Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 11 in There and back again: More on the taxonomy of the crab spiders genus Epicadus (Thomisidae: Stephanopinae)

FIGURE 11. Epicadus tigrinus sp. nov., male (MCTP 39867). A, B habitus (A dorsal, B frontal); C, D left palp (C frontal, D retrolateral). Scale bars: 1 mm (A), 0.5 mm (B), 0.2 mm (C, D).

FIGURE 9 in There and back again: More on the taxonomy of the crab spiders genus Epicadus (Thomisidae: Stephanopinae)

FIGURE 9. Epicadus taczanowskii (RoeWer, 1951) male (MPEG 022624). A, B habitus (A dorsal, B frontal); C, D left palp (C frontal, D retrolateral). Scale bars: 1 mm (A), 0.5 mm (B), 0.1 mm (C, D).

FIGURE 13 in There and back again: More on the taxonomy of the crab spiders genus Epicadus (Thomisidae: Stephanopinae)

FIGURE 13. Epicadus trituberculatus (TaczanoWski, 1872), male (MPEG 022623). A, B habitus (A dorsal, B frontal); C, D left palp (C frontal, D retrolateral). A dorsal habitus; B front; C frontal vieW of left palp; D retrolateral vieW of left palp. Scale bars: 1 mm (A), 0.5 mm (B), 0.1 mm (C, D).

FIGURE 8 in There and back again: More on the taxonomy of the crab spiders genus Epicadus (Thomisidae: Stephanopinae)

FIGURE 8. Epicadus taczanowskii (RoeWer, 1951), female (A MCTP 41287, B–D MNHN 2617). A, B habitus (A dorsal, B frontal); C epigynal plate (ventral); D spermathecae and copulatory ducts (dorsal). Scale bars: 2 mm (A), 1 mm (B), 0.2 mm (C, D).

FIGURE 2 in There and back again: More on the taxonomy of the crab spiders genus Epicadus (Thomisidae: Stephanopinae)

FIGURE 2. Epicadus camelinus (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1869), female (UFMG 11007). A, B habitus (A dorsal, B frontal); C epigynal plate (ventral); D spermathecae and copulatory ducts (dorsal). Scale bars: 2 mm (A, B), 0.2 mm (C, D).

FIGURE 15 in There and back again: More on the taxonomy of the crab spiders genus Epicadus (Thomisidae: Stephanopinae)

FIGURE 15. Female specimens in vivo. A–C Epicadus caudatus (Mello-Leitão, 1929) A nuptial guard, B egg-sac guarding behavior, C diagnostic orange blister-shaped setae sockets); D E. granulatus Banks 1909; E Epicadus pustulosus (Mello- Leitão, 1929), diagnostic yelloW blister-shaped setae sockets. Photo credits: Alfredo Colón Archilla (A, B, C); Morley Read (D); Paul Bertner (E).

FIGURE 5. Epicadus granulatus Banks, 1909 in There and back again: More on the taxonomy of the crab spiders genus Epicadus (Thomisidae: Stephanopinae)

FIGURE 5. Epicadus granulatus Banks, 1909, female (MNHN 3403). A, B habitus (A dorsal, B frontal); C epigynal plate (ventral); D spermathecae and copulatory ducts (dorsal). Scale bars: 2 mm (A), 1 mm (B), 0.1 mm (C, D).

FIGURE 1 in There and back again: More on the taxonomy of the crab spiders genus Epicadus (Thomisidae: Stephanopinae)

FIGURE 1. Epicadus heterogaster (Guérin-Méneville, 1829). A dorsal gutter of left tibia I (adapted from Silva-Moreira & Machado 2016: fig. 15B) (AMNH 41); B detail of the sensorial pit on tibia I (AMNH); C ventral vieW of the epigynal plate With arroWs indicating the median septum (MSept) and copulatory openings (CO) (adapted from Silva-Moreira & Machado 2016: fig. 15B); D dorsal vieW of female genitalia With detail of the primary (S1) and secondary spermathecae (S2) (adapted from Silva-Moreira & Machado 2016: fig. 15A) (AMNH 41); E retrolateral vieW of the male left palp With arroWs indicating the RTA and DTA (adapted from Silva-Moreira & Machado 2016: fig. 15C) (MCTP 1772); Scale bars: 1 mm (A), 0.05 mm (B), 0.2 mm (D), 0.5 mm (C, E);F female front With arroW indicating the medial spire (MS) on the thoracic area (Photo credit: Almir Cândido de Almeida).

