Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

1,085

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.7.1

Reset

Dataset results

1,085 results for “Ciliophora”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 1 in Loricophrya bosporica n. sp. (Ciliophora, Suctorea) epibiont of Desmoscolex minutus (Nematoda, Desmoscolecida) from oxic / anoxic boundary of the Black Sea Istanbul Strait's outlet area

FIGURE 1. The distribution of Loricophrya bosporica sp. nov. on Desmoscolex cf. minutus from Bosporus Strait's area.

opennotspecifiedDec 2016View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 2 in Redescriptions of five species of marine peritrichs, Zoothamnium plumula, Zoothamnium nii, Zoothamnium wang, Pseudovorticella bidulphiae, and Pseudovorticella marina (Protista, Ciliophora)

FIGURE 2. Morphology of Zoothamnium nii and its synonyms from live cells (A, C–G, I–L, O, P, R), after staining with protargol (B, H, M, N), and after staining with silver nitrate (Q). A. General view of a typical zooid. B. Detail of infundibular polykineties. C, D. Zoothamnium duplicatum, after Kahl (1933). E, J. form of colony. F, G. Zoothamnium sp. after Kahl (1935). H. Oral view of the oral apparatus, arrow marks the epistomial membrane. I, K, L. Variations in shape of zooids. M. Lateral view showing macronucleus (dark area) and micronucleus (arrow). N. Macronucleus (dark area) and germinal kinety (arrow). O, P. Zooids at high magnification showing pellicuilar striations and variations in shape of the body. Q. General view of silverline system. R. Telotroch. Abbreviations: G, germinal kinety; H, haplokinety; P1–3, infundibular polykinety 1–3; Po, polykinety. Scale bars: 40 Μm (Figs. A, O, R), 50 Μm (Figs. L, P), 300 Μm (Figs. D–F, J, K).

opennotspecifiedDec 2011View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 5 in Redescriptions of five species of marine peritrichs, Zoothamnium plumula, Zoothamnium nii, Zoothamnium wang, Pseudovorticella bidulphiae, and Pseudovorticella marina (Protista, Ciliophora)

FIGURE 5. Morphology of Pseudovorticella marina (A–D, I–Q) and similar species (E–H). A, J, M. General view of typical cells. B. Variations in shape of the cell body. C. From Warren, 1986. D. Oral infraciliature, arrow marks the epistomial membrane. E. Pseudovorticella punctata (from Ji et al. 2006a). F. Vorticella campanulata (from Warren 1986). G. Vorticella fusca (from Warren 1986). H. Vorticella jaerae (from Precht 1935). I. Zooids seen at low magnification. K. Detail of stalk, arrows mark mitochondria. L. Detail of infundibular polykineties. N. Trochal band (arrows). O. Oral view of protargol impregnated specimen showing the epistomial membrane (arrow) and germinal kinety (arrowheads). P, Q. Silverline system, arrows mark pellicular pores. Abbreviations: G, germinal kinety; H, haplokinety; P1–3, infundibular polykinety 1–3; Po, polykinety. Scale bars: 20 Μm (Figs. A–C, E–H), 60 Μm (Fig. J), 100 Μm (Fig. M), 150 Μm (Fig. I).Fig. 1

opennotspecifiedDec 2011View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 4 in Redescriptions of five species of marine peritrichs, Zoothamnium plumula, Zoothamnium nii, Zoothamnium wang, Pseudovorticella bidulphiae, and Pseudovorticella marina (Protista, Ciliophora)

FIGURE 4. Morphology of Pseudovorticella bidulphiae (A–D, H–M) and similar species (E–G). A, I. General view of a typical cell. B. Variations in shape of the cell body. C, D. After Stiller (1939). E. Pseudovorticella pseudocampanula (after Foissner 1979). F. Pseudovorticella sauwaldensis (from Foissner and Schiffmann, 1979). G. Vorticella venusta (from Warren 1986). H. Oral infraciliature, arrow marks the epistomial membrane. J. Pellicular striations. K. Detail of stalk. L. Protargol-stained specimen showing infundibular polykineties. M. General view of silverline system, arrows mark the trochal band. Abbreviations: G, germinal kinety; H, plokinety; P1–3, infundibular polykinety 1–3; Po, polykinety. Scale bars: 20 Μm (Figs. A, E–G), 50 Μm (Figs. C, I).

