Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
835
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.7.1
Dataset results
835 results for “ground beetles”
Figure 2 from: Bergeron C, Spence J, Volney J (2011) Landscape patterns of species-level association between ground-beetles and overstory trees in boreal forests of western Canada (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 147: 577-600. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.147.2098
Figure 2 - Figure 2. NMS ordination of the 193 sites (grey dots) with weighted centroid for beetle (crosses) and tree species (dark dots), stress = 15.1. Vector direction indicates sites with increasingly poor drainage. The abbreviations of the beetle species are as follow: Agograt: Agonum gratiosum , Agoretr: Agonum retractum , Agosord: Agonum sordens , Caladve: Calathus advena , Calingr: Calathus ingratus , Carcham: Carabus chamissonis , Patfove: Patrobus foveocollis , Pladece: Platynus decentis , Plamann: Platynus mannerheimmi , Pteads: Pterostichus adstrictus , Ptebrev: Pterostichus brevicornis , Ptepens: Pterostichus pensylvanicus , Ptepunc: Pterostichus punctatissimus , Stehaem: Stereocerus haematopus , Treapic: Trechus apicalis, Trechal: Trechus chalybeus . Abbreviations for the tree species are; Aw: Populus tremuloides , Fb: Abies balsamea , Lx: Larix laricina , Pb: Populus balsamifera , Sb: Picea mariana , and Sw: Picea glauca .
Figure from: Bergeron C, Spence J, Volney J (2011) Landscape patterns of species-level association between ground-beetles and overstory trees in boreal forests of western Canada (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 147: 577-600. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.147.2098
Figure - Figure 9. Drainage values for the 193 sites plotted on the beetle ordination of figure 2. High drainage values represent poorly drained sites.
Figure 1 from: Bergeron C, Spence J, Volney J (2011) Landscape patterns of species-level association between ground-beetles and overstory trees in boreal forests of western Canada (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 147: 577-600. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.147.2098
Figure 1 - Figure 1. Map of the sampling sites. Squares represent destroyed sites, open circles represent harvested sites, triangle represents the outlier, and the star represents the burnt site.
Figure 3 from: Bergeron C, Spence J, Volney J (2011) Landscape patterns of species-level association between ground-beetles and overstory trees in boreal forests of western Canada (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 147: 577-600. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.147.2098
Figure 3 - Figure 3. Relative basal area of Picea glauca for the 193 sites plotted on the beetle ordination of figure 2.
Figure 5 from: Riley K, Browne R (2011) Changes in ground beetle diversity and community composition in age structured forests (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 147: 601-621. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.147.2102
Figure 5 - Relative abundance across the forest age gradient for a representative species from each of the indicator classes (see text for definitions of indicator classes).
Figure 4 from: Riley K, Browne R (2011) Changes in ground beetle diversity and community composition in age structured forests (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 147: 601-621. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.147.2102
Figure 4 - Proportions of carabid populations brachypterous and macropterous for five forest age classes. Significant differences occurred for all forest age classes except the zero age class (χ2 < 0.05).
Figure 3 from: Riley K, Browne R (2011) Changes in ground beetle diversity and community composition in age structured forests (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 147: 601-621. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.147.2102
Figure 3 - Results of Non-Metric Multidimensional Scaling (NMDS) analysis for 33 study sites. The analysis was based on the 17 most common carabid beetle species from five forest age classes (0, 10, 50, 85, and 150 years). Each the five polygons represent different forest age classes, as indicated by different symbols.
Figure 2 from: Riley K, Browne R (2011) Changes in ground beetle diversity and community composition in age structured forests (Coleoptera, Carabidae). ZooKeys 147: 601-621. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.147.2102
Figure 2 - Carabid beetle species accumulation curves for five forest age classes. Vertical line indicates species richness of each curve at n = 233 individuals.
Figures 1-2 from: Wang B, Zhang H (2011) A new ground beetle (Carabidae, Protorabinae) from the Lower Cretaceous of Inner Mongolia, China. ZooKeys 130: 229-237. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.130.1300
Figures 1-2 - Cretorabus rasnitsyni sp. n., photomicrograph of holotype NIGP152464 1 dry 2 under alcohol. Scale bar represents 1 mm.
Figures 3-4 from: Wang B, Zhang H (2011) A new ground beetle (Carabidae, Protorabinae) from the Lower Cretaceous of Inner Mongolia, China. ZooKeys 130: 229-237. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.130.1300
Figures 3-4 - Cretorabus rasnitsyni sp. n., drawings of holotype NIGP152464 3 without legs 4 with legs.
Figure 3 from: Looney C, Zack R (2014) Ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) of the Hanford Nuclear Site in south-central Washington State. ZooKeys 396: 13-42. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.396.6936
Figure 3 - Bar graphs presenting total seasonal abundance for select pitfall-trapped carabid species. Y-axes indicate the total number captured per month, summed across all sites.
