Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
557
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
557 results for “data reporting”
Output reports and supplementary data for MTB workflow
<p>The archive contains the following data:</p> <ul> <li>Output of the workflow on all validation samples (tabular summaries and full HTML reports).</li> <li>Database with AMR regions and mutations.</li> </ul> <p> </p>
Cumulative Data-Level Metrics (DLM) Report - September 2015
<p>Article-Level Metrics (ALM) measure the reach and online engagement of scholarly works. This DataSite Data-Level Metrics (DLM) Server report contains the cumulative stats collected for all works through September 11, 2015. Data are generated by the Lagotto open source software. Go to the Lagotto forum for questions or comments.</p>
Supporting data: Reporting phenotypes in model organisms when considering body size as a potential confounder.
<p>This directory contains the data and associated scripts used to generate the figures in the manuscript "Reporting phenotypes in model organisms when considering body size as a potential confounder." submitted to the Journal of Biomedical Semantics</p>
Nordic trial reporting project: Raw data from EU Clinical Trials Registry (EUCTR) and ClinicalTrials.gov
<p>Uploaded on behalf of the author team for the research project "<strong>Systematic evaluation of clinical trial reporting at medical universities and university hospitals in the Nordic countries</strong>".</p><p><strong>Raw data</strong> from EU Clinical Trials Registry (EUCTR) and ClinicalTrials.gov:</p><p><strong>EUCTR</strong>: We retrieved the latest dataset for the EU Trials Tracker of EUCTR trials on Nov 27, 2022, reflecting data from Nov 7, 2022 (1,2). We also used a custom web scraper that automatically extracts data from EUCTR country protocols and results sections (variables described in Appendix Table 2), developed by the EU Trials Tracker team (2).<br>References: <br>1. Goldacre B, DeVito NJ, Heneghan C, Irving F, Bacon S, Fleminger J, Curtis H. Compliance with requirement to report results on the EU Clinical Trials Register: cohort study and web resource. BMJ. 2018 Sep 12;362:k3218.<br>2. EU Trials Tracker — Who's not sharing clinical trial results? [Internet]. [cited 2022 Aug 30]. Available from: http://eu.trialstracker.net/</p><p><strong>ClinicalTrials.gov</strong>: We downloaded the complete Aggregate Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov dataset (AACT, http://aact.ctti-clinicaltrials.org/) on Nov 27, 2022, reflecting data from Nov 9, 2022. </p><p>See our GitHub and preregistered protocol for more details:<br>https://github.com/cathrineaxfors/nordic-trial-reporting<br>https://osf.io/97qkv/</p>
Data for Tekran Model 3425 performance evaluation report for elemental mercury
<p>During the SI-Hg performance evaluation of elemental mercury gas generators on the market three generators were tested, e.g., PSA 10.536 elemental Hg generator, bell-jar and Tekran Model 3425. Key characteristics were determined e.g.; the stabilisation period, short-term drift, precision, i.e., reproducibility and repeatability of the concentration generated, linearity, bias, sensitivity to sample gas pressure, sensitivity to surrounding temperature and sensitivity to electrical voltage. All three generators could be tested according to the calibration protocol developed within the project. The results obtained with the different gas generator clearly shows the importance of a metrological calibration. All three candidate generators show a different bias for the setpoint compared to the calibrated output. </p><p>The data obtained during the performance evaluation of the Tekran Model 3425 is published in this repository. The files of the following experiments can be found here:</p><ul><li>m1<ul><li>Calibration Tekran mercury gas generator m1 20230612</li><li>Calibration_Tekran_m1</li></ul></li><li>m2<ul><li>Calibration Tekran mercury gas