Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
686
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
686 results for “Lima”
Figure 4 from: Lima SFB, Christoffersen ML (2016) Redescription and designation of a neotype for Caecum floridanum (Littorinimorpha, Truncatelloidea, Caecidae) with a characterization of the protoconch and growth stages. ZooKeys 585: 17-31. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.585.7646
Figure 4 - Hypothesis in the reconstruction of growth stages and synonyms of Caecum floridanum: A Protoconch to teleoconch IV B Sculpture of teleoconch I C Sculpture of teleoconch II to IV D Caecum irregular, teleoconch IV (syntype – MNHN 25729) E Caecum phronimum at different growth stages, teleoconch II to III (syntype – MNHN 25728) F Caecum compactum, teleoconch IV (USNM 83590) G–H Caecum puntagordanum (holotype – PRI 26107 and paratype – PRI 26108, respectively), teleoconch IV. Measures and scale bars: A protoconch and first half of teleoconch I (Bandel 1996: pl. 7, fig. 7, 0.7 mm), second half of teleoconch II to III (200 µm), teleoconch IV (500 µm), 100 µm (B–C), 500 µm (D–E), 1 mm (F–H)
Figure 3 from: Lima SFB, Christoffersen ML (2016) Redescription and designation of a neotype for Caecum floridanum (Littorinimorpha, Truncatelloidea, Caecidae) with a characterization of the protoconch and growth stages. ZooKeys 585: 17-31. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.585.7646
Figure 3 - Scanning electron micrographs of Caecum floridanum shells at different growth stages and operculum: A Teleoconch II to III (MORG 41.867) B Truncation region between teleoconch II and III (A) C Teleoconch II to III (IBUFRJ 18376) D–F Teleoconch IV (E–F Arrows pointing to last three to four axial ribs at anterior end) (D–F IBUFRJ 18376) G Operculum, outer surface (IBUFRJ 7408) H Operculum, inner surface (IBUFRJ 7408). Scale bars: 500 µm (A, C, E–H), 100 µm (B, I), 200 µm (D).
Figure 1 from: Lima SFB, Christoffersen ML (2016) Redescription and designation of a neotype for Caecum floridanum (Littorinimorpha, Truncatelloidea, Caecidae) with a characterization of the protoconch and growth stages. ZooKeys 585: 17-31. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.585.7646
Figure 1 - Photos of Caecum floridanum, teleoconch IV (neotype, ANSP 407671): A–B lateral view C Apical region showing mucro D Detail of longitudinal lines and axial interspaces/ribs E Anterior region view F Operculum (outer surface view) G Operculum (internal surface view). Scale bars: 500 μm (A–B), 200 μm (C, E), 100 μm (D, F–G).
Figure 2 from: Lima SFB, Christoffersen ML (2016) Redescription and designation of a neotype for Caecum floridanum (Littorinimorpha, Truncatelloidea, Caecidae) with a characterization of the protoconch and growth stages. ZooKeys 585: 17-31. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.585.7646
Figure 2 - Scanning electron micrographs of Caecum floridanum shells at different growth stages: A–B Protoconch and teleoconch I (Bandel 1996: pl. 7, fig. 8, 0.3 mm, fig. 7, 0.7 mm, respectively) C Teleoconch II to IV (IBUFRJ 12687) D Teleoconch II to IV (IBUFRJ 12689) E Teleoconch II to IV (MORG 41.867) F Truncation region between teleoconch II and III G Truncation region between teleoconch II and III. Scale bars: 500 μm (C–E), 100 μm (F), 50 μm (G).
Figure 6 from: Klishko OK, Lopes-Lima M, Froufe E, Bogan AE, Abakumova VY (2016) Systematics and distribution of Cristaria plicata (Bivalvia, Unionidae) from the Russian Far East. ZooKeys 580: 13-27. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.580.7588
Figure 6 - Distribution of Cristaria plicata in a Eastern Russia, Mongolia, China (pink spots) and b southern edge of the area in northern Vietnam, Laos, Thailand and Cambodia (pink shaded area).
Figure 2 from: Klishko OK, Lopes-Lima M, Froufe E, Bogan AE, Abakumova VY (2016) Systematics and distribution of Cristaria plicata (Bivalvia, Unionidae) from the Russian Far East. ZooKeys 580: 13-27. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.580.7588
Figure 2 - Shell morphology of Cristaria plicata from Eastern Russia: A–C Cristaria plicata from Khanka Lake identified by Zhadin in 1927 D–E Cristaria plicata from Khanka Lake identified by Starobogatov in 1967 F–G Cristaria tuberculata and H Cristaria herculea from Khanka Lake identified by Moskvicheva in 1971 I limnetic, and J riverine forms of Cristaria (herculea) plicata from Transbaikalia (Klishko et al. 2014).
