Find research datasets worth reusing

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2018View details →

Fig. 3 in Discrimination of habitat use between two sympatric species of mullets, Mugil curema and Mugil liza (Mugiliformes: Mugilidae) in the rio Tramandaí Estuary, determined by otolith chemistry

Fig. 3. Otolithtransectsof Mugilcurema measuredbyLA-ICP-MSfromthecoretotheedge. 43 (line) 86 43 (dashedline). Theidentificationcodeand totallength (mm) ofeachfishareindicatedonthegraph.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2018View details →

Fig. 6 in Ontogenetic development of tetra Astyanax lacustris (Characiformes: Characidae)

Fig. 6. Total length (mm) of Astyanax lacustris during its larval development. Arrows indicate the total consumption time of yolk reserves.

Fig. 2 in Molecular phylogeny and biogeographic history of the Neotropical tribe Glandulocaudini (Characiformes: Characidae: Stevardiinae)

Fig. 2. Calibrated Bayesian tree based on concatenated dataset (16S+COI+RAG2, 1,829 bp) showing the relationships within the Glandulocaudini. Numbers at branches are posterior probabilities and bootstrap values. Species/populations from Brazilian crystalline shield are highlighted in brown (upland areas) and species/populations from Brazilian coastal drainages in green (lowland areas).

Fig. 5 in Redescription of Hyphessobrycon itaparicensis, a senior synonym of H. sergipanus (Characiformes: Characidae)

Fig. 5. Distribution map of Hyphessobrycon itaparicensis. White and red stars represent the type localities of H. itaparicensis and H. sergipanus, respectively. Some circles indicate more than one sampling site. Names of the main drainages of the Northeastern Mata Atlântica ecoregion are given. Numbers refer to conservation units (1) Itabaiana National Park, (2) Baía de Todos os Santos Environmental Protection Area (EPA), (3) Caminhos Ecológicos da Boa Esperança EPA, (4) Pratigi EPA and (5) Baía de Camamu EPA.

Fig. 5 in Age and growth of the Amazonian migratory catfish Brachyplatystoma rousseauxii in the Madeira River basin before the construction of dams

Fig. 5. Mean monthly relative marginal increment (RMI ± S.D.) of 357 Brachyplatystoma rousseauxii's otoliths in relation to the hydrological cycle in the Madeira River basin. The values above bars indicate the number of otoliths analysed each month.

Fig. 4a in Age and growth of the Amazonian migratory catfish Brachyplatystoma rousseauxii in the Madeira River basin before the construction of dams

Fig. 4a. Different types of growth rings; and b. their relative proportions, in transverse thin sections of Brachyplatystoma rousseauxii from the Madeira River basin. S-single, D-double, T-triple rings.

Fig. 18. A in Aglaopheniid hydroids (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Aglaopheniidae) from off New Caledonia collected during KANACONO and KANADEEP expeditions of the French Tropical Deep-Sea Benthos Program

Fig. 18. A. Macrorhynchia phoenicea (Busk, 1852), hydrotheca from sample MNHN-IK-2015-510. — B–D. Macrorhynchia disjuncta (Pictet, 1893), portion of stem (B), hydrotheca (C) and phylactocarp with gonotheca (D) from sample MNHN-IK-2015-513. Scale bars: A–C = 200 µm; D = 500 µm.

Fig. 14 in Aglaopheniid hydroids (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Aglaopheniidae) from off New Caledonia collected during KANACONO and KANADEEP expeditions of the French Tropical Deep-Sea Benthos Program

Fig. 14. Lytocarpia pilosa sp. nov., from sample MNHN-IK-2015-524. A–C. Portion of stem seen frontally (A) and basally (B), and detached pseudophylactocarp (C). D. Hydrotheca. E. Costa of corbula. Scale bars: A–C, E = 500 µm; D = 200 µm.

Fig. 15 in Aglaopheniid hydroids (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Aglaopheniidae) from off New Caledonia collected during KANACONO and KANADEEP expeditions of the French Tropical Deep-Sea Benthos Program

Fig. 15. Lytocarpia pseudoctenata sp. nov. A. Portion of stem. B–D. Hydrotheca (B) and details of its basal (C) and distal (D) parts, all seen laterally. E–F. Portion of the rachis of corbula, and costa with gonotheca (F). From samples MNHN-IK-2015-527 (C–D) and MNHN-IK-2015-528 (A–B, E–F). Scale bars: A, F = 500 µm; B–E = 200 µm.

