Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
12,393
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
12,393 results for “materiality”
Supplementary material 1 from: Klinger YP, Eckstein RL, Horlemann D, Otte A, Ludewig K (2020) Germination of the invasive legume Lupinus polyphyllus depends on cutting date and seed morphology. NeoBiota 60: 79-95. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.60.56117
Model Tables
Supplementary Materials for Article "What Library Digitization Leaves Out"
<p>Code and data used in "What Library Digitization Leaves Out" by Allen Riddell and Troy J. Bassett.</p>
Supplementary material 1 from: Snyder MR, Stepien CA (2020) Increasing confidence for discerning species and population compositions from metabarcoding assays of environmental samples: case studies of fishes in the Laurentian Great Lakes and Wabash River. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 4: e53455. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.4.53455
Supplementary material: Additional methods, results, figures, and tables
Supplementary material 4 from: Chen W-H, Zhang Y-M, Guo S-W, Zhang Z-R, Chen L, Shui Y-M (2020) Reassessment of Bournea Oliver (Gesneriaceae) based on molecular and palynological evidence. In: Shui Y-M, Chen W-H, Ren M-X, Wen F, Hong X, Qiu Z-J, Wei Y-G, Kang M (Eds) Taxonomy of Gesneriaceae in China and Vietnam. PhytoKeys 157: 27-41. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.157.55254
Supporting materials
Supplementary material 2 from: Chen W-H, Zhang Y-M, Guo S-W, Zhang Z-R, Chen L, Shui Y-M (2020) Reassessment of Bournea Oliver (Gesneriaceae) based on molecular and palynological evidence. In: Shui Y-M, Chen W-H, Ren M-X, Wen F, Hong X, Qiu Z-J, Wei Y-G, Kang M (Eds) Taxonomy of Gesneriaceae in China and Vietnam. PhytoKeys 157: 27-41. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.157.55254
Figure S1
Supplementary material 3 from: Chen W-H, Zhang Y-M, Guo S-W, Zhang Z-R, Chen L, Shui Y-M (2020) Reassessment of Bournea Oliver (Gesneriaceae) based on molecular and palynological evidence. In: Shui Y-M, Chen W-H, Ren M-X, Wen F, Hong X, Qiu Z-J, Wei Y-G, Kang M (Eds) Taxonomy of Gesneriaceae in China and Vietnam. PhytoKeys 157: 27-41. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.157.55254
Figure S2
Supplementary material 1 from: Chen W-H, Zhang Y-M, Guo S-W, Zhang Z-R, Chen L, Shui Y-M (2020) Reassessment of Bournea Oliver (Gesneriaceae) based on molecular and palynological evidence. In: Shui Y-M, Chen W-H, Ren M-X, Wen F, Hong X, Qiu Z-J, Wei Y-G, Kang M (Eds) Taxonomy of Gesneriaceae in China and Vietnam. PhytoKeys 157: 27-41. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.157.55254
Tables S1, S2
Supplementary material 1 from: Dupérré N, Francisco C, Santana-Propper E, Agnarsson I, Binford GJ (2020) Heteroonops (Araneae, Oonopidae) spiders from Hispaniola: the discovery of ten new species. ZooKeys 964: 1-30. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.964.51554
Phylogeny in Figure 1 with full taxon labeling
Supplementary material 2 from: Laini A, Beermann AJ, Bolpagni R, Burgazzi G, Elbrecht V, Zizka VMA, Leese F, Viaroli P (2020) Exploring the potential of metabarcoding to disentangle macroinvertebrate community dynamics in intermittent streams. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 4: e51433. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.4.51433
Table S1, Figures S1–S5
Supplementary material 1 from: Laini A, Beermann AJ, Bolpagni R, Burgazzi G, Elbrecht V, Zizka VMA, Leese F, Viaroli P (2020) Exploring the potential of metabarcoding to disentangle macroinvertebrate community dynamics in intermittent streams. Metabarcoding and Metagenomics 4: e51433. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.4.51433
Raw data
Supplementary material 2 from: Colihueque N, Arriagada A, Fuentes A (2020) Distribution modelling of the Pudu deer (Pudu puda) in southern Chile. Nature Conservation 41: 47-69. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.41.53748
Table S2
Supplementary material 1 from: Colihueque N, Arriagada A, Fuentes A (2020) Distribution modelling of the Pudu deer (Pudu puda) in southern Chile. Nature Conservation 41: 47-69. https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.41.53748
Table S1
Figure 9 from: Spiridonov VA, Simakova UV, Anosov SE, Zalota AK, Timofeev VA (2020) Review of Macropodia in the Black Sea supported by molecular barcoding data; with the redescription of the type material, observations on ecology and epibiosis of Macropodia czernjawskii (Brandt, 1880) and notes on other Atlanto-Mediterranean species of Macropodia Leach, 1814 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Inachidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 96(2): 609-635. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.96.48342
Figure 9 Morphometric relationships and fecundity characteristics of Macropodia czernjawskii. a. Relationships between carapace width (CW) and the geometric mean of chela length, height and thickness (ChGM). b. Relationships between CW and decimal logarithm of the number of developing eggs (I or II stage of development) on pleopods (F). For statistical data see Table 2.
