Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
778
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
778 results for “tomato”
Fig. 4 in Effect of Bombus terrestris L. (Hymenoptera, Apidae) pollinating on flowering and fruiting trends of greenhouse tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum)
Fig. 4: The fruiting process in greenhouse tomato with and without bumblebees pollination treatments.
Figure 1 in The tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae): pupal key characters for sexing individuals
Figure 1. Pupal stage of the tomato leafminer Tuta absoluta: A) dorsal, B) ventral, and C) lateral views.
Figure 2 in The tomato leafminer, Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae): pupal key characters for sexing individuals
Figure 2. Ventral views of female and male pupae of the tomato leafminer. Abdominal segments indicated as 5th (A5), 6th (A6), 7th (A7), 8th (A8), 9th (A9), and 10th (A10).
Fig. 3 in High-level phylogeographic structuring of Neoleucinodes elegantalis Guenée (Lepidoptera, Crambridae) in Brazil: an important tomato pest
Fig. 3. Potential distribution as the probability of occurrence of N. elegantalis in the present (Now, 0 years BP), last glacial maximum (LGM; <21,000 years BP), and last interglacial (LIG, 120,000–140,000 years BP).
Dataset for agronomic, quality and resistance traits in tomato BRESOV materials
<p>Different dataset for agronomic data, qualitative data and resistances to pathogens related to tomato BRESOV material</p>
Tomato 'de penjar' fruit quality data
<p><span>A collection of 44 varieties of ‘de penjar’ tomato from different origins throughout the Valencian Region, located on the Spanish eastern coast, were evaluated under two N fertilization conditions. The collection was composed of 39 local varieties and 5 commercial varieties of the BRESOV collection. Data from University of Valencia</span></p>
Fig. 3 in Host range of the invasive tomato pest Tuta absoluta Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) on solanaceous crops and weeds in Tanzania
Fig. 3. Tuta absoluta-related damage in solanaceous crops and weeds in Tanzania. Damage values are averaged across all survey locations (see Table 1). Damage was quantified as the number of T. absoluta mines per leaf (A) and percentage of T. absoluta-damaged fruits (B) in 10 locations within each sampled field. Six to 12 fields were sampled per crop, and 1 to 3 fields per weed species (see Table 2). Tomato, Solanum lycopersicum; eggplant or aubergine, Solanum melongena; African (Afr.) eggplant, Solanum aethiopicum; African (Afr.) nightshades, Solanum nigrum and Solanum americanum; pepper, Capsicum annuum; and 3 weed species, Datura stramonium, Nicandra physalodes, and Solanum incanum.
Fig. 1 in Host range of the invasive tomato pest Tuta absoluta Meyrick (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) on solanaceous crops and weeds in Tanzania
Fig. 1. Map of locations surveyed to determine host range and infestation level of Tuta absoluta in solanaceous crops and weeds in 2015. Four districts were targeted, each within the major tomato-producing regions of Tanzania. Within each district, 3 villages (indicated by black circles) were randomly selected for the survey (see Table 1).
Fig. 1 in First report of invasive South American tomato leaf miner Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) in Tajikistan
Fig. 1. Damage (%) of Tuta absoluta on tomato in Tajikistan during Mar to Aug 2016. (A) Dukoni Jamoat, (B) Hissor Jamoat, (C) Guliston Jamoat, (D) Ghayrat Jamoat.
Fig. 3 in Effect of BAM-FX in developing a management program to control major insect pests of tomato: sweetpotato whitefly (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), and their transmitted viruses
Fig. 3. Mean number of western flower thrips (Frankliniella occidentalis) per 5 leaf sample of tomato treated with various treatments of BAM‑FX and N‑P‑K granular fertilizer in 2016. Bars represent standard error of the means. T1 = BAM‑FX applied on soil, no pesticide, no N‑P‑K fertilizer; T2 = BAM‑FX applied on foliage, no pesticide, no N‑P‑K fertilizer; T3 = BAM‑FX applied on soil, pesticide, no N‑P‑K fertilizer; T4 = BAM‑FX applied on foliage, pesticide, no N‑P‑K fertilizer; T5 = BAM‑FX applied on foliage, pesticide, N‑P‑K fertilizer; T6 = no BAM‑FX, pesticide, N‑P‑K fertilizer; T7 = no BAM‑FX, no pesticide, N‑P‑K fertilizer; D1 = first sampling date (14 Dec); D2 = second sampling date (21 Dec); D3 = third sampling date (21 Dec); D4 = fourth sampling date (28 Dec); D5 = fifth sampling date (4 Jan); D6 = sixth sampling date (11 Jan).
