Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
93
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
93 results for “nesting behaviour”
Figure 3 in Nesting behaviour of Canthon unicolor and C. histrio: a new subsocial nesting variation in dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Deltochilini)
Figure 3. Brood balls of Canthon unicolor and C. histrio. A) View of the brood ball of C. unicolor coated with the external shield layer, B) Internal morphology of the brood ball of C. unicolor and its external shield layer, C) Brood ball of C. histrio coated with the external shield layer, D) Internal morphology of the brood ball of C. histrio and its external shield layer. Measures: a) total height, b) total equatorial diameter, c) thickness of the shield layer, d) height of brood ball, e) equatorial diameter of brood ball, f) thickness of brood ball layer, g) height of protuberance, h) diameter of protuberance, i) diameter of provision chamber. Scale bar = 1 cm.
Figure 2 in Nesting behaviour of Canthon unicolor and C. histrio: a new subsocial nesting variation in dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Deltochilini)
Figure 2. Nests of Canthon unicolor and C. histrio. A) Male and female of C. unicolor near to brood ball, B) Nest of C. histrio with the female covering their brood ball with the shield layer.
Figure 1 in Nesting behaviour of Canthon unicolor and C. histrio: a new subsocial nesting variation in dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Deltochilini)
Figure 1. Nesting behaviour of Canthon unicolor and C. histrio. Cycle repeated. In grey, the new phases of the variation of the nesting pattern IV. Comma indicates no cooperation required between sexes; i.e. the activity in question may be performed by either the female or the male alone; addition symbol between the sexes indicates cooperation required; parentheses indicates obligatory activity for females with optional cooperation by male.
Figure 2. A in First description of the nest, eggs, and nestlings of White-tufted Sunbeam (Aglaeactis castelnaudii) and incubation behaviours of Shining Sunbeam (A. cupripennis) in the southeast of Peru
Figure 2. A. castelnaudii (a) nest (Photo: D. Ocampo); (b) egg; and (c) nestling at Abra Malaga Cusco- Machu Picchu road (Photos: H. Greeney).
Figure 1 in First description of the nest, eggs, and nestlings of White-tufted Sunbeam (Aglaeactis castelnaudii) and incubation behaviours of Shining Sunbeam (A. cupripennis) in the southeast of Peru
Figure 1. Habitat used by A. castelnaudii in Abra Malaga, along the Cusco-Machu Picchu road with some patches of Polylepis forest (a), mixed with open areas and fragments of shrubs and mid-height trees belonging principally to the families Ericaceae and Asteraceae (b), at the southeastern Peruvian Andes.
Figure 3 in First description of the nest, eggs, and nestlings of White-tufted Sunbeam (Aglaeactis castelnaudii) and incubation behaviours of Shining Sunbeam (A. cupripennis) in the southeast of Peru
Figure 3. Nest, eggs, and incubation behavior of A. cupripennis for 10 days early in the incubation period (a) female incubating on the nest (Photo: D. Ocampo), showing the temperature sensor cord inserted through the nest indicated by the white arrow; (b) eggs (Photo: G. Londoño); (c) daily count of trips off the nest; and (d) duration of the trips. Notice that days 2 and 8 (brown background) had the highest values of number of trips and the shortest average trip duration which might be a different incubation strategy compared to the other days of monitoring.
Figure 4. Incubation pattern data for A in First description of the nest, eggs, and nestlings of White-tufted Sunbeam (Aglaeactis castelnaudii) and incubation behaviours of Shining Sunbeam (A. cupripennis) in the southeast of Peru
Figure 4. Incubation pattern data for A. cupripennis. (a) Nest and ambient temperatures variation during 10 days of the incubation period; (b) nest and ambient temperature during a daily cycle, with the nest temperature fluctuation reflecting trips off the nest (day 3), hummingbird illustration by Camila León; and (c) box-diagram showing the relationships (lm *P <0.05) between different variables involved in maintaining the nest temperature.
Figure 3. Association between C. sulcata and A. chartifex. A in Nesting behaviour of Neotropical social wasps of the genus Clypearia de Saussure (Hymenoptera: Vespidae: Polistinae)
Figure 3. Association between C. sulcata and A. chartifex. A, The wasps' colony is close to two ants' nests. B, Note that C. sulcata placed its nest immediately above the ants' nests. C and D, Individuals of A. chartifex in dorsal and lateral view.
