Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
1,291
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
1,291 results for “gap”
Figure 5 in Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from Miocene Ethiopian amber: filling gaps in the geological record of African terrestrial biota
Figure 5. Ravavy goldmani sp. nov., photomicrographs. A–B, holotype male NIGP180512, C–F, paratype male IGR. ET2015/001a. A, right lateral view, slightly posterodorsal–oblique orientation. B, oral view, slightly right–lateral–oblique orientation. C, dorsal view, slightly right lateral, anterior oblique orientation. D, ventral view, slightly right–lateral, posterior oblique orientation. E, right lateral, slightly ventral, anterior oblique view. F, caudal view of genitalia, slightly right lateral oblique. Scale bars: 0.5 mm for A, B, F; 1.0 mm for C–E.
Figure 4 in Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) from Miocene Ethiopian amber: filling gaps in the geological record of African terrestrial biota
Figure 4. Ravavy goldmani sp. nov., holotype male NIGP180512, photomicrographs. A, left lateral view, slightly anterioroblique orientation. B, ventral view, slightly left-lateral-oblique orientation. Scale bars: 0.5 mm.
Golgi cell gap junction coupling in cerebellum cortex model WT and KO conditions
<p>Golgi cell gap junction coupling in cerebellum cortex model WT and KO conditions</p>
Gap junction coupling of Golgi cells in cerebellar cortex model
<p>Gap junction coupling of Golgi cells in cerebellar cortex model</p>
Supplementary material 2 from: Garcia Rodrigues J, Conides A, Rivero Rodriguez S, Raicevich S, Pita P, Kleisner K, Pita C, Lopes P, Alonso Roldán V, Ramos S, Klaoudatos D, Outeiro L, Armstrong C, Teneva L, Stefanski S, Böhnke-Henrichs A, Kruse M, Lillebø A, Bennett E, Belgrano A, Murillas A, Sousa Pinto I, Burkhard B, Villasante S (2017) Marine and Coastal Cultural Ecosystem Services: knowledge gaps and research priorities. One Ecosystem 2: e12290. https://doi.org/10.3897/oneeco.2.e12290
Correspondence between our classification and labels for marine and coastal CES as found in the literature
Supplementary material 1 from: Scallion ML, Gibson GAP, Sharanowski BJ (2016) Revision of Paranastatus Masi (Eupelmidae, Eupelminae) with descriptions of four new species. ZooKeys 559: 59-79. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.559.6134
Paranastatus Label Data : Explanation note: This file contains complete label data for all material examined, including localities
FIGURE 6 in Bridging the gap between chewing and sucking in the hemipteroid insects: new insights from Cretaceous amber
FIGURE 6. The most parsimonious reconstruction of the morphological characters used for phylogenetic estimation. Numbers before colon indicate character number (see Table 1), and character state changes are indicated after colon. Autapomorphies on the terminal branches are omitted from the figure.
FIGURE 5 in Bridging the gap between chewing and sucking in the hemipteroid insects: new insights from Cretaceous amber
FIGURE 5. Strict consensus of the most parsimonious trees estimated from the data matrix of 118 morphological characters, showing placement of Archipsyllidae: Mydiognathus. Numbers above branches are Bremer support values.
FIGURE 7 in Bridging the gap between chewing and sucking in the hemipteroid insects: new insights from Cretaceous amber
FIGURE 7. Phylogeny and chronology of Paraneoptera including the placement of Archipsyllidae. Gray branches indicates uncertainty of divergence age (Misof et al. 2014). A–D indicate age of known fossils of Archipsyllidae (A: Psocopsylla (monotypic); B: Archipsylla (5 species known, oldest record indicated); C: Archipsyllodes and Archipsyllopsis (both monotypic); D: Mydiognathus). Numbers connecting branches indicate their supposed synapomorphies as follow: (1) Synapomorphies of Paraneoptera listed previously (e.g. Yoshizawa and Saigusa 2001; Grimaldi and Engel 2005; Beutel et al. 2014) except for (2). (2) Reduction of labial palpus (two segments or less) and reduction of tarsal segments (three segments or less) have been accepted as paraneopteran synapomorphies, but are excluded by recent studies of Archipsyllidae (Huang et al. 2008; present study). (3) Enlarged clypeus and antennal rupturing mechanism were considered as synapomorphies of Archipsyllidae and Psocodea (Huang et al. 2008) but are excluded by the present study. (4) Elongated mandible, elongated and grooved labium, and several forewing articulation apomorphies support placement of Archipsyllidae sister to Condylognatha (these clades together compose the new supraordinal taxon Pancondylognatha).
FIGURE 3 in Bridging the gap between chewing and sucking in the hemipteroid insects: new insights from Cretaceous amber
FIGURE 3. Illustrations of key wing structures in Mydiognathus eviohlhoffae (a–c) and other insect orders (d–f). (a) Forewing (composite drawing reconstructed from distal half of right forewing and basal half of left forewing). (b) Left forewing base articulation. (c) Right forewing base articulation. Forewing base articulation d–f: (d) Alloperla sp. (Plecoptera), (e) Longivalvus nubilus (Psocodea), (f) Petalolyma bicolor (Hemiptera).
