Find research datasets worth reusing

Рис. 7–15. Lixus pulverulentus, груΔные и брюшные сегменты, хетотаксия. 7, 10, 13 – груΔные сегменты; 8, 11, 14 – брюшной сегмент I; 9, 12, 15 – брюшные сегменты VII–X; 7–9 – виΔ сбоку; 10–12 – виΔ сверху; 13–15 – виΔ снизу. Figs 7–15. Lixus pulverulentus, thoracal and abdominal segments, and chaetotaxy. 7, 10, 13 – thoracal segments; 8, 11, 14 – abdominal segment I; 9, 12, 15 –abdominal segments VII–X; 7–9 – lateral view; 10–12 – dorsal view; 13–15 – ventral view. Setae: dls – dorsolateral, dpls – dorsopleurolateral, ds – dorsal, ls – lateral, lsts – laterosternal, msts – mesosternal, pda – pedal, pds – postdorsal, prns – pronotal, prs – prodorsal, ss – spirarulum, sts – sterna, ts – terminal, vpls – ventropleural. in Description of the preimaginal stages and biology of the weevil Lixus (Dilixellus) pulverulentus (Scopoli, 1763) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Lixini)

Рис. 7–15. Lixus pulverulentus, груΔные и брюшные сегменты, хетотаксия. 7, 10, 13 – груΔные сегменты; 8, 11, 14 – брюшной сегмент I; 9, 12, 15 – брюшные сегменты VII–X; 7–9 – виΔ сбоку; 10–12 – виΔ сверху; 13–15 – виΔ снизу. Figs 7–15. Lixus pulverulentus, thoracal and abdominal segments, and chaetotaxy. 7, 10, 13 – thoracal segments; 8, 11, 14 – abdominal segment I; 9, 12, 15 –abdominal segments VII–X; 7–9 – lateral view; 10–12 – dorsal view; 13–15 – ventral view. Setae: dls – dorsolateral, dpls – dorsopleurolateral, ds – dorsal, ls – lateral, lsts – laterosternal, msts – mesosternal, pda – pedal, pds – postdorsal, prns – pronotal, prs – prodorsal, ss – spirarulum, sts – sterna, ts – terminal, vpls – ventropleural.

Рис. 21–32. Lixus pulverulentus, кукоΛка, внешний виΔ и хетотаксия. 21 – виΔ снизу; 22 – виΔ сверху; 23 – виΔ сбоку; 24 – хетотаксия гоΛовы; 25 – хетотаксия переΔнеспинки; 26 – хетотаксия среΔнеспинки; 27 – хетотаксия заΔнеспинки; 28 – хетотаксия брюшного сегмента I; 29 – хетотаксия брюшного сегмента II; 30 – хетотаксия брюшного сегмента VII; 31 – хетотаксия брюшного сегмента VIII; 32 –хетотаксия брюшного сегмента IX. Figs 21–32. Lixus pulverulentus, pupa, habitus and chaetotaxy. 21 – ventral view; 22 – dorsal view; 23 – lateral view; 24 – chaetotaxy of head; 25 – chaetotaxy of pronotum; 26 – chaetotaxy of mesonotum; 27 – chaetotaxy of metanotum; 28 – chaetotaxy of abdominal segment I; 29 – chaetotaxy of abdominal segment II; 30 – chaetotaxy of abdominal segment VII; 31 – chaetotaxy of abdominal segment VIII; 32 – chaetotaxy of abdominal segment IX. ps – pseudocerci, Th n –thoracic segments, Ab n –abdominal segments; setae: as – apical, d – dorsal, ds – discal, fs – femoral, ls – lateral, os – orbital, pas – postatennal, pls – posterolateral, rs – rostral, sos – super-orbital, sls – superlateral, v – ventral, vs – vertical. in Description of the preimaginal stages and biology of the weevil Lixus (Dilixellus) pulverulentus (Scopoli, 1763) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Lixini)

Рис. 21–32. Lixus pulverulentus, кукоΛка, внешний виΔ и хетотаксия. 21 – виΔ снизу; 22 – виΔ сверху; 23 – виΔ сбоку; 24 – хетотаксия гоΛовы; 25 – хетотаксия переΔнеспинки; 26 – хетотаксия среΔнеспинки; 27 – хетотаксия заΔнеспинки; 28 – хетотаксия брюшного сегмента I; 29 – хетотаксия брюшного сегмента II; 30 – хетотаксия брюшного сегмента VII; 31 – хетотаксия брюшного сегмента VIII; 32 –хетотаксия брюшного сегмента IX. Figs 21–32. Lixus pulverulentus, pupa, habitus and chaetotaxy. 21 – ventral view; 22 – dorsal view; 23 – lateral view; 24 – chaetotaxy of head; 25 – chaetotaxy of pronotum; 26 – chaetotaxy of mesonotum; 27 – chaetotaxy of metanotum; 28 – chaetotaxy of abdominal segment I; 29 – chaetotaxy of abdominal segment II; 30 – chaetotaxy of abdominal segment VII; 31 – chaetotaxy of abdominal segment VIII; 32 – chaetotaxy of abdominal segment IX. ps – pseudocerci, Th n –thoracic segments, Ab n –abdominal segments; setae: as – apical, d – dorsal, ds – discal, fs – femoral, ls – lateral, os – orbital, pas – postatennal, pls – posterolateral, rs – rostral, sos – super-orbital, sls – superlateral, v – ventral, vs – vertical.

