Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

68

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

68 results for “myriapod”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo32/100

Supplementary material 1 from: Sammet K, Ivask M, Kurina O (2018) A synopsis of Estonian myriapod fauna (Myriapoda: Chilopoda, Diplopoda, Symphyla and Pauropoda). ZooKeys 793: 63-96. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.793.28050

Full collecting details for one finding from each locality. The locality numbers correspond to those in Table 1 and Figure 1. :

opencc-zeroNov 2018View details →
zenodo32/100

Figure 1 in Why are there so few "far southern" myriapods?

Figure 1. The far southern hemisphere showing Antarctica and the principal island groups listed in the text.

opennotspecifiedJul 2013View details →
dryad32/100

Data from: A new dimension in documenting new species: high-detail imaging for myriapod taxonomy and first 3D cybertype of a new millipede species (Diplopoda, Julida, Julidae)

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJul 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 3 in Terrestrial isopods and myriapods in a forested scree slope: subterranean biodiversity, depth gradient and annual dynamics

Figure 3. Activity dynamics of isopod Ligidium germanicum (LIGE); diplopods Mecogonopodium carpathicum (MECA), Polydesmus denticulatus (PODE), Trachysphaera acutula (TRAC); and centipedes Harpolithobius anodus (HAAN), Lithobius forficatus (LIFO), during the period November 2008– November 2009.

opencc-by-4.0May 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 2 in Terrestrial isopods and myriapods in a forested scree slope: subterranean biodiversity, depth gradient and annual dynamics

Figure 2. The non-metric multidimensional scaling ordination analysis (NMS) diagram of Isopoda and Myriapoda collected during both sampling periods; variance explained by axes 1 and 2 as 87.0% and 8.7%, respectively (triangles – depths, dots – species). Abbreviations: i – Isopoda: LIGE – Ligidium germanicum, MEGR – Mesoniscus graniger, TRCA – Trichoniscus carpaticus; d – Diplopoda: JUCU – Julus curvicornis, LEMA – Leptoiulus mariae, LETR – L. trilobatus, MECA – Mecogonopodium carpathicum, POCO – Polydesmus complanatus, PODE – Polydesmus denticulatus, TRAC – Trachysphaera acutula, STST – Strongylosoma stigmatosum; c – Chilopoda: HAAN – Harpolithobius anodus, LI - Lithobius sp. juv., LIFO – Lithobius forficatus, LILU – Lithobius lucifugus; STAC – Strigamia acuminata, STTR – Strigamia transsilvanica.

opencc-by-4.0May 2016View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 1 from: Haľková B, Tuf IH, Tajovský K, Mock A (2020) Subterranean biodiversity and depth distribution of myriapods in forested scree slopes of Central Europe. In: Korsós Z, Dányi L (Eds) Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Myriapodology, Budapest, Hungary. ZooKeys 930: 117-137. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.930.48914

Table S1

opencc-zeroMay 2020View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 1 from: Haľková B, Tuf IH, Tajovský K, Mock A (2020) Subterranean biodiversity and depth distribution of myriapods in forested scree slopes of Central Europe. In: Korsós Z, Dányi L (Eds) Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Myriapodology, Budapest, Hungary. ZooKeys 930: 117-137. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.930.48914

Figure 1 Location of the study sites. 1 Doline next to Silická ľadnica Ice Cave 2 Vysoká Hill (both sites in Slovak Karst National Park) 3 Drienok Valley (Revúcka Highlands) 4 Belinské skaly (Cerová vrchovina Highlands) 5 Okopanec Hill (Malé Karpaty Mts.) 6–8 Three localities near the Zbrašov Aragonite Caves and Hůrka u Hranic (Moravian-Silesian Foothills) 9–11 Three localities in Chrudim region (Iron Mts.).

opencc-by-4.0May 2020View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 2 from: Haľková B, Tuf IH, Tajovský K, Mock A (2020) Subterranean biodiversity and depth distribution of myriapods in forested scree slopes of Central Europe. In: Korsós Z, Dányi L (Eds) Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Myriapodology, Budapest, Hungary. ZooKeys 930: 117-137. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.930.48914

Table S2

opencc-zeroMay 2020View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 1 from: Horňák O, Mock A, Šarapatka B, Tuf IH (2020) Character of woodland fragments affects distribution of myriapod assemblages in agricultural landscape. In: Korsós Z, Dányi L (Eds) Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Myriapodology, Budapest, Hungary. ZooKeys 930: 139-151. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.930.48586

