Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,121
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,121 results for “weathering”
PIE LTER 15-minute meteorological data from the Marshview Farm weather station located in Newbury, MA, year 2022
Meteorological measurements for 2022 at MBL Marshview Farm, Newbury, MA. Sensors conduct measurements every 5 seconds and measurements are reported as averages or totals for 15 minute intervals. 15 minute averages are reported for air temperature, humidity, solar radiation, PAR, wind speed and direction and barometric pressure. 15 minute totals are reported for precipitation.
PIE LTER 15-minute meteorological data from the Marshview Farm weather station located in Newbury, MA, year 2023
Meteorological measurements for 2023 at MBL Marshview Farm, Newbury, MA. Sensors conduct measurements every 5 seconds and measurements are reported as averages or totals for 15 minute intervals. 15 minute averages are reported for air temperature, humidity, solar radiation, PAR, wind speed and direction and barometric pressure. 15 minute totals are reported for precipitation.
Numerical weather simulation using COSMOiso in June 2019 during L-WAIVE field campaign: selected model output and post-processed data.
<p>This dataset consists of extracts from a simulation with the isotope-enabled regional numerical weather prediction model COSMOiso, which covers the timespan of the Lacustrine-Water vApor Isotope inVentory Experiment (L-WAIVE) field campaign taking place in June 2019 in the Annecy valley in the French Alps (Chazette et al. 2021).The simulation has a horizontal resolution of 0.1° (~10km) and 40 vertical levels.</p><p>This COSMOiso simulation is used in Thurnherr et al. (submitted) to compare stable water isotope measurements from various platforms. Here, we provide selected model outputs and post-processed data used in this comparison study. The post-processed data contain:</p><ol><li>COSMOiso output files for time steps 20190612_12, 20190613_12, 20190615_13, 20190616_13, 20190617_12, 20190622_12.</li><li>Pressure weighted total and subcolumn averages for time steps 20190612_12, 20190613_12, 20190615_13, 20190616_13, 20190617_12, 20190622_12.</li><li>Vertical cross section of selected variables at Annecy, the location of the L-WAIVE field campaign, for the simulation time window.</li><li>Interpolated time series of subcolumn and total column averages at Annecy, the location of the L-WAIVE field campaign, for the simulation time window.</li><li>Interpolated variables along the flight tracks from the L-WAIVE campaign (see Sodemann and Seidl, 2023).</li></ol><p>See also README files for more details on the provided data.</p><p>To access further model output and post-processed data, please contact the dataset authors.</p>
Historical Weather, Load, Wind, and Solar Data for the Salt River Project
<p>We created and curated a dataset of historical (1980-2019) hourly meteorology, load, wind, and solar data for the Salt River Project (SRP) region. The data was created by PNNL's <a href="https://godeeep.pnnl.gov/">GODEEEP</a> project. Each row in the dataset is a single hour and each column is a variable. All meteorological variables are spatially-averaged over the SRP service territory. The variables and their units are as follows:</p><ol><li>"Time_UTC"; Coordinated Universal Time (UTC); Time of day.</li><li>"T2"; Fahrenheit; 2-m air temperature.</li><li>"Q2"; kg/kg; 2-m water vapor mixing ratio.</li><li>"SWDOWN"; W/m^2; Downwelling shortwave radiative flux at the surface.</li><li>"GLW"; W/m^2; Downwelling longwave radiative flux at the surface.</li><li>"WSPD"; m/s; 10-m wind speed.</li><li>"Scaled_2019_Load"; MWh; Simulated hourly demand for electricity that is scaled to 2019 levels of annual energy. This load estimate does not account for historical changes in population and economics within the SRP service territory. It is included to make it easier to isolate weather impacts on load without having to consider long-term changes.</li><li>"Load"; MWh; Simulated hourly demand for electricity.</li><li>"Agua_Fria_Solar_Capacity"; N/A; Solar capacity factor for the SRP Agua Fria project with plant configurations taken from the EIA-860 database.</li><li>"Phoenix_Solar_Capacity"; N/A; Solar capacity factor for hypothetical solar plants derived using the grid cell nearest to Phoenix, AZ.</li><li>"Flagstaff_Solar_Capacity"; N/A; Solar capacity factor for hypothetical solar plants derived using the grid cell nearest to Flagstaff, AZ.</li><li>"Phoenix_Wind_Capacity"; N/A; Wind capacity factor for hypothetical 80-m plants derived using the grid cell nearest to Phoenix, AZ.</li><li>"Flagstaff_Wind_Capacity"; N/A; Wind capacity factor for hypothetical 80-m plants derived using the grid cell nearest to Flagstaff, AZ.</li></ol>
Data for "The effects of weather and mobility on respiratory viruses dynamics before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA and Canada".
