Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
217
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
217 results for “phylogeny of hosts”
FIGURES 5–7 in Taxonomy, host-plant associations and phylogeny of African Crotalaria - feeding seed beetles (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Bruchinae): the Conicobruchus strangulatus (Fåhraeus) species group
FIGURES 5–7. Conicobruchus decoratus: 5—median lobe; 6—basal strut and lateral lobes (specimen 02012, Zambia); Conicobruchus flabellicornis: 7—median lobe (specimen 01209, Kenya).
FIGURE 1 in Taxonomy, host-plant associations and phylogeny of African Crotalaria - feeding seed beetles (Coleoptera, Chrysomelidae, Bruchinae): the Conicobruchus strangulatus (Fåhraeus) species group
FIGURE 1. Dorsal view of specimens belonging the to six species of the Conicobruchus strangulatus species group.
FIGURE 5 in Revision of the world Monoctonia Starý, parasitoids of gall aphids: taxonomy, distribution, host range, and phylogeny (Hymenoptera, Braconidae: Aphidiinae)
FIGURE 5. Cocoons of Monoctonia species, A. Forda marginata parasitized by Monoctonia pistaciaecola; B. Pemphigus matsumurai parasitized by Monoctonia japonica; C and D. Pemphigus spyrothecae parasitized by Monoctonia vesicarii; E. Emergence of adult parasitoid, M. vesicarii from the cocoons.
FIGURE 3 in Revision of the world Monoctonia Starý, parasitoids of gall aphids: taxonomy, distribution, host range, and phylogeny (Hymenoptera, Braconidae: Aphidiinae)
FIGURE 3. Monoctonia japonica Rakhshani & Tomanović, sp. n., female—A. Head; B. Antenna; C. Maxillary and labial palpomeres; D. Propodeum; E. Petiole; F. Fore wing; G. Hind wing; H. Genitalia.
FIGURE 4 in Revision of the world Monoctonia Starý, parasitoids of gall aphids: taxonomy, distribution, host range, and phylogeny (Hymenoptera, Braconidae: Aphidiinae)
FIGURE 4. Monoctonia vesicarii Tremblay, female—A. Head; B. Antenna; C. Maxillary and labial palpomeres; D. Propodeum; E. Petiole; F. Fore wing; G. Hind wing; H. Genitalia.
FIGURE 2 in Revision of the world Monoctonia Starý, parasitoids of gall aphids: taxonomy, distribution, host range, and phylogeny (Hymenoptera, Braconidae: Aphidiinae)
FIGURE 2. Monoctonia pistaciaecola Starý, female—A. Head; B. Antenna; C. Maxillary and labial palpomeres; D. Propodeum; E. Petiole; F. Fore wing; G. Hind wing; H. Genitalia.
FIGURE 1 in Revision of the world Monoctonia Starý, parasitoids of gall aphids: taxonomy, distribution, host range, and phylogeny (Hymenoptera, Braconidae: Aphidiinae)
FIGURE 1. BI Phylogram for COI mtDNA sequences of the species belonging to the subtribe Monoctonina showing Bayesian posterior probabilities above 50%. The scale bar indicates substitutions per site. Praon volucre was used as an outgroup.
FIGURES 73–76 in The nematode genus Fergusobia (Nematoda: Neotylenchidae): molecular phylogeny, descriptions of clades and associated galls, host plants and Fergusonina fly larvae 2633
FIGURES 73–76. Scanning electron micrographs of anterior end of parthenogenetic females of Fergusobia. 73: from E. planchoniana 'leafy' LBG. 76: from E. delegatensis TLG. 77: from E. tereticornis TLG. 78: from E. gomphocephala PG. Scale bars 2 µm.
