Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 4 in DNA Barcoding and Integrative Taxonomy of the Heterolepisma sclerophylla species complex (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae: Heterolepismatinae) and the Description of Two New Species

Figure 4. BI tree for concatenated COI and 28S genes. BI posterior probabilities and ML bootstrap values are shown above and below branches, if ≥0.9 or ≥70%, respectively. Asterisks indicate type specimens, with a single asterisk for paratypes and a double asterisk for holotypes.

Figure 3 in DNA Barcoding and Integrative Taxonomy of the Heterolepisma sclerophylla species complex (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae: Heterolepismatinae) and the Description of Two New Species

Figure 3. BI tree for nuclear gene 28S. BI posterior probabilities and ML bootstrap values are shown above and below branches, if ≥0.9 or ≥70%, respectively. Asterisks indicate type specimens, with a single asterisk for paratypes and a double asterisk for holotypes.

Figure 5 in DNA Barcoding and Integrative Taxonomy of the Heterolepisma sclerophylla species complex (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae: Heterolepismatinae) and the Description of Two New Species

Figure 5. Scatterplot of principal component analysis 1. Members of lineages are indicated by a ⅔ confidence interval ellipse.

Figures 38–48 in DNA Barcoding and Integrative Taxonomy of the Heterolepisma sclerophylla species complex (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae: Heterolepismatinae) and the Description of Two New Species

Figures 38–48. Heterolepisma cooloola sp. nov. holotype ♀, unless indicated otherwise by specimen number(38) habitus (K.377754); (39) posterior comb of pronotum with scale; (40) head; (41) scape, pedicel and basal intervals of flagellum, from above; (42) idem, from below; (43) antenna, most distal surviving interval; (44) mandible; (45) idem, detail of molar and incisor regions; (46) maxilla, only larger setae of palp illustrated; (47) idem, lacinia and galea (QM 207012); (48) ultimate article of maxillary palp of ♂ (QM 207012). Scale bars = 0.1 mm unless otherwise indicated.

Figures 66–77 in DNA Barcoding and Integrative Taxonomy of the Heterolepisma sclerophylla species complex (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae: Heterolepismatinae) and the Description of Two New Species

Figures 66–77. Heterolepisma cooloola sp. nov. holotype ♀, unless otherwise indicated by specimen number (66) urotergite IV; (67) urotergite V, right lateral comb; (68) idem, left sublateral comb; (69) idem, left submedial comb; (70) right side of urotergite VIII (K.261189); (71) infralateral comb of urotergite IX; (72) urotergite X; (73) urotergite X of paratype (QM 207012); (74) urosternite IV; (75) posterior comb of urosternite V; (76) urosternites VII, VIII, IX and ovipositor; (77) base of stylus VII. Scale bars = 0.1 mm.

Figure 2 in DNA Barcoding and Integrative Taxonomy of the Heterolepisma sclerophylla species complex (Zygentoma: Lepismatidae: Heterolepismatinae) and the Description of Two New Species

Figure 2. BI trees for mitochondrial genes 16S and COI. BI posterior probabilities and ML bootstrap values are shown above and below branches, if ≥0.9 or ≥70%, respectively.Asterisks indicate type specimens, with a single asterisk for paratypes and a double asterisk for holotypes.

Fig. 4 in Taxonomy and morphology of four "ophrys-related" scuticociliates (Protista, Ciliophora, Scuticociliatia), with the description of a new genus, Paramesanophrys gen. nov.

Fig. 4. Comparisons among different buccal apparatus patterns of Paramesanophrys gen. nov. and some related genera; arrows in A–J show different positions to which PM extends anteriorly and highlighted structures in A–J mark M2. A. Paramesanophrys typica gen. et sp. nov. (from the present work). B. Mesanophrys carcini (Grolière & Léglise, 1977) Small & Lynn in Aescht, 2001 (from Song & Wilbert 2000). C. Uronema marinum Dujardin, 1841 (from Song et al. 2009). D. Uronemella filificum (Kahl, 1931) Song & Wilbert, 2002 (from Song & Wilbert 2002). E. Metanophrys sinensis Song & Wilbert, 2000 (from Song & Wilbert 2000). F. Anophryoides haemophila Cawthorn et al., 1996 (from Cawthorn et al. 1996). G. Philasterides armatalis Song, 2000 (from Song 2000). H. Paranophrys marina Thompson & Berger, 1965 (from Song et al. 2002). I. Paralembus digitiformis Kahl, 1931 (from Song & Wilbert 2000). J. Cohnilembus verminus (Müller, 1786) Kahl, 1933 (from Song 2000). Abbreviations: M1–3 = membranelles 1, 2 and 3; PM = paroral membrane; Sc = scutica.

