Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 6 from: Franz N, Gilbert E, Ludäscher B, Weakley A (2016) Controlling the taxonomic variable: Taxonomic concept resolution for a southeastern United States herbarium portal. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e10610. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e10610

Figure 6 - Project management time line; see also Sections 5 & 8. G = graduate student; UG = undergraduate students.

Figure 5 from: Franz N, Gilbert E, Ludäscher B, Weakley A (2016) Controlling the taxonomic variable: Taxonomic concept resolution for a southeastern United States herbarium portal. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e10610. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e10610

Figure 5 - Euler/X toolkit products. (A) Part of the complex "Andropogon use case", with 1948/1950/1968 input sec. Weakley (2015) (see also Fig. 1). (B) Euler/X visualization of input constraints. Each concept taxonomy is uniquely colored. Ten RCC–5 articulations are provided. (C) Euler/X alignment visualization, showing congruent (grey, rounded) and incongruent (colored) alignment regions. Arrows represent proper inclusion; blue dashed lines show overlap. (D) Subset of 48 inferred, Maximally Informative Relations (MIR). The "*" represents the 1948.Androgon_var_tenuispatheus concept lineage throughout (A) and (C).

Figure 4 from: Franz N, Gilbert E, Ludäscher B, Weakley A (2016) Controlling the taxonomic variable: Taxonomic concept resolution for a southeastern United States herbarium portal. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e10610. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e10610

Figure 4 - Species concept entry Weakley's Flora (Weakley 2015: 355), with 15 RCC–5 articulations to name usages endorsed in incongruent, preceding treatments (such as Radford et al. 1968 ["RAB"]).

Figure 3 from: Franz N, Gilbert E, Ludäscher B, Weakley A (2016) Controlling the taxonomic variable: Taxonomic concept resolution for a southeastern United States herbarium portal. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e10610. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e10610

Figure 3 - SERNEC (2016) Taxonomic Thesaurus for the genus-level name Cleistesiopsis, as of August 2016. [] = synonym.

Figure 2 from: Franz N, Gilbert E, Ludäscher B, Weakley A (2016) Controlling the taxonomic variable: Taxonomic concept resolution for a southeastern United States herbarium portal. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e10610. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e10610

Figure 2 - "Where do these endangered orchid species occur?" – visualizing the taxonomic variable for aggregated herbarium data. Mappings for the same 250 SERNEC specimens (not all resolved at this geographic scale) according to four distinct taxonomies. (A) sec. SERNEC (2016) 'consensus', (B) sec. Radford et al. (1968), (C) sec. Kartesz (2010), (D) sec. Weakley (2015). In A, C, and D, unequal sets of specimens labeled as bifaria are red; those labeled as divaricata are blue. In B, all specimens are identified as divaricata, and hence a query for bifaria would not return any specimens.

Figure 1 from: Franz N, Gilbert E, Ludäscher B, Weakley A (2016) Controlling the taxonomic variable: Taxonomic concept resolution for a southeastern United States herbarium portal. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e10610. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.2.e10610

Figure 1 - Taxonomic concept labels and concept-to-concept articulations, represented in a tabular alignment of nine schemata, for the Cleistes use case (sec. A.S. Weakley). The vertical column position and width of taxonomic concept labels indicates taxonomic non-/congruence. The colors approximate taxonomic name lineages, e.g. blue for bifaria and yellow for divaricata.

Figure 9 from: Zlatkov B, Huemer P (2019) Remarkable confusion in some Western Palearctic Clepsis leads to a revised taxonomic concept (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae). ZooKeys 885: 51-87. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.885.38655

Figure 9 Signa of bursa copulatrix in Clepsis spp. AC. neglectanaBC. striolanaCC. triviaDC. consimilanaEC. eatonianaF A detail of plate shaped signum of C. consimilana consisting of sclerotised papillae. 1 falcate signum, 2 plate shaped signum, 3 cestum. Scale bars: 250 μm (A–E, all to scale), 25 μm (F).

