Find research datasets worth reusing

Figure 2 in Homoplasy in shells discombobulated the taxonomy: revision of the larger helicarionid land snails of northern Queensland, Australia (Stylommatophora: Helicarionidae)

Figure 2. Majority-rule consensus tree based on Bayesian analysis of the concatenated data set of fragments of the mitochondrial genes 16S and COI. Ambiguous alignment sites in 16S removed using MAFFT. Numbers on branches indicate posterior probabilities. Scale bar indicates 7% of modelled sequence divergence. Individual samples are named as per their initial identification; genus and species names for a clade are based on the final taxonomic decisions.

Figure 21 in Homoplasy in shells discombobulated the taxonomy: revision of the larger helicarionid land snails of northern Queensland, Australia (Stylommatophora: Helicarionidae)

Figure 21. Genitalia of Pravonitor stuarti, QM MO86002 (holotype), High Range. a) Reproductive system. b) Penis with tunica opened. c) Penis with tunica opened, opposite orientation to b). d) Penis interior. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Figure 1 in Homoplasy in shells discombobulated the taxonomy: revision of the larger helicarionid land snails of northern Queensland, Australia (Stylommatophora: Helicarionidae)

Figure 1. Best maximum likelihood tree based on an analysis of the concatenated data set of fragments of the mitochondrial genes 16S and COI using IQ-TREE. Ambiguous alignment sites in 16S removed using MAFFT. Numbers on branches indicate nodal support based on 10,000 ultra-fast bootstrap repeats as well as by employing Shimodaira and Hasegawa's (1999)) approximate Likelihood Ratio Test ('SH-aLRT'). Scale bar indicates 7% of modelled sequence divergence. Individual samples are named as per their initial identification; genus and species names for a clade are based on the final taxonomic decisions.

Figure 15 in Homoplasy in shells discombobulated the taxonomy: revision of the larger helicarionid land snails of northern Queensland, Australia (Stylommatophora: Helicarionidae)

Figure 15. Genitalia of Pravonitor annulus, QM MO15645, Yam Island. a) Reproductive system. b) penis interior. c) Spermatophore. Scale bars: 1 mm.

FIGURES 181–185 in Australian Opilonini (Coleoptera: Cleridae: Clerinae) part I: A revised taxonomy for Australian Opilo Latreille including descriptions of new genera and species

FIGURES 181–185. (181) labels of the syntype specimen designated as the lectotype of Opilo congruus Newman (NHML); (182) labels of the syntype (holotype label invalid) specimen designated as the paralectotype of Opilo abdominalis Schenkling (IRSNB); (183) labels of the syntype specimen designated as the lectotype of Opilo variipes Chevrolat (MNHN); (184) labels of the syntype specimens designated as the lectotype of Opilo femoralis Westwood; (185) Westwood's original Opilo femoralis syntype series (NHML) (a) O. femoralis lectotype, (b) smaller, non-conspecific, specimens representing a new species, Notopilo confusus sp. nov..

FIGURE 186 in Australian Opilonini (Coleoptera: Cleridae: Clerinae) part I: A revised taxonomy for Australian Opilo Latreille including descriptions of new genera and species

FIGURE 186. Simplified phylogeny estimate, modified from Gunter et al. (2013), showing position of Notopilo Bartlett & Lambkin gen. nov. within the higher classification framework of Bartlett (2021).

FIGURES 162–173 in Australian Opilonini (Coleoptera: Cleridae: Clerinae) part I: A revised taxonomy for Australian Opilo Latreille including descriptions of new genera and species

FIGURES 162–173. Habitus: (162–165) Notopilo, cambageicola species group—(162) Notopilo cambageicola, paratype; (163) Notopilo interfabulatus, holotype; (164) Notopilo lawnhillensis, holotype; (165) Notopilo tanybasilaris, paratype; (166) Notopilo congruus (congruus species group), lectotype (of Opilo congruus); (167–168) Notopilo, reduncus species group—(167) Notopilo magnus, holotype; (168) Notopilo reduncus, paralectotype (of Opilo abdominalis Schenkling); (169–171) Notopilo, variipes species group—(169) Notopilo brevistriatus, paratype; (170) Notopilo gerstmeieri, paratype; (171) Notopilo variipes; (172–173) Notopilo, unplaced to species group—(172) Notopilo confusus, specimen from Western Australia; (173) Notopilo elstoni, holotype (scale bars: 1.0 mm).

