Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
461,131
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
461,131 results for “FIGURES”
Figure 22 in Systematic taxonomy of the Trilobatus sacculifer plexus and descendant Globigerinoidesella fistulosa (planktonic foraminifera)
Figure 22. Exponential relationship between maximum test size and test surface area in morphospecies of the Trilobatus sacculifer plexus, and to a lesser extent in Globigerinoidesella fistulosa. The T. sacculifer plexus morphospecies all show comparable relationships, whereas data for G. fistulosa show more scatter.
Figure 21 in Systematic taxonomy of the Trilobatus sacculifer plexus and descendant Globigerinoidesella fistulosa (planktonic foraminifera)
Figure 21. Lobateness of Trilobatus sacculifer plexus morphospecies and Globigerinoidesella fistulosa determined through a combination of circularity and curvature values; A, demonstrates the large variability, but consistently high lobateness values for Globigerinoidesella fistulosa compared to T. sacculifer plexus morphospecies (which have comparatively high circularity and low curvature). Although the T. sacculifer plexus morphospecies appear to form a tight cluster, the lower plot, B, demonstrates the variability in lobateness values (see text for discussion).
Figure 19 in Systematic taxonomy of the Trilobatus sacculifer plexus and descendant Globigerinoidesella fistulosa (planktonic foraminifera)
Figure 19. Surface area of the final chamber compared to the remaining test is expressed in the final chamber dominance ratio, which is plotted against maximum test diameter for Trilobatus sacculifer plexus morphospecies and Globigerinoidesella fistulosa. Trilobatus trilobus values are inherently ± 1 as this forms part of its morphospecies concept (see text).
Figure 18 in Systematic taxonomy of the Trilobatus sacculifer plexus and descendant Globigerinoidesella fistulosa (planktonic foraminifera)
Figure 18. Distribution plot of test diameters (Lm) in the Trilobatus sacculifer plexus from sample GLOW-3. Black dots each represent an individual specimen, grouped at a bin width of 20 Lm per stacked row. Black diamond = mean size. White filled 'violin distributions' show variation in values.
Figure 5 in Systematic taxonomy of the Trilobatus sacculifer plexus and descendant Globigerinoidesella fistulosa (planktonic foraminifera)
Figure 5. Visual representation of image analysis software and measured morphometric and biometric parameters (see text for details of parameter equations).
Figure 4 in Systematic taxonomy of the Trilobatus sacculifer plexus and descendant Globigerinoidesella fistulosa (planktonic foraminifera)
Figure 4. Site location map. Location map showing sites from this study (black star symbols) and the type localities (black triangle symbols) for the investigated morphospecies.
Figure 3 in Systematic taxonomy of the Trilobatus sacculifer plexus and descendant Globigerinoidesella fistulosa (planktonic foraminifera)
Figure 3. Overlapping morphological clusters. As the mean morphology of a population changes gradually on a temporal scale, morphospecies are challenging to delimit, and arbitrary morphospace sectors are required for taxonomic units. SD: standard deviation.
Figure 7. Hypothetical apparatus reconstruction deduced from the element arrangement within the Caudicriodus woschmidti conodont cluster. A, Model 1 in A new icriodontid conodont cluster with specific mesowear supports an alternative apparatus motion model for Icriodontidae
Figure 7. Hypothetical apparatus reconstruction deduced from the element arrangement within the Caudicriodus woschmidti conodont cluster. A, Model 1 with tips of coniform elements pointing dorsally and 'posterior' part of icriodontan elements oriented ventrally. B, Model 2 with tips of coniform elements and 'posterior' part of icriodontan elements oriented ventrally. C, Model 3 with tips of coniform elements pointing ventrally and 'posterior' part of icriodontan elements oriented dorsally. D, Model 4 with tips of coniform elements and 'posterior' part of icriodontan elements oriented ventrally. Coniform elements are arranged in multiple rows.
Figure 5 in A new icriodontid conodont cluster with specific mesowear supports an alternative apparatus motion model for Icriodontidae
Figure 5. Denticle tip wear of icriodontid I elements. A–C, Icriodus aff. michiganus, dextral I element, lateral and oral view; Middle Devonian, Eifel, Germany; sample BL-12-29c-9. D–F, Icriodus sp., dextral I element, lateral and oral view; Middle Devonian, Eifel, Germany; sample BL-12-29c-3. Extent and orientation of tip wear are indicated by dotted lines and arrowheads.
