Find research datasets worth reusing

Fig. 3 in Systematics of Sphagnum Frogs of the Genus Philoria (Anura: Myobatrachidae) in Eastern Australia, With the Description of Two New Species

Fig. 3. Waveforms (left) and spectrograms (right) of a single male advertisement call of (A) Philoria kundagungan from Mount Superbus (SUP); (B) P. loveridgei from Border Ranges NP (BOR); (C) P. pughi from Spirabo SF (SPI); (D) P. richmondensis from Dome Mountain (RR1); and (E) P. sphagnicolus from Calacoma Falls (DOR).

Fig. 1 in Systematics of Sphagnum Frogs of the Genus Philoria (Anura: Myobatrachidae) in Eastern Australia, With the Description of Two New Species

Fig. 1. Map of eastern Australia showing the collection localities for Philoria. Abbreviations refer to localities examined for genetic analyses, details of which are listed in the Appendix. Symbols: O P. kundagungan, • P. loveridgei, P. pughi, Δ P. richmondensis, Z P. sphagnicolus.

Fig. 2 in Systematics of Sphagnum Frogs of the Genus Philoria (Anura: Myobatrachidae) in Eastern Australia, With the Description of Two New Species

Fig. 2. (A) NJ tree of CSE distances among 19 OTUs of Philoria. Asterisk indicates support from split decomposi- tion analysis. (B) A maximum likelihood tree of the 26 ND4 sequences from 19 OTUs of Philoria. Numbers to the left of nodes indicate ML (upper) and MP (lower) bootstrap proportions (100 and 2000 pseudoreplicates respectively). See the Appendix for OTU abbreviations.

Fig. 5 in Systematics of Sphagnum Frogs of the Genus Philoria (Anura: Myobatrachidae) in Eastern Australia, With the Description of Two New Species

Fig. 5. Map showing distribution of Philoria in northern NSW and southeast Queensland based on museum vouchers. Symbols: O P. kundagungan, • P. loveridgei, P. pughi, Δ P. richmondensis, Z P. sphagnicolus, ^ species' identity not determined.

Figure 5 in Higher-level phylogeny of Asian and American coralsnakes, their placement within the Elapidae (Squamata), and the systematic affinities of the enigmatic Asian coralsnake Hemibungarus calligaster (Wiegmann, 1834)

Figure 5. Right lateral view of the head of Hemibungarus calligaster, TNHC 62483, showing delineated primary and secondary temporal plates as interpreted in this paper and by Leviton (1964). Lower primary temporal (larger) was interpreted as a sixth raised labial by Slowinski et al. (2001). Supralabials and temporals are indicated by numerals.

Figure 4 in Higher-level phylogeny of Asian and American coralsnakes, their placement within the Elapidae (Squamata), and the systematic affinities of the enigmatic Asian coralsnake Hemibungarus calligaster (Wiegmann, 1834)

Figure 4. Selected views of right hemipenis of Ophiophagus hannah, UTA R-6813. A, sulcate view of complete organ; B, asulcate view of complete organ; C, sulcate inner view of lobes; D, sulcate view of base and furcation; E, asulcate view of base and furcation.

Figure 2 in Higher-level phylogeny of Asian and American coralsnakes, their placement within the Elapidae (Squamata), and the systematic affinities of the enigmatic Asian coralsnake Hemibungarus calligaster (Wiegmann, 1834)

Figure 2. Phylogram of the single optimal tree estimated by maximum likelihood analysis of the combined data set (mtDNA + c-mos). Support values for nodes (> 50%) are provided in grey rectangles adjacent to nodes: posterior probability (PP) based on MCMC analyses of the combined data (1st from top of rectangle, bold), bootstrap (BSS) values based on ML analysis of the combined data (2nd from top of rectangle, bold), PP based on MCMC analyses of the mtDNA data (3rd from top of rectangle, italics), and PP based on MCMC analysis of the c-mos data (bottom of rectangle, italics). Support less than 50% is indicated by a dashed line. See text for description and justification of nucleotide substitution models used for MCMC analyses.

