Find research datasets worth reusing

FIGURE 9 in Two new and potentially highly threatened Megophrys Horned frogs (Amphibia: Megophryidae) from Indochina's highest mountains

FIGURE 9. Megophrys hoanglienensis sp. nov. in preservative (holotype VNMN 2018.02). (A) Dorsal view, (B) ventral view. 10 mm scale bar.

FIGURE 2. A in Two new and potentially highly threatened Megophrys Horned frogs (Amphibia: Megophryidae) from Indochina's highest mountains

FIGURE 2. A maximum likelihood tree for ~550 bp section of 16S (mtDNA) gene for Megophrys fansipanensis sp. nov. and Megophrys hoanglienensis sp. nov. along with representatives of all Panophrys species for which comparative sequences are available. Representatives of all other subgenera are included as outgroups. Node support indicated on the tree; <70 not given, ± 70 = grey and 1.00 = black.

FIGURE 4 in Two new and potentially highly threatened Megophrys Horned frogs (Amphibia: Megophryidae) from Indochina's highest mountains

FIGURE 4. Megophrys fansipanensis sp. nov. in preservative (holotype VNMN 2018.01). (A) Lateral view of head, (B) palmar surface of right hand, and (C) plantar surface of left foot. 5 mm scale bar.

FIGURE 1 in Two new and potentially highly threatened Megophrys Horned frogs (Amphibia: Megophryidae) from Indochina's highest mountains

FIGURE 1. Distribution of Megophrys fansipanensis sp. nov. in the Hoang Lien Range, northern Vietnam.

FIGURE 8 in Two new and potentially highly threatened Megophrys Horned frogs (Amphibia: Megophryidae) from Indochina's highest mountains

FIGURE 8. Distribution of Megophrys hoanglienensis sp. nov. on Mount Fansipan, Mount Ky Quan San and Che Tao Commune, northern Vietnam.

opennotspecifiedMay 2018View details →

FIG. 2 in Spatial, Seasonal, and Sexual Variation in the Diet of Graptemys flavimaculata, a Threatened Turtle of the Pascagoula River System, Mississippi, USA

FIG. 2. Diets of male and female Graptemys flavimaculata from the Leaf (LR) and lower Pascagoula Rivers (PR) by season (Spring—dark gray, Summer—black, Fall—light gray). Prey items are sorted alphabetically with minor items not included.

opennotspecifiedMay 2018View details →

FIG. 1 in Spatial, Seasonal, and Sexual Variation in the Diet of Graptemys flavimaculata, a Threatened Turtle of the Pascagoula River System, Mississippi, USA

FIG. 1. Percent molluscivory of male and female Graptemys flavimaculata from the Leaf River (LR) and the lower Pascagoula River (PR).

FIG. 5 in Patch Dynamics Inform Management Decisions in a Threatened Frog Species

FIG. 5. (A) Crawfish Frog movement from Nate's Pond (Hillenbrand Fish and Wildlife Area-West, Greene County, Indiana). One-third of juvenile Crawfish Frogs that metamorphosed at Nate's Pond dispersed to nearby wetlands to breed. Two-thirds of juveniles returned to Nate's to breed. Numbers in parentheses represent counts of individuals. The sizes of the arrows are proportional to the number of individuals. (B) A subset of adult Crawfish Frogs shifted breeding wetlands between years. Colors match the initial wetland from which frogs emigrated. Numbers indicate counts of individuals moving between wetlands. Scale bar ¼ 500 m.

FIG. 4 in Patch Dynamics Inform Management Decisions in a Threatened Frog Species

FIG. 4. Retention of juvenile Crawfish Frogs released at artificial burrows west of Nate's Pond (Hillenbrand Fish and Wildlife AreaWest, Greene County, Indiana). From 24 June–1 August 2015, we used wildlife cameras to determine burrow occupancy. We defined snake predation as instances when frogs no longer appeared after a snake was photographed at burrows. Snake predation (n ¼ 10) and an unknown case of mortality (n¼ 1) are noted.

FIG. 1 in Patch Dynamics Inform Management Decisions in a Threatened Frog Species

FIG. 1. Crawfish Frog breeding wetlands (n ¼ 6) at Hillenbrand Fish and Wildlife Area-West (HFWA-W; Greene County, Indiana). We encircled Nate's and Cattail ponds (bolded text) with drift fence/pitfall trap arrays in 2009– 2016 and sampled at the remaining wetlands (Big, Erosion Control [EC], New, and Nate's Jr.) using funnel traps. We monitored Crawfish Frog breeding (late February through early May) and metamorphosis (mid-June through early August) at Nate's and Cattail, and only breeding at the remaining wetlands. The yellow outline indicates the boundary of HFWAW. Scale bar ¼ 1 km.