FIGURES 80–88 in The nematode genus Fergusobia (Nematoda: Neotylenchidae): molecular phylogeny, descriptions of clades and associated galls, host plants and Fergusonina fly larvae 2633
FIGURES 80–88. Gall forms induced by the Fergusobia/Fergusonina mutualism. 80: PG on leaf and petiole on S. luehmannii. 81: SBG on M. quinquenervia. 82: axial bud 'stem' galls on C. tessellaris. 83: FBG on E. eugenioides. 84: TLG on E. camaldulensis. 85: Bud galls on E. leucoxylon. 86: Unilocular axial bud gall on M. decora. 87: PG on leaf of E. pauciflora. 88: PG on leaf of E. gomphocephala. Scale bars 80–83 = 5mm; 84 = 1cm; 85–88 = 5mm
FIGURES 69–72 in The nematode genus Fergusobia (Nematoda: Neotylenchidae): molecular phylogeny, descriptions of clades and associated galls, host plants and Fergusonina fly larvae 2633
FIGURES 69–72. Scanning electron micrographs of lateral fields of parthenogenetic females of Fergusobia. 69: from E. gomphocephala PG. 70: from E. tereticornis TLG. 71: from E. viminalis 'leafy' LBG. 72: from E. gomphocephala PG. Scale bars 69–71 = 5 µm; 72 = 2 µm.
FIGURES 1–22 in The nematode genus Fergusobia (Nematoda: Neotylenchidae): molecular phylogeny, descriptions of clades and associated galls, host plants and Fergusonina fly larvae 2633
FIGURES 1–22. Habitus drawings of parthenogenetic females from Fergusobia clades inferred from sequences of D2/ D3. 1: F. magna from C. tessellaris axial bud 'stem' galls. 2: from M. linariifolia SBG. 3: from E. camaldulensis TLG. 4: from E. camaldulensis FBG. 5: from E. microcarpa FBG. 6: from E. delegatensis TLG. 7: from E. fasciculosa style gall. 8: from E. gomphocephala PG. 9: from E. planchoniana 'leafy' LBG. 10: from E. tereticornis PG. 11: from S. luehmannii PG. 12: F. ptychocarpae from C. ptychocarpa FBG. 13: from A. floribunda TLG. 14: F. fisheri from E. leucoxylon FLG. 15: from Corymbia sp. PG. 16: from E. camaldulensis axial bud 'stem' galls. 17: F. quinquenerviae from M. quinquenervia SBG. 18: from M. nervosa BSG. 19: from M. quinquenervia 'rosette' gall. 20: from E. obliqua FBG a. 21: from E. obliqua FBG b. 22: from E. viminalis 'leafy' LBG. Scale bars = 50µm.
FIGURES 62–68 in The nematode genus Fergusobia (Nematoda: Neotylenchidae): molecular phylogeny, descriptions of clades and associated galls, host plants and Fergusonina fly larvae 2633
FIGURES 62–68. Shield forms found on third stage larvae of Fergusonina fly species associated with Fergusobia nematodes. "Bars" form. 62: from E. delegatensis TLG. 63: from Eucalyptus sp. FLG. "Dots" form. 64: from E. porosa PG. 65: from E. viminalis ULBG. 66: from E. odorata FLG. 67: from E. siderophloia FLG. "Plates with teeth" form. 68: from E. cosmophylla TLG. Scale bars 62–67 = 0.02mm; 68= 0.2mm.
FIGURES 44–61 in The nematode genus Fergusobia (Nematoda: Neotylenchidae): molecular phylogeny, descriptions of clades and associated galls, host plants and Fergusonina fly larvae 2633
FIGURES 44–61. Habitus drawings of preparasitic infective females from Fergusobia clades inferred from sequences of D2/D3. 44: F. magna from C. tessellaris axial bud 'stem' galls. 45: from M. linariifolia 46 from E. camaldulensis TLG. 47: from E. camaldulensis FBG. 48: from E. microcarpa FBG. 49: from E. delegatensis TLG. 50: from E. fasciculosa style gall. 51: from E. gomphocephala PG. 52: from E planchoniana 'leafy' LBG. 53: from S. luehmannii PG. 54: F. ptychocarpae from C. ptychocarpa FBG. 55: from A. floribunda TLG. 56: F. fisheri from E. leucoxylon FLG. 57: from Corymbia sp. PG. 58: from E. camaldulensis axial bud 'stem' galls. 59: F. quinquenerviae from M. quinquenervia SBG. 60: from M. quinquenervia 'rosette' gall. 61: from E. viminalis 'leafy' LBG. Scale bars = 50µm.