Figure 1 in Higher-level phylogeny of Asian and American coralsnakes, their placement within the Elapidae (Squamata), and the systematic affinities of the enigmatic Asian coralsnake Hemibungarus calligaster (Wiegmann, 1834)

Figure 1. Phylogram of the single shortest tree resulting from a heuristic maximum parsimony search of the combined (mtDNA + c-mos) data. Bootstrap support (BSS) for nodes (> 50%) are provided in grey rectangles adjacent to nodes based on parsimony analyses of the combined data set (top of rectangle, bold), the mtDNA data set (middle of rectangle, italics), and c-mos data set (bottom of rectangle, italics). Support values (BSS) for nodes <50% are either not indicated or are indicated by a dashed line.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2021View details →

How Creatively Are We Teaching and Assessing Creativity in Computing Education: A Systematic Literature Review

Data from: Wouter Groeneveld, Brett A. Becker, and Joost Vennekens. 2022. How Creatively Are We Teaching and Assessing Creativity in Computing Education: A Systematic Literature Review. In Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 (SIGCSE 2022),March 3–5, 2022, Providence, RI, USA. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3478431.349936 When referring to this dataset, please cite the above article. That contains the DOI of this dataset. Please do not cite this dataset directly without citing the article.

FIG. 6. — Sindhochelys ragei n. gen., n in First report of a bothremydid turtle, Sindhochelys ragei n. gen., n. sp., from the early Paleocene of Pakistan, systematic and palaeobiogeographic implications

FIG. 6. — Sindhochelys ragei n. gen., n. sp., holotype CPAG-RANKT-V-3, from the Paleocene of Ranikot, locality K18-12, Southern Pakistan: left anterior part of the shell in oblique posterolateral view showing the delimitation of marginals 2 and 3, and of plastral scutes by the indentation at the end of sulci border, and the ventral bulges of the scutes. Abbreviations: ax b, axillary buttress; 3d per, third peripheral. The arrows indicate ends of sulci at the border of the peripherals and anterior plastral lobe. Scale bar: 5 cm.

FIG. 9 in First report of a bothremydid turtle, Sindhochelys ragei n. gen., n. sp., from the early Paleocene of Pakistan, systematic and palaeobiogeographic implications

FIG. 9. — Comparison of the decoration of Sindhochelys ragei n. gen., n. sp. from the Paleocene of Ranikot, locality K18-12, Southern Pakistan, and Taphrosphys sulcatus (Leidy, 1856) from the early Paleocene of New Jersey (United States): A-D, Sindhochelys ragei n. gen., n. sp., holotype CPAG-RANKT-V-3: A, nuchal part; B, left peripherals 2, dorsal face with smaller polygons than in other parts; C, suprapygal-pygal part, dorsal views; D, imprint of an isolated plate, ventral view; E-G, Taphrosphys sulcatus: E, AMNH 1470, "Barnsboro, N.J." (Cope collections), nuchal border of three plates, dorsal view; F, G, AMNH 2522, «Tinton Falls, N.J.», syntype: F, peripheral 6 (medial plate of three in Leidy (1856: pl. 19, fig.4), and in Gaffney et al. (2006: fig. 20), dorsal view; G, xiphiplastron, ventral view. Scale bars: A-C, E-G, 5 cm; D, 2 cm.

FIG. 10 in First report of a bothremydid turtle, Sindhochelys ragei n. gen., n. sp., from the early Paleocene of Pakistan, systematic and palaeobiogeographic implications

FIG. 10. — Fragmentary part of a carapace of an undetermined Bothremydidae, from the Paleocene of Ranikot, locality K18-12, CPAG-RANKT-V4, Southern Pakistan: A, B, ventral and dorsal views; C, detail of the dorsal decoration. Abbreviations: cost3, costal 3; cost5, costal 5; pcs, suture of the peripheral border with the border of plastral processes; per 5-8, peripherals 5, 6, 7, 8; perf, pholad perforations. Scale bars: A, B, 4 cm; C, 1 cm.