generator m2 20230619</li><li>Calibration_Tekran_m2</li></ul></li><li>m3<ul><li>Calibration Tekran mercury gas generator m3 20230626</li><li>Calibration_Tekran_m3</li></ul></li><li>m4<ul><li>Calibration Tekran mercury gas generator m4 20230629</li><li>Calibration_Tekran_m4</li></ul></li><li>short-term drift<ul><li>m2<ul><li>Calibration Tekran mercury gas generator short term drift m2</li><li>Tekran_Short_Term_M2</li></ul></li><li>m3<ul><li>Calibration Tekran mercury gas generator short term drift m3</li><li>Tekran_Short_Term_M3</li></ul></li><li>m4<ul><li>Calibration Tekran mercury gas generator short term drift m4</li><li>Tekran_Short_Term_M4</li></ul></li><li>m5<ul><li>Calibration Tekran mercury gas generator short term drift m5</li><li>Tekran_Short_Term_M5</li></ul></li></ul></li><li>stability<ul><li>Calibration Tekran mercury gas generator 20230609 stability</li></ul></li></ul>
Data for SI-Hg D2 validation report for the calibration of elemental mercury gas generators including information on repeatability, reproducibility and uncertainty evaluation at emission and ambient levels extended to the sub ng/m3 level
<p>In deliverable 2 of the SI-Hg project the first validation results of the SI-Hg calibration protocol are reported. Within the SI-Hg project a protocol for the metrological calibration of elemental mercury gas generators used in the field was developed. For the validation the output of two different mercury gas generators was calibrated according to the protocol. As metrological reference standard the primary mercury gas standard from the Van Swinden Laboratory (VSL) was used. The measurements described in the protocol could be performed during the validation and the data was processed using a script to determine the output of the candidate generator and the uncertainty of the mercury concentration. Based on the validation measurements and data processing several improvements for the calibration protocol were identified and were used to improve the calibration protocol. </p><p>In this repository data obtained during the validation is published. The files of the following comparisons between reference generator and candidate generator can be found in this repository:</p><ul><li>VSL vs VSL<ul><li>m1<ul><li>09022022 calibration mercury gas generator VSL vs VSL m1</li><li>VSL_vs_VSL_m1</li></ul></li><li>m2 <ul><li>05072022 calibration mercury gas generator VSL vs VSL m2</li><li>VSL_vs_VSL_m2</li></ul></li><li>m3<ul><li>07072022 calibration mercury gas generator VSL vs VSL m3</li><li>VSL_vs_VSL_m3</li></ul></li></ul></li><li>VSL vs PSA before modification<ul><li>m1<ul><li>15032022 calibration mercury gas generator VSL vs PSA fixed m1</li><li>single_point_VSL_vs_PSA_fixed_m1_4</li><li>single_point_VSL_vs_PSA_fixed_m1_6</li><li>single_point_VSL_vs_PSA_fixed_m1_8</li><li>single_point_VSL_vs_PSA_fixed_m1_12</li></ul></li><li>m2<ul><li>28032022 calibration mercury gas generator VSL vs PSA fixed m2</li><li>single_point_VSL_vs_PSA_fixed_m2_4</li><li>single_point_VSL_vs_PSA_fixed_m2_6</li><li>single_point_VSL_vs_PSA_fixed_m2_8</li><li>single_point_VSL_vs_PSA_fixed_m2_12</li></ul></li><li>m3 <ul><li>06042022 calibration mercury gas generator VSL vs PSA fixed m3</li><li>single_point_VSL_vs_PSA_fixed_m3_4</li><li>single_point_VSL_vs_PSA_fixed_m3_6</li><li>single_point_VSL_vs_PSA_fixed_m3_8</li><li>single_point_VSL_vs_PSA_fixed_m3_12</li></ul></li><li>m4 <ul><li>12042022 calibration mercury gas generator VSL vs PSA fixed m4</li><li>single_point_VSL_vs_PSA_fixed_m4_4</li><li>single_point_VSL_vs_PSA_fixed_m4_6</li><li>single_point_VSL_vs_PSA_fixed_m4_8</li><li>single_point_VSL_vs_PSA_fixed_m4_12</li></ul></li><li>less tubing <ul><li>14042022 calibration mercury gas generator VSL vs PSA fixed less tubing</li><li>single_point_VSL_vs_PSA_fixed_less_tubing</li></ul></li><li>less tubing and air as complementary gas <ul><li>19042022 calibration mercury gas generator VSL vs PSA fixed less tubing in