Figure 2 in Nesting behaviour of Neotropical social wasps of the genus Clypearia de Saussure (Hymenoptera: Vespidae: Polistinae)
Figure 2. Nest camouflage on Clypearia species as a defence feature. A and B, Clypearia angustior; C, Clypearia apicipennis; D, Clypearia weyrauchi.
Figure 5. Nestling feeding behaviour during the 15 in Nesting biology of Green-and-gold tanager (Tangara schrankii): unique traits for lowland reproductive success?
Figure 5. Nestling feeding behaviour during the 15-day nestling period, based on six nests monitored for a total of 30 days. (a) Hourly and (b) daily feeding trips.
Figure 3 in Nesting biology and behavioural ecology of the solitary bee Monoeca haemorrhoidalis (Smith) and its cleptoparasite Protosiris gigas Melo (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Tapinotaspidini; Osirini)
Figure 3. Percentage of pollen grains found in samples collected from females and males of Monoeca haemorrhoidalis.
Figure 2 in Nesting biology and behavioural ecology of the solitary bee Monoeca haemorrhoidalis (Smith) and its cleptoparasite Protosiris gigas Melo (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Tapinotaspidini; Osirini)
Figure 2. (A) Female Monoeca haemorrhoidalis building a tumulus around the nest entrance; (B) female entering its nest with a mixture of pollen and oil on its scopae; (C) a "nesting female" inside its nest and an "invader female" in the surroundings; (D) an "invader female" entering the nest after the "nesting female" left; (E) a female with exuvial remains entering a nest when the "nesting female" was away; (F) males trying to copulate with a newly emerged female; (G) a cluster of males trying to copulate with a female; (H) M. haemorrhoidalis copulation; (I) a copulation attempt between a M. haemorrhoidalis male and a Protosiris gigas male; (J) a female M. haemorrhoidalis on flowers of Niedenzuella acutifolia; (K) a female with a pollinarium of Grandiphyllum divaricatum on its front; (L) a male M. haemorrhoidalis on flowers of Coccocypselum condalia.
Figure 4 in Nesting biology and behavioural ecology of the solitary bee Monoeca haemorrhoidalis (Smith) and its cleptoparasite Protosiris gigas Melo (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Tapinotaspidini; Osirini)
Figure 4. (A) Female Heterostylum maculipennis hovering over a nest of M. haemorrhoidalis; (B) an individual of Tetraolytta gerardi eating pollen on flowers of Niedenzuella acutifolia; (C) an individual of Pyrogaster moestus preying on a male Monoeca haemorrhoidalis; (D) a female Pseudomethoca melanocephala excavating a closed nest of M. haemorrhoidalis; (E) Protosiris gigas copulation; (F) a female P. gigas leaving a nest after parasitizing it; (G) a female P. gigas removing earth pellets from a nest entrance; (H) a specimen P. gigas visiting flowers of Coccocypselum condalia; (I) a female P. gigas perching on leaves of Coccocypselum condalia.
Figure 1 in Nesting biology and behavioural ecology of the solitary bee Monoeca haemorrhoidalis (Smith) and its cleptoparasite Protosiris gigas Melo (Hymenoptera: Apidae: Tapinotaspidini; Osirini)
Figure 1. Monthly variation in relative air humidity, annual rainfall and temperature, measured from March 2005 to February 2007 in the Meteorological Station of Pinhais, southern Brazil.
Figure 10 in Phylogeny and the evolution of nesting behaviour in the tribe Ageniellini (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Pompilidae)
Figure 10. The results of phylogenetic analyses of the tribe Ageniellini. Strict consensus of 2572 most parsimonious trees and> 50% majority consensus of Bayesian inference trees provided compatible topology (solid branches), the latter of which was more resolved (dashed branches). The statistical support for the branches (bootstrap score and posterior probability,> 50%) is shown above the branches.
Figure 9 in Phylogeny and the evolution of nesting behaviour in the tribe Ageniellini (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Pompilidae)
Figure 9. Characters of wings. A–E, forewing: (A) Machaerothrix tsushimensis; (B) Priocnemis irritabilis; (C) Macromeris violacea; (D) Mystacagenia sp.; (E) Macromerella honesta. F and G, anterobasal hindwing: (F) Caliadurgus ussuriensis; (G) Cyemagenia rubrozonata. H–J, hindwing: (H) Macromeris violacea; (I) Ageniella (Alasagenia) sartoriana; (J) Machaerothrix tsushimensis. Scale bars: 0.5 mm. (F from Shimizu, 1994.)