<p>Epidemiological and mobility data analysed in the paper "The effects of weather and mobility on respiratory viruses dynamics before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in the USA and Canada".</p>
Space Weather ElectroMagnetic Database for Ireland (SWEMDI)
<p>This is a database containing electromagnetic (EM) data that can contribute to better understand and quantify the electric fields caused by space weather events at the Earth's surface, and the physical properties of Ireland’s lithosphere. The database is named Space Weather Electromagnetic Database for Ireland (SWEMDI).</p> <p>It contains measured electromagnetic time series using magnetotelluric equipment, electromagnetic tensor relationships, 3D electrical resistivity model of Ireland's lithosphere, modelled electric and magnetic time series for Ireland between 1991 and 2018, documents and publications that used parts of this database, and a series of scripts that were used to generate the database.</p>
Weather and Air Quality data for Ireland as RDF data cube
<p>Weather, Air Pollution and Events data represented as RDF data cube. The original weather data has been downloaded from https://www.met.ie//climate/available-data/historical-data and the Air Quality data from <a href="https://discomap.eea.europa.eu/map/fme/AirQualityExport.htm">https://discomap.eea.europa.eu/map/fme/AirQualityExport.htm</a> and <a href="https://discomap.eea.europa.eu/map/fme/AirQualityExportAirbase.htm">https://discomap.eea.europa.eu/map/fme/AirQualityExportAirbase.htm</a>. The Events data refers to random events within the Republic of Ireland.</p> <p>The data has then been uplifted by running the {eeaMapping, metMapping, eventsMapping}.py scripts, which generate R2RML mappings to convert the CSV data to RDF. The mappings re-use vocabularies and ontologies that are W3C recommendations for dataset descriptions (DCAT, https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-dcat-2/), statistical data (RDF Data Cube, https://www.w3.org/TR/vocab-data-cube/) and provenance data (PROV-O, https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/). The scripts use the R2RML engine from https://github.com/chrdebru/r2rml to execute the mappings which generate a data and metadata files for each of the datasets.</p> <p> </p>
Weather dataset from Otemma glacier forefield, Switzerland (from 14 July 2019 to 18 November 2021)
<p>Weather data collected in the Otemma forefield (Switzerland) from 14 July 2019 to 18 November 2021.<br> Data were collected by the research teams of Bettina Schaefli<sup>2</sup> and Stuart N. Lane<sup>1</sup>.</p> <p><sup>1</sup> Institute of Earth Surface Dynamics (IDYST), University of Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland</p> <p><sup>2</sup> Institute of Geography (GIUB), University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland</p> <p>For further information, please contact:<br> tom.muller.1@unil.ch<br> bettina.schaefli@giub.unibe.ch</p> <p><strong>Description of data : </strong>WeatherData.csv</p> <p>Time span of data : 14 July 2019 to 18 November 2021<br> Time step : homogenized 10 minutes-averaged data</p> <p>Location of data (Coordinate in SWISS LV95 (EPSG:2056)<br> - Glacier snout Station : 2598615 / 1087375<br> - Glacier center Station : 2600495 / 1088631<br> - Floodplain Station : 2598096 / 1087087</p> <p>STRUCTURE OF DATA : tidy dataframe with following headers :<br> - <em>date </em>: local date (UTC+01 with daylight saving time)<br> - <em>variable </em>: parameter of interest, with following classes :<br> Air_humidity : Air humidity in percent of air saturation [%]<br> Air_temperature : Air temperature in [°C]<br> Atm_pressure : Atmospheric pressure in [hPa]<br> Incoming_radiation : Incoming shortwave radiation in [W/m2]<br> Precipitation : Liquid precipitation measured [mm]<br> - <em>name </em>: location of data (see coordinates above)<br> - <em>dateUTC </em>: date with UTC timezone</p> <p>Device used for data acquisition :<br> - Air_humidity/Air_temperature/Atm_pressure : Decagon VP-4<br> - Incoming_radiation : Apogee Instruments SP-11<br> - Precipitation : Double tipping buckets rain gauge from Davis Instruments (resolution 0.2 mm)</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Description of data : </strong>RainComposite_Otemma_Arolla.csv</p> <p>Time span of data : 01 July 2019 to 18 November 2021<br> Time step : homogenized 10 minutes-averaged data</p> <p>The dataset compiles the measured rain during summer at the closest weather station (Glacier snout).