Figure 8 from: Zlatkov B, Huemer P (2019) Remarkable confusion in some Western Palearctic Clepsis leads to a revised taxonomic concept (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae). ZooKeys 885: 51-87. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.885.38655

Figure 8 Female genitalia of the Clepsis neglectana species group AC. neglectana, Finland BC. striolana, Austria CC. trivia, Crete. The top row shows the whole genitalia, the bottom row shows the sterigma and colliculum enlarged. 1 papilla analis, 2 apophysis posterior, 3 sterigma, 4 colliculum, 5 apophysis anterior, 6 ductus seminalis, 7 ductus bursae, 8 cestum, 9 corpus bursae, 10 falcate signum, 11 plate shaped signum, 12 ostium, 13 sclerotised plicae, 14 protrusion. Scale bars: 1 mm (top row), 250 μm (bottom row).

Figure 16 from: Zlatkov B, Huemer P (2019) Remarkable confusion in some Western Palearctic Clepsis leads to a revised taxonomic concept (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae). ZooKeys 885: 51-87. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.885.38655

Figure 16 Neighbour-joining tree of Clepsis neglectana and C. consimilana species groups (Kimura 2 parameter, built with MEGA6; cf. Tamura et al. 2013). Note: the scale bar only applies to internal branches between species. The width of the triangles represents the sample size, and the depth the relative genetic variation within the cluster (2× scale bar). Source: DNA Barcode data from BOLD (Barcode of Life Database, cf. Ratnasingham and Hebert 2007).

Figure 17 from: Zlatkov B, Huemer P (2019) Remarkable confusion in some Western Palearctic Clepsis leads to a revised taxonomic concept (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae). ZooKeys 885: 51-87. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.885.38655

Figure 17 Distribution map of examined material of Clepsis neglectana and C. consimilana species groups. Map created with SimpleMappr (http://www.simplemappr.net).

Figure 7 from: Zlatkov B, Huemer P (2019) Remarkable confusion in some Western Palearctic Clepsis leads to a revised taxonomic concept (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae). ZooKeys 885: 51-87. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.885.38655

Figure 7 Specialised male setae in Clepsis spp. A–E cornuti: AC. neglectana, Finland BC. striolana, Austria CC. trivia, Crete DC. consimilana, neotype of Tortrix consimilanaEC. eatoniana, Spain F modified large seta from the medial surface of valva of C. consimilana, Germany. Scale bar: 100 μm, all to scale.

Figure 4 from: Zlatkov B, Huemer P (2019) Remarkable confusion in some Western Palearctic Clepsis leads to a revised taxonomic concept (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae). ZooKeys 885: 51-87. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.885.38655

Figure 4 Male genitalia of the Clepsis neglectana species group (some without phallus) A, BC. neglectana: ATortrix neglectana lectotype BC. neglectana, Southern Germany C, DC. striolana: CT. striolana lectotype DC. striolana, Austria, North Tyrol E, FC. trivia: ET. trivia holotype FC. trivia, Crete. Scale bar: 500 μm, all to scale.

Figure 11 from: Zlatkov B, Huemer P (2019) Remarkable confusion in some Western Palearctic Clepsis leads to a revised taxonomic concept (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae). ZooKeys 885: 51-87. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.885.38655

Figure 11 Adults of Clepsis consimilana species group A–HC. consimilana: A illustration from the original description of Tortrix consimilanaB neotype of T. consimilanaC male, Bulgaria D lectotype of T. unifascianaE Holotype of Siclobola placidaF male, Poland G female, Italy H female, Poland I–LC. eatoniana: I Lectotype of T. eatonianaJ male, Spain K Lectotype of Tortrix xylotoma (courtesy by D. Lees and Trustees of the Natural History Museum, London) L female, Spain. Scale bar: 5 mm, all to scale.