air</li><li>single_point_VSL_vs_PSA_fixed_less_tubing_air</li></ul></li></ul></li><li>VSL vs PSA after modification<ul><li>m1 air as complementary gas <ul><li>Calibration PSA fixed mercury gas generator air m1 20230324</li><li>PSA_fixed_air_m1_9</li><li>PSA_fixed_air_m1_11</li><li>PSA_fixed_air_m1_14</li></ul></li><li>m2 air as complementary gas <ul><li>Calibration PSA fixed mercury gas generator air m2 20230327</li><li>PSA_fixed_air_m2_9</li><li>PSA_fixed_air_m2_11</li><li>PSA_fixed_air_m2_14</li></ul></li><li>m3 air as complementary gas <ul><li>Calibration PSA fixed mercury gas generator air m3 20230329</li><li>PSA_fixed_air_m3_9</li><li>PSA_fixed_air_m3_11</li><li>PSA_fixed_air_m3_14</li></ul></li><li>m4 air as complementary gas <ul><li>Calibration PSA fixed mercury gas generator air m4 20230907</li><li>PSA_fixed_air_m4_9</li><li>PSA_fixed_air_m4_11</li><li>PSA_fixed_air_m4_14</li></ul></li><li>m5 air as complemantary gas <ul><li>Calibration PSA fixed mercury gas generator air m5 20230911</li><li>PSA_fixed_air_m5_9</li><li>PSA_fixed_air_m5_11</li><li>PSA_fixed_air_m5_14</li></ul></li><li>m1 nitrogen (N2) as complementary gas<ul><li>Calibration PSA fixed mercury gas generator nitrogen m1 20230330</li><li>PSA_fixed_N2_m1_9</li><li>PSA_fixed_N2_m1_11</li><li>PSA_fixed_N2_m1_14</li></ul></li><li>m2 N2 as complementary gas <ul><li>Calibration PSA fixed mercury gas generator nitrogen m2 20230331</li><li>PSA_fixed_N2_m2_9</li><li>PSA_fixed_N2_m2_11</li><li>PSA_fixed_N2_m2_14</li></ul></li><li>m3 N2 as complementary gas <ul><li>Calibration PSA fixed mercury gas generator nitrogen m3 20230405</li><li>PSA_fixed_N2_m3_9</li><li>PSA_fixed_N2_m3_11</li><li>PSA_fixed_N2_m3_14</li></ul></li><li>measurement at TUV<ul><li>PSA_Fixed_at_TUV</li></ul></li></ul></li></ul>
Data for PSA 10.536 Elemental Hg generator performance evaluation report
<p>During the SI-Hg performance evaluation of elemental mercury gas generators on the market three generators were tested, e.g., PSA 10.536 elemental Hg generator, bell-jar and Tekran Model 3425. Key characteristics were determined e.g.; the stabilisation period, short-term drift, precision, i.e., reproducibility and repeatability of the concentration generated, linearity, bias, sensitivity to sample gas pressure, sensitivity to surrounding temperature and sensitivity to electrical voltage. All three generators could be tested according to the calibration protocol developed within the project. The results obtained with the different gas generator clearly shows the importance of a metrological calibration. All three candidate generators show a different bias for the setpoint compared to the calibrated output. </p><p>The data obtained during the performance evaluation of the PSA 10.536 elemental Hg generator is published in this repository. The files of the following experiments can be found here:</p><ul><li>range1 m1<ul><li>Calibration_PSA_range1_m1_20221130</li><li>multi_point_calibration_PSA_range1_m1</li></ul></li><li>range1 m2<ul><li>Calibration_PSA_range1_m2_20221209</li><li>multi_point_calibration_PSA_range1_m2</li></ul></li><li>range1 m3<ul><li>Calibration_PSA_range1_m3_20221214</li><li>multi_point_calibration_PSA_range1_m3</li></ul></li><li>range1 m4<ul><li>Calibration_PSA_range1_m4_20230915</li><li>multi_point_calibration_PSA_range1_m4</li></ul></li><li>range1 m5<ul><li>Calibration_PSA_range1_m5_20230919</li><li>multi_point_calibration_PSA_range1_m5</li></ul></li><li>range2 m1<ul><li>Calibration_PSA_range2 m1 20221006</li><li>multi_point_calibration_PSA_range2_m1</li></ul></li><li>range2 m2<ul><li>Calibration_PSA_range2 m2 20221011</li><li>multi_point_calibration_PSA_range2_m2</li></ul></li><li>range2 m3<ul><li>Calibration_PSA_range2 m3 20221012</li><li>multi_point_calibration_PSA_range2_m3</li></ul></li><li>short-term drift<ul><li>m1<ul><li>Calibration mercury gas generator range1 short term drift 20221012 deel 1</li><li>PSA_short_term_drift_M1</li></ul></li><li>m2<ul><li>Calibration mercury gas generator range1 short term drift 20221012 deel 2</li><li>PSA_short_term_drift_M2</li></ul></li><li>m3<ul><li>Calibration mercury gas generator range1 short term drift 20221012 deel 3</li><li>PSA_short_term_drift_M3</li></ul></li><li>m4<ul><li>Calibration mercury gas generator range1 short term drift 20221012 deel 4</li><li>PSA_short_term_drift_M4</li></ul></li></ul></li><li>stability<ul><li>Calibration mercury gas generator range2 stability 20220811</li><li>Calibration mercury gas generator stability 20221018</li></ul></li></ul>