Fig. 7 in Taxonomy and morphology of four "ophrys-related" scuticociliates (Protista, Ciliophora, Scuticociliatia), with the description of a new genus, Paramesanophrys gen. nov.

Fig. 7. Metanophrys similis Song et al., 2002, in vivo (A–F) and after protargol staining (G–J). A. Ventral view of a typical individual. B–D. Ventral views of three individuals; arrowheads in D mark somatic cilia. E. Food vacuole (arrow). F. Posterior region; arrow shows caudal cilium. G, I. Ventral views, to show detailed structure of the buccal area. H. Dorsal view; arrow shows monokinetids, arrowhead marks dikinetids. J. Macronucleus. Abbreviations: M1–3 = membranelles 1, 2 and 3; Ma = macronucleus; PM = paroral membrane. Scale bars: A–D = 30 μm.

Fig. 6 in Taxonomy and morphology of four "ophrys-related" scuticociliates (Protista, Ciliophora, Scuticociliatia), with the description of a new genus, Paramesanophrys gen. nov.

Fig. 6. Metanophrys sinensis Song & Wilbert, 2000, in vivo (A–D, G) and after protargol (E–F, I–J) or silver nitrate (H) staining. A. Ventral view of a typical individual. B. Ventral view of another individual; arrowheads mark somatic cilia. C. Ventral view; arrowhead exhibits buccal field. D. Notched pellicle (arrowhead). E. Detailed structure of buccal area. F. Individual in morphogenesis, to show buccal apparatus. G. Ventral view, showing bar-shaped crystal (arrowhead). H. Detail of somatic kinetids. I. Dikinetids of scutica (arrowheads). J. Posterior region; arrowheads show monokinetids of somatic kineties. Abbreviations: M1–3 = membranelles 1, 2 and 3; PM = paroral membrane. Scale bars: A–B = 15 μm.

Fig. 5 in Taxonomy and morphology of four "ophrys-related" scuticociliates (Protista, Ciliophora, Scuticociliatia), with the description of a new genus, Paramesanophrys gen. nov.

Fig. 5. Mesanophrys carcini Small & Lynn in Aescht, 2001, in vivo (A–D) and after protargol staining (E–G). A. Ventral view of a representative individual; arrow shows contractile vacuole. B–D. Ventral views of four individuals; arrow in B shows caudal cilium and arrow in D marks food vacuole. E–F. Ventral views, detailed structure of buccal area. G. Dorsal view; arrow indicates somatic kinety. Abbreviations: M1–3 = membranelles 1, 2 and 3; Ma = macronucleus; PM = paroral membrane; Sc = scutica. Scale bars: A–D = 30 μm; E–G = 5 μm.

Fig. 2 in Taxonomy and morphology of four "ophrys-related" scuticociliates (Protista, Ciliophora, Scuticociliatia), with the description of a new genus, Paramesanophrys gen. nov.

Fig. 2. Paramesanophrys typica gen. et sp. nov., from life (A–F) and after protargol staining (G–I). A. Ventral view of a representative individual. B. Different body shapes. C. Changing shapes of buccal field of the same individual. D. Movement trace. E. Food granules. F. Part of pellicle, to show extrusomes. G–H. Ventral (G) and dorsal (H) views of the same specimen (holotype), showing infraciliature and nuclear apparatus. I. Detailed structure of the buccal area. Abbreviations: M1–3 = membranelles 1, 2 and 3; Ma = macronucleus; PM = paroral membrane; Sc = scutica. Scale bars: A = 30 μm; B = 40 μm.

Fig. 1. Sampling sites. A in Taxonomy and morphology of four "ophrys-related" scuticociliates (Protista, Ciliophora, Scuticociliatia), with the description of a new genus, Paramesanophrys gen. nov.

Fig. 1. Sampling sites. A. Coastal waters of the Yellow Sea at Qingdao, Shandong province. B. A coastal mariculture-region in Zhanjiang, Guangdong province. C. Coastal waters of Daya Bay, Guangdong province.

Fig. 10 in Taxonomy of some Galeommatoidea (Mollusca, Bivalvia) associated with deep-sea echinoids: A reassessment of the bivalve genera Axinodon Verrill & Bush, 1898 and Kelliola Dall, 1899 with descriptions of new genera Syssitomya gen. nov. and Ptilomyax gen. nov.

