Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
93
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
93 results for “taxonomic differentiation”
FIGURE 9 in Phylogenetic differentiation and taxonomic consequences in the Saurodactylus brosseti species complex (Squamata: Sphaerodactylidae), with description of four new species
FIGURE 9. Holotype of Saurodactylus slimanii sp. nov. from dorsal (top) and ventral (bottom) view. Photos by S. Javanmardi.
FIGURE 7 in Phylogenetic differentiation and taxonomic consequences in the Saurodactylus brosseti species complex (Squamata: Sphaerodactylidae), with description of four new species
FIGURE 7. Saurodactylus splendidus sp. nov. in its natural habitat (type locality, Icht). Photo by S. Vogler.
FIGURE 4 in Phylogenetic differentiation and taxonomic consequences in the Saurodactylus brosseti species complex (Squamata: Sphaerodactylidae), with description of four new species
FIGURE 4. Variation in rostral scalation within Saurodactylus brosseti species complex. Drawings by S. Javanmardi.
FIGURE 14 in Phylogenetic differentiation and taxonomic consequences in the Saurodactylus brosseti species complex (Squamata: Sphaerodactylidae), with description of four new species
FIGURE 14. Holotype of Saurodactylus splendidus sp. nov. from dorsal (top), ventral (middle) and lateral (bottom) view. Photos by Achim Ritter & S. Javanmardi.
FIGURE 2. A in Phylogenetic differentiation and taxonomic consequences in the Saurodactylus brosseti species complex (Squamata: Sphaerodactylidae), with description of four new species
FIGURE 2. A) Bayesian tree based on concatenated mtDNA sequences (12S + ND4), with S. mauritanicus as outgroup. Bayesian posterior probabilities are shown below nodes and bootstrap support values for Maximum Likelihood are shown above nodes. Purple square highlights the new lineage. B) Sampling locality codes (1-22) according to Table 4, colors refer to their respective clades in (A).
FIGURE 1 in Phylogenetic differentiation and taxonomic consequences in the Saurodactylus brosseti species complex (Squamata: Sphaerodactylidae), with description of four new species
FIGURE 1. Map showing the distribution range of Saurodactylus brosseti according to Joger et al. 2006 (area surrounded in black dashed line). Solid lines show known ranges of five clades: North (N), i.e., S. brosseti; South (S), i.e., S. harrisii; East (E), i.e., S. slimanii; Anti-Atlas (A-A), i.e., S. elmoudenii; Southeast (SE), i.e., S. splendidus. Based on present study and Rosado et al. (2017). Map source: www.mapsland.com.
FIGURE 3 in Phylogenetic differentiation and taxonomic consequences in the Saurodactylus brosseti species complex (Squamata: Sphaerodactylidae), with description of four new species
FIGURE 3. Illustrations showing variation in color and pattern among five clades of the Saurodactylus brosseti species complex. Letters a, b, c refer to subcategories of respective morphs. Drawings by Soheila Javanmardi.
FIGURE 5. A in Phylogenetic differentiation and taxonomic consequences in the Saurodactylus brosseti species complex (Squamata: Sphaerodactylidae), with description of four new species
FIGURE 5. A) Bayesian tree based on concatenated mtDNA sequences (12S + ND4) with S. fasciatus as outgroup. Bayesian posterior probabilities are shown above nodes and bootstrap support values for Maximum Likelihood are shown below nodes. B) Bayesian tree resulted from collapsing nodes with posterior probabilities smaller than 0.95.
FIGURE 13 in Phylogenetic differentiation and taxonomic consequences in the Saurodactylus brosseti species complex (Squamata: Sphaerodactylidae), with description of four new species
FIGURE 13. Type locality of Saurodactylus splendidus sp. nov. in Djebel Bani, Icht. View from above, in westerly direction, with Acacia and palm trees. Photo by Sven Vogler..
FIGURE 11 in Variability of Echiniscus tristis Gąsiorek & Kristensen, 2018 - is morphology sufficient for taxonomic differentiation of Echiniscidae?
FIGURE 11. Correlation of body length (in [μm]) of Echiniscus tristis Gąsiorek & Kristensen, 2018 (population from Madagas- car) females and the type of chaetotaxy. The size of the specimens with A-C-Dd-E chaetotaxy (Mean = 194 μm ±SD = 19 μm), and specimens with A-Dd-E chaetotaxy (190 ±18 μm). SE—standard error, SD—standard deviation.
FIGURE 10 in Variability of Echiniscus tristis Gąsiorek & Kristensen, 2018 - is morphology sufficient for taxonomic differentiation of Echiniscidae?