FIGURES 23–43 in The nematode genus Fergusobia (Nematoda: Neotylenchidae): molecular phylogeny, descriptions of clades and associated galls, host plants and Fergusonina fly larvae 2633
FIGURES 23–43. Habitus drawings of males from Fergusobia clades inferred from sequences of D2/D3. 23: F. magna from C. tessellaris axial bud 'stem' galls. 24: from M. linariifolia ULBG. 25: from E. camaldulensis TLG. 26: from E. camaldulensis FBG. 27: from E. microcarpa FBG. 28: from E. delegatensis TLG. 29: from E. fasciculosa style gall. 30: from E. gomphocephala PG. 31: from E. planchoniana 'leafy' LBG. 32: from E. tereticornis PG. 33: from S. luehmannii PG. 34: F. ptychocarpae from C. ptychocarpa FBG. 35: from A. floribunda TLG. 36: F. fisheri from E. leucoxylon FLG. 37: from Corymbia sp. PG. 38: from E. camaldulensis axial bud 'stem' galls. 39: F. quinquenerviae from M. quinquenervia SBG. 40: from M. quinquenervia 'rosette' gall. 41: from E. obliqua FBGa. 42: from E. obliqua FBGb. 43: from E. viminalis 'leafy' LBG. Scale bars = 50µm.
Figure 8. Oxydromus humesi and Scrobicularia plana. First contacts with the host. A1–A3 in On the enigmatic symbiotic polychaete 'Parasyllidea' humesi Pettibone, 1961 (Hesionidae): taxonomy, phylogeny and behaviour
Figure 8. Oxydromus humesi and Scrobicularia plana. First contacts with the host. A1–A3, contact with the bivalve and displacement to lie between shell and glass bottom. B1–B3, crawling over the host shell until reaching the siphons.
Data from: The effects of phylogeny, habitat, and host characteristics on the thermal sensitivity of helminth development
<p>Helminth parasites are part of almost every ecosystem, with more than 300 000 species worldwide. Helminth infection dynamics are expected to be altered by climate change, but predicting future changes is difficult due to lacking thermal sensitivity data for greater than 99.9% of helminth species. Here, we compiled the largest dataset to date on helminth temperature sensitivities and used the Metabolic Theory of Ecology to estimate activation energies (AEs) for parasite developmental rates. The median AE for 129 thermal performance curves was 0.67, similar to non-parasitic animals. Although exceptions existed, related species tended to have similar thermal sensitivities, suggesting some helminth taxa are inherently more affected by rising temperatures than others. Developmental rates were more temperature-sensitive for species from colder habitats than those from warmer habitats, and more temperature sensitive for species in terrestrial than aquatic habitats. AEs did not depend on whether helminth life stages were free-living or within hosts, whether the species infected plants or animals, or whether the species had an endotherm host in its life cycle. The phylogenetic conservatism of AE may facilitate predicting how temperature change affects the development of helminth species for which empirical data are lacking or difficult to obtain.Helminth parasites are part of almost every ecosystem, with more than 300 000 species worldwide. Helminth infection dynamics are expected to be altered by climate change, but predicting future changes is difficult due to lacking thermal sensitivity data for greater than 99.9% of helminth species. Here, we compiled the largest dataset to date on helminth temperature sensitivities and used the Metabolic Theory of Ecology to estimate activation energies (AEs) for parasite developmental rates. The median AE for 129 thermal performance curves was 0.67, similar to non-parasitic animals. Although exceptions existed, related species tended to have similar thermal sensitivities, suggesting some helminth taxa are inherently more affected by rising temperatures than others. Developmental rates were more temperature-sensitive for species from colder habitats than those from warmer habitats, and more temperature sensitive for species in terrestrial than aquatic habitats. AEs did not depend on whether helminth life stages were free-living or within hosts, whether the species infected plants or animals, or whether the species had an endotherm host in its life cycle. The phylogenetic conservatism of AE may facilitate predicting how temperature change affects the development of helminth species for which empirical data are lacking or difficult to obtain.</p>