Fig. 10. Ptilomyax hadalis sp. nov. A. Holotype attached to echinoid spines. B. Paratype, left side. C. Juvenile paratype lacking "wings". D. Anatomy of a paratype as viewed from the left side.

Fig. 9. Pourtalesia miranda Agassiz, 1869 in Taxonomy of some Galeommatoidea (Mollusca, Bivalvia) associated with deep-sea echinoids: A reassessment of the bivalve genera Axinodon Verrill & Bush, 1898 and Kelliola Dall, 1899 with descriptions of new genera Syssitomya gen. nov. and Ptilomyax gen. nov.

Fig. 9. Pourtalesia miranda Agassiz, 1869 with Syssitomya pourtalesiana sp. nov. attached, from Biscay. Courtesy of A.J. & E.C. Southward.

Fig. 6 in Taxonomy of some Galeommatoidea (Mollusca, Bivalvia) associated with deep-sea echinoids: A reassessment of the bivalve genera Axinodon Verrill & Bush, 1898 and Kelliola Dall, 1899 with descriptions of new genera Syssitomya gen. nov. and Ptilomyax gen. nov.

Fig. 6. Montacuta substriata (Montagu, 1808), NMW.Z 2000.101.73. Gulfaks Oil Field, North Sea, 217 m. A-B. SEM of hinges of right and left valves. C. SEM of internal of right valve. D. SEM of external of left valve.

Fig. 7 in Taxonomy of some Galeommatoidea (Mollusca, Bivalvia) associated with deep-sea echinoids: A reassessment of the bivalve genera Axinodon Verrill & Bush, 1898 and Kelliola Dall, 1899 with descriptions of new genera Syssitomya gen. nov. and Ptilomyax gen. nov.

Fig. 7. Syssitomya pourtalesiana sp. nov. from Norwegian Sea. A-C. Photo micrographs a external of left valve, internals of both valves. D-E. SEM of hinges of right and left valves. F-G. SEM of internal of both valves. H. SEM of prodissoconch. I. SEM of internal of right valve from NORBI cruise, abyssal, Courtesy of Anders Warén.

Fig. 8 in Taxonomy of some Galeommatoidea (Mollusca, Bivalvia) associated with deep-sea echinoids: A reassessment of the bivalve genera Axinodon Verrill & Bush, 1898 and Kelliola Dall, 1899 with descriptions of new genera Syssitomya gen. nov. and Ptilomyax gen. nov.

Fig. 8. Computer enhanced photomicrographs of whole specimens of Syssitomya pourtalesiana sp. nov. from the Norwegian Sea. A-A2. Holotype A. Exterior from right side. A1. Dorsal. A2. Ventral. B. Paratypes, size series.

Fig. 4 in Taxonomy of some Galeommatoidea (Mollusca, Bivalvia) associated with deep-sea echinoids: A reassessment of the bivalve genera Axinodon Verrill & Bush, 1898 and Kelliola Dall, 1899 with descriptions of new genera Syssitomya gen. nov. and Ptilomyax gen. nov.

Fig. 4. Scanning electron micrographs of anatomy. A. K. symmetros (Jeffreys, 1876) from Biscay. B. Syssitomya pourtalesiana sp. nov. from Norwegian Sea. C. Montacuta substriata (Montagu, 1808) from North Sea. D. Excised ctenidium of M. substriata. E. Excised piece of ctenidium from S. pourtalesiana sp. nov.

Fig. 5 in Taxonomy of some Galeommatoidea (Mollusca, Bivalvia) associated with deep-sea echinoids: A reassessment of the bivalve genera Axinodon Verrill & Bush, 1898 and Kelliola Dall, 1899 with descriptions of new genera Syssitomya gen. nov. and Ptilomyax gen. nov.

Fig. 5. Aeropsis rostrata (Wyville Thomson, 1877) with Kelliola symmetros (Jeffreys, 1876) attached, from Biscay.

Fig. 3 in Taxonomy of some Galeommatoidea (Mollusca, Bivalvia) associated with deep-sea echinoids: A reassessment of the bivalve genera Axinodon Verrill & Bush, 1898 and Kelliola Dall, 1899 with descriptions of new genera Syssitomya gen. nov. and Ptilomyax gen. nov.

Fig. 3. Kelliola symmetros (Jeffreys, 1876) from Biscay. A-C. Photo micrographs a external of left valve, internals of both valves. D-E. SEM of hinges of right and left valves. F-H. SEM of internal of both valves and external of left valve. I. SEM of prodissoconch. J. SEM of anterior area showing weak radial sculpture. K. SEM of margin showing transverse grooves.