FIGURE 10. The body length (in [μm]) of the juveniles of Echiniscus tristis Gąsiorek & Kristensen, 2018 (population from Madagascar) and the type of chaetotaxy. Specimens with A-C-Dd-E chaetotaxy (Mean =151 μm ±SD = 15 μm) and specimens with A-Dd-E chaetotaxy and (138 ±13 μm), respectively. SE—standard error, SD—standard deviation.
FIGURE 6 in Variability of Echiniscus tristis Gąsiorek & Kristensen, 2018 - is morphology sufficient for taxonomic differentiation of Echiniscidae?
FIGURE 6. Echiniscus tristis Gąsiorek & Kristensen, 2018 (population from Madagascar): A—B—the characteristic pattern on the terminal plate visible in some individuals (PCM and SEM respectively), arrow indicates large pores in place where median plate 3 can be present in different taxa; C—cuticular pillars visible on ventral side with larger pillars on the leg line (PCM). Scale bars in micrometres [μm].
FIGURE 3 in Variability of Echiniscus tristis Gąsiorek & Kristensen, 2018 - is morphology sufficient for taxonomic differentiation of Echiniscidae?
FIGURE 3. Types of chaetotaxy found in Madagascan juveniles and females of Echiniscus tristis Gąsiorek & Kristensen, 2018, with first two on the left in upper row being most common.
FIGURE 1 in Variability of Echiniscus tristis Gąsiorek & Kristensen, 2018 - is morphology sufficient for taxonomic differentiation of Echiniscidae?
FIGURE 1. Echiniscus tristis Gąsiorek & Kristensen, 2018 (population from Madagascar)—voucher exoskeletons (hologeno- phores) of specimens used in DNA isolation, PCM:—A—voucher No MAD/139/3/S, B—voucher No MAD/139/12/S, C— voucher No MAD/139/2/S, D—voucher No MAD/139/9/S, E—voucher No MAD/139/10/S, F—voucher No MAD/139/8/S. Scale bars in micrometres [μm].
FIGURE 2 in Variability of Echiniscus tristis Gąsiorek & Kristensen, 2018 - is morphology sufficient for taxonomic differentiation of Echiniscidae?
FIGURE 2. Echiniscus tristis Gąsiorek & Kristensen, 2018 (population from Madagascar)—habitus: A—dorso-ventral assembled image (PCM); insert shows close-up on split lateral cirrus C; B–D—specimens with different chaetotaxy (PCM); E–F—specimens with different chaetotaxy (SEM); arrowheads indicate positions of dorsal and lateral cirri. Scale bars in micrometres [μm].
FIGURE 4 in Morphometric analysis to differentiate taxonomically seven species of Eleutherodactylus (Amphibia: Anura: Leptodactylidae) from an Andean cloud forest of Colombia
FIGURE 4. Side of Eleutherodactylus head showing how tympanumeye distance and tympanum diameter were measured.
FIGURE 2. A in Morphometric analysis to differentiate taxonomically seven species of Eleutherodactylus (Amphibia: Anura: Leptodactylidae) from an Andean cloud forest of Colombia
FIGURE 2. A. Cluster analysis CA2. Data set included 58 cases (only adult individuals) and 40 qualitative variables. B. Cluster analysis CA3. Data set included 58 cases (only adult individuals) and the diagnostic variables for the Eleutherodactylus species. In parenthesis, number of individuals of each species.
FIGURE 3. Discriminant analysis. Data set included 140 in Morphometric analysis to differentiate taxonomically seven species of Eleutherodactylus (Amphibia: Anura: Leptodactylidae) from an Andean cloud forest of Colombia
FIGURE 3. Discriminant analysis. Data set included 140 of four species (Eleutherodactylus douglasi, E. merostictus, E. miyatai and E. prolixodiscus) and 11 quantitative variables. The model utilized stepwise discrimination in which all variables were included in the model and then, at each step, the variable that contributed least to the prediction of group memberships was eliminated.
FIGURE 1 in Morphometric analysis to differentiate taxonomically seven species of Eleutherodactylus (Amphibia: Anura: Leptodactylidae) from an Andean cloud forest of Colombia
FIGURE 1. Cluster analysis CA1. Data set included 159 cases (all individuals) and 40 qualitative variables. It was analyzed with Manhattan distances and the UPGMA algorithm; missing data were not substituted. In parenthesis, number of individuals of each species.
Data from: Taxonomic and functional diversity of the co-flowering community differentially affect Cakile edentula pollination at different spatial scales
Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.