Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
7,849
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
7,849 results for “Conservancy”
Figure 20 from: Hawlitschek O, Brückmann B, Berger J, Green K, Glaw F (2011) Integrating field surveys and remote sensing data to study distribution, habitat use and conservation status of the herpetofauna of the Comoro Islands. ZooKeys 144: 21-79. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.144.1648
Figure 20 - Proposed areas of conservational importance for the herpetofauna on the Comoro islands.
Figure 2 from: Hawlitschek O, Brückmann B, Berger J, Green K, Glaw F (2011) Integrating field surveys and remote sensing data to study distribution, habitat use and conservation status of the herpetofauna of the Comoro Islands. ZooKeys 144: 21-79. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.144.1648
Figure 2 - Land cover, localities and number of recorded species
Figure 4 from: Hawlitschek O, Brückmann B, Berger J, Green K, Glaw F (2011) Integrating field surveys and remote sensing data to study distribution, habitat use and conservation status of the herpetofauna of the Comoro Islands. ZooKeys 144: 21-79. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.144.1648
Figure 4 - Localities and number of species in relation to altitude.
Figure 3 from: Mankga L, Kowiyou Y, Moteetee A, Daru B, van der Bank M (2013) Efficacy of the core DNA barcodes in identifying processed and poorly conserved plant materials commonly used in South African traditional medicine. ZooKeys 365: 215-233. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.365.5730
Figure 3 - Continued.
Figure 2 from: Cumberlidge N, Alvarez F, Villalobos J-L (2014) Results of the global conservation assessment of the freshwater crabs (Brachyura, Pseudothelphusidae and Trichodactylidae): The Neotropical region, with an update on diversity. In: Wehrtmann IS, Bauer RT (Eds) Proceedings of the Summer Meeting of the Crustacean Society and the Latin American Association of Carcinology, Costa Rica, July 2013. ZooKeys 457: 133-157. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.457.6598
Figure 2 - Distribution of Trichodactylidae based on all known point localities (n = 853).
Figure 1 from: Cumberlidge N, Alvarez F, Villalobos J-L (2014) Results of the global conservation assessment of the freshwater crabs (Brachyura, Pseudothelphusidae and Trichodactylidae): The Neotropical region, with an update on diversity. In: Wehrtmann IS, Bauer RT (Eds) Proceedings of the Summer Meeting of the Crustacean Society and the Latin American Association of Carcinology, Costa Rica, July 2013. ZooKeys 457: 133-157. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.457.6598
Figure 1 - Distribution of Pseudothelphusidae based on all known point localities (n = 1719).
Figure 2 from: Espinasa L, Espinasa M, Fenolio D, Slay M, Niemiller M (2014) Distribution and conservation status of Speleonycta ozarkensis (Insecta, Zygentoma, Nicoletiidae) from caves of the Ozark Highlands of Arkansas and Oklahoma, USA. Subterranean Biology 14: 51-62. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.14.8275
Figure 2 - Speleonycta ozarkensis from AD85, Adair Co., Oklahoma.
Figure 4 from: Souza-Silva M, Ferreira RL (2015) Cave invertebrates in Espírito Santo state, Brazil: a primary analysis of endemism, threats and conservation priorities. Subterranean Biology 16: 79-102. https://doi.org/10.3897/subtbiol.16.5227
Figure 4 - Relative richness of the invertebrate fauna in 15 caves in the state of Espírito Santo.
Figure 2 from: Minoli I, Morando M, Avila LJ (2015) Reptiles of Chubut province, Argentina: richness, diversity, conservation status and geographic distribution maps. ZooKeys 498: 103-126. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.498.7476
Figure 2 - Reptile species conservation status per genus for central Patagonia, Argentina.
Figure 9 from: Gherghel I, Papeş M, Brischoux F, Sahlean T, Strugariu A (2016) A revision of the distribution of sea kraits (Reptilia, Laticauda) with an updated occurrence dataset for ecological and conservation research. ZooKeys 569: 135-148. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.569.6975
Figure 9 - Distribution of Laticauda semifasciata.
Figure 7 from: Gherghel I, Papeş M, Brischoux F, Sahlean T, Strugariu A (2016) A revision of the distribution of sea kraits (Reptilia, Laticauda) with an updated occurrence dataset for ecological and conservation research. ZooKeys 569: 135-148. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.569.6975
Figure 7 - Distribution of Laticauda laticaudata.