FIG. 5. — Sindhochelys ragei n. gen., n in First report of a bothremydid turtle, Sindhochelys ragei n. gen., n. sp., from the early Paleocene of Pakistan, systematic and palaeobiogeographic implications

FIG. 5. — Sindhochelys ragei n. gen., n. sp., holotype CPAG-RANKT-V-3, from the Paleocene of Ranikot, locality K18-12, Southern Pakistan: A, anterolateral part of the carapace after removal of a part of the costal 1 with part of the neural l and the costal 2, to show the imprints of the thoracic ribs 1 and 2, and axillary buttress, in dorsal view; B, same removed part in ventral view. Abbreviations: ax b, axillary buttress; cost 1, costal 1; n1, neural 1; nu, nuchal; per 2, peripheral 2; rib 1, rib 2, medial part of thoracic ribs 1 and 2. Scale bar: 4 cm.

FIG. 4. — Sindhochelys ragei n. gen., n in First report of a bothremydid turtle, Sindhochelys ragei n. gen., n. sp., from the early Paleocene of Pakistan, systematic and palaeobiogeographic implications

FIG. 4. — Sindhochelys ragei n. gen., n. sp., holotype CPAG-RANKT-V-3, from the Paleocene of Ranikot, locality K18-12, Southern Pakistan: A, B, shell drawings, in dorsal (A) and ventral (B) views. Scale bars: 10 cm.

FIG. 1 in First report of a bothremydid turtle, Sindhochelys ragei n. gen., n. sp., from the early Paleocene of Pakistan, systematic and palaeobiogeographic implications

FIG. 1. — Location and stratigraphic position of fossil material: A, location of the Laki Range in eastern Sindh Province, southern Pakistan, and simplified geological map of the Ranikot Fort area (adapted from Schelling 1999); B, stratigraphic position of the fossil assemblage within the Waddi Sawri section. Note that the base of this section is close to the base of the Khadro Formation; in this area the thickness of the Khadro Formation is c. 80 m, and the fossil locality K18-12 is in the lower Khadro Formation.

FIG. 3. — Sindhochelys ragei n. gen., n in First report of a bothremydid turtle, Sindhochelys ragei n. gen., n. sp., from the early Paleocene of Pakistan, systematic and palaeobiogeographic implications

FIG. 3. — Sindhochelys ragei n. gen., n. sp., holotype CPAG-RANKT-V-3, from the Paleocene of Ranikot, locality K18-12, Southern Pakistan: A, B, shell photographs in dorsal (A) and ventral (B) views. Scale bar: 10 cm.

FIG. 2 in First report of a bothremydid turtle, Sindhochelys ragei n. gen., n. sp., from the early Paleocene of Pakistan, systematic and palaeobiogeographic implications

FIG. 2. — Turtle shell, CPAG-RANKT-V-3, holotype of Sindhochelys ragei n. gen., n. sp., in situ, during and after excavation at the locality K18-12: A, carapace in posterior view; A1, close-up of a lateral border showing the presence of a venerid bivalve in life position inside the carapace; B, carapace in dorsal view after excavation and split into three blocks. Scale bar: 30 cm.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2021View details →

FIGURE 43 in Systematic Revision Of The Arboreal Neotropical "Thorellii" Clade Of Centruroides Marx, 1890, Bark Scorpions (Buthidae C.L. Koch, 1837) With Descriptions Of Six New Species

FIGURE 43. Centruroides yucatanensis, sp. nov., ♀ (CNAN T01417), habitus. A. Dorsal aspect. B. Ventral aspect. Scale bars = 10 mm.

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2021View details →

FIGURE 42 in Systematic Revision Of The Arboreal Neotropical "Thorellii" Clade Of Centruroides Marx, 1890, Bark Scorpions (Buthidae C.L. Koch, 1837) With Descriptions Of Six New Species

FIGURE 42. Centruroides yucatanensis, sp. nov., ♂ (CNAN T01416), habitus. A. Dorsal aspect. B. Ventral aspect. Scale bars = 10 mm.