<br> For the winter period (and few gaps during the summer), the solid precipitations (snow) from the closest MeteoSwiss weather stations (SwissMetNet) were used.<br> Gaps where filled with 1) MeteoSwiss Otemma and if data were still missing filled with 2) MeteoSwiss Arolla<br> <br> Location of data (Coordinate in SWISS LV95 (EPSG:2056)<br> - Glacier snout Station : 2598615 / 1087375<br> - Otemma camp Station : 2597508 / 1086653<br> - MeteoSwiss Station : 2596476 / 1085864<br> - MeteoSwiss Arolla : 2603507 / 1095832</p> <p>STRUCTURE OF DATA : tidy dataframe with following headers :<br> - date : local date (UTC+01 with dst)<br> - variable : parameter of interest<br> Precipitation : Liquid and solid precipitation [mm]. Composite dataset composed of melted snow (snow Water Equivalent, in mm, from MeteoSwiss station) and Rain (in mm from Glacier station).<br> - Location : location of data (see above)<br> - dateUTC : date in UTC timezone<br> <br> Device used for data acquisition :<br> - Glacier snout Station : Double tipping buckets rain gauge from Davis Instruments (resolution 0.2 mm)<br> - Otemma camp Station : Double tipping buckets rain gauge, Spectrum WatchDog 1120 (resolution 0.25 mm)<br> - MeteoSwiss : see <a href="https://www.meteoswiss.admin.ch/home/measurement-and-forecasting-systems/land-based-stations/automatisches-messnetz.html">SwissMetNet</a> project</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Description of data :</strong> Otemma_weather_Plot_alldata.html</p> <p>An interactive plot generated with python plotly (open in web browser) containing all above described data.</p>
Supplementary material for 'Revealing patterns of nocturnal migration using the European weather radar network'
<p>This package contains data, filters and visualizations from <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ecog.04003">Nilsson and Dokter et al. (2019)</a>.</p> <p><strong>Files</strong></p> <p><strong>radar_metadata.csv</strong>: Metadata for the 84 European radars considered for this study. Includes radar code (<code>odim_code</code> = <code>country</code> + <code>odim_code_3char</code> and alternative radar code <code>vp_radar</code>), radar site location (<code>location</code>, <code>latitude</code>, <code>longitude</code>), radar site elevation (<code>site_altitude_asl</code> in meters above sea level) and radar altitude range used in this study (<code>min_height_cut_asl</code> and <code>max_height_cut_asl</code> in meters above sea level).</p> <p><strong>vp.zip</strong>: Vertical profiles of birds (vp) data, processed from the radar volume data following procedures described by Dokter et al. (2011), using the vol2bird algorithm in the R package bioRad. Zip file includes vp data for the 84 European radars considered for this study from September 19 to October 9, 2016 (21 days). This time period is characterized by strong passerine migration throughout Europe. Files are organized in radar (= <code>odim_code</code>), date and hour directories and follow the <a href="https://github.com/adokter/vol2bird/wiki/ODIM-bird-profile-format-specification">ODIM bird profile format specification</a>. Data can be read with the <a href="https://github.com/adokter/bioRad/">R package bioRad</a>.</p> <p><strong>vp_processing_settings.yaml</strong>: Data selection setting for this study, based on data quality criteria. File lists for each radar the altitudes to include (<code>include_heights</code>), time periods to exclude (<code>exclude_datetimes</code>) and reasons for exclusion (comments). 