Tables, figures, and country data complementing the European Union One Health Zoonoses 2022 Report
<p>European Food Safety Authority; European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control</p><p>All summary tables and figures produced for the European Union One Health 2022 Zoonoses Report are provided as archives containing Excel files for tables, and as PDF or PNG files for figures.</p><p><strong>All country data connected to this Report are published SEPARATELY on Knowledge Junction - see related identifiers. This is because DATA OWNERSHIP for country data stays with the organisation(s) of the country submitting the data - for further reference see doi:10.2903/sp.efsa.2019.EN-1544.</strong></p><p>Supplementary datasets submitted are given in the related identifier section, however for clarity we give here the information on what they refer to:</p><p><strong>10.5281/zenodo.10255165 </strong>Foodborne outbreaks</p><p><strong>10.5281/zenodo.10256864 </strong>Disease status</p><p><strong>10.5281/zenodo.10255061 </strong>Animal Population</p><p><strong>10.5281/zenodo.10246432 </strong>Prevalence</p><p><i><strong>Sample-based data submitted by specific countries</strong></i></p><p><strong>10.5281/zenodo.10257184 </strong>Finland</p><p><strong>10.5281/zenodo.10257162 </strong>Croatia</p><p><strong>10.5281/zenodo.10257105 </strong>Norway</p><p><strong>10.5281/zenodo.10257034 </strong>Luxembourg</p><p><strong>10.5281/zenodo.10257142 </strong>United Kingdom (Northern Ireland)</p><p><strong>10.5281/zenodo.10257210 </strong>Ireland</p><p><strong>10.5281/zenodo.10257388 </strong>Sweden</p><p>Journal article: 10.2903/j.efsa. 2023.8442 </p><p>Citation</p><p>EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) & ECDC (European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control). (2023). Tables, figures, and country data complementing the European Union One Health Zoonoses 2022 Report [Dataset]. <a href="https://eur03.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdoi.org%2F10.5281%2Fzenodo.10057302&data=05%7C01%7C%7Cd53ce1fd0eeb4b027cb608dbf6528f55%7C406a174be31548bdaa0acdaddc44250b%7C1%7C0%7C638374606688640910%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=46n1ois6rCgqRamDnk4%2B42K2XGwwg1T1nvG5ezYqqyg%3D&reserved=0">https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10057302</a></p>
Excel mapping tool for 2023 avian influenza data reporting
<p>Data collection is an important task of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) and a fundamental component of risk assessment (Articles 22 and 23 of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002). EFSA receives a large volume of data from Member States (MSs) that is used in support of its risk assessment mission.</p> <p>Council Directive 2005/94/EC and Commission Decision 2010/367/EU lay down the guidelines for monitoring and reporting avian influenza surveillance data on poultry and wild birds by European Union (EU) MSs. EFSA has been assigned the task of collating, validating, analysing, and summarising in an annual report the results from the avian influenza surveillance programmes in poultry and wild birds. For the reporting of data, EFSA provides a Data Collection Framework that allows data providers to submit data in eXtensible Markup Language (XML) format through a web interface or a web service. Here, a data model describing the format, and the content requested when submitting data through the DCF, is provided.</p> <p>The data model supports the reporting of laboratory testing results for avian influenza in both wild birds, and poultry. The use of this reporting standard ensures that reported results are comparable between reporting countries. Data reported in this format will be used to generate epidemiological updates on the avian influenza surveillance testing carry out in Europe, and to provide scientific advice to the European Commission.</p>