Figure 5 from: Klishko OK, Lopes-Lima M, Froufe E, Bogan AE, Abakumova VY (2016) Systematics and distribution of Cristaria plicata (Bivalvia, Unionidae) from the Russian Far East. ZooKeys 580: 13-27. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.580.7588
Figure 5 - Discriminant analysis plots of Cristaria plicata, Cristaria herculea and Cristaria tuberculata forms from Far Eastern Russia showing the spread of the first two discriminant scores in discriminant space.
Figure 3 from: Klishko OK, Lopes-Lima M, Froufe E, Bogan AE, Abakumova VY (2016) Systematics and distribution of Cristaria plicata (Bivalvia, Unionidae) from the Russian Far East. ZooKeys 580: 13-27. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.580.7588
Figure 3 - A Variation of the R-index with shell length B range and mean values of R-index for Far East Russian specimens of Cristaria plicata, Cristaria herculea and Cristaria tuberculata.
Figure 4 from: Klishko OK, Lopes-Lima M, Froufe E, Bogan AE, Abakumova VY (2016) Systematics and distribution of Cristaria plicata (Bivalvia, Unionidae) from the Russian Far East. ZooKeys 580: 13-27. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.580.7588
Figure 4 - Variation of the morphometric shell indexes (B/H, H/L and B/L) with shell length in the three putative Cristaria taxa.
Figure 1 from: Klishko OK, Lopes-Lima M, Froufe E, Bogan AE, Abakumova VY (2016) Systematics and distribution of Cristaria plicata (Bivalvia, Unionidae) from the Russian Far East. ZooKeys 580: 13-27. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.580.7588
Figure 1 - Phylogenetic tree obtained by Bayesian Inference analysis, using mtDNA fragments (CO1). Support values are given as Bayesian posterior probability above nodes, except for those within major clades, which have been omitted for clarity. Available sequences downloaded from GenBank and new sequences codes refer to Table 1.
Figure 3 from: Manni M, Lima KM, Guglielmino CR, Lanzavecchia SB, Juri M, Vera T, Cladera J, Scolari F, Gomulski L, Bonizzoni M, Gasperi G, Silva JG, Malacrida AR (2015) Relevant genetic differentiation among Brazilian populations of Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera, Tephritidae). In: De Meyer M, Clarke AR, Vera MT, Hendrichs J (Eds) Resolution of Cryptic Species Complexes of Tephritid Pests to Enhance SIT Application and Facilitate International Trade. ZooKeys 540: 157-173. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.540.6713
Figure 3 - Correlation of FST values with the geographic distances (upper plot) and altitude differences (bottom plot) among the 6 Brazilian samples of Anastrepha fraterculus.
Figure 2 from: Manni M, Lima KM, Guglielmino CR, Lanzavecchia SB, Juri M, Vera T, Cladera J, Scolari F, Gomulski L, Bonizzoni M, Gasperi G, Silva JG, Malacrida AR (2015) Relevant genetic differentiation among Brazilian populations of Anastrepha fraterculus (Diptera, Tephritidae). In: De Meyer M, Clarke AR, Vera MT, Hendrichs J (Eds) Resolution of Cryptic Species Complexes of Tephritid Pests to Enhance SIT Application and Facilitate International Trade. ZooKeys 540: 157-173. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.540.6713
Figure 2 - Two-dimensional plot of Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) based on similarity matrix derived from Anastrepha fraterculus microsatellites data. The Morphotype classification (Hernández-Ortiz et al. 2012), relative to each sample is also reported.
Figure 2 from: Flinte V, Hentz E, Morgado BM, Lima ACM, Khattar G, Monteiro RF, Macedo MV (2015) Biology and phenology of three leaf beetle species (Chrysomelidae) in a montane forest in southeast Brazil. In: Jolivet P, Santiago-Blay J, Schmitt M (Eds) Research on Chrysomelidae 5. ZooKeys 547: 119–132. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.547.9015
Figure 2 - Population phenology of Coptocycla arcuata (A), Omaspides trichroa (B) and Platyphora axillaris (C) in a montane forest at 1000 m altitude between November 2008 and June 2011. A climatic diagram (data obtained from a meteorological station in the same site) is given for the same period as surveys (D). Dotted area = dry period; striped area = humid period; black area = super-humid period. The line above species fluctuations represents the percentage of host plant with new leaf shoots, the dotted line being < 25% of plants in this phase; fine line between 25% and 75%; thick line > 75%.
