Find research datasets worth reusing

APPENDIX 6 in Equids from the late Middle Pleistocene to Early Holocene of the Apulia Peninsula (southern Italy): reassessment of their taxonomy and biochronology

APPENDIX 6. — Boxplot of length of lower molars (A, M L; B, M3L) from the late Middle Pleistocene to Early Holocene sites of the Apulia. Abbreviations see: Table 1. 1-2

APPENDIX 5 in Equids from the late Middle Pleistocene to Early Holocene of the Apulia Peninsula (southern Italy): reassessment of their taxonomy and biochronology

APPENDIX 5. — Boxplot of length of lower premolars (A, P2L; B, P3-4L) from the late Middle Pleistocene to Early Holocene sites of the Apulia.Abbreviations see: Table 1.

APPENDIX 4 in Equids from the late Middle Pleistocene to Early Holocene of the Apulia Peninsula (southern Italy): reassessment of their taxonomy and biochronology

APPENDIX 4. — Boxplot of length of upper molars (A, M1-2L; B, M3L) from the late Middle Pleistocene to Early Holocene sites of the Apulia. Abbreviations: see Table 1.

APPENDIX 2 in Equids from the late Middle Pleistocene to Early Holocene of the Apulia Peninsula (southern Italy): reassessment of their taxonomy and biochronology

APPENDIX 2. — Schematic stratigraphical log of Grotta Uluzzo C (modified from Borzatti von LÖwenstern & Magaldi 1969).

FIG. 7 in Equids from the late Middle Pleistocene to Early Holocene of the Apulia Peninsula (southern Italy): reassessment of their taxonomy and biochronology

FIG. 7. — Postflexid index of the lower teeth of Equus species from the late Middle Pleistocene to Early Holocene sites of the Apulia. Abbreviations: see Table 1.

APPENDIX 1 in Equids from the late Middle Pleistocene to Early Holocene of the Apulia Peninsula (southern Italy): reassessment of their taxonomy and biochronology

APPENDIX 1. — Schematic stratigraphic log of Grotta Mario Bernardini (modified from Borzatti von LÖwenstern 1970).

APPENDIX 3 in Equids from the late Middle Pleistocene to Early Holocene of the Apulia Peninsula (southern Italy): reassessment of their taxonomy and biochronology

APPENDIX 3. — Boxplot of length of upper premolars (A, P2L; B, P3-4L) from the late Middle Pleistocene to Early Holocene sites of the Apulia. For the abbreviations: see Table 1.

FIG. 6 in Equids from the late Middle Pleistocene to Early Holocene of the Apulia Peninsula (southern Italy): reassessment of their taxonomy and biochronology

FIG. 6. — Protocone index of the upper teeth of Equus species from the late Middle Pleistocene to Early Holocene sites of the Apulia. Abbreviations: see Table 1.

FIGURE 8. Molfetta dinosaur tracks, photogrammetry derived 3D in The use of aerial and close-range photogrammetry in the study of dinosaur tracksites: Lower Cretaceous (upper Aptian/lower Albian) Molfetta ichnosite (Apulia, southern Italy)

FIGURE 8. Molfetta dinosaur tracks, photogrammetry derived 3D models and interpretations; 1-2, DEM and contour line map of a theropod footprint (contour lines have an interval of 0.2 cm); 4-5, DEM and contour line map of an ornitischian footprint; 3 and 6, interpretative outline drawings of the studied tracks.

FIGURE 7 in The use of aerial and close-range photogrammetry in the study of dinosaur tracksites: Lower Cretaceous (upper Aptian/lower Albian) Molfetta ichnosite (Apulia, southern Italy)

FIGURE 7. Orthophotomosaic of the Molfetta tracksite produced by the aerial survey performed with the hexacopter.

FIGURE 6 in The use of aerial and close-range photogrammetry in the study of dinosaur tracksites: Lower Cretaceous (upper Aptian/lower Albian) Molfetta ichnosite (Apulia, southern Italy)

FIGURE 6. Comparison of the products generated for the sector including the "L-shaped trace". 1, orthophoto raster map; 2, hillshade raster map; 3, slope raster map; 4, contour lines vector map.