Data supplementing Einhäuser, W., Neubert, C. R., Grimm, S., & Bendixen, A. (2024). High visual salience of alert signals can lead to a counterintuitive increase of reaction times. Scientific Reports, 14, 8858.
<p>These files supplement the publication <br>Einhäuser, W., Neubert, C. R., Grimm, S., & Bendixen, A. (2024). High visual salience of alert signals can lead to a counterintuitive increase of reaction times. <em>Scientific Reports, </em>14, 8858. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-58953-4</p> <p>The files data_expX.mat, where X is the experiment number (1-4), contain the data as described below. </p> <p>The files dataTraining_expX.mat contain the data of the first (training) block of each experiment. They are needed only for the supplemental material. </p> <p>To exemplify the usage, the functions figure2and3.m, figure4.m, figure5.m, figure6.m and Table1.m output the paper's figures and the data of Table 1, respectively; figureS2.m, figureS3.m, figureS4.m and figureS5.m output the figures of the supplemental material (figure S1 needs substantial amounts of external source code to compute the salience maps and is therefore not included).</p> <p><br>data_exp1.mat contains the following variables<br>For alert trials, variable of dimensions subjects x blocks x alert trials (20x10x64); note that only used participants and blocks with alert trials (2 through 11) are included in the data set:<br>alert_aud - the salience level of the alert tone (1-8, corresponding to 54dB(A) through 89 dB(A))<br>alert_vis - the salience level of the alert frame (1-8, corresponding to 0.10 to 8.50 Weber contrasts in logarithmic steps)<br>alert_side - the side on which the alert frame and the tone were presented (1-left, 2-right)<br>alert_fixOk - derived from eye movement data, was the first fixation closer to the alert square than to the center?<br>alert_primaryRT - primary-task reaction time (for alert trials)<br>alert_alertRT - alert-task reaction time <br>alert_correctAlert - was the response (up/down) to the alert correct?<br>alert_intrusionAlert - was there an intrusion (left/right pressed before up or down)?<br>alert_correctPrimary - was the primary task conducted correctly?<br>alert_intrusionPrimary - was there an intrusion for the primary task?<br>alert_timeToFixation - time to first fixation on alert square <br>alert_fixationToResp - time from beginning of fixation to response to the alert <br>alert_fixDur - duration of first fixation after trial onset</p> <p>For no-alert trials, variable of dimensions subjects x blocks x no-alert trials (20x10x448):<br>noalert_correctPrimary - was the primary task conducted correctly?<br>noalert_intrusionPrimary - was there an intrusion for the primary task? (i.e., up/down pressed before left/right)?</p> <p>For all trials, variable of dimensions subjects x blocks x no-alert trials (20x10x512):<br>all_correctPrimary - was the primary task conducted correctly?<br>all_intrusionPrimary - was there an intrusion for the primary task? (i.e., up/down pressed before left/right)?