70 of the 84 radars were retained after filtering.</p> <p><strong>vp_processed_70_radars_20160919_20161009.csv</strong>: Processed vp data for 70 radars. Is the result of processing <code>vp.zip</code> with <code>vp_processing_settings.yaml</code> and <code>radar_metadata.csv</code> using <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1173544">vp-processing</a> (Desmet & Nilsson 2018). Note: includes all timestamps: day and night & those marked for exclusion (marked in <code>exclusion_reason</code>). This data file forms the basis for analysis in the study.</p> <p>Headers are:</p> <ul> <li><code>radar_id</code>: odim_code of the radar</li> <li><code>datetime</code>: timestamp</li> <li><code>HGHT</code>: lower altitude of altitude bin (m above sea level)</li> <li><code>u</code>: bird ground speed towards east (m/s)</li> <li><code>v</code>: bird ground speed towards north (m/s)</li> <li><code>dens</code>: bird density (birds/km3)</li> <li><code>dd</code>: bird flight direction (degrees from north)</li> <li><code>ff</code>: bird ground speed (m/s)</li> <li><code>DBZH</code>: reflectivity factor (dBZ) in horizontal polarisation</li> <li><code>mtr</code>: migration traffic rate (birds/km/h)</li> <li><code>day_night</code>: timestamp occurs during <code>day</code> or <code>night</code> (based on sunrise/sunset)</li> <li><code>date_of_sunset</code>: date at sunset, with night timestamps between midnight and sunrise belonging to the previous date</li> <li><code>exclusion_reason</code>: reason timestamp is excluded in vp_processing_settings.yaml (if applicable). Excluded timestamps have <code>NA</code> values for <code>u</code>, <code>v</code>, <code>dens</code>, <code>dd</code>, <code>ff</code>, <code>DBZH</code>, and <code>mtr</code>.</li> </ul> <p><strong>vp_flowviz.csv:</strong> Input data for visualizations. Is the result of processing <code>vp_processed_70_radars_20160919_20161009.csv</code> using <code>vp-to-flowviz.Rmd</code> in <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1173544">vp-processing</a> (Desmet & Nilsson 2018). Aggregates data in hourly bins for 200-2000m (<code>altitude_band</code> = 1) and above (<code>altitude_band</code> = 2). Only altitude band 1 is used in visualizations.</p> <p><strong>flowviz.mov:</strong> Screencast of <code>vp_flowviz.csv</code> visualized with <a href="https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.57472">Bird migration flow visualization v2</a> (Desmet et al. 2016, Shamoun-Baranes et al. 2016). The visualization extrapolates the migration over the entire sampling range (cropped in the screencast due to technical limitations and thus excluding the Bulgarian radar), not taking topography or water bodies into account, and shows the ground speed (length of arrows) and direction of migration over time. Note that density is not shown: low density movements can therefore appear as strong as high density movements when ground speeds are similar.</p> <p><strong>cartoviz.mov:</strong> Screencast of <code>vp_flowviz.csv</code> visualized as an interactive map with <a href="https://carto.com">CARTO</a>. Visualization shows migration density (size of circles) and mean direction (colour) over time. The interactive map is available at <a href="https://inbo.carto.com/u/lifewatch/builder/8685140f-8d8c-4d06-9e1e-25d051d43748/embed">https://inbo.carto.com/u/lifewatch/builder/8685140f-8d8c-4d06-9e1e-25d051d43748/embed</a>.</p>
Fire Weather Index - ERA-Interim
