Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
61,240
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
61,240 results for “two”
Figure 2 in Comparative population biology of Uca rapax (Smith, 1870) (Brachyura, Ocypodidae) from two subtropical mangrove habitats on the Brazilian coast
Figure 2. Uca rapax. Comparison of the median sizes of males and females at each site (A) and comparison of the median size of each sex and site (B). Boxes with at least one letter in common showed no statistically significant difference (P.0.05).
Figure 5 in Comparative population biology of Uca rapax (Smith, 1870) (Brachyura, Ocypodidae) from two subtropical mangrove habitats on the Brazilian coast
Figure 5. Uca rapax. Sex ratio by month (A) and size classes of carapace width (mm) (B) for populations from Itamambuca and Ubatumirim. Asterisks above the columns indicate significant differences between the proportions of males and females (P,0.05).
Figure 3 in Revision of the genus Niwaella in China (Pisces, Cobitidae), with description of two new species
Figure 3. Subdorsal scales. (A) N. laterimaculata; (B) N. longibarba sp. n.; (C) N. xinjiangensis sp. n.
Figure 6 in Comparative population biology of Uca rapax (Smith, 1870) (Brachyura, Ocypodidae) from two subtropical mangrove habitats on the Brazilian coast
Figure 6. Uca rapax. Recruitment in the Itamambuca and Ubatumirim habitats by season of the year. Small letters above bars compare the proportions of juveniles among seasons in the same site. Bars with at least one letter in common did not differ statistically (P.0.05).
Figure 1 in Comparative population biology of Uca rapax (Smith, 1870) (Brachyura, Ocypodidae) from two subtropical mangrove habitats on the Brazilian coast
Figure 1. Uca rapax. Median values (¡SD) of the organic matter content of the sediment at Itamambuca and Ubatumirim. The statistical comparisons were performed for each season between sites (Kruskal–Wallis, a50.05). White bars with at least one letter in common did not differ statistically.
Figure 7 in Comparison of natural histories and karyotypes of two closely related ant-eating spiders, Zodarion hamatum and Z. italicum (Araneae, Zodariidae)
Figure 7. Behaviour of sex chromosome during spermatogonial mitosis and meiosis. (A, F) Zodarion italicum; (B– E, G–I) Z. hamatum. (A) Early spermatogonial prophase; (B) premeiotic interphase (two prominent heteropycnotic bodies represent segments of chromosome X); (C) pachytene (note that sex chromosome does not exhibit heteropycnosis); (D) late pachytene; (E) diplotene (*ring bivalent with two chiasmata); (F) metaphase I (*bivalent exhibiting precocious division); (G) anaphase I; (H) prometaphase II; (I) anaphase II. Arrow identifies sex chromosome. Scale bars: 10 mm.
Figure 4 in Comparison of natural histories and karyotypes of two closely related ant-eating spiders, Zodarion hamatum and Z. italicum (Araneae, Zodariidae)
Figure 4. Number of attacks for four ant species (pooled for females and juveniles of Zodarion italicum and Z. hamatum). For description see Figure 3.
Figure 5 in Comparison of natural histories and karyotypes of two closely related ant-eating spiders, Zodarion hamatum and Z. italicum (Araneae, Zodariidae)
Figure 5. Mimics and the putative model (from left to right): Zodarion hamatum, Lasius emarginatus and Z. italicum. Scale bar: 1 mm.
Figure 2 in Comparison of natural histories and karyotypes of two closely related ant-eating spiders, Zodarion hamatum and Z. italicum (Araneae, Zodariidae)
Figure 2. Phenology of study species. (A) Seasonal activity of adult individuals of Zodarion italicum (pitfall-trap data, n56266); (B) proportion of adults in Z. hamatum (grey bar) and Z. italicum (empty bar) during season (hand collections, n5121),? represents missing data; (C) seasonal variability in proportion of males (grey bar) and females (empty bar) of Z. italicum (pitfall-trap data, n56266).
Figure 1 in Comparison of natural histories and karyotypes of two closely related ant-eating spiders, Zodarion hamatum and Z. italicum (Araneae, Zodariidae)
Figure 1. Distribution of Zodarion hamatum and Z. italicum in Europe. Distribution of Z. italicum in southern Italy is not shown.