Figure 7 from: Spiridonov VA, Simakova UV, Anosov SE, Zalota AK, Timofeev VA (2020) Review of Macropodia in the Black Sea supported by molecular barcoding data; with the redescription of the type material, observations on ecology and epibiosis of Macropodia czernjawskii (Brandt, 1880) and notes on other Atlanto-Mediterranean species of Macropodia Leach, 1814 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Inachidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 96(2): 609-635. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.96.48342
Figure 7 Macropodia czernjawskii. a. Right chela, male, CW 11.0 (ZMMU Ma 3547); b. Right chela, male. CW 6.0 mm (ZMMU Ma 3544) c. Malformed right chela, male, CW 8.0 mm (ZMMU Ma 3543); d, e. Same specimen as c. dactylus and propodus of P 5. Scale bars: 1 mm (a–c, e), 0.5 mm (d).
Figure 6 from: Spiridonov VA, Simakova UV, Anosov SE, Zalota AK, Timofeev VA (2020) Review of Macropodia in the Black Sea supported by molecular barcoding data; with the redescription of the type material, observations on ecology and epibiosis of Macropodia czernjawskii (Brandt, 1880) and notes on other Atlanto-Mediterranean species of Macropodia Leach, 1814 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Inachidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 96(2): 609-635. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.96.48342
Figure 6 Macropodia czernjawskii. a. Anterior part of the body with basal antennal segment (ZMMU Ma 3543); b. Anterior part of the body with basal antennal segments, male (ZMMU Ma 3547). c. Male pleon (ZMMU Ma 3547); d. Female sterno-pleonal cavity with exposed genital segment (ZMMU Ma 3538). Scale bar: 1 mm.
Figure 5 from: Spiridonov VA, Simakova UV, Anosov SE, Zalota AK, Timofeev VA (2020) Review of Macropodia in the Black Sea supported by molecular barcoding data; with the redescription of the type material, observations on ecology and epibiosis of Macropodia czernjawskii (Brandt, 1880) and notes on other Atlanto-Mediterranean species of Macropodia Leach, 1814 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Inachidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 96(2): 609-635. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.96.48342
Figure 5 Macropodia czernjawskii, photographs in natural coloration. a. male (ZMMU Ma 3547), dorsal view. b. Same specimen as a. ventral view. c. female ov (ZMMU Ma 3542), dorsal view. d. Same specimen as c. ventral view. Scale bar: 10 mm. Photographs by SE Anosov.
Figure 4 from: Spiridonov VA, Simakova UV, Anosov SE, Zalota AK, Timofeev VA (2020) Review of Macropodia in the Black Sea supported by molecular barcoding data; with the redescription of the type material, observations on ecology and epibiosis of Macropodia czernjawskii (Brandt, 1880) and notes on other Atlanto-Mediterranean species of Macropodia Leach, 1814 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Inachidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 96(2): 609-635. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.96.48342
Figure 4 Macropodia czernjawskii (a, b. possible paralectotype ZIN-RAS 1609; c, d.ZIN-RAS 35102) and Macropodia longirostris (JC Fabricius, 1775) (e.SMF 3752). a. Right cheliped, ventral view. b. Right cheliped, dorsal view. c. Cphalothorax, dorsal view. d. Cephalothorax, ventral view. e. Cephalothorax, dorsal view. Scale bar: 10 mm.
Figure 3 from: Spiridonov VA, Simakova UV, Anosov SE, Zalota AK, Timofeev VA (2020) Review of Macropodia in the Black Sea supported by molecular barcoding data; with the redescription of the type material, observations on ecology and epibiosis of Macropodia czernjawskii (Brandt, 1880) and notes on other Atlanto-Mediterranean species of Macropodia Leach, 1814 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Inachidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 96(2): 609-635. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.96.48342
Figure 3 Comparison of Macropodia czernjawskii (a–d. possible paralectotype, male, ZIN-RAS 88750) to Macropodia tenuirostris (Leach, 1814) (a'–d'. male, SMF 3749) and Macropodia rostrata (Linnaeus, 1761) (a''–d''.SMF 40660). a. Dorsal view. b. Lateral view. c. Anterior part of the body, with antennules, basal antennal segments, and epistome, ventral view. d. Dactylus of pereopod 5. Scale bars: 10 mm (a–a''–b–b''), 1 mm (c–c''–d–d'').
Figure 2 from: Spiridonov VA, Simakova UV, Anosov SE, Zalota AK, Timofeev VA (2020) Review of Macropodia in the Black Sea supported by molecular barcoding data; with the redescription of the type material, observations on ecology and epibiosis of Macropodia czernjawskii (Brandt, 1880) and notes on other Atlanto-Mediterranean species of Macropodia Leach, 1814 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Inachidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 96(2): 609-635. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.96.48342
Figure 2 Macropodia czernjawskii (Brandt, 1880), female lectotype (ZIN-RAS 88751). a. Dorsal view. b. Ventral view. c. Lateral view. Scale bar: 5 mm.
Figure 8 from: Spiridonov VA, Simakova UV, Anosov SE, Zalota AK, Timofeev VA (2020) Review of Macropodia in the Black Sea supported by molecular barcoding data; with the redescription of the type material, observations on ecology and epibiosis of Macropodia czernjawskii (Brandt, 1880) and notes on other Atlanto-Mediterranean species of Macropodia Leach, 1814 (Crustacea, Decapoda, Inachidae). Zoosystematics and Evolution 96(2): 609-635. https://doi.org/10.3897/zse.96.48342
Figure 8 Macropodia czernjawskii. Male (ZMMU Ma 3543), right gonopod . a. Pleonal view. b. Sternal view. Scale bar: 1 mm.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.