<p>The Fire Weather Index (FWI) is a numeric rating of fire intensity, dependent on weather conditions. This is a good indicator of fire danger because it contains both a component of fuel availability (drought conditions) and a measure of ease of spread.</p> <p>This is part of a larger dataset providing gridded field calculations from the Canadian Fire Weather Index System using weather forcings from the European Centre for Medium-range Weather Forecast (ECMWF) ERA-Interim reanalysis dataset (Vitolo et al., 2019; Di Giuseppe et al., 2016). The dataset has been developed through a collaboration between the Joint Research Centre and ECMWF under the umbrella of the Global Wildfires Information System (GWIS), a joint initiative of the GEO and the Copernicus Work Programs. The whole dataset consists of seven indices, each of which describes a different aspect of the effect that fuel moisture and wind have on fire ignition probability and its behavior, if started. The indices are called: Fine Fuel Moisture Code (FFMC), Duff Moisture Code (DMC), Drought Code (DC), Initial Spread Index (ISI), Build Up Index (BUI), Fire Weather Index (FWI) and Daily Severity Rating (DSR). For convenience, each index is archived separately. </p> <p>Data are generated using the open source software GEFF v3.0 (https://git.ecmwf.int/projects/CEMSF/repos/geff), which now uses settings and parameters provided by the JRC (more info here https://git.ecmwf.int/projects/CEMSF/repos/geff/browse/NEWS.md). </p> <p>This dataset can be manipulated using the caliver R package (Vitolo et al. 2017, 2018). </p> <p>Details: </p> <ul> <li> <p>File format: netcdf4 </p> </li> <li> <p>Coordinate system: World Geodetic System 1984 (also known as WGS 1984, EPSG:4326). </p> </li> <li> <p>Longitude range: [-180, +180] </p> </li> <li> <p>Latitude range: [-90, +90] </p> </li> <li> <p>Temporal resolution: 1 day </p> </li> </ul> <ul> <li> <p>Spatial resolution: 0.7 degrees (~80 Km) </p> </li> <li> <p>Spatial coverage: Global </p> </li> <li> <p>Time span: from 1980-01-01 to 2018-12-31 </p> </li> </ul>
Air temperature measurements from Automatic Weather Station (AWS) at Freiburg – Chemiehochhaus (FRCHEM) from 2019-01-01 to 2019-12-31 [L2]
<p>Quality controlled and gap-filled continuous air temperature data from the urban rooftop weather station at Freiburg-Chemiehochhaus (FRCHEM, 7.8486ºE, 48.0011ºN, 323.5 m) using an actively ventillated and shielded psychrometer operated 2m above roof level.</p> <ul> <li>Quality controlled air temperature data are available and aggregated at 10min, 30min, hourly, daily, monthly and yearly resolution for the year 2019.</li> <li>Average, minimum and maximum air temperatures are provided on hourly, daily, monthly and annual scales.</li> <li>Characteristic hours and days are reported on daily, monthly and annual scales (e.g. summer days with T_max > 25ºC, hot days with T_max > 30º, desert days with T_max > 35ºC, tropical nights with T_min > 20°, frost days with T_min < 0ºC and ice days with T_max < 0ºC, all based on 00:00 - 24:00 UTC).</li> <li>Detailed information on gap-filled data is provided.</li> <li>Note: All times are provided in UTC, not local time.</li> </ul> <p>For more details read `FRCHEM_2019_AirTemperature_MetaData.txt`.</p> <p>Version 1.1.0 contains additionally air temperature data aggregated at 10min and 30min.</p>
Air temperature measurements from Automatic Weather Station (AWS) at Freiburg – Werthmannstrasse (FRWRTM) from 2019-01-01 to 2019-12-31 [L2]
<p>Quality controlled and gap-filled continuous air temperature data from the urban weather station at Freiburg-Werthmannstrasse (FRWRTM, 7.8447ºE, 47.9928, 277 m) using a passively ventilated and shielded temperature and humidity probe (Campbell Scientific Inc., CS 215) operated in a Stevenson Screen 2m above ground level in the vegetated backyard of Werthmannstrasse 10.</p> <ul> <li>Quality controlled in-canopy air temperature data are available and aggregated at 10min, 30min, hourly, daily, monthly and yearly resolution for the year 2019.</li> <li>Average, minimum and maximum in-canopy air temperatures are provided on hourly, daily, monthly and annual scales.</li> <li>Characteristic hours and days are reported on daily, monthly and annual scales (e.g. summer days with T_max > 25ºC, hot days with T_max > 30º, desert days with T_max > 35ºC, tropical nights with T_min > 20°, frost days with T_min < 0ºC and ice days with T_max < 0ºC, all based on 00:00 - 24:00 UTC).</li> <li>Detailed information on gap-filled data is provided.</li> <li>Note: All times are provided in UTC, not local time.</li> </ul> <p>For more details read `FRWRTM_2019_AirTemperature_MetaData.txt`.</p> <p>Version 1.1.0 contains additionally air temperature data aggregated at 10min and 30min.</p>