Figure 2 from: Looney C, Zack R (2014) Ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) of the Hanford Nuclear Site in south-central Washington State. ZooKeys 396: 13-42. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.396.6936
Figure 2 - Examples of Hanford plant communities. A Site SB, mature sagebrush B Site CG, cheatgrass-dominated community C Site WL, alkaline pond with mixed sagebrush-cheatgrass community (sites GM and GS) in the distance D Site RS, freshwater spring system E Site SD, typical sand dune habitat.
Figure 4 from: Looney C, Zack R (2014) Ground beetles (Coleoptera, Carabidae) of the Hanford Nuclear Site in south-central Washington State. ZooKeys 396: 13-42. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.396.6936
Figure 4 - Bar graphs presenting per-trap catches of select pitfall-trapped species from seven collecting sites. Y-axis units for each graph are individuals/trap/day, over the entire collecting period. Locality abbreviations (X-axis) are found in Table 1.
Figure 8 from: Klimaszewski J, Work T, Thiffault E, Bourdon C, Pare D, Bousquet Y, Venier L, Titus B (2013) Initial responses of rove and ground beetles (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Carabidae) to removal of logging residues following clearcut harvesting in the boreal forest of Quebec, Canada. ZooKeys 258: 31-52. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.258.4174
Figure 8 - a–d Colour images of abundant species: a Quedius labradorensis Smetana b Gabrius brevipennis (Horn) c Pseudopsis subulata Herman d Pterostichus punctatissimus (Randall).
Figure 7 from: Klimaszewski J, Work T, Thiffault E, Bourdon C, Pare D, Bousquet Y, Venier L, Titus B (2013) Initial responses of rove and ground beetles (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Carabidae) to removal of logging residues following clearcut harvesting in the boreal forest of Quebec, Canada. ZooKeys 258: 31-52. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.258.4174
Figure 7 - a–d Colour images of abundant species: a Atheta capsularis Klimaszewski b Atheta klagesi Bernhauer c Atheta strigosula Casey d Tachinus fumipennis (Say).
Figure 5 from: Klimaszewski J, Work T, Thiffault E, Bourdon C, Pare D, Bousquet Y, Venier L, Titus B (2013) Initial responses of rove and ground beetles (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Carabidae) to removal of logging residues following clearcut harvesting in the boreal forest of Quebec, Canada. ZooKeys 258: 31-52. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.258.4174
Figure 5 - Boxplots depicting catch rates (beetles/day) for eight abundant species collected from experimental plots where forest was a clearcut and deadwood was left intact (SOH) b clearcut with quantity of deadwood reduced (WTH), and c uncut forest (Control). Bold line depicts median value, box denotes 25–75% quantile range, whiskers correspond to 1.5 times the interquartile range.
Figure 6 from: Klimaszewski J, Work T, Thiffault E, Bourdon C, Pare D, Bousquet Y, Venier L, Titus B (2013) Initial responses of rove and ground beetles (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Carabidae) to removal of logging residues following clearcut harvesting in the boreal forest of Quebec, Canada. ZooKeys 258: 31-52. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.258.4174
Figure 6 - Multivariate regression tree based on sum-of-squares depicting differences in beetle assemblages among experimental plots where forest was a clearcut with stem-only harvested (SOH) b clearcut with whole-tree harvested (WTH), and c uncut forest (Control). The tree was selected based on 935/1000 cross-validations and explains 64% of the variance. Both experimental treatment and deadwood volumes provided equivalent improvement at each split. We have labelled splits using experimental treatments.
Figure 4 from: Klimaszewski J, Work T, Thiffault E, Bourdon C, Pare D, Bousquet Y, Venier L, Titus B (2013) Initial responses of rove and ground beetles (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Carabidae) to removal of logging residues following clearcut harvesting in the boreal forest of Quebec, Canada. ZooKeys 258: 31-52. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.258.4174
Figure 4 - Boxplots depicting overall catch rates (beetles/day) where forest was a clearcut and deadwood was left intact (SOH) b clearcut with quantity of deadwood reduced (WTH), and c uncut forest (Control). Bold line depicts median value, box denotes 25–75% quantile range, whiskers correspond to 1.5 times the interquartile range.
Figure 3 from: Klimaszewski J, Work T, Thiffault E, Bourdon C, Pare D, Bousquet Y, Venier L, Titus B (2013) Initial responses of rove and ground beetles (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Carabidae) to removal of logging residues following clearcut harvesting in the boreal forest of Quebec, Canada. ZooKeys 258: 31-52. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.258.4174
Figure 3 - Boxplots showing volume of fine and coarse woody debris in stem-only harvested plots (SOH), whole-tree harvested plots (WTH), and in uncut forest (Control). Bold line depicts median value, box denotes 25–75% quantile range, whiskers correspond to 1.5 times the interquartile range.
Figure 1 from: Klimaszewski J, Work T, Thiffault E, Bourdon C, Pare D, Bousquet Y, Venier L, Titus B (2013) Initial responses of rove and ground beetles (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Carabidae) to removal of logging residues following clearcut harvesting in the boreal forest of Quebec, Canada. ZooKeys 258: 31-52. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.258.4174
Figure 1 - Schematic representation of treatments with pitfall trap locations, Forêt Montmorency, Quebec.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.