Fig. 12. A–C in Aglaopheniid hydroids (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Aglaopheniidae) from off New Caledonia collected during KANACONO and KANADEEP expeditions of the French Tropical Deep-Sea Benthos Program

Fig. 12. A–C. Lytocarpia fragilis sp. nov, fertile colony (A) and details of a corbula (B–C), all from sample MNHN-IK-2015-523 (holotype). — D–F. Lytocarpia pilosa sp. nov., fertile colony (D), portion of stem, showing proximal parts of pseudophylactocarps (E), and corbula (F), all from sample MNHN-IK-2015-524 (holotype). — G–H. Lytocarpia pseudoctenata sp. nov., fertile colony (G) and corbula (H), all from sample MNHN-IK-2015-527 (holotype). Scale bars: A, D = 1 cm; B, H = 1 mm; C, E = 500 µm; F = 2 mm; G = 2 cm.

Fig. 10 in Aglaopheniid hydroids (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Aglaopheniidae) from off New Caledonia collected during KANACONO and KANADEEP expeditions of the French Tropical Deep-Sea Benthos Program

Fig. 10. Gymnangium expansum (Jäderholm, 1903). A. Diagrammatic illustration of the mode of branching of the stem: main (m. t.) and accessory (a. t.) tubes, primary (p. b.) and secondary (s. b.) branches with cladia. B–C. Stem internode with gonotheca (B) and detail (C), showing the nematotheca associated to the hydrocladial apophysis. Hydrothecae in lateral (D–E) and frontal (F) views, and detail of their base (G). H–K. Nematothecae: mesial with bifid (H) and quintuple (I) aperture; lateral with simple (J) and bifid (K) apertures. From samples MNHN-IK-2015-515 (B, C, E, G, H, J) and MNHN-IK-2015-516 (D, F, I, K). Scale bars: B, D–F = 200 µm; C, G–K = 100 µm.

Fig. 11. A in Aglaopheniid hydroids (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Aglaopheniidae) from off New Caledonia collected during KANACONO and KANADEEP expeditions of the French Tropical Deep-Sea Benthos Program

Fig. 11. A. Lytocarpia brevirostris (Busk, 1852), hydrotheca from sample MNHN-IK-2015-514. — B–K. Lytocarpia fragilis sp. nov., from sample MNHN-IK-2015-523. A–B. Portions of stems in frontal (B) and dorsal (C) aspects. D–G. Hydrotheca seen laterally (D) and frontally (E), and details of its basal (F) and distal (G) parts, both in lateral view. H–I. Distal part of mesial nematotheca seen frontally (H) and apically (I). J–K. Two corbulacostae. Scale bars: B = 500 µm; A, D–E, J–K = 200 µm; C, F–I = 100 µm.

Fig. 9 in Aglaopheniid hydroids (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Aglaopheniidae) from off New Caledonia collected during KANACONO and KANADEEP expeditions of the French Tropical Deep-Sea Benthos Program

Fig. 9. Cladocarpus pennatus sp. nov. (continued). A–E. Hydrothecae from different colonies seen in lateral view (A–D), to show variation in abaxial curvature, and proximalmost part of a hydrocladium seen frontally (E). F–G. Details of the basal (F) and distal (G) parts of a hydrotheca seen laterally. From samples MNHN-IK-2015-531 (C), MNHN-IK-2015-532 (A, E–G), MNHN-IK-2015-536 (D) and MNHN-IK-2015-539 (B). Scale bars: A–E = 200 µm; F–G = 100 µm.

Fig. 16. A in Aglaopheniid hydroids (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Aglaopheniidae) from off New Caledonia collected during KANACONO and KANADEEP expeditions of the French Tropical Deep-Sea Benthos Program

Fig. 16. A. Lytocarpia cf. spiralis (Totton, 1930), colony from sample MNHN-IK-2015-546. — B. Lytocarpia subtilis sp. nov., colony and corbula (insert) from sample MNHN-IK-2015-525 (holotype). — C–D. Macrorhynchia phoenicea (Busk, 1852) (C), from sample MNHN-IK-2015-512, compared to M. disjuncta (Pictet, 1893) (D), from sample MNHN-IK-2015-513. — E–G. Macrorhynchia spiralis sp. nov., colonies from samples MNHN-IK-2015-519 (E, holotype) and MNHN-IK-2015-520 (F, one paratype), and medusoid gonophore (G) from former sample. Scale bars: A = 3 cm; B–F = 1 cm; B (insert) = 1 mm; G = 100 µm.

