Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
119
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
119 results for “arguments”
Fig. 4 in Aragonitic rostra of the Turonian belemnitid Goniocamax: Arguments from diagenesis
Fig. 4. Minor element contents (in ppm) in Recent shells. A. Average compositions of inner prismatic and outer prismatic aragonite layers in Sepia and Spirula. B. Average compositions of inner prismatic, nacreous and outer prismatic aragonite layers in Nautilus macromphalus. C. Average compositions of crossed lamellar aragonite layer in gastropods; in the nacreous aragonite layer in Pinna nobilis, and foliated calcite layer in Pecten.
Fig. 5 in Aragonitic rostra of the Turonian belemnitid Goniocamax: Arguments from diagenesis
Fig. 5. Box and whisker plots based on the chemical compositions of the shells. A. Explanation of the box and whisker plot. B. Box and whisker plot for Ca in Recent and fossil shells, and sedimentary calcite.
Fig. 9 in Aragonitic rostra of the Turonian belemnitid Goniocamax: Arguments from diagenesis
Fig. 9. Principal component plots based on the chemical compositions of the Recent and fossil shells. A. Samples are grouped according to their age, with Recent shells having relatively high Ca and Na contents, and low Fe, P, and Sr contents. B. Samples are grouped according to their mineralogy in terms of calcite and aragonite. Calcite samples have relatively high Mg, S, and Ca contents, and aragonite samples have higher Sr contents.
Fig. 10. 3D in Aragonitic rostra of the Turonian belemnitid Goniocamax: Arguments from diagenesis
Fig. 10. 3D principal component plots based on the chemical compositions of the Recent and fossil shells. Axis 1 has high negative loadings corresponding to P, Fe, and Sr, with a positive Na loading. Axis 2 has high negative loadings corresponding to S, Ca, and Fe, and a positive Sr loading. Axis 3 has a high negative loading corresponding to Mg and a positive Sr loading. Recent and fossil calcites are separated according to axis 3, whereas Recent and fossil aragonites are separated according to axis 1.
Fig. 2 in Aragonitic rostra of the Turonian belemnitid Goniocamax: Arguments from diagenesis
Fig. 2. Secondary electron images illustrating the microstructures of Recent shells. A. Dorsal shield of Sepia sp. (from New Caledonia), showing the thin inner prismatic layer, the nacreous layer and the thick multi−layered outer spherulitic prismatic layer. B. Outer wall of Spirula sp. (from New Caledonia), showing two prismatic layers and a mainly organic thin nacreous layer (arrow). C. Nautilus macromphalus (from New Caledonia). D. Nacreous layer of the pelecypod Pinna nobilis (from the Mediterranean Sea, Port Cros Island). E. Foliated calcite layer of Pecten maximus (from Brittany, France). F. Crossed lamellar aragonite layer of the gastropod Murex sp. (of unknown origin). Abbreviations: ip, inner prismatic layer; nac, nacreous layer; op, outer prismatic layer. All specimens from the UPS collection of Recent molluscs, not numbered.
Fig. 3 in Aragonitic rostra of the Turonian belemnitid Goniocamax: Arguments from diagenesis
Fig. 3. Secondary electron images illustrating the microstructures in Goniocamax sp. (A–D) and fossil molluscs (E–G); all samples from the Turonian of N Siberia. A. UPS−2435, adjacent calcitic and aragonitic zones; the growth lines are not clearly visible in the calcitic zones. B. UPS−2460, non−compact, thin calcite prisms. C. UPS−2459, aragonitic sectors with preserved growth lines. D. UPS−2460, growth lines in the well−preserved aragonite. E. UPS−2448, aragonite nacreous of an ammonite shell. F. UPS−2591, crossed lamellar layer of a fossil gastropod. G. UPS−2587, nacreous layer of an inoceramid shell.