FIGURE 4 in The use of aerial and close-range photogrammetry in the study of dinosaur tracksites: Lower Cretaceous (upper Aptian/lower Albian) Molfetta ichnosite (Apulia, southern Italy)

FIGURE 4. Comparison of the results obtained on a sample area. 1, orthophoto; 2, DEM; 3, slope raster map produced by the quadcopter at flight height of 30 m; 4, orthophoto; 5, DEM; 6, slope raster map produced by the quadcopter at a flight height of 10 m; 7, orthophoto; 8, DEM; 9, slope raster map produced by the hexacopter at a flight height of 15 m.

FIGURE 3 in The use of aerial and close-range photogrammetry in the study of dinosaur tracksites: Lower Cretaceous (upper Aptian/lower Albian) Molfetta ichnosite (Apulia, southern Italy)

FIGURE 3. The UAVs (Unmanned Aerial Vehicles) used for aerial survey of the tracksite. 1, quadcopter SZ DJI Phantom 4; 2, hexacopter Tarot FY680 Pro.

FIGURE 5 in The use of aerial and close-range photogrammetry in the study of dinosaur tracksites: Lower Cretaceous (upper Aptian/lower Albian) Molfetta ichnosite (Apulia, southern Italy)

FIGURE 5. Comparison of the products generated for one of the most trampled sector. 1, orthophoto raster map; 2, hillshade raster map; 3, slope raster map; 4, contour lines vector map.

FIGURE 1 in The use of aerial and close-range photogrammetry in the study of dinosaur tracksites: Lower Cretaceous (upper Aptian/lower Albian) Molfetta ichnosite (Apulia, southern Italy)

FIGURE 1. Locality map showing the San Leonardo quarry tracksite, Apulia, southern Italy. Image obtained using Google Earth Pro.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2023View details →

Fig. 2 in Strongyloidiasis in humans and dogs in Southern Italy: an observational study

Fig. 2 (MAP 2): Geographic distribution of positive dogs (n=6) and humans (n=9). Different colours as in map 1 are indicative of the different habits (red= kennels, blue= agricultural farms; violet= livestock farm). None of the kennels/farms positive for dogs were positive for humans and vice-versa

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2023View details →

Fig. 1 in Strongyloidiasis in humans and dogs in Southern Italy: an observational study

Fig. 1 (MAP 1): Distribution of sampled farms and kennels differentiated by colours (red=kennels; violet=livestock farms; Blue=agricultural farms)

opencc-by-4.0May 2023View details →

Fig. 7 in The reinstated identity of agglutinated foraminifer Campanellula capuensis from the Lower Cretaceous of southern Italy by means of a 3D model investigation

Fig. 7. Lituolinid foraminifer Campanellula capuensis De Castro, 1964, from the Lower Cretaceous of Italy, un tangled; explanatory notes to the test structure based on different sections (not to scale). A, B. San Lorenzello section. A. Thin section DiSTSL99C.1, upper Hauterivian. B. Thin section DiSTARL36.1, lower Barremian, with three different individuals (B1, B2, B3). C. Thin section IPA.679.1 (from De Castro 1964: pl. 1: 10), paratype, Cava Grande, Punta Orlando, Hauterivian–Barremian. D. Thin section IPA.281.5 with two different individuals (D1, D2) (from De Castro 1964: pl. 1: 3, 5), paratype, Castel Morrone, Caserta, Hauterivian–Barremian. E. Thin section IPA.85.3 (from De Castro 1964: pl. 1: 14), Monte La Foresta, Salerno, Hauterivian–Barremian. F, G. San Lorenzello section. F. Thin section DiSTAR39.2 with two different individuals (F1, F2), lower Barremian; dashed line in F1 indicates the coiling axis;. G. Thin section DiSTSL90/91.1, upper Hauterivian.

opencc-by-4.0May 2023View details →

Fig. 10 in The reinstated identity of agglutinated foraminifer Campanellula capuensis from the Lower Cretaceous of southern Italy by means of a 3D model investigation

Fig. 10. Lituolinid foraminifer Campanellula capuensis De Castro, 1964, from Castel Morrone, Italy, upper Hauterivian–lower Barremian, Lower Cretaceous. A. DiSTARL36.1, oblique section showing (A1), compared with the 3D sectioned model (cut in frontal view, A2), also represented sideways (A3). B. DiSTARL36.1, longitudinal section (B1), compared with the 3D sectioned model (cut in frontal view, B2), also represented sideways (B3). C. DiSTARL36.1, oblique section (C1), compared with the 3D sectioned model (cut in frontal view, C2), also represented sideways (C3). Scale bars 100 μm.