strong>intervention_type_paca</strong>: the conservation intervention takes places through protected areas or conserved areas (yes; no)</li> <li><strong>intervention_type_restoration</strong>: the conservation intervention takes places through restoration (yes; no)</li> <li><strong>intervention_type_species_use</strong>: the conservation intervention takes places through species protection or sustainable use measures (yes; no)</li> <li><strong>intervention_type_livelihoods_tourism</strong>: the conservation intervention takes places through livelihoods support or tourism (yes; no)</li> <li><strong>intervention_type_incentives</strong>: the conservation intervention takes places through incentives, compensation schemes, or market instruments (yes; no)</li> <li><strong>intervention_type_education</strong>: the conservation intervention takes places through education or capacity building (yes; no)</li> <li><strong>intervention_type_stewardship</strong>: the conservation intervention takes places through local/indigenous stewardship (yes; no)</li> <li><strong>description_primary_type</strong>: short description of the primary conservation type</li> <li><strong>description_secondary_type: </strong>short description of any additional conservation types (if applicable)</li> <li><strong>study_covers_governance: </strong>the paper describes governance processes (yes; no)</li> <li><strong>iplc_involved: </strong>indigenous people and/or local communities are involved in the conservation intervention (no; yes, partially; yes, locally-led)</li> <li><strong>description_governance</strong>: short description of the governance process and main actors involved</li> <li><strong>additional_notes: </strong>notes and/or remarks about conservation intervention/governance</li> <li><strong>ecological_outcomes_incl:</strong> study describes ecological outcomes or conservation effectiveness (yes; no)</li> <li><strong>ecological_outcomes: </strong>the reported ecological outcomes are positive, negative, or mixed (positive; negative; mixed; N/A)</li> <li><strong>social_outcomes_incl</strong>: study describes social impacts or outcomes associated with conservation (yes; no)</li> <li><strong>social_outcomes:</strong> the reported social outcomes are positive, negative, or mixed (positive; negative; mixed; N/A)</li> </ul>
Psychotherapy to Patients With Primary Breast Cancer - Psycho-social and Survival Outcome From a Randomised Trial
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01108224. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.
CRacking the HEterogeneity of Social Outcome Through Neuropsychophysiological Profiles
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06869616. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.
How Do Structural Social Determinants of Health Affect AKT-MP and Outcomes
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05597982. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 0. Publications: 0.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.