Figure 6 in A new icriodontid conodont cluster with specific mesowear supports an alternative apparatus motion model for Icriodontidae
Figure 6. Diagrams illustrating orientation and direction of denticle tip wear. A, Icriodus aff. michiganus; left-side illustration shows the orientation of the inclined facet plane, right-side illustration the direction of vertically inclined facet; Middle Devonian, Eifel, Germany; sample BL-12-29c-9. B, Icriodus sp. left-side illustration shows the orientation of the inclined facet plane, middle the direction of the vertically inclined facet, and right the orientation and direction of the facet plane of median row denticles; Middle Devonian, Eifel, Germany; sample BL-12-29c-3).
Figure 4. A in A new icriodontid conodont cluster with specific mesowear supports an alternative apparatus motion model for Icriodontidae
Figure 4. A, denticle tip wear of the dextral I element of Caudicriodus woschmidti; Early Devonian, southern Burgenland, Austria; Ki/ 4/2a-1, NHMW 2011/0374/0001. B, detailed view of oral surface of the dextral I element with extent and orientation of tip wear indicated by dotted line and arrow head.
Figure 3 in A new icriodontid conodont cluster with specific mesowear supports an alternative apparatus motion model for Icriodontidae
Figure 3. Chronological listing of notation history for icriodontid apparatus elements. Morphologically similar coniform element types and the icriodontan element evaluated for this study are highlighted in different colours or shades.
Figure 2 in A new icriodontid conodont cluster with specific mesowear supports an alternative apparatus motion model for Icriodontidae
Figure 2. Conodont cluster of Caudicriodus woschmidti, Early Devonian, southern Burgenland, Austria; Ki/4/2a-1, NHMW 2011/0374/ 0001. A, SEM scan of the conodont cluster. B, detailed view of the coniform elements (C1–C5) close to the dextral I element. C, D, computer microtomography-based three-dimensional reconstruction with identification of all elements. E, hypothetical arrangement of all elements preserved within the fused conodont cluster.
Figure 3 in Exploring phylogenetic relationships of Pteraspidiformes heterostracans (stem-gnathostomes) using continuous and discrete characters
Figure 3. Cartoons of selected characters and character states. Numbers signify characters, bracketed numbers represent character states e.g. 1(0), where 1 is the characters and (0) is the character state.
Figure 6. Most parsimonious result from a in Exploring phylogenetic relationships of Pteraspidiformes heterostracans (stem-gnathostomes) using continuous and discrete characters
Figure 6. Most parsimonious result from a phylogenetic analysis of discrete (1—64) and discretized continuous characters identified through gap coding (88—100). A, strict consensus of 30 most parsimonious trees with equally weighted characters (tree length 346). B, most parsimonious solution with implied weighted characters (k = 3) (tree length 27.86). Psammosteidae taxa in bold (for which quantitative characters have been treated as inapplicable, i.e. non-homologous).
Figure 7 in Before the freeze: otoliths from the Eocene of Seymour Island, Antarctica, reveal dominance of gadiform fishes (Teleostei)
Figure 7. Fossil otolith record in Antarctica, Australia, New Zealand and the North Sea Basin and distribution and estimated abundance of gadiform otoliths (number of species, recognized or inferred, not shown). Ranicipitidae shown in family ranking following Nelson (1994); other families following Nelson (2006). Data compiled and altered from Nolf (2013), Schwarzhans (1980, 1985, 1994, 2003) and Stinton (1965, 1966).
Figure 6. Eocene otoliths from Seymour Island. A in Before the freeze: otoliths from the Eocene of Seymour Island, Antarctica, reveal dominance of gadiform fishes (Teleostei)
Figure 6. Eocene otoliths from Seymour Island. A, Argentina antarctica sp. nov., holotype, NRM-PZ P.15964, mirror imaged, inner face. B, C, Diaphus? marambionis sp. nov., holotype, NRM-PZ P.15966; B, inner face; C, ventral view. D—F, Macruronus eastmani sp. nov., holotype, NRM-PZ P.15970, mirror imaged; D, inner face; E, ventral view; F, outer face. G—I, Palimphemus seymourensis sp. nov., holotype, NRM-PZ P.15973, mirror imaged; G, inner face; H, ventral view; I, outer face. J—L, Coelorinchus nordenskjoeldi sp. nov., holotype, NRM-PZ P.15978; J, inner face; K, ventral view; L, outer face. M, N, Coelorinchus balushkini sp. nov., holotype, NRM-PZ P.15976; M, inner face; N, ventral view. O, P, Hoplobrotula? antipoda sp. nov., holotype, NRM-PZ P.15984, mirror imaged; O, inner face; P, ventral view. Q, Notoberyx cionei gen. nov., sp. nov.; holotype, NRM-PZ P.15987, inner face. R, Cepola anderssoni sp. nov., holotype, NRM-PZ P.15996, mirror imaged, inner face.