Figure 12 from: Zlatkov B, Huemer P (2019) Remarkable confusion in some Western Palearctic Clepsis leads to a revised taxonomic concept (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae). ZooKeys 885: 51-87. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.885.38655

Figure 12 Male genitalia of the Clepsis consimilana species group (some without phallus) A–EC. consimilana: ATortrix consimilana neotype BC. consimilana, Italy CC. consimilana, Albania DSiclobola placida holotype ET. unifasciana lectotype FT. eatoniana lectotype. Scale bar: 500 μm, all to scale.

Figure 15 from: Zlatkov B, Huemer P (2019) Remarkable confusion in some Western Palearctic Clepsis leads to a revised taxonomic concept (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae). ZooKeys 885: 51-87. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.885.38655

Figure 15 Male genitalia of the Clepsis consimilana species group: C. eatonianaATortrix xylotoma lectotype (courtesy by D. Lees and Trustees of the Natural History Museum, London) BC. eatoniana, Spain. Scale bar: 500 μm, all to scale.

Figure 14 from: Zlatkov B, Huemer P (2019) Remarkable confusion in some Western Palearctic Clepsis leads to a revised taxonomic concept (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae). ZooKeys 885: 51-87. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.885.38655

Figure 14 Female genitalia of the Clepsis consimilana species group AC. consimilana, Italy BC. eatoniana, Spain. The sterigma and colliculum are shown enlarged to the right of the whole genitalia. Scale bars: 1 mm (whole genitalia), 250 μm (sterigma and colliculum).

Figure 13 from: Zlatkov B, Huemer P (2019) Remarkable confusion in some Western Palearctic Clepsis leads to a revised taxonomic concept (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae). ZooKeys 885: 51-87. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.885.38655

Figure 13 Phalli with vesicae everted of the Clepsis consimilana species group A–BC. consimilana: A neotype of Tortrix consimilanaB specimen from Italy CC. eatoniana, Spain. The phallus of each species is shown in three aspects from top to bottom: sclerotised phallic tube (without vesica) in dorsal view, tip of vesica in dorsal view and whole phallus in left view. Scale bar: 250 μm.

Figure 6 from: Zlatkov B, Huemer P (2019) Remarkable confusion in some Western Palearctic Clepsis leads to a revised taxonomic concept (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae). ZooKeys 885: 51-87. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.885.38655

Figure 6 Phalli with vesicae everted of the Clepsis neglectana species group AC. neglectana, Germany BC. striolana, Austria CC. trivia, Crete DC. acclivana, paralectotype of Cacoecia acclivana. The phallus of each species is shown in three aspects from top to bottom: sclerotised phallic tube (without vesica) in dorsal view (viewpoint marked with black arrow), vesica in dorsal view (viewpoint marked with white arrow) and whole phallus in left view. 1 cornutus, 2 diverticulum, 3 location of gonopore, 4 phallic process, 5 caulis. Scale bar: 250 μm.

Figure 10 from: Zlatkov B, Huemer P (2019) Remarkable confusion in some Western Palearctic Clepsis leads to a revised taxonomic concept (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae). ZooKeys 885: 51-87. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.885.38655

Figure 10 Male genitalia of the Clepsis neglectana species group (some without phallus) A–BC. acclivana: ACacoecia acclivana lectotype BC. acclivana paralectotype, right valva intentionally not cleaned from scales CClepsis semiana, holotype of Cacoecia unifasciana var. semiana. Scale bar: 500 μm, all to scale.

Figure 5 from: Zlatkov B, Huemer P (2019) Remarkable confusion in some Western Palearctic Clepsis leads to a revised taxonomic concept (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae). ZooKeys 885: 51-87. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.885.38655

Figure 5 Labides of Clepsis spp. A, BC. neglectana: A Southern Germany B Finland CC. striolana, Austria, North Tyrol DC. trivia, Crete EC. acclivana, paralectotype of Cacoecia acclivanaF, GC. consimilana: F Germany, neotype of Tortrix consimilanaG Italy HC. eatoniana, Spain. Scale bar: 100 μm, all to scale.