FIGURE 2 in Bridging the gap between chewing and sucking in the hemipteroid insects: new insights from Cretaceous amber
FIGURE 2. Key head structures of Mydiognathus eviohlhoffae (a–c) and Neotrogla aurora (d). (a) Head. Dotted gray lines indicate alignment of mouthpart structures against the labrum (Lr) or lacinia (Lc, only for galea: Ga) (Acl: anteclypeus; At: antenna; ATP: anterior tentorial pit; Ca: cardo; E: eye; ES: epistomal suture; FGR: frontogenal suture; Fr: frons; Ga: galea; Ge: gena; Lc: lacinia; LiP: labial palpus; Lr: labrum; Md: mandible; MxP: maxillary palpus; Oc: ocellus; Pcl: postclypeus; Pf: palpifer; Pg: paraglossa; St: stipes). (b) Head, magnified. White arrowheads indicate the internally expanded lacinial base. (c) Tip of the mouth, magnified. (d) Antennal flagellum of Neotrogla aurora (Psocodea: Trogiomorpha: Prionoglarididae), showing the rupturing mechanism observed in extant Psocodea.
FIGURE 1 in Bridging the gap between chewing and sucking in the hemipteroid insects: new insights from Cretaceous amber
FIGURE 1. Photographs of Mydiognathus eviohlhoffae. (a) Habitus, right view. (b) Habitus, left view. (c) Head. (d) Connection between first (top) and second antennal flagellomeres. (e) Right hind tarsus, ventral view.
FIGURE 4 in Bridging the gap between chewing and sucking in the hemipteroid insects: new insights from Cretaceous amber
FIGURE 4. Male terminalia of Mydiognathus eviohlhoffae (St: sternite; T: tergite; Ad: aedeagus; Ep: epiproct; Pa: paraproct; Tr: trichobothria).
Deposition of amorphous carbon at different energies modeled with GAP
<p>These videos show the simulated deposition, one atom at a time, of amorphous carbon (a-C) films. The system is equilibrated to 300 K after each impact and before the next deposition event. Different deposition energies are simulated, from 1 eV to 100 eV. The atoms are deposited onto a preexisting diamond substrate, shown in the 60 eV video; after 2500 depositions at 60 eV, the generated a-C film is used as template to deposit all the other films. The interatomic interactions are modeled with the a-C GAP of Deringer and Csányi [Phys. Rev. B <strong>95</strong>, 094203 (2017)] interfaced through LAMMPS [http://lammps.sandia.gov]. The visualization is carried out with VMD [http://www.ks.uiuc.edu/Research/vmd] using Axel Kohlmeyer's TopoTools [DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.545655]. For further information, refer to Phys. Rev. Lett. <strong>120</strong>, 166101 (2018) and Phys. Rev. B <strong>102</strong>, 174201 (2020). Funding from the Academy of Finland (grants 310574 and 285526) and computational resources from CSC [http://www.csc.fi] are acknowledged.</p>
Monthly MODIS LST data related to the article: A new fully gap-free time series of land surface temperature from MODIS LST data
<p>Temperature time series with high spatial and temporal resolutions are important for several applications. The new MODIS Land Surface Temperature (LST) collection 6 provides numerous improvements compared to collection 5. However, being remotely sensed data in the thermal range, LST shows gaps in cloud-covered areas. With a novel method [1] we fully reconstructed the daily global MODIS LST products MOD11C1 and MYD11C1 (spatial resolution: 3 arc-min, i.e. approximately 5.6 km at the equator). For this, we combined temporal and spatial interpolation, using emissivity and elevation as covariates for the spatial interpolation. Here we provide a time series of these reconstructed LST data aggregated as monthly average, minimum and maximum LST maps.</p> <p>[1] Metz M., Andreo V., Neteler M. (2017): A new fully gap-free time series of Land Surface Temperature from MODIS LST data. Remote Sensing, 9(12):1333. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs9121333</p> <p>LICENSE: Open Data Commons Open Database License (ODbL) http://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/</p> <p>Acknowledgments: We are grateful to the NASA Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center (LP DAAC) for making the MODIS LST data available. The dataset is based on MODIS Collection V006.