opennotspecifiedDec 2011View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 3 in Redescriptions of five species of marine peritrichs, Zoothamnium plumula, Zoothamnium nii, Zoothamnium wang, Pseudovorticella bidulphiae, and Pseudovorticella marina (Protista, Ciliophora)

FIGURE 3. Morphology of Zoothamnium wangi from live cells (A, C, F–H, J), after staining with protargol (D, E, I, L, M), and after staining with silver nitrate (B, K). A. General view of a typical zooid. B, K. Silverline system, arrow marks the trochal band. C, F. Form of colony. D, M. Detail of infundibular polykineties. E. Oral infraciliature, arrow marks the epistomial membrane. G. Zooids at low magnification showing shape of the body. H. Highly magnified zooid showing pellicular striations. I. Lateral view showing macronucleus (dark area) and micronucleus (arrow). J. Structure of stalk showing densely arranged mitochondria in spasmoneme (arrow). L. Germinal kinety (arrow) and trochal band (arrowhead). Abbreviations: F, filamentous reticulum; G, germinal kinety; H, haplokinety; P1–3, infundibular polykinety 1–3; Po, polykinety. Scale bars: 5 Μm (Fig. J), 40 Μm (Fig. A), 50 Μm (Fig. G), 200 Μm (Fig. F), 250 Μm (Fig. C).

opennotspecifiedDec 2011View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 1 in Redescriptions of five species of marine peritrichs, Zoothamnium plumula, Zoothamnium nii, Zoothamnium wang, Pseudovorticella bidulphiae, and Pseudovorticella marina (Protista, Ciliophora)

FIGURE 1. Morphology of Zoothamnium plumula from live cells (A–F, J–M), after staining with protargol (H, I, N–P), and after staining with silver nitrate (G, Q) (A, G from Song et al. 2002; B, C after Kahl 1933). A. General view of a typical zooid. B, D–F. Different colony forms. C. Comparison of normal zooid with enlarged zooid. G. Silverline system, arrow marks the trochal band. H. Oral infraciliature, arrow marks the epistomial membrane, double-arrow indicates the distal fragment. I. Detail of infundibular polykineties. J. Branching pattern of a typical colony. K. Variations in shape of zooids. L. Detail of stalk, arrows mark mitochondria. M. Pellicular striations. N. Arrangement of infundibular polykineties. O. Germinal kinety (arrow) and radial myonemes in cell body (arrowheads). P. Epistomial membrane (arrow). Q. General view of silverline system. Abbreviations: G, germinal kinety; H, haplokinety; P1-3, infundibular polykinety 1–3; Po, polykinety. Scale bars: 30 Μm (Fig. A), 100 Μm (Fig. K), 400 Μm (Figs. F, J).

opennotspecifiedDec 2011View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 3 in New records of suctorians (Ciliophora: Suctoria) as epibionts of aquatic true bugs (Hemiptera: Prosorrhyncha: Nepomorpha) from two regions: Mexico and Eastern Europe

FIGURE 3. Some epibiotic suctorians of nepomorphans. a. Discophrya ochtebii. b. Tokophrya quadripartita from Lethocerus sp. (Mexico). c. Podophrya fixa. d. Kormosia linguifera. e. Metacineta longipes.

opennotspecifiedDec 2011View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 2 in New records of suctorians (Ciliophora: Suctoria) as epibionts of aquatic true bugs (Hemiptera: Prosorrhyncha: Nepomorpha) from two regions: Mexico and Eastern Europe

FIGURE 2. Some epibiotic suctorians of nepomorphans. a. Dendrosoma radians (Ukraine). b. Cyclophrya magna (Ukraine). c. Tokophrya lemnarum (Ukraine).