Figure 2 in Re-description of the lycosiformis species group of Anyphops Benoit and description of two new species (Araneae, Selenopidae)
Figure 2. (a–c) Anyphops lycosiformis (Lawrence), female holotype. (a) Dorsal prosoma colour pattern, (b) epigynum, ventral view, (c) epigynum, dorsal view. (d–f) Anyphops mumai (Corronca), male holotype. (d) Male palp, lateral view, (e) male palp, ventral view, (f) dorsal body colour pattern. (g–k) Anyphops natalensis (Lawrence). (g–i) Female holotype: (g) dorsal body colour pattern, (h) epigynum, ventral view, (i) epigynum, dorsal view; (j, k) male paratype: (j) male palp, lateral view, (k) male palp, ventral view. go, genital opening; ll, lateral lobes. Scale bars: genitalia50.25 mm; other drawings51 mm.
Figure 59 in A revision of Tachyphron Brown and description of two new genera within the Ariphron group (Hymenoptera: Tiphiidae)
Figure 59. Distribution of Deuterothynnus spp. and Heligmothynnus spp. (note the coincident collecting of D. fulvicentratus with H. microspinus, and D. fulvisetatus with D. parallelus).
Figures 41–48 in A revision of Tachyphron Brown and description of two new genera within the Ariphron group (Hymenoptera: Tiphiidae)
Figures 41–48. Tachyphron spp., male genitalia, lateral and dorsal views. (41, 42) T. athertonensis. (43, 44) T. aculeatus (note: basal ring partially detached). (45, 46) T. mantonensis. (47, 48) T. townsvillensis. Scale bars: 0.25 mm.
Figures 53–58 in A revision of Tachyphron Brown and description of two new genera within the Ariphron group (Hymenoptera: Tiphiidae)
Figures 53–58. Tachyphron spp., male hypopygia. (53) T. planus. (54) T. halmaherensis. (55) T. athertonensis. (56) T. mantonensis. (57) T. townsvillensis. (58) T. aculeatus. Scale bars: 0.25 mm.
Figures 33–40 in A revision of Tachyphron Brown and description of two new genera within the Ariphron group (Hymenoptera: Tiphiidae)
Figures 33–40. Tachyphron spp., male genitalia, lateral and dorsal views. (33, 34) T. fragilis. (35, 36) T. neosubfragilis (note: basal ring partially detached). (37, 38) T. comatus. (39, 40) T. nigrisetatus. Scale bars: 0.25 mm.
Figures 49–52 in A revision of Tachyphron Brown and description of two new genera within the Ariphron group (Hymenoptera: Tiphiidae)
Figures 49–52. Tachyphron spp., male genitalia, lateral and dorsal views. (49, 50) T. planus (note: basal ring not shown). (51, 52) T. halmaherensis (note: basal ring partially obscured by apex of metasoma). Scale bar: 0.25 mm.
Figures 17–24 in A revision of Tachyphron Brown and description of two new genera within the Ariphron group (Hymenoptera: Tiphiidae)
Figures 17–24. Heligmothynnus spp., male genitalia, lateral and dorsal views. (17, 18) H. microspinus. (19, 20) H. atratus. (21, 22) H. neoaratus. (23, 24) H. sabronensis (note: basal ring not shown). Scale bar: 0.25 mm.
Figures 25–28 in A revision of Tachyphron Brown and description of two new genera within the Ariphron group (Hymenoptera: Tiphiidae)
Figures 25–28. Heligmothynnus spp., male hypopygia. (25) H. sabronensis. (26) H. microspinus. (27) H. atratus. (28) H. neoaratus. Scale bar: 0.25 mm.
Figures 13–16 in A revision of Tachyphron Brown and description of two new genera within the Ariphron group (Hymenoptera: Tiphiidae)
Figures 13–16. Deuterothynnus spp., male hypopygia. (13) D. fulvicentratus. (14) D. fulvisetatus. (15) D. parallelus. (16) D. insularis. Scale bar: 0.25 mm.
Figures 29–32 in A revision of Tachyphron Brown and description of two new genera within the Ariphron group (Hymenoptera: Tiphiidae)
Figures 29–32. Tachyphron spp., male hypopygia. (29) T. fragilis. (30) T. neosubfragilis. (31) T. comatus. (32) T. nigrisetatus. Scale bar: 0.25 mm.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.