Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
187
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
187 results for “Western Turkey”
Figs 24-31 in A revision of Geostiba of the Western Palaearctic region. XIX. New species from Turkey and Iran and additional records, with an updated key and a catalogue of the species of the Eastern Mediterranean, the Caucasus, and adjacent regions (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Aleocharinae)
Figs 24-31: Geostiba erecta nov.sp. (24-26, 28-30: holotype): (24) male habitus; (25-26) male forebody in dorsal and in ventral view; (27) female forebody; (28) male abdomen; (29) male tergites VI-VIII in lateral view; (30) median lobe of aedeagus in lateral view; (31) spermatheca. Scale bars: 24: 1.0 mm; 25-29: 0.5 mm; 30-31: 0.1 mm.
Figs 9-14 in A revision of Geostiba of the Western Palaearctic region. XIX. New species from Turkey and Iran and additional records, with an updated key and a catalogue of the species of the Eastern Mediterranean, the Caucasus, and adjacent regions (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Aleocharinae)
Figs 9-14: Geostiba heliophila nov.sp. (9, 11-13: holotype): (9) male forebody; (10) female forebody; (11) male abdomen; (12) male tergites VI-VIII in lateral view; (13) median lobe of aedeagus in lateral view; (14) spermatheca. Scale bars: 9-11: 0.5 mm; 12: 0.2 mm; 13-14: 0.1 mm.
Figs 1-7 in A revision of Geostiba of the Western Palaearctic region. XIX. New species from Turkey and Iran and additional records, with an updated key and a catalogue of the species of the Eastern Mediterranean, the Caucasus, and adjacent regions (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Aleocharinae)
Figs 1-7: Geostiba gecmisica nov.sp. (1-2, 4-7: holotype): (1) male habitus; (2) male forebody; (3) female forebody; (4) head in lateral view; (5) male tergites VI-VIII in lateral view; (6) median lobe of aedeagus in lateral view; (7) spermatheca. Scale bars: 1: 1.0 mm; 2-3: 0.5 mm; 4-5: 0.2 mm; 6-7: 0.1 mm.
Text-fig. 1. Sampling areas in Çankırı province: the village of Sakarcaören near to the town of Orta (green circle) in the east of GVP, and the other sites (yellow circles), volcanic centers (red circles) and the border of GVP. The sites marked as yellow circles: ELM, Elmali village; SOG, Soguksu National Park; BUG, Bugralar village; INO, Inozu Valley South Side; INL, Inozu Valley North Side; KAR, Karasar village; MEN, Menceler Plateau; KIR, Kiraluc Site near Nuhhoca village; AGU, Asagiguney village; KUZ, Kuzca village (Bayam et al. 2018); PEL, Pelitcik village (Akkemik et al. 2009); GUD, Gudul (Akkemik et al. 2017); HOC, Hoçaş village and KOZ, Kozyaka village (Akkemik et al. 2016). The sites located in the western part (INO, INL, KAR, MEN, KIR, AGU, KUZ, HOC and KUZ) are from early – middle Burdigalian and Hancili Formation (Altun et al. 2002, Akbaş et al. 2002). The sites in the central part (GUD, BUG, ELM, PEL and SOG) are from middle – late Burdigalian, Pazar Formation (Kazancı 2012, Sen et al. 2017), and finally the fossil site in the east part of GVP is the late Miocene, Hüyükköy Formation (Sengüler 2007). in The First Glyptostroboxylon And Taxodioxylon Descriptions From The Late Miocene Of Turkey And Palaeoclimatological Evaluation
Text-fig. 1. Sampling areas in Çankırı province: the village of Sakarcaören near to the town of Orta (green circle) in the east of GVP, and the other sites (yellow circles), volcanic centers (red circles) and the border of GVP. The sites marked as yellow circles: ELM, Elmali village; SOG, Soguksu National Park; BUG, Bugralar village; INO, Inozu Valley South Side; INL, Inozu Valley North Side; KAR, Karasar village; MEN, Menceler Plateau; KIR, Kiraluc Site near Nuhhoca village; AGU, Asagiguney village; KUZ, Kuzca village (Bayam et al. 2018); PEL, Pelitcik village (Akkemik et al. 2009); GUD, Gudul (Akkemik et al. 2017); HOC, Hoçaş village and KOZ, Kozyaka village (Akkemik et al. 2016). The sites located in the western part (INO, INL, KAR, MEN, KIR, AGU, KUZ, HOC and KUZ) are from early – middle Burdigalian and Hancili Formation (Altun et al. 2002, Akbaş et al. 2002). The sites in the central part (GUD, BUG, ELM, PEL and SOG) are from middle – late Burdigalian, Pazar Formation (Kazancı 2012, Sen et al. 2017), and finally the fossil site in the east part of GVP is the late Miocene, Hüyükköy Formation (Sengüler 2007).