opennotspecifiedDec 2011View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 1 in New records of suctorians (Ciliophora: Suctoria) as epibionts of aquatic true bugs (Hemiptera: Prosorrhyncha: Nepomorpha) from two regions: Mexico and Eastern Europe

FIGURE 1. Some epibiotic suctorians of nepomorphans. a. Manuelophrya hannae parasite of peritrich epibiont of Lethocerus sp. (Mexico). b. Pseudogemma pachystyla parasite of Periacineta buckei attached to Ranatra sp. (Mexico). c. Discophrya elongata on Ranatra sp. (Mexico). d. Discophrya gessneri epibiont of Aphelocheirus aestivalis (Ukraine); the insert shows the shape of the stalk. e. Discophrya lichteinsteinii found on Ambrysus sp. (Mexico). f. Empty loricaes of Periacineta notonectae from Corixa sp. (Ukraine). g-i. Periacineta buckei from Ranatra sp., Belostoma sp. and Lethocerus sp., respectively (Mexico).

opennotspecifiedDec 2011View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 2 in First record of a new epibionts suctorian ciliate Tokophrya huangmeiensis sp. n. (Ciliophora, Phyllopharyngea) from redclaw crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus von Martens 1868

FIGURE 2. Line drawings of T. huangmeiensis sp. n. (a) Body of T. huangmeiensis suspended on stalk. (b) Epistylis sp. as a substrate to Tokophrya sp. Scale bars: a=60 µm, b=1 mm.

opennotspecifiedDec 2017View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 1 in First record of a new epibionts suctorian ciliate Tokophrya huangmeiensis sp. n. (Ciliophora, Phyllopharyngea) from redclaw crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus von Martens 1868

FIGURE 1. Photomicrographs of T. huangmeiensis sp. n. found on redclaw crayfish (a) Cherax quadricarinatus collected from suspected fish farm. (b) Epistylis sp. as a substrate to T. huangmeiensis sp. n.; Abbreviations: Ep = Epistylis, Th = T. huangmeiensis sp. n. (c) Elongated pyramidal shaped and corrugated cell body of T. huangmeiensis sp. n., arrowhead showing macronucleus. (d) Apical part of the cell body showing single contractile vacuole. (e) Apical border of the cell body showing fascicle of finger-like tentacles. (f) Indicating basal plate which was concave up-word and gently dipped inside the cell body, under this basal plate transparent stalk is present with longitudinal striations. (g) Showing junction of Epistylis sp. as a substrate to Tokophrya sp., slightly protrude outward. Scale bars: b=100 µm, c=10 µm, d=5 µm, e=5 µm, f=5 µm, g=3 µm.

opennotspecifiedDec 2017View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 3 in First record of a new epibionts suctorian ciliate Tokophrya huangmeiensis sp. n. (Ciliophora, Phyllopharyngea) from redclaw crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus von Martens 1868

FIGURE 3. Phylogenetic tree generated by Bayesian analysis of SSU rDNA sequences of T. huangmeiensis sp. n. and related ciliates. Genbank accession numbers are listed adjacent to species names. Numbers given at nodes of branches are posterior probabilities (BI) and bootstrap values (ML), respectively. Asterisks are shown where values exceeded 95%. Dashes are shown for values under 50%.

opennotspecifiedDec 2017View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 2–28 in Polymorphism and inconsistencies in the taxonomy of Diplodinium anisacanthum da Cunha, 1914 (Ciliophora, Entodiniomorphida, Ophryoscolecidae) and taxonomic notes on the genus Diplodinium Schuberg, 1888