FIGURE 4 in There and back again: More on the taxonomy of the crab spiders genus Epicadus (Thomisidae: Stephanopinae)

FIGURE 4. Epicadus dimidiaster sp. nov., male (MPEG 30603). A, B habitus (A dorsal, B frontal); C, D left palp (C frontal vieW With arroW indicating the tegular furroW (TF), D retrolateral vieW). Scale bars: 1 mm (A), 0.5 mm (B), 0.1 mm (C, D).

Fig. 18 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 18 Characters relative to the female and male genitalia of specimens sampled in the present analysis: a Isala spiralis comb. nov., dorsal view of the epigynal plate. b Stephanopis armata, dorsal view of the epigynal plate. c Paratobias championi sp. rev., ventral view of the epigynal plate. d Coenypha nodosa comb. nov., ventral view of the epigynal plate. e Stephanopis lata, ventral view of the epigynal plate. f Borboropactus cinerascens, ventral view of the epigynal plate (arrows indicate the epigynal teeth). g Stephanopis flagellata, left palp. h Sidymella bicuspidata, left palp

Fig. 21 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 21 Characters relative to the male genitalia of specimens sampled in the present analysis: a Stephanopis barbipes, left palp. b Isala cambridgei comb. nov., left palp. c Onocolus intermedius, left palp. d Sidymella longispina, left palp. e Paratobias sp. 1, left palp. f Tmarus polyandrus, left palp. g Stephanopis altifrons, left palp (lower arrows indicate the pair of ventral filamentous setae on tibiae). h Stephanopis bicornis, retrolateral view of left palp (detail of the cymbial setae brush)

Fig. 8 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 8 Characters relative to dorsal habitus and prosoma of specimens sampled in the present analysis: a Stephanopis lata, frontal view. b Sidymella excavata, frontal view. c Stephanopis pentacanha, carapace. d Epicadinus trispinosus, carapace. e Tmarus polyandrus, carapace. f Isala arenata comb. nov., dorsal habitus. g Epicadus granulatus, sternum. h Borboropactus nyerere, sternum

Fig. 6 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 6 Character transformations, detailed topology of the relationships between "ditissima clade" (blue) and Sidymella (stricto sensu); emergence of the "pentacantha clade" (purple) as part of the "Epicadus group"

Fig. 13 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 13 Characters relative to carapace and legs of specimens sampled in the present analysis: a Stephanopis pentacantha, prosoma (detail of the procurve posterior eye row). b Paratobias championi sp. rev. (detail of the recurve posterior eye row). c Stephanopis fissifrons, prosoma (detail of the straight posterior eye row). d Stephanopis barbipes, prosoma (arrows indicate MOQ macrosetae). e Borporopactus cinerascens, prosoma (canoeshaped tapetum). f Tmarus elongatus, tibiae I (trichobothria linearly distributed). g Stephanopis pentacantha, tibiae I (clustered trichobothria). h Coenypha edwardsi, leg I (arrows indicate mesial and ectal apophysis on femur)

Fig. 5 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 5 Character transformations and detail of the dichotomy between the Isala and Paratobias gen. rev. based on the topology of the most congruent tree (K = 17.89). Filled squares represent synapomorphies

Fig. 2 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 2 Hypothetical reconstruction of the relationships of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on the strict consensus of the most congruent tree (K = 17.89) obtained after implied weighted analysis. Nodal stability is represented by the "Navajo rugs" along the branches (analysis recovering

Fig. 4 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 4 Character transformations in Stephanopis (stricto sensu) based on the topology of the most congruent tree (K = 17.89). Filled squares represent synapomorphies and those in white are homoplastic

Fig. 3 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 3 Clade supports obtained by relative Bremer index (above the branches) and symmetric resampling analysis (below the branches). A colour scheme is applied to represent the geographical distribution of the clades represented on the working phylogenetic hypothesis

Fig. 1 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 1 Topologic comparison between consensuses trees obtained under equal weighting parsimony (EW) and Bayesian inference (BI)

Fig. 20 in Phylogenetic relationships in Stephanopinae: systematics of Stephanopis and Sidymella based on morphological characters (Araneae: Thomisidae)

Fig. 20 Characters relative to the male genitalia of specimens sampled in the present analysis: a Stephanopis fissifrons, grooved RTA. b Sidymella lucida, nodose RTA. c Isala palliolata comb. nov., smooth RTA. d Epicadus taczanowskii, canoe-shaped RTAbvr. e Sidymella hirsuta, spoon-shaped RTAvbr. f Coenypha ditissima comb. nov., left palp. g Sidymella furcillata, left palp. h Isala spiralis comb. nov., left palp