<br>all_RT - reaction time in the primary task<br>all_isAlertTrial - was the trial an alert trial? (useful to map no-alert trials and alert trials on all trials)</p> <p>In addition, there are some raw eye movement data for the alert blocks:<br>alert_eyeX, alert_eyeY - dimension 20 x 10 x 64 x 6000; x and y position in pixel coordinates relative to trial (and alert) onset, 1ms/sample, ends at conclusion of trials, filled up with NaN if duration was less than 6000ms <br>alert_eyeFixX, alert_eyeFixY, alert_eyeFixTon, alert_eyeFixDur - 20 x 10 x 64 x 15; x and y position, onset (in ms relative to trial onset) and duration of fixations during the trial (from onset to primary-task response), filled with NaN when less than 15 fixations were made. Note that the first entry of alert_eyeFixDur along the forth dimension will usually equal the alert_fixDur</p> <p><br>data_exp2.mat contains the same variables as data_exp1.mat with the following exceptions:<br>alert_vis - contains only two levels (1 and 2) corresponding to Weber contrasts of 0.10 and 2.39, respectively<br>alert_dur - the level of duration of the alert frame (1 through 8, corresponding to 25ms, 50ms, 100ms, 200ms, 300ms, 400ms, 600ms, 800ms)<br>alert_aud is not included (all tones were at 54 dB(A))<br>there are only 19 participants; hence the variables are of size 19 x ...<br>note: block 8 for subject 6 contains only 450 trials (57 alert trials), the remainder is filled with NaN.</p> <p><br>data_exp3.mat contains the same variables as data_exp1.mat with the following exceptions:<br>alert_aud - contains only two levels (1 and 2) corresponding to sound levels of 54 dB(A) and 79 dB(A) respectively<br>alert_dur - the level of duration of the alert tone (1 through 8, corresponding to 25ms, 50ms, 100ms, 200ms, 300ms, 400ms, 600ms, 800ms)<br>alert_vis is not included (all alert frames were at 0.10 contrast)</p> <p> </p> <p>data_exp4.mat contains the same variables as data_exp1.mat with the following exceptions:<br>alert_aud - contains only two levels (1 and 2) corresponding to sound levels of 54 dB(A) and 79 dB(A) respectively<br>alert_vis is not included and replaced by<br>alert_condBefore - alert frame contrast level before the saccade (1 - 0.10 contrast, 2 - 2.39 contrast)<br>alert_condAfter - alert frame contrast level after the saccade (1 - 0.10 contrast, 2 - 2.39 contrast)</p> <p><br>dataTraining_expX.mat contains for the first (training) block of experiment X (X being 1, 2, 3 or 4) the following variables of size 20x512 (participant x trial) [19x512 in case of Experiment 2]:<br>all_correctPrimary - was the primary task conducted correctly?<br>all_RT - reaction time in the primary task<br>[Note that there are no alert trials in this block and these data are only used in the supplementary material (part 4)]</p>
IPCC Working Group 1 (WG1) Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) Annex III Extended Data
<p>Extended data relating to atmospheric abundences and effective radiative forcing from historical and future projections. Data is presented in abridged form in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Sixth Assessment Report (AR6) Working Group 1 (WG1) Annex 3. </p> <p>In this dataset, data is provided for all years, and includes additional scenarios not included in the published tables.</p> <p><strong>Contents</strong></p> <ul> <li>table A3.1: historical observed greenhouse gas (GHG) abundances. All subtables a-f in the printed report are combined into one CSV file.</li> <li>table A3.2: future projections (2020-2500) of GHG abundances for nine SSP scenarios (SSP1-1.9, SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, SSP3-7.0, SSP3-7.0-lowNTCF, SSP4-3.4, SSP4-6.0, SSP5-3.4-over, SSP5-8.5). Orignal data is from Meinshausen et al. (2020): https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2019-222 </li> <li>table A3.3: historical effective radiative forcing (ERF) for 1750-2019 (unit is W m<sup>-2</sup>) <ul> <li>best estimate</li> <li>5th percentile</li> <li>95th percentile</li> <li>100000 member Monte Carlo ensemble (HDF file)</li> </ul> </li> <li>table A3.4: future projections of ERF from 1750-2500 (including historical to 2014, projections starting from 2015). Unit is W m<sup>-2</sup>. <ul> <li>table A3.4a: SSP1-1.9 (best estimate, 5th and 95th percentile)</li> <li>table A3.4b: SSP1-2.6 (best estimate, 5th and 95th percentile)</li> <li>table A3.4c: SSP2-4.5 (best estimate, 5th and 95th percentile)</li> <li>table A3.4d: SSP3-7.0 (best estimate, 5th and 95th percentile)</li> <li>table A3.4e: SSP5-8.5 (best estimate, 5th and 95th percentile)</li> <li>table A3.4f: breakdown of minor greenhouse gases, and aggregated categories, for the five Tier 1 SSP scenarios in tables A3.4a to A3.4e (best estimate)</li> <li>tables A3.4x: tables A3.4a to A3.4f for Tier 2 SSP scenarios: <ul> <li>SSP3-7.0-lowNTCF</li> <li>SSP3-7.0-lowNTCFCH4</li> <li>SSP4-3.4</li> <li>SSP4-6.0</li> <li>SSP5-3.4-over</li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li>table A3.5: projections of ERF from 1750-2500 from RCP2.6, RCP4.5, RCP6.0 and RCP8.5 using AR6 assessment (best estimate, 5th and 95th percentile, breakdown of minor gases; unit is W m<sup>-2</sup>)</li> </ul> <p><strong>Citation</strong></p> <p>IPCC, 2021: Annex III: Tables of historical and projected well-mixed greenhouse gas mixing ratios and effective radiative forcing of all climate forcers [Dentener F.J., B. Hall, C. Smith (eds.)]. In <em>Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change</em> [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press.</p>
Sample based prevalence data complementing the European Union One Health 2020 Zoonoses Report - Norway
<p>This dataset contains monitoring data on zoonoses and zoonotic agents under the Directive 2003/99/EC. This Directive requires Member Sates (MSs) to collect, evaluate and report data on zoonoses and zoonotic agents. MSs can also report monitoring data and information on some other pathogenic microbiological agents in foodstuffs. Relevant EU legislation: Commission Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005,Commission Regulation (EC) No 1441/2007, Commission Regulation (EU) No 1086/2011, Commission Regulation (EU) No 209/2013, Commission Regulation(EU) No 217/2014.</p>
Sample based prevalence data complementing the European Union One Health 2020 Zoonoses Report - Luxembourg
<p>This dataset contains monitoring data on zoonoses and zoonotic agents under the Directive 2003/99/EC. This Directive requires Member Sates (MSs) to collect, evaluate and report data on zoonoses and zoonotic agents. MSs can also report monitoring data and information on some other pathogenic microbiological agents in foodstuffs. Relevant EU legislation: Commission Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005,Commission Regulation (EC) No 1441/2007, Commission Regulation (EU) No 1086/2011, Commission Regulation (EU) No 209/2013, Commission Regulation(EU) No 217/2014.</p>
Animal disease data complementing the European Union One Health 2020 Zoonoses Report
<p>This dataset contains the mandatory annual data reported for bovine tuberculosis and for bovine and ovine and caprine brucellosis based on Directive 2003/99 that cites in Recital 7 the Council Directives 64/432/EEC and 91/68/EEC. The relevant Commission Decisions relating to the officially free (OF) MS and MS' regions and related reporting are: Decision 2003/467/EC for bovine tuberculosis and bovine brucellosis, and Decision 93/52/EC for sheep and goat brucellosis (B. melitensis). REPORTING AUTHORITIES CONTRIBUTING TO EACH DATA COLLECTION: Disease_status_data_2020_20211109: >></p>
Prevalence data complementing the European Union One Health 2020 Zoonoses Report
<p>This dataset contains monitoring data on zoonoses and zoonotic agents under the Directive 2003/99/EC. This Directive requires Member Sates (MSs) to collect, evaluate and report data on zoonoses and zoonotic agents. MSs can also report monitoring data and information on some other pathogenic microbiological agents in foodstuffs. Relevant EU legislation: Commission Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005,Commission Regulation (EC) No 1441/2007, Commission Regulation (EU) No 1086/2011, Commission Regulation (EU) No 209/2013, Commission Regulation(EU) No 217/2014. REPORTING AUTHORITIES CONTRIBUTING TO EACH DATA COLLECTION: Prev_data_2020 >></p>