Fig. 1 in Aragonitic rostra of the Turonian belemnitid Goniocamax: Arguments from diagenesis
Fig. 1. Two SEM images illustrating different aspects of Goniocamax sp. from the Turonian of Northern Siberia, Piasina River, Western Taymyr Peninsula. A. UPS−1483, polished and etched longitudinal section of a rostrum showing the aragonitic region (a, white) and the calcitic region (c, black). B. UPS−2451, longitudinal fracture showing a part of the phragmocone (p) with some septa visible, and rostrum (r).
FIG. 1 in A Revised Classification of the Phylinae (Insecta: Heteroptera: Miridae): Arguments for the Placement of Genera
FIG. 1. Cladogram of relationships of Phylinae from Menard et al. (2013), which forms the framework for the
[Dataset] Is it a match? Motivations on citizen science volunteers and recruitment arguments in project descriptions
<p>This dataset contains the necessary details to reproduce the experiments of the paper:</p> <p><em>Kai Nils, W., Gutiérrez Páez,N.F., Sabel, O. and Hämäläinen, R. (2022) “Is It a Match? Motivations on Citizen Science Volunteers and Recruitment Arguments in Project Descriptions.” In Proceedings of the ECSA2022 conference: Citizen Science for Planetary Health, 69–70. <a href="https://2022.ecsa-conference.eu/files/ecsa/Bilder/ECSA2022_Conference_Proceedings.pdf">https://2022.ecsa-conference.eu/files/ecsa/Bilder/ECSA2022_Conference_Proceedings.pdf</a></em></p> <p>Data has been collected by quantitative triangulation. 1076 participants in citizen science projects answered a survey about the 12 motivational factors for participating. They had access to the survey by social media posts or email invitations sent to people in charge of projects. Data regarding motivational arguments in recruitment come from quantitative content analysis of 367 project descriptions of the website Zooniverse. The content analysis of the project descriptions was done manually by two coders independently. Then, both coders analysed their codings and reached consensus.</p>
Figs 7–10 in Monophyly of the Myriapoda? Reliability of current arguments
Figs 7–10. Polyxenus lagurus, series of semithin transverse sections through the head, showing components of the tentorial complex from anterior to posterior as indicated in Fig. 2. 7. Head cut in front of oral opening, showing left frontal process (fp) and right transverse bar (tb) in connection with epipharyngeal bar (eb) next to pharynx (ph). 8. Same, a little farther back, showing parts of curved epipharyngeal bar (eb). 9. Same, farther back, showing mandibular base (mb) and gnathal lobe (mg) within the preoral chamber and the origin of mandibular muscles from the posterior process (pp). 10. Same, a little farther back, showing articulation of mandibular gnathal lobe (mg) with hypopharyngeal bar (hb).
Figs 3–6 in Monophyly of the Myriapoda? Reliability of current arguments
Figs 3–6. Pauropus sp., series of ultrathin transverse sections through the head, showing components of the tentorial complex from anterior to posterior as indicated in Fig. 1. 3. Preoral chamber cut at level of mandibular gnathal lobe (mg), showing epipharnygeal bar (eb) and frontal process (fp). Arrow indicates insertion of muscle fibres. 4. Same, a little farther back, showing transverse bar (tb) as a side branch of the epipharyngeal bar (eb). Arrows indicate muscle attachments. 5. Same, farther back, showing the base of the right posterior process and its connection to epi- (eb) and hypopharnygeal bar (hb) as well as pharynx (ph) and infrabuccal chamber (if). 6. Cephalic cavity, showing posterior processes (pp) below the gut. Arrow indicates the cavity of the left posterior process.
