Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 7 in A new ornithomimid dinosaur with gregarious habits from the Late Cretaceous of China

Fig. 7. Juvenile skull of Sinornithomimus dongi gen. et sp. nov. (IVPP−V11797−31) in lateral (A, E), dorsal (B, F), occipital (C, G), and posterolateral views, showing the structure of the quadrate region (D, H). Scale bar below C represents 3 cm and is for A–C and E–G. Scale bar left of D is 2 cm.

Fig. 1 in A new ornithomimid dinosaur with gregarious habits from the Late Cretaceous of China

Fig. 1. Map of Nei Mongol (Inner Mongolia) Autonomous Region of China, showing the Ulan Suhai locality (large black dot).

Fig. 4 in A new ornithomimid dinosaur with gregarious habits from the Late Cretaceous of China

Fig. 4. Reconstructed skeletons of Sinornithomimus dongi gen. et sp. nov. (subadult, IVPP−V11797−10; juvenile, IVPP−V11797−11). Scale bar 30 cm.

Fig. 3 in A new ornithomimid dinosaur with gregarious habits from the Late Cretaceous of China

Fig. 3. Largest block, containing eight complete and partial skeletons of Sinornithomimus dongi gen. et sp. nov., recovered from the Ulan Suhai locality: photograph (A) and explanatory drawing of the same (B). Gray areas in B indicate the gastrolith masses. Scale bars 30 cm.

Fig. 6 in A new ornithomimid dinosaur with gregarious habits from the Late Cretaceous of China

Fig. 6. Juvenile skull of Sinornithomimus dongi gen. et sp. nov. (IVPP−V11797−11) in right lateral view. Photograph (A) and explanatory drawing of the same (B). Scale bar 5 cm.

Fig. 2 in A new ornithomimid dinosaur with gregarious habits from the Late Cretaceous of China

Fig. 2. Bone distribution map at the Ulan Suhai locality. The dotted line shows the approximate area of the large block drawn in Fig. 3.

Fig. 4 in New Late Cretaceous mammals from the Intertrappean beds of Rangapur, India and paleobiogeographic framework

Fig. 4. Deccanolestes cf. robustus. Right m1 or m2 (ITV/R/Mm−6) in occlusal (A, B), lingual (C), and labial (D) views. Scale bar 0.5 mm.

Fig. 2 in New Late Cretaceous mammals from the Intertrappean beds of Rangapur, India and paleobiogeographic framework

Fig. 2. Diagramatic sketch of the upper and lower molar measurements. Anteroposterior axes pass through the paracone and metacone for upper molars and through the metaconid and entoconid for lower molars. Abbreviations are as follows: for upper molars, AW, anterior width; PW, posterior width; PW1, posterior width sensu Butler (1990); PRW, protocone shelf width; MCL, postmetacrista length; BL, buccal length; PRL, protocone shelf length; PRH, protocone height; PAH, paracone height; MEH, metacone height; and for lower molars, L, length; TRW, trigonid width; TAW, talonid width; PHL, posthypocristid length; PEL, postentocristid length; PDH, protoconid height; MDH, metaconid height; AML, premetaconid length; TAL, talonid length; TAH, talonid height.

Fig. 7. Theria incertae sedis. A. Left p1 in New Late Cretaceous mammals from the Intertrappean beds of Rangapur, India and paleobiogeographic framework

Fig. 7. Theria incertae sedis. A. Left p1 or p2 (ITV/R/Mm−14) in labial view. B. Right p1 (ITV/R/Mm−17) in labial view. C. Right p3 or p4 (ITV/R/Mm−13) in lingual view. D. Right P3 (ITV/R/Mm−5) in labial (D1) and occlusal (D2, D3) views. Scale bar 0.5 mm.

Fig. 6. Sahnitherium rangapurensis. Right M1 in New Late Cretaceous mammals from the Intertrappean beds of Rangapur, India and paleobiogeographic framework

Fig. 6. Sahnitherium rangapurensis. Right M1 or M2 (ITV/R/Mm−1), holotype in occlusal (A, B), labial (C), anterior (D), and posterior (E) views. Scale bar 0.5 mm.

Fig. 5 in New Late Cretaceous mammals from the Intertrappean beds of Rangapur, India and paleobiogeographic framework

Fig. 5. Deccanolestes? sp. A. Left m1 or m2 (ITV/R/Mm−9) in occlusal (A1, A2), lingual (A3), and labial (A4) views. B. Right m1 or m2 (ITV/R/Mm−8) in occlusal (B1, B2), lingual (B3), and labial (B4) views. Hatched areas indicate breakage. Scale bar 0.5 mm.

Fig. 3 in Petrosal bones of placental mammals from the Late Cretaceous of Uzbekistan

Fig. 3. Stereophotographs of the petrosal of Kulbeckia kulbecke (URBAC 00−16) in cerebellar (A),squamosal (B),and tympanic views. Scale bar 1 mm. Anterior towards the top in all views.