Figs 1-7 in A revision of Western Palaearctic Medon. VI. A new species from Turkey and additional records (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Paederinae)
Figs 1-7: Medon meybohmi nov.sp.: (1) habitus; (2) head and pronotum; (3) male sternite VII; (4) male sternite VIII; (5-6) aedeagus in lateral and in ventral view; (7) apical part of aedeagus in ventral view. Scale bars: 1: 1.0 mm; 2-4: 0.5 mm; 5-7: 0.2 mm.
Figs 1-8 in On the genus Sunius Stephens, 1829 of Turkey. V. A new micropterous species from central southern Anatolia, with additional records from the western Mediterranean region (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Paederinae)
Figs 1-8. Details of Sunius tauricus sp. n. (1) Habitus. (2) Forebody. (3) Male abdominal sternite VII. (4) Male abdominal sternite VIII. (5-6) Aedeagus, lateral view. (7-8) Aedeagus, ventral view. Scale bars: 0.5 mm (1-2); 0.1 mm (3-8).
Fig. 8 in A revision of Geostiba of the Western Palaearctic region. XX. Four new species from Turkey and Albania, and additional
Fig. 8: Type locality of G. devia nov.sp.
Figure 2. A female E. s in New locality records of Eumeces schneideri (Daudin, 1802) (Sauria: Scincidae) from western Anatolia, Turkey
Figure 2. A female E. s. barani from Savcılı village, Buharkent, Aydın.
Figure 1 in First record of adult Nematomorpha Gordius sp. from western Anatolia (Turkey)
Figure 1. Squalius fellowesii and Gordius sp. from Topçam Dam Lake.
Figure 1 in Epigean amphipod fauna of Gönen Stream (western Anatolia, Turkey), with the description of Gammarus gonensis sp. nov.
Figure 1. Geographical position of Gönen Stream and the sampling localities.
Figure 2 in Epigean amphipod fauna of Gönen Stream (western Anatolia, Turkey), with the description of Gammarus gonensis sp. nov.
Figure 2. Habitus of Gammarus gonensis sp. nov. Holotype male.
Figure. Camera traps points (l) in study area. in Camera trapping of medium and large-sized mammals in western Black Sea deciduous forests in Turkey
Figure. Camera traps points (l) in study area.
FIGURE 2 in A new genus and species of Muridae (Rodentia) from the Quaternary deposits of the Denizli Basin, South-western Turkey
FIGURE 2. Dental terminology of murid upper and lower molars (after Lazzari et. al., 2010).
