Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2020View details →

FIGURE 2 in A Century after! Rediscovery of the ancient catfish Diplomystes Bleeker 1858 (Siluriformes: Diplomystidae) in coastal river basins of Chile and its implications for conservation

FIGURE 2 | Individuals of Diplomystes nahuelbutaensis recorded in this study and their habitat. A. individual collected in Laraquete (Lar01); B. individual collected and released in Carampangue. C. individual collected in Laraquete (Lar02) and released; D. Habitat of D. nahuelbutaensis in the Cabrera River, Carampangue Basin.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2020View details →

FIGURE 4 in A Century after! Rediscovery of the ancient catfish Diplomystes Bleeker 1858 (Siluriformes: Diplomystidae) in coastal river basins of Chile and its implications for conservation

FIGURE 4 | Null distribution of Fst values assuming a panmictic model versus the observed Fst value (vertical line) between Coastal and Biobío samples of Diplomystes nahuelbutaensis.

Raw data for: Spatial and temporal variation in farmland bird nesting ecology: Implications for effective Corn Bunting Emberiza calandra conservation

<p>These are raw data accompanying the study "<span>Spatial and temporal variation in farmland bird nesting ecology: Implications for effective Corn Bunting Emberiza calandra conservation</span>". All information on data origin, data analysis, and derived implications will be available with the original publiation.</p>

Figure 2 in Spatial and temporal nesting pattern of Sea Turtles in Alas Purwo National Park, and its implications for conservation management practices

Figure 2. Trend of sea turtle nesting in the past 40 years at APNP: (A) L.olivacea, (B) C. mydas, (C) E. imbricata, and (D) D. coriacea.

Figure 1 in Spatial and temporal nesting pattern of Sea Turtles in Alas Purwo National Park, and its implications for conservation management practices

Figure 1. Study location in Alas Purwo National Park's Pancur-Cungur Coast with six hypothetical stations (dot: sector benchmark point).

Figure 4 in Spatial and temporal nesting pattern of Sea Turtles in Alas Purwo National Park, and its implications for conservation management practices

Figure 4. Number of four sea turtles nesting in each month during survey period: (A) L.olivacea, (B) C. mydas, (C) E. imbricata, and (D) D. coriacea.

Fig. 9 in Modelling the distribution of the Ocellated Lizard in France: implications for conservation

Fig. 9. Areas within the potential niche of the Ocellated Lizard (in orange) for which there are no observation data (in red), based on Model 6 with its presence probability threshold of 0.70 combined with presence data from observations including a buffer zone with a 5-km radius.

Fig. 5 in Modelling the distribution of the Ocellated Lizard in France: implications for conservation

Fig. 5. Change in vegetation cover from 2000 to 2016: standard deviation of the yearly NDVI values relative to the NDVI mean value for the month of July.

Fig. 3 in Modelling the distribution of the Ocellated Lizard in France: implications for conservation

Fig. 3. Localization of the total presence data for the Ocellated Lizard Timon lepidus collected in France during the period 1970 to 2016.

Fig. 8 in Modelling the distribution of the Ocellated Lizard in France: implications for conservation

Fig. 8. Location of populations that have disappeared in relation to the predicted presence map generated by Model 6 (blue dots).

Fig. 7 in Modelling the distribution of the Ocellated Lizard in France: implications for conservation

Fig. 7. The predicted distribution map generated by Model 6 (in pink) with specific locations of presence data (from observations) from the dataset (black dots).

Fig. 6 in Modelling the distribution of the Ocellated Lizard in France: implications for conservation

Fig. 6. Predictive modelling maps showing presence probability of the Ocellated Lizard (Timon lepidus) in the study area.

Figure 10 in Modelling the distribution of the Ocellated Lizard in France: implications for conservation

Figure 10: Contribution of protected nature areas to the conservation of Timon lepidus. Predicted presence within protected areas (dark purple) and predicted distribution range (light purple).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2014View details →

Fig. 3 in Migrations and Conservation Implications of Post-Nesting Green Turtles from Gielop Island, Ulithi Atoll, Federated States of Micronesia

Fig. 3: 2007 green turtle migration routes following nesting activities at Gielop Island as indicated by satellite telemetry.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2014View details →

Fig. 4 in Migrations and Conservation Implications of Post-Nesting Green Turtles from Gielop Island, Ulithi Atoll, Federated States of Micronesia

Fig. 4: Location of presumed foraging area in Ryukyu Islands, Japan for green turtles with turtle ID: 52703, 40725, and 52702.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2014View details →

Fig. 2 in Migrations and Conservation Implications of Post-Nesting Green Turtles from Gielop Island, Ulithi Atoll, Federated States of Micronesia

Fig. 2: 2005 and 2006 green turtle migration routes following nesting activities at Gielop Island as indicated by satellite telemetry.

FIGURE 4 in Spintherobolus papilliferus in the rio Ribeira de Iguape basin: implications for the biogeography and conservation of an endangered species (Ostariophysi: Characiformes)

FIGURE 4 | Maximum likelihood tree of species of Spintherobolus based on partial sequences of the COI gene (531 bp). Numbers represent voucher specimens deposited in LBP (Tab. 1). Vouchers LBP 101792 and 101793 are from rio Ribeira de Iguape drainage, municipality of Juquitiba, and voucher LBP 61600 is from rio Sertãozinho, rio Itapanhaú drainage, municipality of Bertioga, both São Paulo State, Brazil.

FIGURE 3 in Spintherobolus papilliferus in the rio Ribeira de Iguape basin: implications for the biogeography and conservation of an endangered species (Ostariophysi: Characiformes)

FIGURE 3 | A. Boxplot for dependent variables body depth (BD), predorsal distance (PD), preanal distance (PA), caudal-peduncle depth (CPD), and upper jaw length (UJL) of Spintherobolus papilliferus from the three drainages: Itapanhaú (IT), Ribeira de Iguape (RI), and upper rio Tietê (UT). B. Scatter plot of LDA features for distinct drainages Itapanhaú (IT – red dots), Ribeira de Iguape (RI – green dots), and upper rio Tietê (UT – blue dots).

FIGURE 5 in Spintherobolus papilliferus in the rio Ribeira de Iguape basin: implications for the biogeography and conservation of an endangered species (Ostariophysi: Characiformes)

FIGURE 5 | Map of southeastern South America showing a detail of the map of São Paulo State (dark grey in small map) and the three drainages discussed in this study: upper rio Tietê (yellow), rio Itapanhaú (pink) and rio Ribeira de Iguape (green). Localities 1–4 belong to the upper rio Tietê, locality 5 belongs to rio Itapanhaú and locality 6 belongs to rio Juquiá, rio Ribeira de Iguape drainages. PE = Parque Estadual.

FIGURE 2 in Spintherobolus papilliferus in the rio Ribeira de Iguape basin: implications for the biogeography and conservation of an endangered species (Ostariophysi: Characiformes)

FIGURE 2 | Stream stretch affluent of rio Juquiá, rio Ribeira de Iguape, municipality of Juquitiba, São Paulo State, where specimens of Spintherobolus papilliferus were sampled for this study. A. General view showing rapids in the background. B. Rapids pool where specimens were caught.