Fig. 4. Soft tissue reconstructions. A in Petrosal bones of placental mammals from the Late Cretaceous of Uzbekistan

Fig. 4. Soft tissue reconstructions. A. Tympanic view of "Zhelestidae". B. Squamosal view of "Zhelestidae". C. Tympanic view of Prokennalestes (modified from Wible et al. 2001). D. Squamosal view of Prokennalestes (modified from Wible et al. 2001). E. Tympanic view of Didelphis virginiana (modified from Wible 1990). F. Squamosal view of Didelphis virginiana (modified from Wible 1990). G. Tympanic view of Kulbeckia kulbecke. H. Squamosal view of Kulbeckia kulbecke. Anterior towards the top in A, C, E, and G. Anterior towards the right in B, D, F, and H.

Fig. 2 in Petrosal bones of placental mammals from the Late Cretaceous of Uzbekistan

Fig. 2. Stereophotographs of the petrosal of "Zhelestidae". A. Cerebellar view of URBAC 99−41. B. Squamosal view of URBAC 99−41. C. Tympanic view of URBAC 99−41. D. Tympanic view of ZIN C. 85514 with internal structures exposed. E. Lambdoidal view of URBAC 99−73. Scale bar 1 mm. Anterior towards the top in A–D; tympanic towards top in E.

Fig. 1. Promontorium area versus lower m3 in Petrosal bones of placental mammals from the Late Cretaceous of Uzbekistan

Fig. 1. Promontorium area versus lower m3 area for taxa with associated petrosal and dental remains. Open circle, Daulestes kulbeckensis; closed circle, Kennalestes gobiensis; open square, Prokennalestes trofimovi; closed square, Asioryctes nemegetensis; open diamond, Barunlestes butleri; closed diamond, Deltatheridium pretrituberculare.

Fig. 7. A in Campanian (Late Cretaceous) nautiloids from Sakhalin, Far East Russia

Fig. 7. A. Cymatoceras cf. honmai Matsumotoand Miyauchi, 1983 (specimenPIW2002IV−5 fromtheLower CampanianBykov Formation,Member10, locality35attheManujRiversection,Sakhalin)inlateral(A1),ventral(A2),andseptal(A3)views. B.Reconstructionofwhorlsection. C.Sutureline(not to scale) (all figures natural size except C).

Fig. 6. A in Campanian (Late Cretaceous) nautiloids from Sakhalin, Far East Russia

Fig. 6. A. Cymatoceras pseudoatlas (Yabe and Shimizu, 1924b). PIW2002IV−2 from the Krasnoyarka Formation, Member 2, locality 12 (Canadoceras multicostatum Zone, Upper Campanian), Naiba River valley, Sakhalin; apertural view [see also Fig. 5B]. B. Cymatoceras cf. bifidum Shimansky, 1975. PIW2002IV−4 from the Krasnoyarka Formation, Member 1 (Pachydiscus (P.) aff. egertoni Zone, Upper Campanian), locality 0.6, Naiba River valley, Sakhalin; in lateral (B1, B3) and ventral (B2) views. Scale bar in the middle is for A, B1, and B3. Scale bars 2 cm.

Fig. 5 in Campanian (Late Cretaceous) nautiloids from Sakhalin, Far East Russia

Fig. 5. Cymatoceras pseudoatlas (Yabe and Shimizu, 1924b). A. PIW2002IV−3 from the Krasnoyarka Formation, Member 2, locality 431 (Canadoceras multicostatum Zone,UpperCampanian),ManujRivervalley,Sakhalin,inlateral(A1)andventral(A2)views. B.PIW2002IV−2fromtheKrasnoyarkaFormation,Member2,locality12(Canadoceras multicostatum Zone,UpperCampanian),NaibaRivervalley,Sakhalin,inlateral(B1)andventral(B2)views. Scale bar 2 cm.

Fig. 3 in Campanian (Late Cretaceous) nautiloids from Sakhalin, Far East Russia

Fig. 3. Synoptic ammonite and inoceramid bivalve biostratigraphy of the areas discussed in the text (compiled after Zonova et al. 1993; Toshimitsu et al. 1995; Shigeta et al. 1999; Yazykova 2002; Yazykova et al. 2002). Abbreviation: Sant., Santorians.

Fig. 2 in Campanian (Late Cretaceous) nautiloids from Sakhalin, Far East Russia

Fig. 2. Stratigraphic log of the Upper Santonian to Lower Maastrichtian of Sakhalin; numbers of lithostratigraphic members, nautiloid occurrences and biostratigraphic events (first and last appearance data, FAD/LAD) are indicated (modified after Yazykova 2002: fig. 2).