FIGURE 2–28. Schematic drawings of the species described in genus Diplodinium Schuberg based on the original description. 2. Diplodinium dentatum, type species of the genus; 3. D. africanum a–b. polimorfism in the posterior end of the body; 4. Diplodinium anisacanthum; a. anisacanthum; b. anacanthum; c. monacanthum; d. diacanthum; e. triacanthum; f. tetracanthum; g. pentacanthum; 5. D. archon; 6. D. babici; 7. a. D. bubalidis f. bubalidis; b. D. bubalidis f. aspinosum; 8. D. cameli; 9. a. D. consors f. consors; b. D. consors f. spinulosum; c. D. consors f. hamulosum; d. D. consors f. bispinulosum; 10. D. costatum; 11. D. crista–galli a–b. polymorphism in the posterior end of the body; 12. D. dogieli; 13. D. elongatum; 14. a. D. flabellum f. flabellum; b. D. flabellum f. aspinatum; b. D. flabellum f. monospinatum; c. D. flabellum f. laterospinatum; 15. D. italicum; 16. D. komareki; 17. D. laeve; 18. D. leche a–b. polymorphism in the posterior end of the body; 19. D. lochinvarense; 20. a. D. mahidoli f. mahidoli b. D. mahidoli f. bispinosum; 21. D. minor; 22. D. moucheti; 23. D. nanum; 24. D. polygonale; 25. D. psittaceum; 26. D. quinquespinosum; 27. D. rangiferi a–b. polymorphism in the posterior end of the body; 28. a. D. zambiense f. zambiense; b. D. zambiense f. trispinosum; c. D. zambiense f. bispinosum; d. D. zambiense f. monospinosum. ACZ: adoral ciliary zone; DCZ: dorsal ciliary zone; Ma: macronucleus; Mi: micronucleus; CV: contractile vacuole; CS: caudal spines. Figures prepared out of scale. For morphometric data, please see Table 2.

opennotspecifiedDec 2017View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 1 in Polymorphism and inconsistencies in the taxonomy of Diplodinium anisacanthum da Cunha, 1914 (Ciliophora, Entodiniomorphida, Ophryoscolecidae) and taxonomic notes on the genus Diplodinium Schuberg, 1888

FIGURE 1. Six morphotypes of Diplodinium anisacanthum da Cunha, 1914 reported in Brazilian sheep (Ovis aries L.) a. D. anisacanthum anisacanthum, schematic drawing based on specimen stained with Lugol's solution; b–d: schematic drawings of nuclear apparatus (b), infraciliary bands (c) and caudal projections (d). e–j. specimens after silver carbonate impregnation. e. D. anisacanthum monacanthum; f. D. anisacanthum diacanthum; g. D. anisacanthum triacanthum; h. D. anisacanthum tetracanthum; i. D. anisacanthum pentacanthum; j. D. anisacanthum anisacanthum. AP: adoral polybracykynety; ACZ: adoral ciliary zone; CS: caudal spine; Ctp: cytoproct; CV: contractile vacuole; DCZ: dorsal ciliary zone; DP: dorsal polybrachykynety; Ma: macronucleus; Mi: micronucleus; VP: vestibular polybrachykynety. Bars: 20 µm.

opennotspecifiedDec 2017View details →
zenodo32/100

FIG. 2 in Distribution of the protozoan epibiont Ophryodendron mysidacii (Ciliophora, Suctoria) on the mysid Schistomysis parkeri (Crustacea)

FIG. 2. Female of Schistomysis parkeri showing the location of several individuals of Ophryodendron mysidacii. (a) Tentaculate form. (b) Tentaculate individual with a bud. (c) Vermiform individuals.

opennotspecifiedDec 2002View details →
zenodo32/100

FIG. 3 in Distribution of the protozoan epibiont Ophryodendron mysidacii (Ciliophora, Suctoria) on the mysid Schistomysis parkeri (Crustacea)

FIG. 3. Canonical representation of the six age groups of Schistomysis parkeri (confidential regions for the means of age groups, p <0.01), taking into account two variables: the size and the number of epibionts. The horizontal axis correspond to the state of sexual maturity. J, juvenile individuals; MM, mature males; PIF, post-incubating females; INCF, incubating females; IF, immature females; IM, immature males.

opennotspecifiedDec 2002View details →
zenodo32/100

FIG. 1 in Distribution of the protozoan epibiont Ophryodendron mysidacii (Ciliophora, Suctoria) on the mysid Schistomysis parkeri (Crustacea)

FIG. 1. Ophryodendron mysidacii. (a) Elongated tentaculate form. (b) Vermiform individual. (c) Flattened tentaculate form. (d) Resistant form. Ma, macronucleus; l, lobes; t, tentacles; Mi, micronuclei; N, nucleolus; v, vacuoles.