Figure 12 in Phylogeny and the evolution of nesting behaviour in the tribe Ageniellini (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Pompilidae)
Figure 12. Evolution of nesting behaviour in the Ageniellini. Ancestral states are estimated under the criteria of (A) maximum parsimony, and (B) maximum likelihood with the Mk1 model. Branch shading shows the estimated character states; the proportional likelihood for the most plausible state is shown on the branches in (B). Branch lengths were based on the Bayesian inference tree (Fig. 10).
Figure 8 in Phylogeny and the evolution of nesting behaviour in the tribe Ageniellini (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Pompilidae)
Figure 8. Characters of legs. A and B, male hind femur, ventrolateral view: (A) Machaerothrix tsushimensis; (B) Macromeris violacea. C–F, apex of female left fore tibia, dorsal view: (C) Ageniella (Nemagenia) longula; (D) Ctenocerus ramosus (Smith, 1865); (E) Caliadurgus ussuriensis; (F) Priocnemella rufothorax. G–K, hind tibia, dorsolateral (G–I) and inner views (J, K): (G) Paragenia argentifrons; (H, J) Poecilagenia rubricans; (I) Priocnemis irritabilis; (K) Ageniella (Nemagenia) longula. L–N, hind tarsomere V, ventral (L) and ventrolateral views (M, N): (L) Priocnemis japonica Gussakovskij, 1930; (M) Auplopus kyotensis: (N) Leptodialepis nicevillei (Bingham, 1896). O–T, male fore tarsal claw, inner claw (O, Q, S) and outer claw (P, R, T): (O, P) Macromerella honesta; (Q, R) Phanochilus sp.; (S, T) Ageniella (Leucophrus) semitincta. U–Y, male hind tarsal claw, inner claw (Y) and outer claw (U–X): (U) Auplopus pygialis (Pérez, 1905); (V) Dichragenia pulchricoma; (W) Calopompilus pyrrhomelas; (X, Y) Poecilagenia sculpturata. Z and AA, apical tarsomeres of hind leg, dorsal (Z) and outer views (AA): (Z) Cyemagenia rubrozonata; (AA) Atopagenia menkei. Scale bars 0.5 mm: a for (B); b for (G, AA); c for (A, I, K, N); d for (C, F, H, J); e for (E); f for (D, M, O–R, U, W, Z); g for (L); h for (V); i for (X, Y); j for (S, T). (B, I, and L–N from Shimizu, 1994; X and Y from Shimizu, 2000a.)
Figure 5 in Phylogeny and the evolution of nesting behaviour in the tribe Ageniellini (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Pompilidae)
Figure 5. Characters of mesosoma, female (D–K) and male (A–C). A–G, head and pronotum, dorsal (A–D), lateral (E), and dorsolateral views (F, G): (A) Ageniella (Leucophrus) semitincta; (B) Ageniella (Lissagenia) difformis; (C–E) Ageniella (Nemagenia) longula; (F) Poecilagenia rubricans; (G) Atopagenia menkei. H and I, lower mesopleuron, lateral view: (H) Paragenia argentifrons; (I) Macromeris violacea. J and K, mesosternum, ventral view: (J) Cyemagenia certator; (K) Macromerella honesta. Scale bars: 0.5 mm.
Figure 6 in Phylogeny and the evolution of nesting behaviour in the tribe Ageniellini (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Pompilidae)
Figure 6. Characters of head, propodeum, tarsal seta, forewing, and propodeum: female (A–I) and male (J). A and B, propodeum, lateral view: (A) Auplopus carbonarius; (B) Ageniella (Ageniella) coronata. C–E, apicodorsal sublateral seta on hind tarsomere IV, dorsal view: (C) Priocnemis irritabilis; (D) Auplopus carbonarius; (E) Poecilagenia sculpturata. F, forewing of Macromeris violacea. G, clypeus of Priocnemella tabascoensis, anterior view. H–J, propodeum, dorsal view: (H) Phanagenia bombycina; (I) Poecilagenia sculpturata; (J) Machaerothrix tsushimensis. Scale bars: 1 mm.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.