Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

1,037

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

1,037 results for “large-scale”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
zenodo28/100

Determination of process parameters and precipitation methods for potential large-scale production of sugar beet leaf protein concentrate

<p>Abstract</p> <p><br>BACKGROUND</p> <p>Sugar beet is one of the most produced industrial plants in the world, and during manufacturing, it produces a&nbsp;large quantity of leaf waste. Because this waste is rich in protein, this study aimed to identify an efficient method for producing&nbsp;large-scale protein concentrate from sugar beet leaves.</p> <p><br>RESULTS</p> <p>Results showed that protein extraction from fresh leaves was more effective than dried leaves. Maximum protein extraction was achieved at pH 9, compared with pH 7 or 8. Blanching as a pretreatment reduced protein yield during isoelectric precipitation, with a yield of 2.31% compared to 20.20% without blanching. Consequently, blanching was excluded&nbsp;from the extraction process. After extraction, isoelectric precipitation, heat coagulation, and isoelectric&ndash;ammonium sulfate precipitation were compared. Although the latter resulted in the highest protein yield, Fourier transform infrared analysis revealed&nbsp;that excessive salt was not removed during dialysis, making it unsuitable for scale-up due to its additional cost and complexity.&nbsp;Therefore, isoelectric precipitation was selected as the appropriate method for protein precipitation from sugar beet leaves. To&nbsp;increase yield, extractions were assisted by ultrasound or enzyme addition. Ultrasound-assisted extraction resulted in an&nbsp;increased protein yield from 20.20% to 28.60%, while Pectinex Ultra SP-L-assisted extraction was the most effective, increasing&nbsp;protein yield from 20.20% to 38.09%.</p> <p><br>CONCLUSION</p> <p>Proteins were extracted from fresh sugar beet leaves using optimum conditions (50 &deg;C, 30 min, pH 9) and precipitated at the isoelectric point, with enzymatic-assisted extraction yielding the maximum protein recovery.<br><br></p>

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2023View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary: Observing the Southern US Honor Culture Using Large-Scale Social Media Analysis

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2024View details →
zenodo28/100

Data for the article: Residual Flexural Performance of Large-Scale Ferronickel Slag Alkali-Activated Concrete Slabs After Fire Exposure

<p>Figures and related data for the article Residual Flexural Performance of Large-Scale Ferronickel Slag Alkali-Activated Concrete Slabs After Fire Exposure</p>

opencc-by-4.0Nov 2024View details →
zenodo28/100

Improved snow darkening coefficient for large-scale albedo modelling with Crocus

<p><strong>Description</strong></p> <p>Light-absorbing particles (LAPs) deposited at the snow surface significantly reduce its albedo and strongly affect the snow melt&nbsp;dynamics. The explicit simulation of these effects with advanced snow radiative transfer models can be associated with a large&nbsp;computational cost. Consequently, many albedo schemes used in snowpack models still rely on empirical parameterizations that&nbsp;do not account for the spatial variability of LAP deposition. In Gaillard et al. (2024), a new strategy of intermediate complexity&nbsp;that includes the effects of spatially variable LAP deposition on snow albedo was tested with the snowpack model Crocus. It&nbsp;relies on an optimization of the snow darkening coefficient that controls the evolution of snow albedo in the visible range. A&nbsp;global dataset of LAP-informed and spatially variable values of the snow darkening coefficient was constructed. The revised&nbsp;snow darkening coefficient improved snow albedo simulations at the ten sites considered in the study by 10%, with the largest&nbsp;improvements found in the Arctic (more than 25%). The uncertainties in the values of the snow darkening coefficient resulting&nbsp;from the inter-annual variability of LAP deposition on snow were also computed.</p> <p>The data are distributed in a NetCDF file (gamma<em>_tot_publish_v2.nc</em>). More details about the dataset and the file format are given in the file <em>readme_gamma_v2.pdf</em>.&nbsp;</p>

opencanada-crownNov 2024View details →
zenodo28/100

Large-scale statistical learning for mass transport prediction in porous materials using 90,000 artificially generated microstructures

<p>Dataset and code used in B Prifling, et al, &quot;Large-scale statistical learning for mass transport prediction in porous materials using 90,000 artificially generated microstructures&quot;, published in Frontiers in Materials. In this work, we investigate relationships between 3D microstructure and effective diffusivity and permeability, based on a dataset of 90,000 structures and using analytical formulas, artificial neural networks (ANNs), and convolutional neural networks (CNNs). Herein, the codes in Matlab and Python/Tensorflow necessary to investigate the prediction models and reproduce the results of the paper are supplied. Also, microstructures together with their computed geometrical descriptors and effective properties are included.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2020View details →
dryad28/100

