Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
226
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
226 results for “confidence”
Raw Data for the article: COVID-19 safety measures at the Radiology Unit of a Transplant Institute: the non-COVID-19 patient's confidence with safety procedures
<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To support the wellbeing of both patients and their families, our aim was to investigate the satisfaction of non-COVID in- and out-patients regarding safety measures implemented at our radiology unit of a transplant institute against COVID infection.</p> <p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Over a five-month period, adult patients' feedback was obtained by a questionnaire on the fear of contracting COVID-19 during a radiology examination, the perceived delay in treatment, and the following safety measures implemented: modified schedules to limit the number of patients in the waiting area and to maximize social distancing; assistance by staff when visitors were not admitted; cleaning and disinfection of machines; mask wearing and hand hygiene of staff; and staff advice on hand hygiene and infection control precautions.</p> <p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a five-month period, our preliminary results (387 patients) showed general patient satisfaction (99.1%) with safety measures applied at our radiology unit. Patients were satisfied with distancing and assistance by staff (100%), cleaning and disinfection (91%), mask wearing and hand hygiene of the staff (97%), and staff advice (94%). There was some criticism of the perceived delay in treatment (7.3%) and in the scheduling of the waiting list (5.4%), with 5.4% fearing contracting the virus. Patients' awareness of safety measures and confidence in the hospital preparedness policy was perceived by all interviewers, and 100% appreciated being questioned.</p> <p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The feedback given by the non-COVID patient helps to measure the quality in health care, to improve the quality service, and to protect and satisfy more vulnerable patients, also during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p>
Dataset from 'Klever, L., Beyvers, M., Fiehler, K., Mamassian, P., & Billino, J. (2023). Cross-modal metacognition: Visual and tactile confidence share a common scale. Journal of Vision, 23(5): 3, 1-16. doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.5.1
<p>We provide two files:<br> - "data.txt": data file containing the data of our final sample (N=54) on which analyses are based<br> - "column_description.txt": description file providing information on the content of each column in the data file</p> <p>___________________________________________<br> For further questions, please contact:<br> jutta.billino[at]psychol.uni-giessen.de</p>
Supplementarty Data: Retention time and fragmentation predictors increase confidence in identification of common variant peptides
<p>Supplementary data related to the paper "Retention time and fragmentation predictors increase confidence in identification of common variant peptides"</p> <p>The database directory contains the FASTA files of the four protein sequence databases used in the analysis of the paper.</p> <p>The data directory contains exports with lists of all peptide-to-spectrum matches obtained from the analysis.</p> <p>More information and scripts to reproduce the post-processing steps are available at: https://github.com/ProGenNo/VariantPeptideIdentification</p>
Species occurrence test set for "Using ChatGPT with Confidence for Biodiversity-Related Information Tasks" (hash://sha256/fd1c8a5304508981a02481a31dc88ad429356a26dff6f89d24fe47fc60a275a4)
Species occurrence test set described in "Using ChatGPT with Confidence for Biodiversity-Related Information Tasks", presented at TDWG 2023 in SYM05
CONFIDENT: Supporting Long-term Care Workers During COVID-19
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05168800. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 2.
Strategies to Reduce Injuries and Develop Confidence in Elders
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT02475850. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 10.
Assessing Patient Satisfaction and Confidence After Use of Educational Video to Augment Surgical Consent for Thyroid Surgery
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06918223. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 16.
CONFIDENCE Registry to Assess Safety and Performance of Portico System to Treat Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis.
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03752866. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 9. Publications: 1.
CONFIDENCE Financial Education for Caregivers
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05292248. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 4.
Skills Learning and Self-confidence in Learning in High-fidelity Simulation
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05111327. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 3.