Fig. 8 in Aglaopheniid hydroids (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Aglaopheniidae) from off New Caledonia collected during KANACONO and KANADEEP expeditions of the French Tropical Deep-Sea Benthos Program

Fig. 8. Cladocarpus pennatus sp. nov. (part). Portion of stem showing insertions of successive cladia (A) and details of apophysis with its associated nematothecae (B–C). Proximal portions of fertile cladia in frontal (D, with phylactocarp) and dorsal (E, phylactocarp on first cormidium not shown) aspects. Phylactocarp (F). Male (G) and female (H) gonothecae. Hydrotheca seen apically (I). From samples MNHN-IK-2015-532 (A–C), MNHN-IK-2015-533 (E, I), MNHN-IK-2015-537 (G) and MNHN-IK-2015-540 (D, F, H). Scale bars: G = 100 µm; A–F, H, I = 200 µm.

Fig. 7 in Aglaopheniid hydroids (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Aglaopheniidae) from off New Caledonia collected during KANACONO and KANADEEP expeditions of the French Tropical Deep-Sea Benthos Program

Fig. 7. Cladocarpus partitus sp. nov., from sample MNHN-IK-2015-529. Portions from proximal (A, seen frontally; B, seen laterally) and distal (C, with insertion of phylactocarp) parts of stem. Hydrotheca seen laterally (D) and frontally (E), and details of its basal (F) and distal (G) parts; mesial nematotheca (H) seen frontally (left) and apically (right); internal septa in an apical view of the hydrotheca (I). Distal end of phylactocarp with two gonothecae (J). Scale bars: A–C = 500 µm; D–G, J = 200 µm; H, I = 100 µm.

Fig. 2. Aglaophenia howensis Briggs, 1918 in Aglaopheniid hydroids (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Aglaopheniidae) from off New Caledonia collected during KANACONO and KANADEEP expeditions of the French Tropical Deep-Sea Benthos Program

Fig. 2. Aglaophenia howensis Briggs, 1918, from sample MNHN-IK-2015-544. A–B. Portion of a stem in frontal aspect (A) and of another stem in dorsal aspect (B). C–F. Two hydrothecae from one colony in lateral (C, F), frontal (D) and apical (E) views. G–I. A hydrotheca from another colony in lateral (G), frontal (H) and apical (I) aspects. Scale bars: A–H = 200 µm.

Fig. 1. A–B. Aglaophenia howensis Briggs, 1918 in Aglaopheniid hydroids (Cnidaria: Hydrozoa: Aglaopheniidae) from off New Caledonia collected during KANACONO and KANADEEP expeditions of the French Tropical Deep-Sea Benthos Program

Fig. 1. A–B. Aglaophenia howensis Briggs, 1918, fertile cormoid (A) and corbula (B), both from sample MNHN-IK-2015-544. — C. Aglaophenia sinuosa Bale, 1888, cormoid from sample MNHN- IK-2015-545. — D–E. Cladocarpus asymmetricus sp. nov., fertile cormoid (D) and phylactocarp (E) from sample MNHN-IK-2015-530 (holotype). — F. Cladocarpus keiensis Schuchert, 2003, colony from sample MNHN-IK-2015-534. Scale bars: F = 2 cm; A, C–D = 1 cm; E = 1 mm; B = 500 µm.

Fig. 19 in Integrative taxonomy identifies two new tardigrade species (Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae) from Greenland

Fig. 19. Tenuibiotus zandrae sp. nov. Egg chorion morphology seen in SEM. A. Entire egg. B. Magnification of the egg surface. C–F. Details of the egg processes and surface between them. Filled flat arrowheads indicate thickenings/striae on the surface between processes and filled indented arrowheads indicate small tubercles on the process walls. Scale bars in μm.

Fig. 18 in Integrative taxonomy identifies two new tardigrade species (Eutardigrada: Macrobiotidae) from Greenland

Fig. 18. Tenuibiotus zandrae sp. nov. Egg chorion morphology seen in PCM. A. Midsection under 400× magnification. B. Surface under 400× magnification. C–D. Surface between processes under 1000× magnification. E–H. Midsections of processes of four different eggs under 1000× magnification. Filled flat arrowheads indicate thickenings/striae which are visible as dark dots and lines on the surface between processes. Scale bars in μm.