Рис. 1–6. Lixus pulverulentus. 1 – биотоп, ассоциация Cirsium acanthoides; 2 – Λичинка внутри стебΛя кормового растения; 3 – моΛоÃой жук внутри стебΛя кормового растения; 4 – гоΛова Λичинки; 5 – внешний виÃ Λичинки; 6 – внешний виÃ кукоΛки. Figs 1–6. Lixus pulverulentus. 1 – biotope, Cirsium acantoides association; 2 – larva within the stalk of the host plant; 3 – young beetle inside the stalk of the host plant; 4 – head of the larva; 5 – habitus of the larva; 6 – habitus of the pupa. in Description of the preimaginal stages and biology of the weevil Lixus (Dilixellus) pulverulentus (Scopoli, 1763) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Lixini)

Рис. 1–6. Lixus pulverulentus. 1 – биотоп, ассоциация Cirsium acanthoides; 2 – Λичинка внутри стебΛя кормового растения; 3 – моΛоÃой жук внутри стебΛя кормового растения; 4 – гоΛова Λичинки; 5 – внешний виÃ Λичинки; 6 – внешний виÃ кукоΛки. Figs 1–6. Lixus pulverulentus. 1 – biotope, Cirsium acantoides association; 2 – larva within the stalk of the host plant; 3 – young beetle inside the stalk of the host plant; 4 – head of the larva; 5 – habitus of the larva; 6 – habitus of the pupa.

Рис. 16–20. Lixus pulverulentus, гоΛова Λичинки и ротовые органы. 16 – виΔ сверху; 17 – усик; 18 – максиΛΛоΛабиаΛьный компΛекс; 19 – Λабрум и кΛипеус; 20 – эпифаринкс. Figs 16–20. Lixus pulverulentus, larval head and mouth parts. 16 – dorsal view; 17 – antenna; 18 – maxillolabial complex; 19 – labrum and clypeus; 20 – epipharynx. at – antenna, cl – clypeus, stp – stipes, ma – mala, plb – praelabium, plsb – postlabium; setae: als – anteriolateral, ams – anteriomedial, cls – clypeal, des – dorsal epicranial, dms – dorsal marar, fs – frontal, les – lateral epicranial, mbs – malabasiventral, mds – mandibular dorsal, mes – median, pfs – palpiferal, pslbs – postlabial, vms – ventral malar. in Description of the preimaginal stages and biology of the weevil Lixus (Dilixellus) pulverulentus (Scopoli, 1763) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Lixini)

Рис. 16–20. Lixus pulverulentus, гоΛова Λичинки и ротовые органы. 16 – виΔ сверху; 17 – усик; 18 – максиΛΛоΛабиаΛьный компΛекс; 19 – Λабрум и кΛипеус; 20 – эпифаринкс. Figs 16–20. Lixus pulverulentus, larval head and mouth parts. 16 – dorsal view; 17 – antenna; 18 – maxillolabial complex; 19 – labrum and clypeus; 20 – epipharynx. at – antenna, cl – clypeus, stp – stipes, ma – mala, plb – praelabium, plsb – postlabium; setae: als – anteriolateral, ams – anteriomedial, cls – clypeal, des – dorsal epicranial, dms – dorsal marar, fs – frontal, les – lateral epicranial, mbs – malabasiventral, mds – mandibular dorsal, mes – median, pfs – palpiferal, pslbs – postlabial, vms – ventral malar.

Figure 10 in Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Paralongidorus sali Siddiqi, Hooper, and Khan, 1963 with a Description of the First-Stage Juvenile and Male of Longidorus jonesi Siddiqi, 1962 from China

Figure 10: Phylogenetic relationships within LONgidOrUS and ParalONgidOrUS. Bayesian 50% majority rule consensus tree as inferred from D2 and D3 expansion segments of 28S rRNA sequence alignment under the general time-reversible model of sequence evolution with correction for invariable sites and a gamma-shaped distribution (GTR + I + G: –lnL = 14601.9935; AIC = 29619.9870; freqA = 0.2204; freqC = 0.2274; freqG = 0.2934; freqT = 0.2588; R(a) = 0.7487; R(b) = 2.4740; R(c) = 1.4407; R(d) = 0.3992; R(e) = 4.6932; R(f) = 1.0000; Pinva = 0.2290; and Shape = 0.6290). Posterior probabilities greater than 0.70 are given for appropriate clades. Newly obtained sequences in this study are shown in bold. Scale bar = expected changes per site.