Figure 1 GAM plots evaluating effect of selected measured environmental factors to communities of centipedes and millipedes a relationship between size of wood fragments and number of centipedes' species trapped b relationship between thickness of leaf litter and number of centipedes trapped c relationship between species richness of trees in sites and number of centipedes trapped d relationship between thickness of leaf litter and number of millipedes trapped. Circles on diagram represent individual fragments of woodland.

opencc-by-4.0May 2020View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 4 from: Haľková B, Tuf IH, Tajovský K, Mock A (2020) Subterranean biodiversity and depth distribution of myriapods in forested scree slopes of Central Europe. In: Korsós Z, Dányi L (Eds) Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Myriapodology, Budapest, Hungary. ZooKeys 930: 117-137. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.930.48914

Figure 4 Graphical presentation of myriapod community characteristics in different fixative solutions (N = number of individuals). A Formaldehyde to ethylene glycol ratio of sampled centipede species from all study sites, where both fixating solutions were used B formaldehyde to ethylene glycol ratio of sampled millipede species from all study sites, where both fixating solutions were used.

opencc-by-4.0May 2020View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 2 from: Haľková B, Tuf IH, Tajovský K, Mock A (2020) Subterranean biodiversity and depth distribution of myriapods in forested scree slopes of Central Europe. In: Korsós Z, Dányi L (Eds) Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Myriapodology, Budapest, Hungary. ZooKeys 930: 117-137. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.930.48914

Figure 2 A Overall depth distribution of centipede individuals and species B values of Shannon's diversity index and Pielou's evenness index, calculated for centipedes, at each of the study sites C mean values of Shannon's diversity index (±SD) calculated for centipedes, at each depth of the gradient (summarised data from all localities) D overall depth distribution of millipede individuals and species E values of Shannon's diversity index and Pielou's evenness index, calculated for millipedes, at each of the study sites F mean values of Shannon's diversity index (±SD) calculated for millipedes, at each depth of the gradient.

opencc-by-4.0May 2020View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 5 from: Haľková B, Tuf IH, Tajovský K, Mock A (2020) Subterranean biodiversity and depth distribution of myriapods in forested scree slopes of Central Europe. In: Korsós Z, Dányi L (Eds) Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Myriapodology, Budapest, Hungary. ZooKeys 930: 117-137. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.930.48914

Figure 5 Vertical distribution of myriapods along the depth gradient in different fixative solutions (data recalculated for the same number of traps). Trend line: dashed = formaldehyde, dotted = ethylene glycol. A Vertical distribution of Chilopoda specimens along the depth gradient (5–95 cm) at five scree slopes in different fixative solutions B vertical distribution of centipede species along the depth gradient at five scree slopes in different fixative solutions C vertical distribution of Diplopoda specimens along the depth gradient (5–95 cm) at five scree slopes in different fixative solutions D vertical distribution of millipede species along the depth gradient at five scree slopes in different fixative solutions.

opencc-by-4.0May 2020View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 3 from: Haľková B, Tuf IH, Tajovský K, Mock A (2020) Subterranean biodiversity and depth distribution of myriapods in forested scree slopes of Central Europe. In: Korsós Z, Dányi L (Eds) Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Myriapodology, Budapest, Hungary. ZooKeys 930: 117-137. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.930.48914

Figure 3 Generalised Additive Models of depth distribution pattern of A centipedes and B millipedes. Only species with significant pattern are illustrated. (F-values, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01): ALamyctes emarginatus (13.1**), Lithobius forficatus (17.2**), Lithobius lucifugus (5.0*), Lithobius nodulipes (9.7**) BArchiboreoiulus pallidus (22.7**), Cylindroiulus nitidus (5.4*), Glomeris connexa (5.4*), Hylebainosoma tatranum (5.4*), Leptoiulus proximus (7.3*), Mastigona bosniensis (10.5**), Megaphyllum projectum (5.4*), Melogona transsylvanica (15.2**), Polydesmus complanatus (13.1**), Trachysphaera acutula (5.4*), Unciger foetidus (4.9*).

opencc-by-4.0May 2020View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 1 from: Parra-Gómez A, Pérez-Schultheiss J, Fernández LD (2024) Redescription of the enigmatic myriapod Hanseniella chilensis (Hansen, 1903) (Symphyla, Scutigerellidae) based on scanning electron microscope images of Chilean specimens. ZooKeys 1198: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1198.119723

Figure 1 APG-17-a Male, dorsal view A head, first tergite and part of the second tergite (dfs-distinct frontal seta, ms-macroseta) B tergites 2–5 (am-anterolateral macrochaeta, hm-hind macrochaeta, pm-posterolateral macrochaeta) C tergites 11–13 D last tergite and cerci (hm-hind macrochaeta (abraded), hs-hind seta). Scale bars: 200.0 µm (A–C); 100.0 µm (D).