Weather Regime definition for the Euro-Atlantic sector (Daily, DFJM, 1979-2018) used for ACDC-ESM
<p><strong>Weather Regime definition for the Euro-Atlantic sector at daily resolution from 1979-2018 for December to March in CSV format</strong></p> <p> </p> <p><strong>TL;DR</strong>: this is the weather regime assignment based the method as set out by Swinda K.J. Falkena in 'Revisiting the identification of wintertime atmosphericcirculation regimes in the Euro-Atlantic sector' (<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3818">10.1002/qj.3818</a>). Daily data is provided for December to March for the period 1979-2018.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Method Description </strong><br> The weather regime assignment can be obtained by applying <em>k</em>-means clustering to the full field data of geopotential height data. Following the observed circulation in reanalysis data, the optimal number of clusters is six. By incorporating a weak persistence constraint in the clustering procedure the assignment is stabilized, without changing the weather regime occurrence rates.</p> <p>The six regimes used have been labelled to indicate atmospheric state. Due to their symmetry, a name (Atlantic Ridge (AR), North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) and Scandinavian Blocking (SB)) and state (positive (+) and negative (-)) are used to label each of the six weather regimes. It should be noted that the naming convention used, does not imply that the weather associated with these six weather regimes is similar to a definition that uses four or two clusters to classify the weather.</p> <p>Full details on the method can be found in: Swinda K.J. Falkena, et al, 'Revisiting the identification of wintertime atmosphericcirculation regimes in the Euro-Atlantic sector' (DOI:<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.3818">10.1002/qj.3818</a>). The original implementation and source code can be found on gitHub via: <a href="https://github.com/SwindaKJ/Regimes_Public">github.com/SwindaKJ/Regimes_Public</a>.</p> <p> </p> <p><strong>Data structure description</strong><br> The file is provided in CSV (.csv) format with a semicolon (;) as separator. The first row stores the column labels. The columns contain the following:</p> <ul> <li>first column (or A) contains the valid-time <ul> <li>Label: datetime</li> <li>Contents represent time with text as [DD/MM/YYYY])</li> </ul> </li> <li>second column (or B) contains the assigned weather regime <ul> <li>Label: WR</li> <li>Contents represent the assigned cluster as an interger in the range [0,5]</li> <li>Meaning: 0="SB-", 1="AR+", 2="NAO-", 3="SB+", 4="NAO+", 5="AR-"</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p> </p> <p><strong>DISCLAIMER</strong>: <em>the content of this dataset has been created with the greatest possible care. However, we invite to use the original assignement of weather regimes for critical applications and studies. </em></p>
Air quality, soil moisture, green roof moisture and weather data from Meetjestad
<p>Soil moisture sensors were developed by citizen science collective Meet je Stad (Measure your City). Measure your City was started in 2015 by inhabitants of the City of Amersfoort, with the goal of measuring climate related indicators. To be able to do so, collaboration was sought with the City of Amersfoort (COA), the local Water Authority and the University of Applied Sciences of Amsterdam. For the first three years the initiative focused on measuring temperature and humidity. Importantly, citizens develop their own research questions, analyze the data together with professionals and discuss potential implications. By doing so, the collective uses citizen science to spread knowledge on both technology and climate change in the most grass-roots manner possible. Within the SCOREwater project, Measure your City was asked to expand measurements with soil moisture measurements and additional temperature and humidity sensors.