Figure 8 from: Gherghel I, Papeş M, Brischoux F, Sahlean T, Strugariu A (2016) A revision of the distribution of sea kraits (Reptilia, Laticauda) with an updated occurrence dataset for ecological and conservation research. ZooKeys 569: 135-148. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.569.6975
Figure 8 - Distribution of Laticauda schistorhynchus, regional view and zoomed in (A).
Figure 6 from: Gherghel I, Papeş M, Brischoux F, Sahlean T, Strugariu A (2016) A revision of the distribution of sea kraits (Reptilia, Laticauda) with an updated occurrence dataset for ecological and conservation research. ZooKeys 569: 135-148. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.569.6975
Figure 6 - Distribution of Laticauda saintgironsi, regional view and zoomed in (A).
Figure 5 from: Gherghel I, Papeş M, Brischoux F, Sahlean T, Strugariu A (2016) A revision of the distribution of sea kraits (Reptilia, Laticauda) with an updated occurrence dataset for ecological and conservation research. ZooKeys 569: 135-148. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.569.6975
Figure 5 - Distribution of Laticauda guineai, regional view and zoomed in (A).
Figure 4 from: Gherghel I, Papeş M, Brischoux F, Sahlean T, Strugariu A (2016) A revision of the distribution of sea kraits (Reptilia, Laticauda) with an updated occurrence dataset for ecological and conservation research. ZooKeys 569: 135-148. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.569.6975
Figure 4 - Distribution of Laticauda frontalis, regional view and zoomed in (A).
Figure 3 from: Gherghel I, Papeş M, Brischoux F, Sahlean T, Strugariu A (2016) A revision of the distribution of sea kraits (Reptilia, Laticauda) with an updated occurrence dataset for ecological and conservation research. ZooKeys 569: 135-148. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.569.6975
Figure 3 - Distribution of Laticauda colubrina.
Figure 2 from: Wood KR, Appelhans MS, Wagner WL (2016) Melicope oppenheimeri, section Pelea (Rutaceae), a new species from West Maui, Hawaiian Islands: with notes on its ecology, conservation, and phylogenetic placement. PhytoKeys 69: 51-64. https://doi.org/10.3897/phytokeys.69.8844
Figure 2 - Map of Maui, Hawai'i showing location of Melicope oppenheimeri in upper Waihe'e Valley.
Data from: Subalpine vegetation changes in the Eastern Sudetes (1973–2021): Effects of abandonment, conservation management and avalanches
<p>This dataset contains the original data used in the article:</p> <p>Klinkovská K., Kučerová A., Pustková Š., Rohel J., Slachová K., Sobotka V., Szokala D., Danihelka J., Kočí M., Šmerdová E. & Chytrý M. (2023) Subalpine vegetation changes in the Eastern Sudetes (1973–2021): effects of abandonment, conservation management and avalanches. <em>Applied Vegetation Science</em>, 26, e12711. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12711">https://doi.org/10.1111/avsc.12711</a></p> <p>The data contain plant species composition from vegetation plots repeatedly surveyed in the Hrubý Jeseník Mountains (Eastern Sudetes, Czech Republic). Vegetation plots surveyed by Leoš Bureš and Zuzana Burešová in 1973–1978 were resurveyed in 2004–2010 by Martin Kočí and Leo Bureš and resurveyed again in 2021 by the authors of this dataset. Several new plots were also surveyed in 2004–2010 and resurveyed in 2021. In the 1970s, plot locations were related to patches of a detailed vegetation map. In the 2000s, plot locations were measured using GPS with an uncertainty of less than 10 m. In 2021, plots were localized using differential GPS with ~5 cm accuracy (Topcon HiPer SR with Getac PS336 Data Collector) in each corner of the plot. These coordinates are stored in the fields Longitude, Longitude2, Longitude3, Longitude4, Latitude, Latitude2, Latitude3 and Latitude4 in the dataset.</p> <p>The dataset contains records of 148 vegetation plots, of which 66 were sampled three times (1970s, 2000s, 2021) and 82 were sampled twice (2000s, 2021), i.e. 362 vegetation-plot records in total. Their locations are shown at <a href="https://arcg.is/0uSrz9">https://arcg.is/0uSrz9</a>.