FIGURES 174–180 in Australian Opilonini (Coleoptera: Cleridae: Clerinae) part I: A revised taxonomy for Australian Opilo Latreille including descriptions of new genera and species

FIGURES 174–180. Habitus: (174–175) Notopilo, unplaced to species group (continued)—(174) Notopilo katherinensis, holotype; (175) Notopilo obesus, paratype; (176) Platynotum bulli, holotype; (177) Platynotum culgoense, paratype; (178) Platynotum femorale, lectotype (of Opilo femoralis); (179) Platynotum foveosetosa, holotype; (180) Platynotum gracile, holotype (scale bars: 1.0 mm).

FIGURES 12–26 in Australian Opilonini (Coleoptera: Cleridae: Clerinae) part I: A revised taxonomy for Australian Opilo Latreille including descriptions of new genera and species

FIGURES 12–26. (12) Notopilo variipes elytra, detail showing foveate punctures with conspicuous lateral nodules; (13) Notopilo congruus elytra, detail showing foveate punctures without lateral nodules; (14) Ancyropilus monteithi elytra, detail showing densely setose intervals; (15) Infectostriatus absentis (paratype) elytra, eighth & ninth elytral stria absent; (16) Notopilo obesus (holotype) elytra, eighth & ninth elytral stria intact; (17) Platynotum bulli (paratype), flat pronotal disc (lateral view); (18) Culcipternotus mareebensis (paratype) tarsus, with four ventral pads; (19) Notopilo reduncus tarsus, with three ventral pads; (20) Olesterus australis eye, finely-facetted; (21) Notopilo confusus eye, coarsely-facetted; (22) Monilonotum pascoei elytra, detail showing intrafoveal seta apparently absent; (23) Ancyropilus brigalowae (paratype) elytra, detail showing short intrafoveal seta; (24) Platynotum foveosetosa (holotype) elytra, detail showing very long intrafoveal seta; (25) Notopilo reduncus elytra, showing puncture rows (striae) terminating before apex; (26) Platynotum femorale elytra, showing elytral puncture rows terminating mostly near apex.

FIGURES 150–161 in Australian Opilonini (Coleoptera: Cleridae: Clerinae) part I: A revised taxonomy for Australian Opilo Latreille including descriptions of new genera and species

FIGURES 150–161. Habitus: (150) Infectostriatus differens, holotype; (151) Monilonotum bunyense, paratype; (152) Monilonotum doddi; (153) Monilonotum pascoei; (154) Monilonotum sundholmi, paratype; (155) Monilonotum rufiventre; (156–161) Notopilo, beswickensis species group—(156) Notopilo beswickensis, holotype; (157) Notopilo calicis, holotype; (158) Notopilo eremosus, holotype; (159) Notopilo tompricensis, holotype; (160) Notopilo xanthoimprocerus, holotype; (161) Notopilo xanthoprolatus, holotype (scale bars: 1.0 mm).

FIGURES 27–47 in Australian Opilonini (Coleoptera: Cleridae: Clerinae) part I: A revised taxonomy for Australian Opilo Latreille including descriptions of new genera and species

FIGURES 27–47. Tegmina, dorsal: (27) Ancyropilus brigalowae, paratype; (28) Ancyropilus emmotti, holotype; (29) Ancyropilus exossuarius, paratype; (30) Ancyropilus monteithi, holotype; (31) Ancyropilus noonbahensis, holotype; (32) Ancyropilus packsaddlensis, holotype; (33) Ancyropilus simplex, paratype; (34) Ancyropilus tricolor, paratype; (35) Ancyropilus hornensis, paratype; (36) Culcipternotus mareebensis, paratype; (37) Infectostriatus absentis, holotype; (38) Infectostriatus differens, holotype; (39) Monilonotum bunyense, paratype; (40) Monilonotum doddi; (41) Monilonotum pascoei; (42) Monilonotum sundholmi, paratype; (43–47) Notopilo, beswickensis species group—(43) Notopilo beswickensis, holotype; (44) Notopilo calicis, paratype; (45) Notopilo tompricensis, holotype; (46) Notopilo xanthoimprocerus, holotype; (47) Notopilo xanthoprolatus, holotype (scale bars: 0.5 mm).