</p> <p>An important note here is that Measure your City develops their own sensors, has developed their own data platform and uses its own gateways purchased from the Things Network. As a result, much effort is put into constructing sensors that are reliable, low-maintenance and accurate. The latter is important for the City of Amersfoort as well, which intends to not only work on shared knowledge and understanding, but also use the data for policy making. To do so the data has to be reliable. By deploying both these sensors and purchasing company-built sensors, we can compare the data to assess how reliable the Measure your City sensors are.</p> <p>The Measure your City can also be deployed on green roofs to measure soil moisture. Whereas the soil moisture sensor measures soil moisture on two depths (10 centimeter and 40 centimeter), the sensor on a roof only measures soil moisture on one depth. In addition to soil moisture, Measure your City also measures air temperature and relative humidity. Some sensors also measure air quality (particle matter).</p>
Raw data of healthy young adults in the Weather Prediction Task
<p>Raw data of 22 healthy young adults (11 females; average age: 26.29 years; range: 21.72–30.82) in the Weather Prediction Task with 100 training trials with associative outcome probabilities of 0.20, 0.40, 0.60, 0.80 and 4 test trials.</p> <p>Raw data of 15 healthy young adults (9 females; average age: 26.58 years; range: 20.37–28.84) in the Weather Prediction Task with 200 training trials with associative outcome probabilities of 0.20, 0.40, 0.60, 0.80 and 4 test trials.</p> <p>Bochud-Fragnière E, Banta Lavenex P and Lavenex P (2022) What Is the Weather Prediction Task Good for? A New Analysis of Learning Strategies Reveals How Young Adults Solve the Task. Front. Psychol. 13:886339. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.886339</p>
Weather station data acquired across multiple locations in the Teakettle Experimental Forest, California, 2011-2017
These weather station records were collected as part of a larger study relating microclimates to tree seedling survival in southern California mountains. These weather station records are for studies at the Teakettle Experimental Forest (Lat 36.967, Long -119.017, elevation 2000-2800 m, www.fs.fed.us/psw/ef/teakettle/). Weather stations were located at six sites across the Teakettle Experimental Forest landscape. Sites were selected to sample topographic variation in surface and air temperatures within a narrow range of elevations on northeast to southwest-facing slopes, ridges, and valleys. Three full weather stations (north slope, south slope, and valley floor) monitored precipitation, wind, insolation, temperature, relative humidity, and soil moisture. Data were recorded on a 10-minute interval using HOBO (Onset, www.onsetcomp.com) devices.
Weather station data acquired across multiple locations in the foothills of the Tehachapi mountains at Tejon Ranch, California, 2011-2017
These weather station records were collected as part of a larger study relating microclimates to tree seedling survival in southern California mountains. These weather station records are for studies in the foothills of the Tehachapi mountains at Tejon Ranch (Lat 34.983, Long -118.716, elevation 750-930 m, www.tejonranch.com). Weather stations were located at six sites across the Tehachapi foothills. Sites were selected to sample topographic variation in surface and air temperatures within a narrow range of elevations on northeast to southwest-facing slopes, ridges, and valleys. Three full weather stations (north slope, south slope, and valley floor) monitored precipitation, wind, insolation, temperature, relative humidity, and soil moisture. Three micro stations (west slope, east slope, and ridge) measured soil moisture at -20 cm. Data was recorded on a 10-minute interval using HOBO (Onset, www.onsetcomp.com) devices.