Figure 5 in Before the freeze: otoliths from the Eocene of Seymour Island, Antarctica, reveal dominance of gadiform fishes (Teleostei)
Figure 5. Drawings of Eocene otoliths from Seymour Island. A—C, Hoplobrotula? antipoda sp. nov.; A, B, holotype, NRM-PZ P.15984, mirror imaged; A, inner face; B, ventral view; C, paratype, NRM-PZ P.15985, inner face. D—G, Notoberyx cionei gen. nov., sp. nov.; D—F, holotype, NRM-PZ P.15987; D, anterior view; E, inner face; F, ventral view; G, paratype, NRM-PZ P.15988, inner face. H, Centroberyx sp., NRM-PZ P.15986, mirror imaged, inner face. I, J, Acanthopterygii indet., NRM-PZ P.15990, mirror imaged; I, inner face, J, ventral view. K, L, Percoidei indet., NRM-PZ P.15992, mirror imaged; K, inner face; L, ventral view. M, N, Haemulidae? indet., NRM-PZ P.15993, mirror imaged; M, inner face; N, ventral view. O, P, Sparidae? indet., NRM-PZ P.15994, mirror imaged; O, inner face; P, ventral view. Q, R, Cepola anderssoni sp. nov., holotype, NRM-PZ P.15996, mirror imaged; Q, inner face; R, ventral view.
Figure 2 in Exploring phylogenetic relationships of Pteraspidiformes heterostracans (stem-gnathostomes) using continuous and discrete characters
Figure 2. Reconstruction of a hypothetical Pteraspidiformes (adapted from Blieck 1984). A, dorsal and ventral view of Pteraspidiformes headshield with plates labelled. B, D, E, measurements used in phylogenetic analysis. C, dorsal headshield sensory canals. Anatomical abbreviations: SOC, supraorbital canal; OrbC, orbital canal; PinC, pineal canal; LDC, lateral dorsal canal; MDC, medial dorsal canal; TC, transverse commissures; MTC, median transverse commissures. Measurement abbreviations: DSL, dorsal shield length; DSW, dorsal shield width, not including the cornual plate width; DPL, dorsal plate length; DPW, dorsal plate width; RPL, rostral plate length; RPW, rostral plate width; PPL, pineal plate length; PPW, pineal plate width; BPL, brachial plate length; BOL, branchial opening distance from anterior of dorsal plate; CPL, cornual plate length; OrbPL, orbital plate length; OrbPAPL, orbital plate anterior process length; OrbPMPL, orbital plate medial process length; OrbPPPL, orbital plate posterior process length; Orb—Orb, orbital opening to orbital opening length; DSBW, dorsal spine base width; DSBL, dorsal spine base length; DPEB, dorsal plate embayment; DPEL, distance to beginning of embayment from anterior end of dorsal plate; DPEW, dorsal plate embayment narrowest width.
Figure 4 in Before the freeze: otoliths from the Eocene of Seymour Island, Antarctica, reveal dominance of gadiform fishes (Teleostei)
Figure 4. Drawings of Eocene otoliths from Seymour Island. A, B, Tripterophycis immutatus Schwarzhans, 1980, NRM-PZ P.15969, mirror imaged; A, inner face; B, dorsal view. C—F, Macruronus eastmani sp. nov.; C—E, holotype, NRM-PZ P.15970, mirror imaged; C, inner face; D, outer face; E, ventral view; F, paratype, NRM-PZ P.15971, inner face. G—M, Palimphemus seymourensis sp. nov.; G—I, holotype, NRM-PZ P.15973, mirror imaged; G, inner face; H, ventral view; I, outer face; J, paratype, NRM-PZ P.15975, mirror imaged, inner face; K—M, paratypes, NRM-PZ P.15974; K, inner face, mirror imaged; L, ventral view; M, inner face. N—R, Coelorinchus nordenskjoeldi sp. nov.; N—P, holotype, NRM-PZ P.15978; N, inner face; O, ventral view; P, outer face; Q, R, paratype, NRM-PZ P.15979, mirror imaged; Q, inner face; R, ventral view. S—U, Coelorinchus balushkini sp. nov., holotype, NRM-PZ P.15976; S, inner face; T, ventral view; U, outer face. V, W, Coelorinchus sp., NRM-PZ P.15911; V, inner face (strongly eroded); W, ventral view.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.