Calling structural variants with confidence from short-read data in wild bird populations
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Bioinformatic pipeline from: Increasing confidence for discerning species and population compositions from metabarcoding assays of environmental samples: case studies of fishes in the Laurentian Great Lakes and Wabash River
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Assessing confidence in root placement on phylogenies: an empirical study using non-reversible models for Mammals
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
Lee and Daunizeau choice data from: Trading mental effort for confidence in the metacognitive control of value-based decision-making
<p>Why do we carefully ponder some decisions, but not others? In this work, we derive a computational model of the metacognitive control of decisions or MCD. In brief, we assume that fast and automatic processes first provide an initial (and largely uncertain) representation of options' values, yielding prior estimates of decision difficulty. This uncertain value representation is then refined by deploying cognitive (e.g., attentional, mnesic) resources, the allocation of which is controlled by an effort-confidence tradeoff. Importantly, the anticipated benefit of allocating resources varies in a decision-by-decision manner according to the prior estimate of decision difficulty. The ensuing MCD model predicts choices, response time, subjective feeling of effort, choice confidence, and choice-induced preference change. We test these predictions in a systematic manner, using a dedicated behavioral paradigm. Our results provide a quantitative link between mental effort, choice confidence, and preference reversals, which could inform interpretations of related neuroimaging findings.</p>
Data from: Out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation experience, confidence, and confidence-associated factors among Northern Japanese emergency life-saving technicians: a population-based cross-sectional study
Objective: Clinical procedural experience and confidence are both important when performing complex medical procedures. Because out-of-hospital endotracheal intubation (ETI) is a complex intervention, we sought to clarify clinical ETI experience among prehospital rescuers as well as their confidence in performing ETI and confidence-associated factors. Design: Population-based cross-sectional study conducted from January to September 2017. Setting: Northern Japan, including eight prefectures. Participants: Emergency life-saving technicians (ELSTs) authorized to perform ETI. Outcome measures: Annual ETI exposure and confidence in performing ETI, according to a 5-point Likert scale. To determine factors associated with ETI confidence, differences between confident ELSTs (those scoring 4 or 5 on the Likert scale) and non-confident ELSTs were evaluated. Results: Questionnaires were sent to 149 fire departments; 140 agreed to participate. Among the 2821 ELSTs working at responding fire departments, 2620 returned the questionnaire (response rate, 92.9%); complete data sets were available for 2567 ELSTs (complete response rate, 91.0%). Of those 2567 respondents, 95.7% performed two or fewer ETI annually; 46.6% reported lack of confidence in performing ETI. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that years of clinical experience (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05–1.13), annual ETI exposure (AOR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.59–2.03), and the availability of ETI skill retention programs including regular simulation training (AOR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.02–1.68) and operating room training (AOR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.14–1.83) were independently associated with confidence in performing ETI. Conclusions: ETI is an uncommon event for most ELSTs and nearly half of respondents did not have confidence in performing this procedure. Because confidence in ETI was independently associated with availability of regular simulation and operating room training, standardization of ETI reeducation that incorporates such methods may be useful for prehospital rescuers.
Data from: Phylogenomics uncovers confidence and conflict in the rapid radiation of Australo-Papuan rodents
The estimation of robust and accurate measures of branch support has proven challenging in the era of phylogenomics. In datasets of potentially millions of sites, bootstrap support for bifurcating relationships around very short internal branches can be inappropriately inflated. Such over-estimation of branch support may be particularly problematic in rapid radiations, where phylogenetic signal is low and incomplete lineage sorting severe. Here, we explore this issue by comparing various branch support estimates under both concatenated and coalescent frameworks, in the recent radiation Australo-Papuan murine rodents (Muridae: Hydromyini). Using nucleotide sequence data from 1245 independent loci and several phylogenomic inference methods, we unequivocally resolve the majority of genus-level relationships within Hydromyini. However, at four nodes we recover inconsistency in branch support estimates both within and among concatenated and coalescent approaches. In most cases, concatenated likelihood approaches using standard fast bootstrap algorithms did not detect any uncertainty at these four nodes, regardless of partitioning strategy. However, we found this could be overcome with two-stage resampling, i.e. across genes and sites within genes (using -bsam GENESITE in IQtree). In addition, low confidence at recalcitrant nodes was recovered using UFBoot2, a recent revision to the bootstrap protocol in IQtree, but this depended on partitioning strategy. Summary coalescent approaches also failed to detect uncertainty under some circumstances. For each of four recalcitrant nodes, an equivalent (or close to equivalent) number of genes were in strong support (> 75% bootstrap) of both the primary and at least one alternative topological hypothesis, suggesting notable phylogenetic conflict among loci not detected using some standard branch support metrics. Recent debate has focused on the appropriateness of concatenated versus multi-genealogical approaches to resolving species relationships, but less so on accurately estimating uncertainty in large datasets. Our results demonstrate the importance of employing multiple approaches when assessing confidence, and highlight the need for greater attention to the development of robust measures of uncertainty in the era of phylogenomics.
