Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 7 in The historic background and potential of sustainable small-scale fisheries and aquaculture in small islands: the case of Saint-Pierre and Miquelon

Figure 7. – Evolution of the number of employees per sector in the past two decades in Saint-Pierre and Miquelon: primary sector, including fisheries, aquaculture and agriculture (in black), secondary sector, including industry and construction (in dark grey), and tertiary sector including commerce, transport, personal services, accommodation, food service activities, public administration, education, health and social work (light grey). Data are from Iedom (2021).

Figure 4 in The historic background and potential of sustainable small-scale fisheries and aquaculture in small islands: the case of Saint-Pierre and Miquelon

Figure 4. – Official captures for the Saint-Pierre and Miquelon's fleet from 1950-2020 (data come from the FAO database).

Figure 1 in The historic background and potential of sustainable small-scale fisheries and aquaculture in small islands: the case of Saint-Pierre and Miquelon

Figure 1. – Map of the 12,400 km2 Exclusive Economic Zone of Saint-Pierre and Miquelon (dark blue), most of which is comprised in NAFO Subarea 3Ps (light blue). The land in the upper left is the South of the Newfoundland island; that on the left the West of Nova Scotia. The insert shows the maps' location in North America.

Figure 9 in The historic background and potential of sustainable small-scale fisheries and aquaculture in small islands: the case of Saint-Pierre and Miquelon

Figure 9. – Evolution of the population of Saint-Pierre and Miquelon. People under 20 years (in black), between 21 and 59 years old (dark grey), and above> 60 years old (light grey). Data are from IEDOM reports (https://www.iedom.fr/saint-pierre-et-miquelon/).

Figure 3 in The historic background and potential of sustainable small-scale fisheries and aquaculture in small islands: the case of Saint-Pierre and Miquelon

Figure 3. – Evolution of the number of dories (in black) and artisanal fishers (in grey) between the 1960s to the 1990s (data are from Briand, 1990).

Figure 10 in The historic background and potential of sustainable small-scale fisheries and aquaculture in small islands: the case of Saint-Pierre and Miquelon

Figure 10. – Comparison of the evolution of the populations of SPM and close small towns from the Burin Peninsula between 1991 and 2016 (data are from IEDOM, 2021 and https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/censusrecensement/2016/index-eng.cfm)

Figure 2 in The historic background and potential of sustainable small-scale fisheries and aquaculture in small islands: the case of Saint-Pierre and Miquelon

Figure 2. – Dories belonging to the association called "Les Zigotos" (http://www.spm-tourisme.fr/nos-iles-dexception/bienvenue-cheznous/les-zigotos/) in the foreground of the picture and the large blue fish plants Interpêche and Interfreeze, with a fishing vessel, in the background.

Figure 8 in The historic background and potential of sustainable small-scale fisheries and aquaculture in small islands: the case of Saint-Pierre and Miquelon

Figure 8. – Evolution of the exports (in black) and imports (in grey) for Saint-Pierre and Miquelon since 2002. Data are from IEDOM reports (https://www.iedom.fr/saint-pierre-et-miquelon/).

Figure 7 in The paleohistology of bone and teeth in Cretaceous Pycnodontidae (Neopterygii: Pycnodontiformes): the case of Neoproscinetes penalvai and Tepexichthys aranguthyorum

Figure 7. – Neoproscinetes penalvai. Dermal bone (see Fig. 2C). A: Section (MNHN-F-Histos 2720) showing an odontode on its supporting bone. The odontode is constituted of a cone of dentine (De) with a thin basal osteocytic bone (Bo). The supporting dermal bone shows numerous osteocytes (white arrow-heads) and is crossed by numerous ramified osteoblastic canalicles (black arrow-heads). (Pc = pulp cavity). B: Cross section (MNHN-F-Histos 2719) of an odontode showing the dentine with the odontoblastic canalicles (Oc) of which end in a thin superficial layer of durodentine (Du). (Pc = pulp cavity). Scale bars: A = 50 μm; B = 100 μm.

Figure 8 in The paleohistology of bone and teeth in Cretaceous Pycnodontidae (Neopterygii: Pycnodontiformes): the case of Neoproscinetes penalvai and Tepexichthys aranguthyorum

Figure 8. – Tepexeichthys aranguthyorum. (IGM 12717b) A: Longitudinal section of a fin ray showing two opposite lepidotrichial hemisegments separated by gang material (black asterisks). Bony tissue is crossed by numerous osteoblastic canalicles orthogonal to the surface of the ray. B: Cross section of a fin ray showing numerous osteoblastic canalicles some of which being ramified (black arrows). C: Detail showing the ramified extremity of several osteoblastic canalicles (black arrows) and several osteocytes (black arrow-heads). Scale bars: A, B = 100 μm; C = 50 μm.

Figure 2. – Neoproscinetes penalvai. A in The paleohistology of bone and teeth in Cretaceous Pycnodontidae (Neopterygii: Pycnodontiformes): the case of Neoproscinetes penalvai and Tepexichthys aranguthyorum

Figure 2. – Neoproscinetes penalvai. A: External view of the studied fossil material showing some teeth (white and black arrowheads). Lines aa' and bb' correspond to the first sections series of the specimen. B: View of the right side (bloc No 2), showing the vomer (Vo), the two prearticulars (PA). C: Polished surface bb' of sample No 2, showing the relations between teeth (asterisks) and the bony skeleton. One can see two teeth inserted on the vomer (Vo) on the right, and several other ones on the two prearticulars (PA) on the left. On the top a dermal bone (Db) with an odontode (arrow-head). D: Neoproscinetes penalvai. Occlusal view of the lower jaw (left prearticular) showing i) two shed teeth (black arrows), the scars of which show pleats indicating a plicidentine organization, ii) three resorbing teeth (black arrow-heads), and iii) two young growing teeth (white arrow-heads). Upper left inset. Detail of the left shed tooth showing the crenulated dentine in the pulp cavity (arrow). Scale bar = 1 mm. E: Tepexeichthys aranguthyorum. External view of the studied fossil material showing fin rays (on the upper right) and some bony plates (black asterisks). The lines aa' and bb' wrap the area of cross sections. Scale bars: A, B, C, D, E = 5 mm.