Figs 11–15 in Monophyly of the Myriapoda? Reliability of current arguments
Figs 11–15. Frontal view of tentorial complex in 11. Lithobius (Chilopoda) as illustrated by Snodgrass (1950, modified) and corresponding components, drawn on the same illustration for direct comparison, in 12. Symphyla, 13. Tetramerocerata (Pauropoda), 14. Pselaphognatha (Diplopoda) as well as 15. Geophilomorpha (Chilopoda).Abbreviations (in brackets: Snodgrass's terminology): eb epipharyngeal bar, epa epipharyngeal arm, flt fultura, hap head apodeme, hb hypopharyngeal bar, hpa hypopharyngeal arm, pp posterior process, tb transverse bar.
Figs 1–2 in Monophyly of the Myriapoda? Reliability of current arguments
Figs 1–2. Schematic illustration of the cephalic tentorium in (1) Pauropus sp. (ventral view) and (2) Polyxenus lagurus (dorsal view). Numbered broken lines refer to oblique transverse sections. Abbreviations: eb epipharyngeal bar, fp frontal process, hb hypopharyngeal bar, pp posterior process, tb transverse bar.
VivesDebate-Speech: A Corpus of Spoken Argumentation to Leverage Audio Features for Argument Mining
<p>The <em>VivesDebate-Speech</em> corpus contains the acoustic information of 29 different argumentative debates and the annotations of the segmentation (i.e., BIO tags) of the Argumentative Discourse Units identified in the spoken natural language discourse. </p>
The Relationship Between Different Python Argument-Passing Mechanisms and Fixes: An Empirical Study
<p>Replication package for the paper: The Relationship Between Different Python Argument-Passing Mechanisms and Fixes -- An Empirical Study</p>
NLAS-multi: A Multilingual Corpus of Automatically Generated Natural Language Argumentation Schemes
<p>The multilingual corpus of natural language argumentation schemes (NLAS-multi) consists of 3,810 natural language argumentation schemes of which 1,893 are in English and 1,917 in Spanish. It has a total of 253,516 words distributed in 118,493 words in English and 135,023 words in Spanish. In terms of inferences, our corpus has a total of 7,964 (3,949 in English and 4,015 in Spanish). Furthermore, the NLAS-multi corpus contains a total of 23,781 conflict relations between arguments in the same topic.</p>
Webis-Argument-Framing-19
<p>The dataset comprises 12,326 arguments that are labeled cover 465 topics and 1623 frames. The following fields are stored for each argument</p> <p>conclusion, premise, frame, topic, stance, argument_id, topic_id, frame_id</p> <p>For more information please refer to our paper "Modeling Frames in Argumentation".</p> <p> </p>
Replication package for the paper :The Relationship Between Different Python Argument-Passing Mechanisms and Fixes: An Empirical Study
<p><strong>Abstract:</strong></p> <p>Modern programming languages, such as Python, have introduced a variety of constructs and syntactical elements to make software development more efficient and concise. Examples include lambda functions, comprehension collections, or mechanisms to facilitate the passing of arguments to a function. While many of such constructs may, in principle, be beneficial for developers, recent studies have shown that certain programming constructs may affect program understanding and even induce more fixes than other changes. <br>This paper studies the effect of different Python argument-passing mechanisms to investigate their relationship with code proneness to be fixed. Specifically, we study the fix-proneness for what concerns function definitions and invocations. This is done by analyzing the evolutionary history of 200 Python projects, for a total of about 3M functions and 12M call sites. While there are varying effects for what concerns parameter declaration mechanisms, we found evidence that keyword-based argument passing is less defect-prone than positional argument passing, and this is not affected by size-related confounding factors.</p>
Drought assessment has been outpaced by climate change: Empirical arguments for a paradigm shift
<p>Derived datasets produced in the analysis of "<strong>Drought assessment has been outpaced by climate change: Empirical arguments for a paradigm shift</strong>". </p>
Fig. 11. Sintula spiniger, A–C male left palp, A in Spiders (Araneae) Of Subotica Sandland (Serbia): Additional Arguments In Environmental Protection
Fig. 11. Sintula spiniger, A–C male left palp, A = prolateral, B = retrolateral, C = paracym-
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.