opennotspecifiedDec 2002View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 11 in Morphology and morphogenesis of Strongylidium pseudocrassum Wang and Nie, 1935, with redefinition of Strongylidium Sterki, 1878 (Protista: Ciliophora: Stichotrichia)

FIGURE 11. Species of Strongylidium assigned to Group 1, modified from originals. S. caudatum, a) ventral side from Kahl (1932), 100–250 µm, b) ventral side from Biernacka (1963), 110–140 µm, c) ventral side from Kattar (1970), 200–220 µm. In Al-Rasheid (1996), 220–250 µm; S. californicum, d) ventral side from Kahl (1932), 250 µm; S. contortus, e, f) ventral side from Gelei (1954), 140–170 µm; S. coronatum, g) ventral side, h) lateral view, from Vuxanovici (1963), 110 µm; S. crassum, i) ventral side, j) dorsal side, from Kahl (1932), 150 µm, k) ventral side from Borror (1972), l) ventral side from Tuffrau and Fleury (1994), 120–180 µm; S. labiatum, m) ventral side, n) left side, from Kahl (1932), 80 µm; S. lanceolatum, o) ventral side from Kowalewskiego (1882), 126µm, p) ventral side from Kahl (1932), 130 µm, q) redrawn from Kowalewskiego (1882) by Kahl (1932); S. lentum nov. comb., r) ventral side from Kahl (1932) 150 µm, s) ventral side from Biernacka (1963), 120–140 µm; S. microstoma, t) ventral side from Dragesco and Dragesco-Kernéis (1986), 135–188 µm; S. mucicola, u) ventral side, v) dorsal side, from Kahl (1932), 120 µm, S. muscorum, w) ventral side from Kahl (1932), 10 µm; marine Strongylidium sp., x) ventral side from Kahl (1932), 70 µm; freshwater Strongylidium sp., y) ventral side from Kahl (1932), 130 µm. Figures were resized out of scale.

opennotspecifiedAug 2007View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 8 in Morphology and morphogenesis of Strongylidium pseudocrassum Wang and Nie, 1935, with redefinition of Strongylidium Sterki, 1878 (Protista: Ciliophora: Stichotrichia)

FIGURE 8. Micrographs of Strongylidium pseudocrassum after protargol-impregnation showing aspects of the divisional morphogenesis. a) ventral side showing early development of primary primordium V, indicated by arrows; b) ventral side of middle divider showing ventral and right marginal primordia. Arrow indicates undulating membranes primordium; c) divider showing long primary primordium V (arrows); d) late divider. Black arrows point to cirral products of primordium IV of the proter; white arrow shows cirrus I/1 of the proter; e) opisthe of late divider. Black arrows show cirral products of primordium IV; white arrows indicate the anterior segment of the cirral product of primordium VI; f) dorsal side of divider showing dorsal kineties primordia (arrows).

opennotspecifiedAug 2007View details →
zenodo32/100

FIGURE 5 in Morphology and morphogenesis of Strongylidium pseudocrassum Wang and Nie, 1935, with redefinition of Strongylidium Sterki, 1878 (Protista: Ciliophora: Stichotrichia)

FIGURE 5. Divisional morphogenesis and physiological reorganization of Strongylidium pseudocrassum from protargol-impregnation slides. a) stage 12, divider showing dorsal side ciliature pattern completely developed; b) early reorganizer. Arrow marks fused undulating membranes; c) reorganizer showing basal bodies disaggregating from the anterior region of the fused undulating membranes (black arrow), and disaggregating adoral membraneles (white arrow); d) reorganizer showing oral anarchic primordium. Arrow shows the early development of cirrus I/1; e) middle reorganizer. White arrow marks supposedly new adoral membranes; f) dorsal side of middle reorganizer showing new dorsal kineties development (arrows); g) ventral side of late reorganizer. The black arrow shows differentiation of the undulating membranes and the white arrow shows supposedly new adoral membraneles.

opennotspecifiedAug 2007View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record