Figure 9 in Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Paralongidorus sali Siddiqi, Hooper, and Khan, 1963 with a Description of the First-Stage Juvenile and Male of Longidorus jonesi Siddiqi, 1962 from China

Figure 9: Relationship of body length to length of functional and replacement odontostyle (= Odontostyle and • = replACement ODOntOStyle); length in three developmental stages and mature females of LONgidOrUS JONeSi.

Figure 8 in Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Paralongidorus sali Siddiqi, Hooper, and Khan, 1963 with a Description of the First-Stage Juvenile and Male of Longidorus jonesi Siddiqi, 1962 from China

Figure 8: Scanning electron microscopy of LONgidOrUS JONeSi (Siddiqi, 1962). A–D, Female head region in lateral and ventrolateral view showing internal (ip) and outer labial papillae (op), oral aperture (oa), stylet (st), and amphidial aperture (aa); E–F, Female tail in lateral view (a = anus); G–H, Vulval region in lateral and ventral view (v = vulva). (Scale bars: A–D = 5 μm; E = 10 μm; F = 20 μm; G–H = 30 μm).

Figure 6 in Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Paralongidorus sali Siddiqi, Hooper, and Khan, 1963 with a Description of the First-Stage Juvenile and Male of Longidorus jonesi Siddiqi, 1962 from China

Figure 6: Light micrographs of LONgidOrUS JONeSi (Siddiqi, 1962). Male and first-stage juvenile. A, Entire body of male; B, Anterior region of male; C, Tail region of male arrows showing position of supplements (spl); D, Entire body of J1; E, ANterior region of J1 arrows showing position of guiding ring (gr) and replacement odontostyle (rodt); F–G, Tail regions of J1. (Scale bars: A = 200 μm; B–C = 40 μm; D = 100 μm; E–G = 10 μm).

Figure 3 in Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Paralongidorus sali Siddiqi, Hooper, and Khan, 1963 with a Description of the First-Stage Juvenile and Male of Longidorus jonesi Siddiqi, 1962 from China

Figure 3: Scanning electron microscopy of ParalONgidOrUS Sali (Siddiqi et al., 1963). A–C, Female head region in lateral and ventrolateral view showing internal (ip) and outer labial papillae (op), cephalic lobe (cl), cephalic papillae (cp), oral aperture (oa), and amphidial aperture (aa). D–E, Female tail in lateral and ventral view (a = anus). F–G: Vulval region (v = vulva). (Scale bars: A–C = 5 μm; D = 30 μm; E, F = 10 μm; G = 20 μm).

Figure 2 in Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Paralongidorus sali Siddiqi, Hooper, and Khan, 1963 with a Description of the First-Stage Juvenile and Male of Longidorus jonesi Siddiqi, 1962 from China

Figure 2: Light micrographs of ParalONgidOrUS Sali (Siddiqi et al., 1963). A–D, lip region of 1st, 2nd, and 3rd stage juveniles and female; E–H, Tail region of 1st, 2nd, and 3rd stage juveniles and female (Scale bars: A–H = 10 μm).

Figure 1 in Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Paralongidorus sali Siddiqi, Hooper, and Khan, 1963 with a Description of the First-Stage Juvenile and Male of Longidorus jonesi Siddiqi, 1962 from China

Figure 1: Light micrographs of ParalONgidOrUS Sali (Siddiqi et al., 1963). Female: A, Pharynx; B–D, Lip region arrow showing amphid; E, Gonad; F, Tail region arrow showing position of anus G, Tail region arrows showing position of caudal pores; H, Ventral view of vulva; I, Vulval region (Scale bars: A = 50 μm; B–D= 10 μm; E= 50 μm; F–I= 10 μm).

Figure 11 in Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Paralongidorus sali Siddiqi, Hooper, and Khan, 1963 with a Description of the First-Stage Juvenile and Male of Longidorus jonesi Siddiqi, 1962 from China

Figure 11: Phylogenetic relationships within LONgidOrUS and ParalONgidOrUS. Bayesian 50% majority rule consensus tree as inferred from 18S rRNA gene sequence alignment under a transitional of invariable sites model with invariable sites and a gamma-shaped distribution (TIM2 + I + G: – lnL= 6866.9821; AIC = 14129.9643; freqA = 0.2626; freqC = 0.2109; freqG = 0.2668; freqT = 0.2597; R(a) = 1.8892; R(b) = 3.9662; R(c) = 1.8892; R(d) = 1.0000; R(e) = 7.1009; R(f) = 1.0000; Pinva = 0.7060; and Shape = 0.6020). Posterior probabilities greater than 0.70 are given for appropriate clades. Newly obtained sequences in this study are shown in bold. Scale bar = expected changes per site.

