Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 5. a–c. Paracilnia ornatipennis Beier, 1935 in An annotated type catalogue of praying mantises (Mantodea) in the Zoological Museum Hamburg (ZMH)

Fig. 5. a–c. Paracilnia ornatipennis Beier, 1935, holotype, ♀ (ZMH 841123). a. Labels. b. Dorsal view. c. Ventral view. d–f. Tarachina constricta Werner, 1923, holotype, ♂ (ZMH 841073). d. Labels. e. Dorsal view. f. Ventral view. Scale bars = 10 mm.

Fig. 4. a–c. Ommatentella brunni Werner, 1923 in An annotated type catalogue of praying mantises (Mantodea) in the Zoological Museum Hamburg (ZMH)

Fig. 4. a–c. Ommatentella brunni Werner, 1923, holotype, ♂ (ZMH 831015). a. Labels. b. Dorsal view. c. Ventral view. d–f. Palaeophotina schneideri Werner, 1923, holotype, ♂ (ZMH 841120). d. Labels. e. Dorsal view. f. Ventral view. Scale bars = 10 mm.

Fig. 26. a–c. Mantis japonica Saussure, 1869 in An annotated type catalogue of praying mantises (Mantodea) in the Zoological Museum Hamburg (ZMH)

Fig. 26. a–c. Mantis japonica Saussure, 1869, holotype, ♀ (ZMH 841099). a. Labels. b. Dorsal view. c. Ventral view. d–f. Mantis religiosa macedonica Karaman, 1961, paratype, ♂ (ZMH 841118). d. Labels. e. Dorsal view. f. Ventral view. Scale bars = 10 mm.

Fig. 29. a–c. Phaeomantis brevipes Beier, 1931 in An annotated type catalogue of praying mantises (Mantodea) in the Zoological Museum Hamburg (ZMH)

Fig. 29. a–c. Phaeomantis brevipes Beier, 1931, holotype, ♂ (ZMH 841119). a. Labels. b. Dorsal view. c. Ventral view. d–f. Pseudomantis hartmeyeri Werner, 1912, syntype, ♂ (ZMH 831016). d. Labels. e. Dorsal view. f. Ventral view. Scale bars = 10 mm.

Fig. 3. Iris tricolor Werner, 1923. a–c in An annotated type catalogue of praying mantises (Mantodea) in the Zoological Museum Hamburg (ZMH)

Fig. 3. Iris tricolor Werner, 1923. a–c. Holotype, ♀ (ZMH 841116). a. Labels. b. Dorsal view. c. Ventral view. d–f. Paratype, ♀ (ZMH 76962). d. Labels. e. Dorsal view. f. Ventral view. Scale bars = 10 mm.

Fig. 2. a–e. Amorphoscelis austrogermanica Werner, 1923 in An annotated type catalogue of praying mantises (Mantodea) in the Zoological Museum Hamburg (ZMH)

Fig. 2. a–e. Amorphoscelis austrogermanica Werner, 1923, holotype, ♂ (ZMH 841075). a. Labels. b. Dorsal view. c. Ventral view. d–e. Genitalia. f–h. Gonypeta benguelae Saussure, 1869, holotype, ♀ (ZMH 833033). f. Labels. g. Dorsal view. h. Ventral view. White scale bars = 10 mm; black scale bar = 0.50 mm.

Fig. 36. a–c. Cardioptera viridipennis Beier, 1931 in An annotated type catalogue of praying mantises (Mantodea) in the Zoological Museum Hamburg (ZMH)

Fig. 36. a–c. Cardioptera viridipennis Beier, 1931, holotype, ♂ (ZMH 841117). a. Labels. b. Dorsal view. c. Ventral view. d–f. Metriomantis gracilicollis Beier, 1931, syntype, ♀ (ZMH 841111). d. Labels. e. Dorsal view. f. Ventral view. Scale bars = 10 mm.

Fig. 1. Acontistella violacea Beier, 1931 in An annotated type catalogue of praying mantises (Mantodea) in the Zoological Museum Hamburg (ZMH)

Fig. 1. Acontistella violacea Beier, 1931, holotype, ♂ (ZMH 841121). a. Labels. b. Dorsal view. c. Ventral view. d. Lateral view. e–f. Genitalia. White scale bars = 10 mm; black scale bar = 0.50 mm.

Fig. 41. Catamusonia minor Beier, 1931 in An annotated type catalogue of praying mantises (Mantodea) in the Zoological Museum Hamburg (ZMH)

Fig. 41. Catamusonia minor Beier, 1931, syntype, ♂ (ZMH 833034). a. Labels. b. Dorsal view. c. Ventral view. d. Lateral view. Scale bars = 10 mm.

Fig. 40. Bantia michaelisi Beier, 1935. a–c in An annotated type catalogue of praying mantises (Mantodea) in the Zoological Museum Hamburg (ZMH)

Fig. 40. Bantia michaelisi Beier, 1935. a–c. holotype, ♂ (ZMH 841083). a. Labels. b. Dorsal view. c. Ventral view.d–h. Paratype, ♂ (ZMH 841084). d. Labels.e. Dorsal view.f. Ventral view.g–h. Genitalia. White scale bars = 10 mm; black scale bar = 0.50 mm.