FIGURES 138–149 in Australian Opilonini (Coleoptera: Cleridae: Clerinae) part I: A revised taxonomy for Australian Opilo Latreille including descriptions of new genera and species

FIGURES 138–149. Habitus: (138) Ancyropilus brigalowae, paratype; (139) Ancyropilus emmotti, holotype; (140) Ancyropilus exossuarius, paratype; (141) Ancyropilus hornensis, paratype; (142) Ancyropilus labris, holotype; (143) Ancyropilus monteithi, paratype; (144) Ancyropilus noonbahensis, holotype; (145) Ancyropilus packsaddlensis, holotype; (146) Ancyropilus simplex, paratype; (147) Ancyropilus tricolor, paratype; (148) Culcipternotus mareebensis, holotype; (149) Infectostriatus absentis, holotype (scale bars: 1.0 mm).

FIGURES 1–11 in Australian Opilonini (Coleoptera: Cleridae: Clerinae) part I: A revised taxonomy for Australian Opilo Latreille including descriptions of new genera and species

FIGURES 1–11. (1) Opilo mollis, elytron (1a) first interval broad, (1b) pre-apical ridge; (2–9) tegmina, lateral—(2) Opilo mollis (arrow showing weakly sclerotised tegminal arm region); (3) Notopilo cf. lawnhillensis; (4) Notopilo gerstmeieri, paratype; (5) Notopilo obesus, paratype; (6) Infectostriatus differens, holotype; (7) Notopilo congruus; (8) Culcipternulus mareebensis, paratype; (9) Ancyropilus tricolor, paratype; (10–11) antennal scape—(10) Opilo mollis (carina absent); (11) Notopilo congruus (arrow showing carina) (scale bars: Figs 1–9, 0.5 mm; Figs 10–11, 0.1 mm).

FIGURES 66–101 in Australian Opilonini (Coleoptera: Cleridae: Clerinae) part I: A revised taxonomy for Australian Opilo Latreille including descriptions of new genera and species

FIGURES 66–101. Median lobes: (66) Ancyropilus brigalowae, paratype; (67) Ancyropilus emmotti, holotype; (68) Ancyropilus exossuarius, paratype; (69) Ancyropilus monteithi, holotype; (70) Ancyropilus noonbahensis, holotype; (71) Ancyropilus packsaddlensis, holotype; (72) Ancyropilus simplex, paratype; (73) Ancyropilus tricolor, holotype; (74) Ancyropilus hornensis, paratype; (75) Culcipternotus mareebensis, paratype; (76) Infectostriatus absentis, holotype; (77) Infectostriatus differens, holotype; (78) Monilonotum bunyense, paratype; (79) Monilonotum pascoei; (80) Monilonotum sundholmi, paratype; (81–85) Notopilo, beswickensis species group—(81) Notopilo beswickensis, holotype; (82) Notopilo calicis, paratype; (83) Notopilo tompricensis, holotype; (84) Notopilo xanthoimprocerus, paratype; (85) Notopilo xanthoprolatus, holotype; (86–88) Notopilo, cambageicola species group—(86) Notopilo cambageicola, paratype; (87) Notopilo interfabulatus, paratype; (88) Notopilo tanybasilaris, paratype; (89) Notopilo congruus (congruus species group); (90) Notopilo reduncus (reduncus species group); (91–93) Notopilo, variipes species group—(91) Notopilo brevistriatus, paratype; (92) Notopilo gerstmeieri, holotype; (93) Notopilo variipes; (94–96) Notopilo, unplaced to species group—(94) Notopilo elstoni, holotype; (95) Notopilo katherinensis, holotype; (96) Notopilo obesus, paratype; (97) Platynotum bulli, paratype; (98) Platynotum culgoense, holotype; (99) Platynotum femorale; (100) Platynotum foveosetosa, holotype; (101) Platynotum gracile, holotype (scale bars: 0.5 mm).