</p> <p><strong>The data available here for download are the reconstructed global MODIS LST products MOD11C1/MYD11C1 at a spatial resolution of 3 arc-min</strong> (approximately 5.6 km at the equator; see https://lpdaac.usgs.gov/dataset_discovery/modis/modis_products_table), <strong>aggregated to monthly data</strong>. The data are provided in GeoTIFF format. The Coordinate Reference System (CRS) is identical to the MOD11C1/MYD11C1 product as provided by NASA. In WKT as reported by GDAL:<br> <br> GEOGCS["Unknown datum based upon the Clarke 1866 ellipsoid",<br> DATUM["Not specified (based on Clarke 1866 spheroid)",<br> SPHEROID["Clarke 1866",6378206.4,294.9786982138982,<br> AUTHORITY["EPSG","7008"]]],<br> PRIMEM["Greenwich",0],<br> UNIT["degree",0.0174532925199433]]<br> </p> <p><strong>File name</strong> abbreviations:</p> <ul> <li>avg = average of daily averages</li> <li>min = minimum of daily minima</li> <li>max = maximum of daily maxima</li> </ul> <p>Meaning of <strong>pixel values</strong>:</p> <ul> <li>The <strong>pixel values</strong> are coded in <strong>degree Celsius * 100</strong> (hence, to obtain °C divide the pixel values by 100.0).</li> </ul> <p>Version <strong>changelog</strong>:</p> <ul> <li>V1.1.0: GeoTIFF metadata updated.</li> <li>V1.0.0: original upload</li> </ul>
FIGURE 5 in Filling gaps in the knowledge of Goniodorididae taxa (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Nudibranchia) with description of seven new species
FIGURE 5. Scanning electron micrographs and light microscope photographs of cuticles, radulae, and penis. A‒D. Ceratodoris trypomandyas sp. nov. A. Detail of labial cuticle elements (QM MO 86034). B. Frontal view of radula (QM MO 86034). C. Detail of inner and outer lateral teeth (QM MO 86034). D. Detail of outer lateral teeth (AM C. 270712). E‒H. Murphydoris polkadotsa sp. nov. (QM MO 86038). E. Frontal view of radula. F. Detail of inner lateral teeth. G. Detail of outer lateral teeth. H. Detail of penial spines. Scale bars: A, G: 5 μm; B, E: 50 μm; C: 30 μm; D: 10 μm; F, H: 20 μm.
FIGURE 2. Buccal bulb and reproductive system. A‒B in Filling gaps in the knowledge of Goniodorididae taxa (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Nudibranchia) with description of seven new species
FIGURE 2. Buccal bulb and reproductive system. A‒B. Trapania franae sp. nov. (QM MO 86031), A. Buccal bulb. B. Reproductive system. C‒D. Bermudella lahainensis sp. nov. (CASIZ 199240). C. Buccal bulb. D. Reproductive system. E‒F. Bermudella mica (MNCN 15.05/94474). E. Buccal bulb. F. Reproductive system. G–H. Bermudella plebeia (MNCN 15.05/94477). G. Buccal bulb. H. Reproductive system. I‒J. Ceratodoris trypomandyas sp. nov. (QM MO 86034). I. Buccal bulb. J. Reproductive system. Abbreviations: am, ampulla; bc, bursa copulatrix; bp, buccal pump; fgm, female gland mass; hd, hermaphroditic duct; oe, esophagus; op, esophageal pump; p, penis; pr, prostate; ra, radular sac; rs, receptaculum seminis; sgl, salivary gland; ud, uterine duct; va, vagina; vd, vas deferens. Scale bars: 1 mm.
FIGURE 4 in Filling gaps in the knowledge of Goniodorididae taxa (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Nudibranchia) with description of seven new species
FIGURE 4. Scanning electron micrographs of cuticles, radulae, and penis. A‒D. Bermudella mica (MNCN 15.05/94476). A. Detail of labial cuticle. B. Frontal view of radula. C. Detail of inner lateral teeth. D. Detail of outer lateral teeth. E‒H. Ceratodoris plebeia (MNCN 15.05/94477). E. Detail of labial cuticle elements. F. Frontal view of radula. G. Detail of inner and outer lateral teeth. H. Detail of penial spines. Scale bars: A: 5 μm; B: 30 μm; C‒D: 20 μm; E: 10 μm; F, H: 100 μm; G, 50 μm.
FIGURE 1. Living animals. A in Filling gaps in the knowledge of Goniodorididae taxa (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Nudibranchia) with description of seven new species
FIGURE 1. Living animals. A. Trapania franae sp. nov. (QM MO 86031). B‒C. Bermudella lahainensis sp. nov., B. CASIZ 180297 and C. CASIZ 192539; D. Bermudella mica. E. Ceratodoris plebeia (MNCN 15.05/94478). F‒G. Ceratodoris trypomandyas sp. nov., F. QM MO 86033 and G. AM C. 270712. H. Murphydoris polkadotsa sp. nov. (QM MO 86038). (Photos A, F–H by G. Cobb., B‒C by C. Pittman, D by P. Pérez, E by S. T. Huang)
FIGURE 3 in Filling gaps in the knowledge of Goniodorididae taxa (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Nudibranchia) with description of seven new species
FIGURE 3. Scanning electron micrographs and light microscope photographs of cuticles, radulae, and penis. A‒F. Trapania franae sp. nov. (QM MO 86031). A. Detail of jaws. B. Frontal view of radula. C‒E. Detail of denticles of the tooth. F. Detail of penial spines. G‒J. Bermudella lahainensis sp. nov. G. Frontal view of the radula (CASIZ 119240). H. Frontal view of half radula (CASIZ 192539). I. Detail of inner and outer lateral teeth (CASIZ 192539). J. Detail of outer lateral teeth (CASIZ 119240). Scale bars: A, B, G: 20 μm; C, H, J: 20 μm; D‒F, I: 10 μm.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.