Figure 5. – Neoproscinetes penalvai. Teeth organization. A in The paleohistology of bone and teeth in Cretaceous Pycnodontidae (Neopterygii: Pycnodontiformes): the case of Neoproscinetes penalvai and Tepexichthys aranguthyorum

Figure 5. – Neoproscinetes penalvai. Teeth organization. A to C. Three successive cross sections from the tooth base till the 1/3 of the pulp cavity. We can see some plies (white arrow-heads) of dentine wall in the pulp cavity (pc) of sections B and C. In the section A the pulp cavity is invaded by bony tissue. (A, B: MNHN-F-Histos 2726; C: MNHN-F-Histos 2725). Scale bars = 25 μm.

Figure 4 in Fishers' perceptions of river resources: case study of French Guiana native populations using contextual cognitive mapping

Figure 4. – Cognitive maps focused on a minimum common overview (gray concepts and edges (incoming arrows)) and village-specific overviews (white concepts and blue (5 Amerindian villages) or brown (2 Aluku villages) edges) of threats to the fish resource and environment.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2020View details →

Figure 2 in Potential impacts of bottom trawling on species of skates (Rajiformes: Rajidae): the case of the Gulf of Cádiz and the Western Mediterranean

Figure 2. – Landings (kg) of Raja spp., Raja asterias, R. clavata and R. undulata from the Gulf of Cádiz (1985-2018).

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2020View details →

Figure 1 in Potential impacts of bottom trawling on species of skates (Rajiformes: Rajidae): the case of the Gulf of Cádiz and the Western Mediterranean

Figure 1. – Marine areas included in the study: the Gulf of Cádiz and the Western Mediterranean Sea (Alboran Sea).

FIGURE 16 in Testing hypothesis of skeletal unity using bone histology: The case of the sauropod remains from the Howe-Stephens and Howe Scott quarries (Morrison Formation, Wyoming, USA)

FIGURE 16. Detailed images of the EFS of both the SMA 0084 "Rich" samples. A, EFS of SMA 0084 "Rich" tibia, in which a cycle of faster growth is included (indicated by arrow). B, EFS of SMA 0084 "Rich" fibula, which also shows a cycle of faster growth (indicated by arrow). Images taken under plane-polarized light.

FIGURE 13 in Testing hypothesis of skeletal unity using bone histology: The case of the sauropod remains from the Howe-Stephens and Howe Scott quarries (Morrison Formation, Wyoming, USA)

FIGURE 13. Images of all forelimb samples taken from SMA 0011 "Max". A, humerus (r). B, humerus (l). C, ulna (l). D, radius (l). For all samples, the bone tissue types are indicated to the left, and the number and patterns of the visible growth cycles are indicated to the right. Abbreviations; D: Bone tissue type D, E: Bone tissue type E, F: Bone tissue type F, MC: Medullary cavity, RA: Remodeled area.

FIGURE 2 in Testing hypothesis of skeletal unity using bone histology: The case of the sauropod remains from the Howe-Stephens and Howe Scott quarries (Morrison Formation, Wyoming, USA)

FIGURE 2. Detailed quarry map of the Howe Scott Quarry with finds from excavation seasons 1995-2003. The color coding reflects the hypothesis of skeletal unity based on field observations (Ayer, 2000). Sauropods are indicated in red in the legend. The arrows indicate the sampled bones used in this study. The quarry map was made by E. Premru, and provided by the Sauriermuseum Aathal, Aathal, Switzerland. Note that SMA M16/12-3 is not marked on the map due to a coordinate inaccuracy, which makes it impossible to correctly locate bone SMA M16/12-3 on the quarry map.

FIGURE 1 in Testing hypothesis of skeletal unity using bone histology: The case of the sauropod remains from the Howe-Stephens and Howe Scott quarries (Morrison Formation, Wyoming, USA)

FIGURE 1. Detailed quarry map of the Howe-Stephens Quarry with finds from excavation seasons 1992-2001. The color coding reflects the hypothesis of skeletal unity based on field observations (Ayer, 2000). Sauropods are indicated in red text in the legend. Note that the 2002 season, which was the last season for the Howe-Stephens Quarry, only uncovered another silicified tree trunk, which was found below the partial skeletons of SMA 0002 "E.T." and SMA no # "Brösmeli". The arrows indicate the sampled bones used in this study. This quarry map was made by E. Premru, and provided by the Sauriermuseum Aathal, Aathal, Switzerland.

FIGURE 15 in Testing hypothesis of skeletal unity using bone histology: The case of the sauropod remains from the Howe-Stephens and Howe Scott quarries (Morrison Formation, Wyoming, USA)

FIGURE 15. Images of both samples taken from SMA 0084 "Rich". A, tibia (l). B, fibula (l). For all samples, the bone tissue types are indicated to the left, and the number and patterns of the visible growth cycles are indicated to the right. Abbreviations; EFS: External fundamental system, MC: Medullary cavity, RA: Remodeled area.