FIGURES 48–65 in Australian Opilonini (Coleoptera: Cleridae: Clerinae) part I: A revised taxonomy for Australian Opilo Latreille including descriptions of new genera and species

FIGURES 48–65. Tegmina, dorsal: (48–51) Notopilo, cambageicola species group—(48) Notopilo cambageicola, paratype; (49) Notopilo interfabulatus, paratype; (50) Notopilo lawnhillensis, paratype; (51) Notopilo tanybasilaris, holotype; (52) Notopilo congruus (congruus species group); (53) Notopilo reduncus (reduncus species group); (54–56) Notopilo, variipes species group—(54) Notopilo brevistriatus, paratype; (55) Notopilo gerstmeieri, holotype; (56) Notopilo variipes; (57–60) Notopilo, unplaced to species group—(57) Notopilo confusus, holotype; (58) Notopilo elstoni, holotype; (59) Notopilo katherinensis, holotype; (60) Notopilo obesus, paratype; (61) Platynotum bulli, paratype; (62) Platynotum culgoense, holotype; (63) Platynotum femorale; (64) Platynotum foveosetosa, holotype; (65) Platynotum gracile, holotype (scale bars: 0.5 mm).

FIGURE 10 in Revising the taxonomy of Darevskia valentini (Boettger, 1892) and Darevskia rudis (Bedriaga, 1886) (Squamata, Lacertidae): a Morpho-Phylogenetic integrated study in a complex Anatolian scenario

FIGURE 10. Parsimony networks corresponding to Cyt-b (A) and MC1R (B) represent reconstruction of the studied group. Numbers within parentheses represent a mutational step, black circles missing haplotypes, and colored circles haplotypes. The circle area is proportional to the number of individuals. The new nomenclature proposed in the text is used.

FIGURE 9 in Revising the taxonomy of Darevskia valentini (Boettger, 1892) and Darevskia rudis (Bedriaga, 1886) (Squamata, Lacertidae): a Morpho-Phylogenetic integrated study in a complex Anatolian scenario

FIGURE 9. Maximum Likelihood (ML) tree (left) and collapsed one for the same tree (right) are given. Numbers on branches indicate the bootstrap and posterior probability (pp) values (ML/BI). Each species delimitation result is shown, and a vertical bar represents each cluster obtained from the analysis. Red circles indicate the internal nodes of each OTUs. The new nomenclature proposed in the text is used.

FIGURE 4 in Revising the taxonomy of Darevskia valentini (Boettger, 1892) and Darevskia rudis (Bedriaga, 1886) (Squamata, Lacertidae): a Morpho-Phylogenetic integrated study in a complex Anatolian scenario

FIGURE 4. UPGMA tree derived from the matrix of distances (Table 1) among MALE samples, showing three great groups: a basal one, well different, with D. bithynica (inc. ssp. tristis), and two more closer groups that include the former rudis and valentini-complexes. See the text for an explanation of the results. The tree, derived from the calculation of ultrametric distances calculated in UPGMA, reflects very well the relationships in respect to the original distanced matrix (see Table 1). Its Cophenetic Correlation Index, r = 0.95, shows that the obtained dendrogram has a very good fit (r> 0.9; Rohlf 2000).

FIGURE 1 in Revising the taxonomy of Darevskia valentini (Boettger, 1892) and Darevskia rudis (Bedriaga, 1886) (Squamata, Lacertidae): a Morpho-Phylogenetic integrated study in a complex Anatolian scenario

FIGURE 1. Map showing both the localities of populations examined in morphology part and the possible distribution range for each taxa. Only the Turkish areas of the taxa are depicted. Numbers refer to population codes (Map ID) given in Appendix 1. Colors are lineage-specific which were identified in phylo-trees (see Figure 9).

FIGURE 3 in Revising the taxonomy of Darevskia valentini (Boettger, 1892) and Darevskia rudis (Bedriaga, 1886) (Squamata, Lacertidae): a Morpho-Phylogenetic integrated study in a complex Anatolian scenario

FIGURE 3. The three-dimensional representation of MALE centroids (bidimensional of samples and centroids in Fig 2) shows the MST (Minimum Spanning Tree) superimposed on the three-dimensional representation of the position of the centroids. The three axes together explain 89.1 % of all the variability. This MST can be considered equivalent to an unrooted NJ and connects each centroid with its closest relative. See text for explanation.