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2024View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 4 from: Parra-Gómez A, Pérez-Schultheiss J, Fernández LD (2024) Redescription of the enigmatic myriapod Hanseniella chilensis (Hansen, 1903) (Symphyla, Scutigerellidae) based on scanning electron microscope images of Chilean specimens. ZooKeys 1198: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1198.119723

Figure 4 Illustrations showing some relevant structures of the species A antennomere 20 of a male B apical antennomere (sensory organs not as detailed as described due to their small size, smallest one not visible on this angle) C distal end of the first pair of legs D distal end of the last pair of legs (frontal seta abraded) E styli. Scale bar: 50 µm.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2024View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 3 from: Parra-Gómez A, Pérez-Schultheiss J, Fernández LD (2024) Redescription of the enigmatic myriapod Hanseniella chilensis (Hansen, 1903) (Symphyla, Scutigerellidae) based on scanning electron microscope images of Chilean specimens. ZooKeys 1198: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1198.119723

Figure 3 PG-71-L-a Female, ventral view A head and first pair of legs B ventral surface details proximal to left leg of pair 8 and its 2 first podomeres, podomere 4 and 5 of pair 7 partially show (lm-laminar needles, sc-scale-like cuticle, slm-"scales" with laminar needles) C coxal sac near leg pair 4 D last pair of legs and cerci (ap-apical seta, ls-large seta, os-outer seta). Scale bars: 100.0 µm (A, D); 50.0 µm (B); 20.0 µm (C).

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2024View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 2 from: Parra-Gómez A, Pérez-Schultheiss J, Fernández LD (2024) Redescription of the enigmatic myriapod Hanseniella chilensis (Hansen, 1903) (Symphyla, Scutigerellidae) based on scanning electron microscope images of Chilean specimens. ZooKeys 1198: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1198.119723

Figure 2 Details of some relevant structures of APG-17-a Male (A, B) and PG-71-L-a Female (C, D) A central rod and triangular sulcus from the top of the head (hs-hind seta, oe-ovoid end, ss-short seta, ts-triangular sulcus) B tergal surface of tergite 3 (cr-cuticular rim) C Tömösváry organ and proximal surface (km-knob with microseta, lp-linguiform protuberance) D apical zone of the last antennomere (sb-sensilla basiconica, so-sensory organ). Scale bars: 50.0 µm (A, B); 10.0 µm (C, D).

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2024View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 5 from: Parra-Gómez A, Pérez-Schultheiss J, Fernández LD (2024) Redescription of the enigmatic myriapod Hanseniella chilensis (Hansen, 1903) (Symphyla, Scutigerellidae) based on scanning electron microscope images of Chilean specimens. ZooKeys 1198: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1198.119723

Figure 5 All known records of Hanseniella chilensis (Hansen, 1903). Diamond = uncertain records from the literature, Star = new record herein, Circle = literature records.

opencc-by-4.0Apr 2024View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 7 from: Sammet K, Ivask M, Kurina O (2018) A synopsis of Estonian myriapod fauna (Myriapoda: Chilopoda, Diplopoda, Symphyla and Pauropoda). ZooKeys 793: 63-96. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.793.28050

Figure 7 Habitat preferences of common Estonian Diplopoda. For explanation of the vertical axis and numbers denoting different habitats on the horizontal axis see Fig. 6.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2018View details →
zenodo28/100

Figure 6 from: Sammet K, Ivask M, Kurina O (2018) A synopsis of Estonian myriapod fauna (Myriapoda: Chilopoda, Diplopoda, Symphyla and Pauropoda). ZooKeys 793: 63-96. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.793.28050

Figure 6 Proportion of samples from different habitats and habitat preferences of common Estonian Chilopoda. Vertical axis: relative abundances (numbers of findings divided by proportion of sampling effort). Horizontal axis numbers represent habitat types as follows: 1 Coastal meadows and alvars 2 Broad-leaved (nemoral) forests 3 Boreo-nemoral deciduous forests 4 Dry heathland forests 5 Drier boreo-nemoral mixed forests 6 Mesophilic boreal forests 7 Hillock forests 8 Carrs and swamp forests 9 Bogs 10 Fens and waterlogged meadows 11 Inland mesophilic grasslands 12 Rural gardens 13 Urban parks and graveyards 14 Arable fields. For detailed description of habitats see Material and methods.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2018View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

ScienceDex for faculty

Your academic CV and NIH biosketch

Make your CV in your school's format and your NIH biosketch from it, then download both as Word files.