Sample based prevalence data complementing the European Union One Health 2020 Zoonoses Report - the United kingdom
<p>This dataset contains monitoring data on zoonoses and zoonotic agents under the Directive 2003/99/EC. This Directive requires Member Sates (MSs) to collect, evaluate and report data on zoonoses and zoonotic agents. MSs can also report monitoring data and information on some other pathogenic microbiological agents in foodstuffs. Relevant EU legislation: Commission Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005,Commission Regulation (EC) No 1441/2007, Commission Regulation (EU) No 1086/2011, Commission Regulation (EU) No 209/2013, Commission Regulation(EU) No 217/2014.</p>
Sample based prevalence data complementing the European Union One Health 2020 Zoonoses Report - Finland
<p>This dataset contains monitoring data on zoonoses and zoonotic agents under the Directive 2003/99/EC. This Directive requires Member Sates (MSs) to collect, evaluate and report data on zoonoses and zoonotic agents. MSs can also report monitoring data and information on some other pathogenic microbiological agents in foodstuffs. Relevant EU legislation: Commission Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005,Commission Regulation (EC) No 1441/2007, Commission Regulation (EU) No 1086/2011, Commission Regulation (EU) No 209/2013, Commission Regulation(EU) No 217/2014.</p>
Sample based prevalence data complementing the European Union One Health 2020 Zoonoses Report - Sweden
<p>This dataset contains monitoring data on zoonoses and zoonotic agents under the Directive 2003/99/EC. This Directive requires Member Sates (MSs) to collect, evaluate and report data on zoonoses and zoonotic agents. MSs can also report monitoring data and information on some other pathogenic microbiological agents in foodstuffs. Relevant EU legislation: Commission Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005,Commission Regulation (EC) No 1441/2007, Commission Regulation (EU) No 1086/2011, Commission Regulation (EU) No 209/2013, Commission Regulation(EU) No 217/2014.</p>
Supporting data for the AI education publication statistics in "An Experience Report of Executive-Level Artificial Intelligence Education in the United Arab Emirates"
<p>Supporting data for the AI education publication statistics presented in the paper "An Experience Report of Executive-Level Artificial Intelligence Education in the United Arab Emirates" to be published at the Twelfth AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence (EAAI-22). The data was used to plot the figure showing the cumulative number of publications from 1976 to 2020 relating to AI education.</p>
Quantitative raw data for "Large scale regional citizen surveys report" (D1.4)
<p>This dataset presents the quantitative raw data that was collected under the H2020 RRI2SCALE project for the D1.4 - “Large scale regional citizen surveys report”. The dataset includes the answers that were provided by almost 8,000 participants from 4 pilot European regions (Kriti, Vestland, Galicia, and Overijssel) regarding the general public's views, concerns, and moral issues about the current and future trajectories of their RTD&I ecosystem. The original survey questionnaire was created by White Research SRL and disseminated to the regions through supporting pilot partners. Data collection took place from June 2020 to September 2020 through 4 different waves – one for each region. Based on the conclusion of a consortium vote during the kick-off meeting, it was decided that instead of resource-intensive methods that would render data collection unduly expensive, to fill in the quotas responses were collected through online panels by survey companies that were used for each region. For the statistical analysis of the data and the conclusions drawn from the analysis, you can access the "Large scale regional citizen surveys report" (D1.4).</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.