Figure 1 from: Flinte V, Hentz E, Morgado BM, Lima ACM, Khattar G, Monteiro RF, Macedo MV (2015) Biology and phenology of three leaf beetle species (Chrysomelidae) in a montane forest in southeast Brazil. In: Jolivet P, Santiago-Blay J, Schmitt M (Eds) Research on Chrysomelidae 5. ZooKeys 547: 119–132. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.547.9015
Figure 1 - Adults and larvae of the study species: Coptocycla arcuata (A), Omaspides trichroa (B) and Platyphora axillaris (C), in a montane rain forest in southeast Brazil. Arrows in B show phoretic wasps.
Figure 7 from: Majure LC, Bécquer ER, Judd WS (2016) Revision of the Lima clade (Miconia sect. Lima, Miconieae, Melastomataceae) of the Greater Antilles. PhytoKeys 72: 1-99. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.72.9355
Figure 7 - Illustration of Miconia granulata (A–E) and Miconia norlindii (F–H). A Habit of Miconia granulata from the type specimen (Ekman 3789) B flower C stamen D fruit longitudinal section E fruit cross section (all from Acuña 13288) F flower of Miconia norlindii (Pipoly 24478) G petal (Pipoly 24478), and H seed (Clemente NSC-5814).
Figure 9 from: Majure LC, Bécquer ER, Judd WS (2016) Revision of the Lima clade (Miconia sect. Lima, Miconieae, Melastomataceae) of the Greater Antilles. PhytoKeys 72: 1-99. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.72.9355
Figure 9 - Photographs of Miconia jashaferi (A–D), Miconia norlindii (E–J), and Miconia granulata (K–P). A Abaxial leaf surface B habit of Miconia jashaferi showing pendant infloresence C close-up of immature fruit showing long clayx lobes D adaxial leaf surface (all from Michelangeli 2284) E habit of Miconia norlindii F close-up of flower, side view G close-up of flower, frontal view H close-up of infloresence (all from Michelangeli 2213) I mature fruit (Bécquer s.n.) J leaf abaxial surface (Michelangeli 2213) K habit of Miconia granulata (Bécquer HFC-82266) L close-up of flower (Michelangeli 2269) M leaf abaxial surface, showing purple primary vein (Michelangeli 2265) N mature fruit (Michelangeli 2269) O close-up of branch of inflorescence (Michelangeli 2269) P leaf adaxial surface showing reduced bulla-based hairs (Michelangeli 2265). Photos I & K taken by E. Bécquer and A–H, J, & L–P by F. Michelangeli.
Figure 6 from: Majure LC, Bécquer ER, Judd WS (2016) Revision of the Lima clade (Miconia sect. Lima, Miconieae, Melastomataceae) of the Greater Antilles. PhytoKeys 72: 1-99. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.72.9355
Figure 6 - Illustration of Miconia cubacinerea (A) and Miconia tentaculicapitata (B–F). A Habit of Miconia cubacinerea from the type specimen (Wright 2483) B habit of Miconia tentaculicapitata (Ekman 14823) C petal (Hioram 7218) D stamen (Hioram 7218) E fruit longitudinal section (Hioram 7218), and F seed (León LS-12337).
Figure 3 from: Majure LC, Bécquer ER, Judd WS (2016) Revision of the Lima clade (Miconia sect. Lima, Miconieae, Melastomataceae) of the Greater Antilles. PhytoKeys 72: 1-99. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.72.9355
Figure 3 - Illustration of Miconia jashaferi A habit (Ekman 3849) B petal (Alain 871) C stamen (Alain 871) D style (Alain 871) E immature fruit longitudinal section (Alain 871) F seed (Acuña SV-13275). Reproduced with permission from Majure et al. (2014a).
Figure 4 from: Majure LC, Bécquer ER, Judd WS (2016) Revision of the Lima clade (Miconia sect. Lima, Miconieae, Melastomataceae) of the Greater Antilles. PhytoKeys 72: 1-99. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.72.9355
Figure 4 - Distribution map of Miconia hirtistyla (closed circles), Miconia jashaferi (closed stars), Miconia cubacinerea (open circle), and Miconia tentaculicapitata (open stars).
Figure 5 from: Majure LC, Bécquer ER, Judd WS (2016) Revision of the Lima clade (Miconia sect. Lima, Miconieae, Melastomataceae) of the Greater Antilles. PhytoKeys 72: 1-99. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.72.9355
Figure 5 - Miconia hirtistyla A habit (Ekman 14617) B leaf abaxial surface (León LS-10923) C bracteole (León LS-10923) D petal (Ekman 14617) E stamen (Ekman 14617) F style (Ekman 14617). Reproduced with permission from Majure et al. (2014a).
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.