Figure 7 in Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Paralongidorus sali Siddiqi, Hooper, and Khan, 1963 with a Description of the First-Stage Juvenile and Male of Longidorus jonesi Siddiqi, 1962 from China

Figure 7: Light micrographs of LONgidOrUS JONeSi (Siddiqi, 1962). A–D, lip region of 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th stage juveniles; E–H, Tail region of 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th stage juveniles (Scale bars: A–H = 10 μm).

Figure 5 in Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Paralongidorus sali Siddiqi, Hooper, and Khan, 1963 with a Description of the First-Stage Juvenile and Male of Longidorus jonesi Siddiqi, 1962 from China

Figure 5: Light micrographs of LONgidOrUS JONeSi (Siddiqi, 1962). Female: A, Pharynx; B–E, Lip regions; F, Gonad; G–H, Pharyngeal bulb; I, Entire female body; J–K, Vulval regions; L, ventral view of tail; M–O, Female tails (Scale bars: A = 50 μm; B–E, G–H, J–O = 10 μm; F = 20 μm; I = 500 μm) am = amphid; bp = body pores; v = vulva; svn = subventrolateral nuclei; dn = dorsal nuclei; a = anus).

Figure 4 in Morphological and Molecular Characterization of Paralongidorus sali Siddiqi, Hooper, and Khan, 1963 with a Description of the First-Stage Juvenile and Male of Longidorus jonesi Siddiqi, 1962 from China

Figure 4: Relationship of body length to length of functional and replacement odontostyle (= Odontostyle and • = replACement ODOntOStyle); length in three developmental stages and mature females of ParalONgidOrUS Sali.

Fig. 6. Aurantiactinomyxon type nov. A in First record and description of actinospore stages (raabeia, triactinomyxon, and aurantiactinomyxon types) of fish parasitic myxozoans from Malaysia

Fig. 6. Aurantiactinomyxon type nov. A) Schematic drawing of apical view. B) The side view of mature actinospores. C) Fixed (90% ethanol) aurantiactinomyxon spore in the apical view. D) Fixed (90% ethanol) aurantiactinomyxon spore in the side view. E) Higher magnification of fresh spore body showing three elongated polar capsules. F) Heavily infected Bothrioneurum sp. with pansporocysts at various stages of development in the intestinal epithelium. G) Pansporocyst showing six to seven of eight actinospores (arrowhead). In some spores, polar capsules can be seen (arrow). Scale bars represent 20 μm except E) 10 μm and F) 100 μm.

Fig. 5. Triactinomyxon type nov. A in First record and description of actinospore stages (raabeia, triactinomyxon, and aurantiactinomyxon types) of fish parasitic myxozoans from Malaysia

Fig. 5. Triactinomyxon type nov. A) Schematic drawing of mature actinospore. B) Freshly released triactinomyxon from Branchiodrilus sp. C) Triactinomyxon spore fixed in 90% ethanol. D) Higher magnification of spore body showing 8 secondary cells. E) Heavily infected Branchiodrilus sp. with pansporocysts at various stages of development in the intestinal epithelium. F) Higher magnification showing pansporocysts of triactinomyxon type in the intestinal epithelium. Scale bars represent 20 μm, except D) 10 μm and E) 100 μm.

Fig. 3 in First record and description of actinospore stages (raabeia, triactinomyxon, and aurantiactinomyxon types) of fish parasitic myxozoans from Malaysia

Fig. 3. (A, B) Semithin sections showing multiple pansporocysts (arrow) of the novel raabeia type in the intestinal epithelium (black arrowhead) of the freshwater oligochaete, Aulodrilus acutus from Tasik Telabak. C) Enlarged section of the pansporocyst with visible polar capsules (white arrowhead) of mature spores. Stained with H&E. Scale bars represent A) 50 μm; B) 20 μm and C) 10 μm.

Fig. 2. Raabeia type nov. A in First record and description of actinospore stages (raabeia, triactinomyxon, and aurantiactinomyxon types) of fish parasitic myxozoans from Malaysia

Fig. 2. Raabeia type nov. A) Schematic drawing of mature actinospore. B) Fresh mount of raabeia. C) Higher magnification of spore body showing two of three polar capsules with 4 coils of the polar tubule. Scale bars represent 50 μm except C) 10 μm.

Fig. 1 in First record and description of actinospore stages (raabeia, triactinomyxon, and aurantiactinomyxon types) of fish parasitic myxozoans from Malaysia

Fig. 1. Map of Peninsular Malaysia showing the studied area. Mud samples with oligochaetes were collected from the site at Tasik Telabak, Hulu Besut, Terengganu (arrowhead).