Data from: Behavioral and neural measures of confidence using a novel auditory pitch identification task
<p>Observers can discriminate between correct versus incorrect perceptual decisions with feelings of confidence. The centro-parietal positivity build-up rate (CPP slope) has been suggested as a likely neural signature of accumulated evidence, which may guide both perceptual performance and confidence. However, CPP slope also covaries with reaction time, which also covaries with confidence in previous studies, and performance and confidence typically covary; thus, CPP slope may index signatures of perceptual performance rather than confidence per se. Moreover, perceptual metacognition – including neural correlates – has largely been studied in vision, with few exceptions. Thus, we lack understanding of domain-general neural signatures of perceptual metacognition outside vision. Here we designed a novel auditory pitch identification task and collected behavior with simultaneous 32-channel EEG in healthy adults. Participants saw two tone labels which varied in tonal distance on each trial (e.g., C vs D, C vs F), then heard a single auditory tone; they identified which label was correct and rated confidence. We found that pitch identification confidence varied with tonal distance, but performance, metacognitive sensitivity (trial-by-trial covariation of confidence with accuracy), and reaction time did not. Interestingly, however, while CPP slope covaried with performance and reaction time, it did not significantly covary with confidence. We interpret these results to mean that CPP slope is likely a signature of first-order perceptual processing and not confidence-specific signals or computations in auditory tasks. Our novel pitch identification task offers a valuable method to examine the neural correlates of auditory and domain-general perceptual confidence.</p>
Average values of S(B) and their corresponding 90% confidence intervals
<p>The animation displays the average values of S(B) for B < 10^6 along with their corresponding 90% confidence intervals, <br>for elliptic curves with ranks 0 or 1 in the conductor range [N,N+10\sqrt(n)]. The cross indicates the location of the local maximum, <br>while circles represent predictions for the first three local maxima at 0.08N, 0.65N, and 1.7N.</p>
Dataset for: Substituting confidence for competence in health literacy: A review of studies, citations, and trial registrations
<p><span>Patient health literacy is crucial for effective patient–physician communication, and interventions targeting health literacy can use measures based on either actual performance (competence) or self-ratings (confidence). This paper analyzed the development of these measures through three studies. Study 1 reviewed articles describing the development of novel measures; Study 2 examined the citations of these studies, and Study 3 evaluated data from clinical trials registries. The literature search was conducted from April 14–27, 2023. PubMed was used as the main database in which studies on health literacy measures were searched for the systematic review (Study 1). We then used Google Scholar and the OpenCitations database to describe citation patterns of the included health literacy measures (Study 2). Finally, we evaluated confidence- or competence-based health literacy measures by extracting and analyzing trial data from ClinicalTrials.gov (Study 3). Our review included 55 health literacy measures, among which 23 (42%) were competence-based, 28 (51%) confidence-based, and 4 (7%) assessed both. Recent trends show a shift toward developing more confidence-based measures and a decline in creating new competence-based measures. Confidence-based measures were increasingly cited, whereas citations for competence-based measures have plateaued. Lastly, our findings showed a steady increase in the use of confidence-based measures in recent clinical trials and a decrease in the use of competence-based measures when controlling for sample size. This shift may be detrimental to public health given our limited knowledge about patients’ ability to meet demands of shared decision-making, especially regarding new technologies like artificial intelligence in healthcare.</span></p>
Code and datasets of Socio-environmental modelling shows physics-like confidence with water modelling surpassing it in numerical claims
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.