FIG. 2 in Patch Dynamics Inform Management Decisions in a Threatened Frog Species

FIG. 2. (A) Newly metamorphosed juvenile Crawfish Frogs at Nate's Pond (Hillenbrand Fish and Wildlife Area-West, Greene County, Indiana) exited with no specific directionality in 2009–2011 and 2014. Exiting frogs were captured by pitfall traps (indicated by yellow squares) positioned every 10 m along the drift fence. Sizes of trap squares are proportional to the number of juveniles exiting from each trap. Numbers next to the traps show the proportion of juveniles exiting from that trap, averaged across the years. (B) Post-breeding adult Crawfish Frogs exhibited a strong tendency to exit Nate's Pond towards the southeast, presumably in the direction of their primary burrow (Heemeyer and Lannoo, 2012). A smaller subset of adults exited east; a much smaller subset exited west. Sizes of trap squares are proportional to the ratio of adults versus juveniles exiting from each trap. We included adults that originated from Nate's Pond and were captured in 2013–2016, and excluded those from 2012 (small sample size, n ¼ 14). We included juveniles captured in 2009–2011 and 2014, and excluded years with small sample sizes (2013, n ¼ 8) and no recruitment (2012 and 2015). Scale bar ¼ 50 m.

Fig. 1 in Geographic Distribution and Habitat Characterization of the Threatened Delta Green Ground Beetle, Elaphrus viridis Horn, 1878 (Coleoptera: Carabidae), in the Jepson Prairie Region of Solano County, California, USA

Fig. 1. Elaphrus viridis (DGGB). a) Green and bronze adult morph, b) Green adult morph, c) Third instar larva.

Fig. 4 in Geographic Distribution and Habitat Characterization of the Threatened Delta Green Ground Beetle, Elaphrus viridis Horn, 1878 (Coleoptera: Carabidae), in the Jepson Prairie Region of Solano County, California, USA

Fig. 4. Graph of sampling plots from the four habitat types and DGGB observations based on discriminant factors DF1 and DF2.

Fig. 3 in Geographic Distribution and Habitat Characterization of the Threatened Delta Green Ground Beetle, Elaphrus viridis Horn, 1878 (Coleoptera: Carabidae), in the Jepson Prairie Region of Solano County, California, USA

Fig. 3. Examples of habitat types sampled for DGGB (see text for additional information). a) Dense valley grassland (foreground), with bare ground as a trail, leading to a playa (background), b) Playa shoreline, illustrating both bare ground and densely vegetated shoreline areas, c) Vernal pool with dense valley grassland encroaching its shoreline, d) Scattered bare ground patches in dense valley grassland.

Fig. 2 in Geographic Distribution and Habitat Characterization of the Threatened Delta Green Ground Beetle, Elaphrus viridis Horn, 1878 (Coleoptera: Carabidae), in the Jepson Prairie Region of Solano County, California, USA

Fig. 2. Map of Jepson Prairie region, with locations of 81 playas color-coded by DGGB presence or absence.

opennotspecifiedNov 2022View details →

Figure 1 in The conservation paradox of an introduced population of a threatened species: spadefoot toads in the coastal dunes of the Netherlands

Figure 1. Sampling sites of the common spadefoot toad (Pelobates fuscus). The main map shows localities sampled outside and the inset localities sampled inside the Netherlands (see main text for details). A rough outline of the natural distribution range in the Netherlands is shaded grey. Localities that contain haplotypes found in the Netherlands are colour coded; otherwise they are left grey (FUS stands for P. fuscus). Sampling details are in supplementary table S1.

opennotspecifiedNov 2022View details →

Figure 3 in The conservation paradox of an introduced population of a threatened species: spadefoot toads in the coastal dunes of the Netherlands

Figure 3. Haplotype network for the common spadefoot toad (Pelobates fuscus) Haplotypes relevant to the current study are colour coded; the remainder is left grey (details in supplementary table S1). The prefix 'FUS' is not shown for the haplotype codes.

opennotspecifiedNov 2022View details →

Figure 2 in The conservation paradox of an introduced population of a threatened species: spadefoot toads in the coastal dunes of the Netherlands

Figure 2. Phylogenetic tree for common spadefoot toad (Pelobates fuscus) and Pallas's spadefoot toad (P. vespertinus). Haplotypes relevant to the current study are colour coded; the remainder is left grey (details in Table S1). Haplotype abbreviations are: FUS = P. fuscus, VES = P. vespertinus, BAL = P. balcanicus, SYR = P. syriacus, CUL = P. cultripes, and VAR = P. varaldii.

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2024View details →

Dataset from: "Global research trends of BRUE (brief resolved unexplained event) or formerly ALTE (apparent life-threatening event): A comprehensive visualization and bibliometric analysis from 1988 to 2024"

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.