Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2017View details →

Fig. 1 in Do container size and predator presence affect Culex (Diptera: Culicidae) oviposition preferences?

Fig. 1. Numbers of eggs rafts number as a function of sampling days and container size.The 100 and 200-L barrels are represented by closed triangles and closed circles, respectively. The open circles represent the 15-L buckets, and asterisks represent the 1-L cups. The bars represent standard error. Different letters indicate different means among the treatments.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2023View details →

Figure 3. Daily temperature variation for a in On the oviposition of Homonota aff. darwinii in the Puna region of the Central Andes of Argentina

Figure 3. Daily temperature variation for a potential Homonota aff. darwinii nesting site. Average and standard errors are indicated.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2023View details →

Figure 1. Species and study area. A in On the oviposition of Homonota aff. darwinii in the Puna region of the Central Andes of Argentina

Figure 1. Species and study area. A) Homonota aff. darwinii adult in the Cordillera Frontal of the province of San Juan, Argentina. B) General view of the environment in which Homonota aff darwinii exists in the Puna region of the Central Andes of Argentina.

Fig. 1 in Oviposition by Copitarsia decolora Guenée (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on and near the host plant

Fig. 1. Number of eggs (mean ± SEM) of paired females of C. decolora on and near the host plant. Different letters indicate mean values significantly different at P <0.05 (Tukey), n = 12.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2018View details →

Fig. 1 in Oviposition preference of rugose spiraling whitefly (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) on five host plant species

Fig. 1. Photo showing the cage arrangement. Six cages (1.83 × 1.83 × 1.83 m with 20 × 20 Mesh Lumite) were constructed in a shadehouse in a north-south row. Each cage had 5 potential host plants and a source plant containing adult whiteflies.

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2018View details →

Fig. 2 in Oviposition preference of rugose spiraling whitefly (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) on five host plant species

Fig. 2. The cumulative number of eggs deposited on different plants during the experiment. The average cumulative number of eggs was always greatest on gumbo limbo.

Fig. 1 in The effects of non-host plant extracts on the oviposition deterrent and ovicidal activity of Conopomorpha sinensis Bradley (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae)

Fig. 1. The effect of 5 plant extracts on oviposition activity index (OAI) values of Conopomorpha sinensis in the choice test. Plant extracts with oviposition activity indexes of ≥ 0.3 are considered as attractants, whereas those of ≤ −0.3 are considered to be deterrents. Negative values indicate that more eggs were deposited in the control group than those in groups receiving treatment with plant extracts.

Fig. 3 in Does prior feeding behavior by previous generations of the maize weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) determine future descendants feeding preference and ovipositional suitability?

Fig. 3. Mean (SE) number of S. zeamais (n = 8,000) attracted to corn, barley, brown rice, and white rice, with a 200 µL Eppendorf tube containing the pheromone lure placed in barley. Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

Fig. 2 in Effect of two oviposition feeding substrates on Orius insidiosus and Orius tristicolor (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae)

Fig. 2. Cumulative daily fertility for Orius tristicolor females on 2 oviposition substrates: bean pods and pepper fruits.

Fig. 6 in Does prior feeding behavior by previous generations of the maize weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) determine future descendants feeding preference and ovipositional suitability?

Fig. 6. Number (SE) of S. zeamais male and female (n = 200) emergence when reared on the individual host grains: corn, barley, brown rice, and white rice. Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

Fig. 5 in Does prior feeding behavior by previous generations of the maize weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) determine future descendants feeding preference and ovipositional suitability?

Fig. 5. Mean (SE) number of S. zeamais (n = 8,000) attracted to corn, barley, brown rice, and white rice, with a 200 µL Eppendorf tube containing the pheromone lure placed in brown rice. Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

Fig. 2 in Does prior feeding behavior by previous generations of the maize weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) determine future descendants feeding preference and ovipositional suitability?

Fig. 2. Mean (SE) number of S. zeamais (n = 8,000) attracted to corn, barley, brown rice, and white rice, with a 200 µL Eppendorf tube containing the pheromone lure placed in corn. Weevils were reared on corn, barley, brown rice, and white rice, then presented with a choice of 4 host grains. Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

Fig. 1 in Does prior feeding behavior by previous generations of the maize weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) determine future descendants feeding preference and ovipositional suitability?

Fig. 1. Mean (SE) number of S. zeamais (n = 8,000) attracted to corn, barley, brown rice, and white rice. Weevils were reared on corn, barley, brown rice, and white rice, then presented with a choice of 4 host grains. Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

Fig. 4 in Does prior feeding behavior by previous generations of the maize weevil (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) determine future descendants feeding preference and ovipositional suitability?

Fig. 4. Mean (SE) number of S. zeamais (n = 8,000) attracted to corn, barley, brown rice, and white rice, with a 200 µL Eppendorf tube containing the pheromone lure placed in white rice. Means with the same letter are not significantly different.

Fig. 3 in Effect of two oviposition feeding substrates on Orius insidiosus and Orius tristicolor (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae)

Fig. 3. Survival curves (in %) of Orius insidiosus females on 2 oviposition substrates under controlled conditions (25 ± 1 °C, 65 ± 10% RH, and a 16:8 h [L:D] photoperiod): bean pods and pepper fruits.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2023View details →

Fig. 1. Egg masses deposited per m2 in Evaluating materials to serve as removable oviposition substrates for Lycorma delicatula (Hemiptera: Fulgoridae) under field conditions

Fig. 1. Egg masses deposited per m2 of removable substrates deployed in direct contact with Ailanthus altissima in 2019. Kruskal-Wallis analysis with Steel-Dwass post hoc applied: bars (means ± SE) sharing a letter were not significantly different from each other. Total egg masses collected from each substrate type is speci- fied above each bar.

Fig. 1 in Effect of the oviposition period and age of the females of Dalbulus maidis (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) in the emergence of egg parasitoids

Fig. 1. Average (± SE) number of eggs laid per d by Dalbulus maidis in treatments (Young-3, Young-6, Mature-3, and Mature-6). The circles represent the mature (8-wk-old) leafoppers, whereas the squares represent the young (2-wk-old) leafoppers.

Fig. 4 in Lady beetle oviposition site choices: maternal effects on offspring performance

Fig. 4. Chroma (carotenoids) of Cycloneda sanguinea (A) and Hippodamia convergens (B) adults that developed with the Uroleucon (grey) and Brevicoryne (black) diets during the immature stages as a function of the mean brightness. Females are indicated with triangles and males with crosses. The dashed ellipse highlights the difference in mean brightness of Cycloneda sanguinea adults for each diet.

Fig. 2 in Lady beetle oviposition site choices: maternal effects on offspring performance

Fig. 2. Individual adult weight (mg) for Cycloneda sanguinea, Hippodamia convergens, and Harmonia axyridis that emerged afer the Uroleucon (grey) and Brevicoryne (black) larvae diets as a function of development time (d). Females are indicated with triangles and males with crosses. The dashed line indicates the weight difference of Cycloneda sanguinea in each diet.

Fig. 1 in Lady beetle oviposition site choices: maternal effects on offspring performance

Fig. 1. Survival curves as a function of time for Harmonia axyridis (A) and Cycloneda sanguinea (B) immatures fed with aphids Brevicoryne (white) or Uroleucon (grey). Straight lines demarcate the average periods for instars (first to fourth in Roman numerals) and pupae.