Wild Plants Used as Vegetables by Transhumant People Around the Georgia–Turkey Border in the Western Lesser Caucasus
<p> Recent ethnobotanical studies in the Caucasus, mainly in Georgia, reveal the</p> <p>significant ethnobotanical knowledge of local people related to wild edible plants.</p> <p>However, few studies have been conducted in the Lesser Caucasus, West Georgia,</p> <p>and the Turkish Caucasus. is study aims to represent and evaluate the cultural</p> <p>importance of wild vegetable plants and their patterns of use along the</p> <p>Georgia–Turkey border. During the transhumance period in the summers of 2017</p> <p>and 2018, 104 participants (65 in Turkey and 39 in Georgia) were interviewed</p> <p>using a semistructured questionnaire. e Cultural Importance Index and</p> <p>Relative Frequency of Citation were used to compare the relative importance of</p> <p>species in each region. e use of 83 wild plant species from 23 plant families as</p> <p>vegetables was documented, with 45 species recorded in Georgia and 72 species in</p> <p>Turkey. One-third of the recorded wild plant species and 52 use instances out of</p> <p>122 species-use combinations were shared on both sides of the border. Women</p> <p>and men had mentioned almost the same number of species, and there was a</p> <p>nonsignificant correlation between plant knowledge and age. Although there</p> <p>were no significant differences in the plant parts used, the way people used plants</p> <p>as vegetables varied significantly across the border. Considering the floral</p> <p>similarity across the border, the number of species used in common and shared</p> <p>vegetable plant knowledge was quite low. ere is not a significant difference</p> <p>between the two countries in terms of the most frequently cited and culturally</p> <p>important species (Rumex, Urtica, and Polygonum spp.). However, the</p> <p>recognition of some of the most important shared species (Heracleum,</p> <p>Chaerophyllum, Arctium, and Campanula spp.) diverged significantly in different</p> <p>administrative regions.</p>
Fig. 23 in A revision of Geostiba of the Western Palaearctic region. XIX. New species from Turkey and Iran and additional records, with an updated key and a catalogue of the species of the Eastern Mediterranean, the Caucasus, and adjacent regions (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Aleocharinae)
Fig. 23: Type locality of G. hasanica nov.sp. (photo: P. Wunderle).
Fig. 15 in A revision of Geostiba of the Western Palaearctic region. XIX. New species from Turkey and Iran and additional records, with an updated key and a catalogue of the species of the Eastern Mediterranean, the Caucasus, and adjacent regions (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Aleocharinae)
Fig. 15: Type locality of G. heliophila nov.sp. (photo: P. Wunderle).
Fig. 8 in A revision of Geostiba of the Western Palaearctic region. XIX. New species from Turkey and Iran and additional records, with an updated key and a catalogue of the species of the Eastern Mediterranean, the Caucasus, and adjacent regions (Coleoptera: Staphylinidae: Aleocharinae)
Fig. 8: Type locality of G. gecmisica nov.sp. (photo: P. Wunderle).
Fig. 1 in Notes on the seasonal dynamics of the coprophagous Hydrophilidae (Coleoptera) in western Turkey, with first record of Megasternum concinnum for Turkish fauna
Fig. 1: Map of the study area, western Turkey.
FIGURES 10–11. Male genitalia, dorsal view. 10 in Two new species of Sciophila Meigen (Diptera: Mycetophilidae) from Turkey, with a key to the Western Palaearctic species of the S. lutea Macquart group
FIGURES 10–11. Male genitalia, dorsal view. 10. Sciophila muglolutea sp. n. 11. S. turkolutea sp. n.
FIGURES 1–8 in Two new species of Sciophila Meigen (Diptera: Mycetophilidae) from Turkey, with a key to the Western Palaearctic species of the S. lutea Macquart group
FIGURES 1–8. Dorsal lobe of gonocoxite and gonocoxal apodeme: dorsal view, half, tergite 9 not included. 1. Sciophila lutea. 2. S. corlutea. 3. S. iberolutea. 4. S. muglolutea sp. n. 5. S. eryngii. 6. S. pandora. 7. S. delphis. 8. S. turkolutea sp. n. Figs 2, 3, 5, and 7 are after Chandler and Blasco Zumeta (2001); Fig. 1 after Zaitzev (1982).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.