Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
695
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
695 results for “transcutaneous”
Short-Term Transcutaneous or Epidural Spinal Stimulation for Enabling Motor Function in Humans With SCI
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05095454. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
The Effect of Intraoral Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation in Orthodontics Pain
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06573996. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 11.
Effects of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Symptom Severity, Sleep Quality, Central Sensitization, and Kinesiophobia in Fibromyalgia
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07173400. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 3.
Transcutaneous Tibial Nerve Stimulation in Acute Spinal Cord Injury
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03965299. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 8.
Cervical Transcutaneous SCS for TBI
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT07147816. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 5.
Abdominal Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation on Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06763237. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 6.
Data from: Randomized study of the impact of a therapeutic education program on patients suffering from chronic low-back pain who are treated with transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
Background: Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is often used for the treatment of low-back pain (LBP). However, its effectiveness is controversial. Objective: To determine the efficacy of TENS in the treatment LBP when associated to a therapeutic education program (TEP). Design: Open randomized monocentric study. Setting: University hospital between 2010 and 2014. Patients: A total of 97 patients suffering from LBP. Interventions: Routine care (TENS group) or routine care plus a therapeutic education program (TENS-TEP group) based on consultation support by a pain resource nurse Main outcome measures: EIFEL and Dallas Pain Questionnaire scores. Results: Twenty-two patients (44%) were still assessable at the end-of-study visit, whereas 33 (70%) were assessable at the same time point in the TENS-TEP group (P = 0.013). The EIFEL score and the Dallas score had a similar evolution over time between groups (p = 0.18 and p = 0.50 respectively). Similarly, there were no significant differences between the groups with respect to resting pain scores (p = 0.94 for back pain and p = 0.16 for leg pain) and movement pain scores (p = 0.52 for back pain and p = 0.56 for leg pain). At Month 6, there was no significant difference between the groups (p = 0.85) with regard to analgesics and social impact. Two patients presented a serious adverse event during the study (one in each group) but non-attributable to the treatment studied. Conclusion: This study does not support the use of TENS in the treatment of patients with chronic LBP even though patients benefited from a therapeutic education program by a pain resource nurse. However, the higher number of premature withdrawals in the TENS group may be due to early withdrawal of patients who did not experience improvement of their symptoms.
Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation enhances motor score and gait recovery in incomplete spinal cord injury. A double-blind randomized controlled trial
<p><strong><span>Background: </span></strong><span>Although transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS) has been suggested as a safe and feasible intervention for gait rehabilitation, no studies have determined its effectiveness compared to sham stimulation.</span></p> <p><strong><span>Objective: </span></strong><span>To determine the effectiveness of tSCS combined with robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT) on lower limb muscle strength and walking function in incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI) participants.</span></p> <p><strong><span>Methods: </span></strong><span>A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled clinical trial was designed. Twenty-seven subacute iSCI participants were randomly allocated to tSCS or sham-tSCS group. The intervention consisted of 20 sessions of standard Lokomat walking training enhanced with tSCS. Primary outcomes were the lower extremity motor score (LEMS) and dynamometry. Secondary outcomes included the 10-Meter Walk Test (10MWT), the Timed Up and Go test (TUG), the 6-Minute Walk test (6MWT), the Spinal Cord Independence Measure III (SCIM III) and the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI-II). Assessments were performed before and after the intervention and at 1-month follow-up.</span></p> <p><strong><span>Results: </span></strong><span>Although no significant differences between groups were detected after the intervention, the tSCS group showed greater effects than the sham-tSCS group for LEMS (3.4 points; p=0.033), 10MWT (37.5s; p=0.030), TUG (47.7s; p=0.009), and WISCI-II (3.4 points; p=0.023) at the 1-month follow-up. Furthermore, the percentage of subjects who were able to walk at the follow-up was greater in the tSCS group (85.7%) compared to the sham group (43.1%; p=0.029).</span></p> <p><strong><span>Conclusions:</span></strong><span> The combination of standard RAGT with tSCS for 20 sessions was effective for LEMS and gait recovery in subacute iSCI participants after one month of follow-up.</span></p> <p><strong><span>Key words: </span></strong><span>Spinal cord injury; Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation; Lokomat; Robotic-assisted gait training; Motor function; </span><span>Gait rehabilitation.</span></p>
Influence of Transcutaneous Spinal Stimulation Intensity on Spasticity After SCI
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04243044. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Validity of Transcutaneous Bilirubin Monitoring in Preterm Infants
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03195998. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 9.
Transconjunctival vs Transcutaneous Anaesthesia in Oculoplastics
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04102878. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Effect of Daily Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS) on Proteinuria in Pediatric Patients With Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT04169776. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Effects of Left and Bilateral Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Pain, Mood, and Autonomic Function in Female Fibromyalgia Patients
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06871306. IPD Sharing: YES. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Phrenic Nerve Stimulation and Transcutaneous Electrical Diaphragmatic Stimulation
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06339632. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 7.
Effect of Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation on Postoperative Myocardial Injury in Elderly Patients Undergoing Thoracoscopic Surgery: a Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06759818. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Combining Spinal Cord Transcutaneous Stimulation and Activity-based Training in Inpatient Rehabilitation to Facilitate Upper Limb Function of Individuals with Acute to Subacute Cervical Spinal Cord In
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06773286. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 10.
Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) for Pain Management With Medication Abortion Through 70 Days' Gestation
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT03925129. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Treating Post-stroke Dysphagia
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06827301. IPD Sharing: UNDECIDED. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Telerehabilitation With Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Chronic Neck Pain:
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06206343. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 1.
Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Aphasia After Stroke
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06403475. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 2.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.