Fig. 2 in Effect of BAM-FX in developing a management program to control major insect pests of tomato: sweetpotato whitefly (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae), thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), and their transmitted viruses
Fig. 2. Mean number of common blossom thrips (Frankliniella schultzei) per 5 leaf sample of tomato treated with various treatments of BAM‑FX and N‑P‑K granular fertilizer in 2016. Bars represent standard error of the means. T1 = BAM‑FX applied on soil, no pesticide, no N‑P‑K fertilizer; T2 = BAM‑FX applied on foliage, no pesticide, no N‑P‑K fertilizer; T3 = BAM‑FX applied on soil, pesticide, no N‑P‑K fertilizer; T4 = BAM‑FX applied on foliage, pesticide, no N‑P‑K fertilizer; T5 = BAM‑FX applied on foliage, pesticide, N‑P‑K fertilizer; T6 = no BAM‑FX, pesticide, N‑P‑K fertilizer; T7 = no BAM‑FX, no pesticide, N‑P‑K fertilizer; D1 = first sampling date (14 Dec); D2 = second sampling date (21 Dec); D3 = third sampling date (21 Dec); D4 = fourth sampling date (28 Dec); D5 = fifh sampling date (4 Jan); D6 = 6th sampling date (11 Jan).
Fig. 4 in Acaricide efficacy and resistance in South Carolina tomato populations of twospotted spider mite
Fig. 4. LC50 values (± 95% confidence interval) for 7 AIs screened against a known-susceptible lab colony and 3 field-collected populations of Tetranychus urticae. When present, the dashed line indicates the amount of AI in the maximum labelled field rate. This value also is indicated in each graph by "FR=". The resistance ratio of each AI × population is written above each data point.
Fig. 1 in Acaricide efficacy and resistance in South Carolina tomato populations of twospotted spider mite
Fig. 1. Mean (± SE) spider mite (Tetranychus urticae) counts per tomato leaflet in a 2015 and 2016 acaricide efficacy trial conducted in South Carolina, USA. Arrows indicate dates of acaricide applications. Treatments with the same letter within a date are not statistically different (lsmeans P> 0.05). "ns" indicates that the overall model was not significant. The dotted line represents the action threshold for spider mites in tomato (2 per leaflet).
Fig. 2 in Acaricide efficacy and resistance in South Carolina tomato populations of twospotted spider mite
Fig. 2. Mean (± SE) cumulative mite d of Tetranychus urticae in a 2015 and 2016 acaricide efficacy trial conducted in South Carolina, USA. Arrows indicate dates of acaricide applications. Treatments with the same letter within a date are not statistically different (lsmeans P> 0.05). "ns" indicates that the overall model was not significant.
Figs 2, 3 in Native bee fauna of tomato crops: a comparison of active sampling and pan trapping methods
Figs 2, 3. Richness (Fig. 2) and abundance (Fig. 3) of flower visiting bees sampled bY different pan trap colors in nine tomato crops in GoiÁs state, BraZil. Boxplots represent means while vertical lines represent the 95% confidence interval. Each point represents value for each sampling unit.
Associated metadata of the 21 resequenced herbarium tomato specimens
<p>Overview and metadata of the 21 resequenced herbarium specimens obtained from the Herbaria Basel, Basel, and the United Herbaria of the University of Zurich and the ETH Zurich (United Herbaria Z+ZT).</p>
Sequencing results of the 21 resequenced herbarium tomato specimens
<p>Sequencing results of the 21 herbarium tomato specimens resequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq 600 platform.</p>
Fig. 1 in Effects of irrigation method on pollination and pollinators (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) in an open-field tomato crop
Fig. 1. Fruit set (A) and weight of fruit (B) in relation to type of irrigation and type of pollination. OM = open + mechanical pollination.
Fig. 1 in A maximum concentration bioassay to assess insecticide efficacy against hemipteran pests of tomato
Fig. 1. Mortality of third instar nymphs from 5 populations of Nezara viridula ('green'), 3 populations of Euschistus quadrator ('brown'), and 1 population of Leptoglossus phyllopus ('leaf') stink bug subjected to a maximum concentration test of 3 pyrethroid and 3 neonicotinoid insecticides and an untreated control (UTC). Percentage mortalities (+ SEM) are based on the mean of 5 nymphs per replicate with 3 replicates. Insecticides designated with the same letter in the horizontal axis are not statistically different (by Bonferroni t-test, P <0.05).
Data from: Repairing a deleterious domestication variant in a floral regulator of tomato by base editing
<p>This repository contains the data necessary to run the analysis described in the publication "Repairing a deleterious domestication variant in a floral regulator of tomato by base editing" by Glaus et al., 2024. A preprint is available on bioRxiv (doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.577624" rel="nofollow">https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.01.29.577624</a>)</p> <p> </p> <p>82_acc_Spim0.1_filtered.vcf.gz -- variant call results for 82 genomes with LA1589 as reference</p> <p>82_acc_Spim0.1_filtered_SIFT_out.tar.gz -- sift4g prediction results for 82 genomes with LA1589 as reference (SIFTannotations.xls and SIFTpredictions.list)</p> <p>sift_lib_LA1589.tar.gz -- sift4g library for the LA1589 genome</p> <p>SolpimLA1589_liftoff.tar.gz -- liftoff annotation of LA1589 genome</p> <p> </p> <p>In case of any questions, please contact Sebastian Soyk (sebastian.soyk@unil.ch)</p>
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.