Fig. 33. a–c. Tisma pauliani Roy, 2005 in An annotated type catalogue of praying mantises (Mantodea) in the Zoological Museum Hamburg (ZMH)

Fig. 33. a–c. Tisma pauliani Roy, 2005, paratype, ♀ (ZMH 841089). a. Labels. b. Dorsal view. c. Ventral view. d–f. Parasphendale arabukosokokei Borer & Ehrmann, 2022, paratype, ♀ (ZMH 841096). d. Labels. e. Dorsal view. f. Ventral view. Scale bars = 10 mm.

Fig. 35. a–c. Micrentella fuliginosa Werner, 1923 in An annotated type catalogue of praying mantises (Mantodea) in the Zoological Museum Hamburg (ZMH)

Fig. 35. a–c. Micrentella fuliginosa Werner, 1923, holotype, ♀ (ZMH 841069). a. Labels. b. Dorsal view. c. Ventral view. d–f. Xanthomantis ornata Beier, 1931, holotype, ♂ (ZMH 833030). d. Labels. e. Dorsal view. f. Ventral view. Scale bars = 10 mm.

Fig. 43. a–e. Musoniella parva Beier, 1935 in An annotated type catalogue of praying mantises (Mantodea) in the Zoological Museum Hamburg (ZMH)

Fig. 43. a–e. Musoniella parva Beier, 1935, holotype, ♂ (ZMH 841093). a. Labels. b. Dorsal view. c. Ventral view. d–e. Genitalia. f–h. Thesprotiella peruana Beier, 1935, holotype, ♂ (ZMH 841088). f. Labels. g. Dorsal view. h. Ventral view. White scale bars = 10 mm; black scale bar = 0.50 mm.

Fig. 26 in A Revision of Cretaceous Mantises and Their Relationships, Including New Taxa (Insecta: Dictyoptera: Mantodea)

Fig. 26. Majorityrule cladograms (with characters ordered and unordered) (L = 36, CI = 0.72; RI = 0.81) of Cretaceous genera and living families of Mantodea, based on the matrix in table 3. Numbers at nodes are bootstrap values.

Fig. 25 in A Revision of Cretaceous Mantises and Their Relationships, Including New Taxa (Insecta: Dictyoptera: Mantodea)

Fig. 25. Scanning electron micrographs of tibial spur (a, c) and femoral brush (b, d) in a ''lower'' mantis (Amorphoscelis: a, b), and a ''higher'' mantis (Pseudocreobotra: c, d). Note the barely discernable suture between the spur and tibia in c (in detail).

Fig. 22. Santanmantis axelrodi paratypes. a–c. SMNS 112 in A Revision of Cretaceous Mantises and Their Relationships, Including New Taxa (Insecta: Dictyoptera: Mantodea)

Fig. 22. Santanmantis axelrodi paratypes. a–c. SMNS 112, showing dorsal habitus (a), detail of head and pronotum (b), and base of forewing with claval furrow (c). d–f. SMNS 172, showing habitus (d), detail of head and pronotum (e), and base of forewing (f) with raking light that depicts claval furrow in relief.

Fig. 16 in A Revision of Cretaceous Mantises and Their Relationships, Including New Taxa (Insecta: Dictyoptera: Mantodea)

Fig. 16. Photomicrographs of Santanmantis axelrodi, new species, holotype (AMNH 1957), in Early Cretaceous limestone from the Santana Formation of Brazil. a. Dorsal view of cleaned specimen. b. Detail of head and pronotum. c. Detail of bases of wings. d. Detail of abdomen, showing the crop contents in relief.

Fig. 19 in A Revision of Cretaceous Mantises and Their Relationships, Including New Taxa (Insecta: Dictyoptera: Mantodea)

Fig. 19. Highresolution CT scans of holotype of Santanmantis axelrodi. Left: a volumerendering of complete specimen, exposing more of the long, slender hindlegs. Right: a more detailed, surfacerendered view of the ventral surface of the anterior half (cf. fig. 18). The rounded topography of the specimen and lack of spines and other fine structures are due to the resolution of imaging (14 µm), not the actual preservation. The bases of some spines on the foretibia and femur are visible.

Fig. 21 in A Revision of Cretaceous Mantises and Their Relationships, Including New Taxa (Insecta: Dictyoptera: Mantodea)

Fig. 21. Santana Formation Mantodea in the SMNS. a. Paratype of Santanmantis axelrodi, SMNS 115. b. SMNS 114, probably a different species (see text). c. Paratype of Santanmantis axelrodi, SMNS 113. Photos of b and c are courtesy of Dr. Günter Bechly (SMNS).

Fig. 15 in A Revision of Cretaceous Mantises and Their Relationships, Including New Taxa (Insecta: Dictyoptera: Mantodea)

Fig. 15. Jersimantis burmiticus, new species (holotype), AMNH Bu170, oblique dorsal view, in midCretaceous amber from Myanmar.