FIGURE 6 in Rumen ciliates (Alveolata, Ciliophora) associated with goats: checklist, geographic distribution, host specificity, phylogeny and molecular dating
FIGURE 6. Dated phylogeny obtained through Maximum Likelihood for endosymbiont ciliates of the Trichostomatia subclass. The red vertical line represents the radiation period of the Caprinae subfamily (Ropiquet & Hassanin 2005 a, b). The green circles represent the nodes and the possible period in millions of years of diversification of the Isotrichidae (4.3–15.5) and Ophryoscolecidae (1.0–5.7) families. My—Millions of years.
FIGURE 4 in Rumen ciliates (Alveolata, Ciliophora) associated with goats: checklist, geographic distribution, host specificity, phylogeny and molecular dating
FIGURE 4. Interaction network between ciliate protozoa species associated with goats and other hosts. The bars in grey and black represent some hosts that associate with ciliates and the ciliate protozoa species, respectively. The colored arrows (ranging from black to red) represent the associations between hosts and ciliate species. The size of the grey and black bars represents the hosts and ciliate species with greater or lower association, respectively (Dogiel 1928; Dehority 1974; Vasily & Mitchell 1974; Wilkinson & Van Hoven 1976; Kleynhans & Hoven 1976; Van Hoven et al. 1979; Dehority 1987; Towne et al. 1988; Dehority 1995; Selim et al. 1996; Dehority 1997; Wright & Lynn 1997; Selim et al. 1999; Dehority et al. 1999; Franzolin & Dehority 1999; Su et al. 2000; Imai et al. 2004; Talar et al. 2004; De la Fuente et al. 2006; Obanda et al. 2008; Del Valle et al. 2008; Martinele & D'Agosto 2008; Mishima et al. 2009; Booyse & Dehority 2012; Baraka 2012; Booyse et al. 2014; Booyse et al. 2015; Cerón Cucchi et al. 2016; Cedrola et al. 2016; Cedrola et al. 2017; Kimura et al. 2017; Gürelli 2017; Gürelli 2018; Cedrola et al. 2018).
FIGURE 5 in Rumen ciliates (Alveolata, Ciliophora) associated with goats: checklist, geographic distribution, host specificity, phylogeny and molecular dating
FIGURE 5. Phylogenetic tree obtained through Maximum Likelihood representing evolutionary relationships of some species of ciliates, based on 18S rDNA sequences. The red color represents species observed in studies with rumen samples from goats. Subclass Haptoria was chosen as outgroup. The values in each node of the tree mean, respectively: Maximum Likelihood (ML) bootstrap and Bayesian inference (BI) values of posterior probability. Scale bar represents 3 substitutions per 100 nucleotide positions.
FIGURE 2 in Rumen ciliates (Alveolata, Ciliophora) associated with goats: checklist, geographic distribution, host specificity, phylogeny and molecular dating
FIGURE 2. Schematic representation of the association of ciliate protozoa genera and the host species of the Caprinae subfamily. The numbers around the circle represent the number of times a genus has been observed in a host. The colors red, pink, caramel and dark orange of the bars represent, respectively, the hosts Capra hircus, Rupicapra rupicapra, Capra pyrenaica, and Capra ibex, and the genera associated with them. The lines within the circle indicate the association between host species and the genera.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.