Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 8 in Mollusc biodiversity in late Holocene nearshore environments of the Caspian Sea: A baseline for the current biodiversity crisis

Fig. 8. Reconstruction of Turali Bay, c. 2300 calyr BP. The palaeocoastline is approximatly based on the estimated lake level reconstructed for the time of deposition.

Fig. 5 in Mollusc biodiversity in late Holocene nearshore environments of the Caspian Sea: A baseline for the current biodiversity crisis

Fig. 5. Late Holocene Novocaspian bivalve species from Turali, with indication of sample and collection number. LV displayed on the left, RV on the right. A–B Cerastoderma sp. A [non C. rhomboides (Lamarck, 1819)] A M0215, RGM.961896 B M0215, RGM.962391 C–D Cerastoderma glaucum (Bruguière, 1789) C M0216, RGM.962390 D M0216, RGM.962389 E–F Didacna baeri (Grimm, 1877) E M0204, RGM.962379 F M0204, RGM.962380 G–H Didacna eichwaldi (Krynicki, 1837) G M02-05, RGM.961900 H M02-05, RGM.961900 I–J Didacna parallela (Bogachev, 1932) I M0202, RGM.962383 J M0202, RGM.962384 K–L Didacna protracta (Eichwald, 1841) K M0202, RGM.962386 L M0222, RGM.962385 M–N Didacna pyramidata (Grimm, 1877) M M0202, RGM.962387 N M0222, RGM.962388 O–P Didacna trigonoides (Pallas, 1771) O M0215, RGM.962378 P M0215, RGM.962377. Q–R Didacna barbotdemarnii (Grimm, 1877) Q M0222, RGM.962420 R M0221, RGM.962421. Scale bars 5 mm.

Fig. 9 in Mollusc biodiversity in late Holocene nearshore environments of the Caspian Sea: A baseline for the current biodiversity crisis

Fig. 9. Box core residue (sample M0267, c. 2 km off shore Turali at a water depth of 9.4 m) separated into the dark Novocaspian (left) and light 20th Century (right) fractions defined in the text. Largest shell c 1.5 cm across.

Fig. 4 in Mollusc biodiversity in late Holocene nearshore environments of the Caspian Sea: A baseline for the current biodiversity crisis

Fig. 4. Rarefaction curves of the Turali samples with 95% confidence interval and extrapolated species richness for double sample size.

Fig. 1 in Mollusc biodiversity in late Holocene nearshore environments of the Caspian Sea: A baseline for the current biodiversity crisis

Fig. 1. Geographic context of study site. (a) Map of the Caspian Sea. Source bathymetry: Kostianoy et al. (2005): Fig. 1 (p. 7). (b) Location of the outcrops treated in this paper. Tu1-Tu5 represent outcrops Turali 1-5. Brown ridges are Holocene Novocaspian beach barriers (see Kroonenberg et al., 2007). (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)

Fig. 1 in Influence of a tropical marina on nearshore fish communities during a harmful algal bloom event

Fig. 1. Stylised maps of Singapore and Raffles Marina (inset). Dotted lines indicate areas outside Raffles Marina where fish traps were deployed.

Fig. 3. Average a in Influence of a tropical marina on nearshore fish communities during a harmful algal bloom event

Fig. 3. Average a) Species richness, b) catch abundance, and c) species diversity (Shannon Wiener index) of fish communities within and outside Raffles Marina before and after a harmful algal bloom event in February 2014 (all means ± SE). DJF-13: December 2013– February 2014; MAM-14: March 2014–May 2014; JJA-14: June 2014–August 2014; SON-14: September 2014–November 2014; DJF-14: December 2014–February 2015. Seasons that are not significantly different are denoted by the same letter (lower case – within marina; upper case – outside marina).

Fig. 2 in Influence of a tropical marina on nearshore fish communities during a harmful algal bloom event

Fig. 2. Principal coordinates analysis of fish communities within and outside Raffles Marina before the harmful algal bloom event in February 2014. The two principal coordinates explained 55.1% of total variation. Factors shown within the circle correlate with PCO1 or PCO2 with a factor of at least 0.5.

Fig. 5 in Influence of a tropical marina on nearshore fish communities during a harmful algal bloom event

Fig. 5. Principal coordinates analysis of fish communities outside Raffles Marina before and after a harmful algal bloom event in February 2014. The two principal coordinates explained 43.2% of total variation. Factors shown within the circle correlate with PCO1 or PCO2 with a factor of at least 0.5. (DJF-13: December 2013–February 2014; MAM-14: March 2014–May 2014; JJA-14: June 2014–August 2014; SON-14: September 2014– ovember 2014; DJF-14: December 2014–February 2015).

Fig. 4 in Influence of a tropical marina on nearshore fish communities during a harmful algal bloom event

Fig. 4. Principal coordinates analysis of fish community within Raffles Marina before and after a HAB event in February 2014. The two principal coordinates explained 38.1% of total variation. Factors shown within the circle correlate with PCO1 or PCO2 with a factor of at least 0.5. (DJF-13: December 2013–February 2014; MAM-14: March 2014–May 2014; JJA-14: June 2014–August 2014; SON-14: September 2014–November 2014; DJF-14: December 2014–February 2015).

Fig. 7 in Diversity And Assemblage Patterns Of Juvenile And Small Sized Fishes In The Nearshore Habitats Of The Gulf Of Thailand

Fig. 7. Results from LDA analysis showing (a) the distribution and overlap of groups of clusters (ellipsoid) and (b) the contribution of parameters to F1 and F2.

Fig. 4 in Diversity And Assemblage Patterns Of Juvenile And Small Sized Fishes In The Nearshore Habitats Of The Gulf Of Thailand

Fig. 4. Boxplots showing (a) abundance (log10-transformed) and (b) diversity index (H′ index) of fish samples in each habitat. Note: The same letter(s) in each box indicates values that are not significantly different when applying the Duncan's post-test, p-value> 0.05.

Fig. 5 in Diversity And Assemblage Patterns Of Juvenile And Small Sized Fishes In The Nearshore Habitats Of The Gulf Of Thailand

Fig. 5. Nodal diagram showing species and sample groups and abundance (log10-transformed) of fish samples per cluster.

Fig. 1 in Diversity And Assemblage Patterns Of Juvenile And Small Sized Fishes In The Nearshore Habitats Of The Gulf Of Thailand

Fig. 1. Location of the sampling habitats at Had Khanom Mu Ko Thale Tai National Park, Thailand. Note: the sampling sites; ▲ seagrass beds; ■ mudflats; ● sandy beaches; ★ mangroves.