</p> <p>Plot size and shape varied by vegetation type. Repeated sampling always used the same plot size as the previous sampling. Most plots were squares of 100 m<sup>2</sup> in woodlands and 16 m<sup>2</sup> in grasslands or rectangles of 10 m<sup>2</sup> in springs. All species of vascular plants were recorded in each plot, and their cover was estimated using the nine-grade Braun-Blanquet scale (Westhoff & van der Maarel, 1978). Bryophytes and lichens were recorded in only some plots, focusing on the dominant species.</p> <p>In 2021, soil samples were collected from the mineral soil horizon at 5–10 cm depth from four places within each plot. We mixed these samples for each plot and measured the soil pH and electrical conductivity of a mixed sample in a soil-water suspension (weight ratio 1:2.5) using the HQ40D digital multimeter. These data are found in the fields Soil_ph and Conduct.</p> <p>Plots were divided into managed and unmanaged based on the overlay of plot coordinates with GIS layers indicating the areas managed for conservation purposes in the last ten years provided by the Administration of the Landscape Protected Area Jeseníky (field Mown). In addition, plots were divided into affected and unaffected by the 2019 avalanche based on the positions of damaged trees observed in the field (field Avalanch).</p> <p>The structure of header data follows the structure of the ReSurveyEurope Database (<a href="http://euroveg.org/eva-database-re-survey-europe">http://euroveg.org/eva-database-re-survey-europe</a>). In addition, the vegetation type of each plot record in the 1970s, 2000s and 2021 is given in the fields Class_2021, Class_2000 and Class_1970, respectively</p> <p>The data on species composition and environmental variables are provided in two formats:</p> <ul> <li>Turboveg 2 database (see <a href="https://www.synbiosys.alterra.nl/turboveg/">https://www.synbiosys.alterra.nl/turboveg/</a>) – file <strong>TurbovegDbBackup_Jeseniky_resurvey.zip</strong>. To use this dataset in Turboveg, the database dictionary (TurbovegDdBackup_Default dictionary.zip) and species list (TurbovegSlBackup_Czechia_slovakia_2015.zip) have to be installed.</li> <li>Two TXT files with columns separated by tabs: <ul> <li><strong>Jeseniky_resurvey_species.txt</strong> contains the percentage covers of plant species in plots. Plant nomenclature harmonized according to Kaplan et al. (2019). Bryophytes, vernal species <em>Anemone nemorosa </em>and <em>Cardamine pratensis</em>, hybrids and species that could not be accurately identified were excluded. Woody species occurring in different layers were merged within each plot.</li> <li><strong>Jeseniky_resurvey_head.txt</strong> includes information about the number of species in each plot (spe.nr), the number and proportion of threatened species (IUCN categories CR, EN, VU, columns end.nr and perc.end) and unweighted means of Ellenberg-type indicator values for light (Light_IV), temperature (Temp_IV), moisture (Moist_IV), soil reaction (React_IV) and nutrients (Nutr_IV) used to test changes in these variables through time.</li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p>These data are also stored in the Czech National Phytosociological Database (Chytrý & Rafajová 2003; <a href="https://botzool.cz/vegsci/phytosociologicalDb">https://botzool.cz/vegsci/phytosociologicalDb</a>) and the ReSurveyEurope database (<a href="http://euroveg.org/eva-database-re-survey-europe">http://euroveg.org/eva-database-re-survey-europe</a>).</p>
Before and after conservation treatment (chemical cleaning)
<p>The object belongs to the Ceramic Conservation and Restoration Studio at the Faculty of Conservation and Restoration of Works of Art, Academy of Fine Arts in Warsaw, Poland. This dataset for before and after cleaning has been presented in the article "Approach to Analysis the Surface Geometry Change in Cultural Heritage Objects" (https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-51935-3_1).</p> <p> </p>
Bank Top Kilns back wall after conservation work
The back wall of Bank Top kilns after building conservation works in 2019. We recommend viewing this model spilt screen alongside the one made before the conservation works at https://sketchfab.com/3d-models/bank-top-kilns-back-wall-flue-and-overhang-609584ab779f42989d472c8a7c391e50. It is fascinating to identify which stones are new and which original, and appreciate how fragile the wall's condition was.  Source: Objaverse 1.0 / Sketchfab
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.