Weather station data acquired across multiple locations in the Tehachapi mountains at Tejon Ranch, California, 2011-2017
These weather station records were collected as part of a larger study relating microclimates to tree seedling survival in southern California mountains. These weather station records are for studies the Tehachapi mountains at Tejon Ranch (Lat 34.967, Long -118.583, elevation 1600-1700m, www.tejonranch.com). Weather stations were located at six sites across the Tehachapi foothills. Sites were selected to sample topographic variation in surface and air temperatures within a narrow range of elevations on northeast to southwest-facing slopes, ridges, and valleys. Three full weather stations (north slope, south slope, and valley floor) monitored precipitation, wind, insolation, temperature, relative humidity, and soil moisture. Three micro stations (west slope, east slope, and ridge) measured soil moisture at -20 cm. Data was recorded on a 10-minute interval using HOBO (Onset, www.onsetcomp.com) devices.
The Jefferson Project 2021 weather data from ten surface weather stations on Lake George, NY, USA.
The Jefferson Project at Lake George – a partnership between Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, IBM Research, and Lake George Association – combines Internet of Things technology and powerful analytics with science to create a new model for environmental monitoring and prediction. The project is building a computing platform that captures and analyzes data from a network of sensors tracking water quality and movement. These sensor data are combined with other monitoring and experimental data to create a thorough understanding of the factors that drive the lake's food web, hydrology, and water quality. More information about The Jefferson Project is available at https://jeffersonproject.rpi.edu/ In 2021, The Jefferson Project had ten weather monitoring stations on and around the lake collecting data on precipitation, temperature, wind speed, wind direction, barometric pressure, and relative humidity. These stations are WX_CedarLane, WX_DFWI, WX_GullRock, WX_MossyPoint, WX_WhaleRock, WX_PilotKnob, WX_Glenburnie, VP_TeaIsland, VP_AnthonysNose, and VP_HarrisBay. The stations have a sensor payload that include some combination of the following sensors: Rotronic HC2-S3 sensor, Campbell Scientific CS616 soil moisture sensor, Li-Cor LI-200R pyranometers, RM Young 85006 anemometer, Vaisala Weather Transmitter WXT series (520 & 530 models), HyQuest TB3 tipping bucket rain gauge, and N-Con wet deposition sampler. The sensors collect data at high-frequency (~1 sample per minute) and the data are transferred in near real-time to off-site databases for monitoring and review by Jefferson Project researchers. The data provided here are level 4 data which has undergone data correction and downsampling to an hourly frequency.
The Jefferson Project 2022 weather data from nine surface weather stations on Lake George, NY, USA.
The Jefferson Project at Lake George – a partnership between Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, IBM Research, and Lake George Association – combines Internet of Things technology and powerful analytics with science to create a new model for environmental monitoring and prediction. The project is building a computing platform that captures and analyzes data from a network of sensors tracking water quality and movement. These sensor data are combined with other monitoring and experimental data to create a thorough understanding of the factors that drive the lake's food web, hydrology, and water quality. More information about The Jefferson Project is available at https://jeffersonproject.rpi.edu/ In 2022, The Jefferson Project had nine weather monitoring stations on and around the lake collecting data on precipitation, temperature, wind speed, wind direction, barometric pressure, and relative humidity. These stations are WX_CedarLane, WX_DFWI, WX_GullRock, WX_MossyPoint, WX_WhaleRock, WX_PilotKnob, WX_Glenburnie, VP_TeaIsland, and VP_HarrisBay. The stations have a sensor payload that include some combination of the following sensors: Rotronic HC2-S3 sensor, Campbell Scientific CS616 soil moisture sensor, Li-Cor LI-200R pyranometers, RM Young 85006 anemometer, Vaisala Weather Transmitter WXT series (520 & 530 models), HyQuest TB3 tipping bucket rain gauge, and N-Con wet deposition sampler. The sensors collect data at high-frequency (~1 sample per minute) and the data are transferred in near real-time to off-site databases for monitoring and review by Jefferson Project researchers. The data provided here are level 4 data which has undergone data correction and downsampling to an hourly frequency.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.