Linking biotic homogenisation with large-scale changes of species' associations

<p><span><span>This is the dataset used for the manuscript</span></span><em> Linking biotic homogenisation with large-scalechanges of species' associations</em></p> <p><span><span><b>Aim: </b><span>The impact of global change on biodiversity is commonly assessed in terms of changes in species distributions, community richness and community composition. Whether and how much associations between species, </span><i><span>i.e.</span></i><span> the degree of correlation in their spatial co-occurrence, </span><span>are also </span><span>chang</span><span>ing</span><span> is much less documented and mostly limited to local studies of ecological networks. </span><span>Here, we propose to quantify the large-scale patterns and changes of species' associations in bird communities</span><span> in relation to modifications in species composition</span><span>.</span></span></span></p> <p><span><span><b>Location:</b><span> France.</span></span></span></p> <p><span><span><b>Time period:</b><span> 2001-2017.</span></span></span></p> <p><span><span><b>Major taxa studied:</b><span> Common breeding birds.</span></span></span></p> <p><span><span><b>Methods: </b><span>We use network approaches to build three community-aggregated indices reflecting complementary aspects of species' associations. We characterise the spatio-temporal heterogeneity and dynamics of these indices using a large</span><span>-</span><span>scale</span><span> and high-resolution dataset of bird co-abundances of more than 100 species</span><span> monitored</span><span> for 17 years (2001-2017) from 1,969 sites across France. We </span><span>finally</span><span> test whether spatial and temporal changes in species association networks are related to species homogenisation estimated as the spatio-temporal dynamics of β-diversity</span><span>.</span></span></span></p> <p><span><span><b>Results: </b><span>We document non-random spatial distribution of both structure and temporal changes in species association networks.</span><span> W</span><span>e </span><span>also </span><span>report a</span><span> directional change in </span><span>association-based</span><span> indices </span><span>with</span><span> β-diversity </span><span>modifications </span><span>in space and time, suggesting a hitherto overlooked aspect of biotic homogenisation affecting species' associations.</span></span></span></p> <p><span><span><b>Main Conclusions: </b><span>Although species association networks are only approximations of species</span><span>'</span><span> interactions, our study highlights that</span><span> the modifications of</span><span> species association networ</span><span>ks </span><span>have to be considered</span><span>,</span><span> in addition to species </span><span>turnover</span><span>,</span><span> as biodiversity</span><span> fac</span><span>es </span><span>global change.</span></span></span></p> <p><span><span><span><b>Keywords:</b> Avifauna, β-diversity, homogenisation, community, interaction network, species' association.</span></span></span></p>

opencc-zeroJan 2022View details →
zenodo28/100

Supplementary material 1 from: Adamov EO, Rachkov VI, Kashirsky AA, Orlov AI (2021) Global outlook on large-scale nuclear power development strategies. Nuclear Energy and Technology 7(4): 263-270. https://doi.org/10.3897/nucet.7.74217

Global outlook on large-scale nuclear power development strategies

opencc-zeroDec 2021View details →
zenodo28/100

R code: Large-scale assessment of bird data quality in a citizen science platform

<p>R code archived to Zenodo for publication</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2022View details →
zenodo28/100

OpenABC-D: A Large-Scale Dataset For Machine Learning Guided Integrated Circuit Synthesis

<p>Logic synthesis is a challenging and widely-researched combinatorial optimization problem during integrated circuit (IC) design. It transforms a high-level description of hardware in a programming language like Verilog into an optimized digital circuit netlist, a network of interconnected Boolean logic gates, that implements the function. Spurred by the success of ML in solving combinatorial and graph problems in other domains, there is growing interest in the design of ML-guided logic synthesis tools. Yet, there are no standard datasets or prototypical learning tasks defined for this problem domain. Here, we describe OpenABC-D,a large-scale, labeled dataset produced by synthesizing open source designs with a leading open-source logic synthesis tool and illustrate its use in developing, evaluating and benchmarking ML-guided logic synthesis. OpenABC-D has intermediate and final outputs in the form of 870,000 And-Inverter-Graphs (AIGs) produced from 1500 synthesis runs plus labels such as the optimized node counts, and de-lay. We define a generic learning problem on this dataset and benchmark existing solutions for it. The codes related to dataset creation and benchmark models are available athttps://github.com/NYU-MLDA/OpenABC.git.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2022View details →
zenodo28/100

Household Survey - Impacts of large-scale land acquisitions on smallholder agriculture and livelihoods in Tanzania

<p><strong>** Article &amp; Dataset Currently Under Review **</strong></p> <p><strong>Dataset Overview</strong></p> <p>Our household dataset&nbsp;is associated with a pre-print article &quot;Impacts of large-scale land acquisitions on smallholder agriculture and livelihoods in Tanzania&quot;. The household survey is designed for the purposes of policy evaluation with selection of households based on proximity to large-scale land acquisitions (treatment) and a set of households in similar socio-ecological contexts with no association to large-scale land acquisitions (control).&nbsp;Households were selected as&nbsp;a random sample in 35 villages surrounding LSLAs who provided responses to a questionnaire covering household income, assets, farming practices, health, food-security, and energy-use.&nbsp;</p> <p>Two datasets are provided. First,&nbsp;the &quot;hh_dataset_rep.csv&quot; providing household responses for variables used in this study. Second, the &quot;hh_crops_rep.csv&quot; provides detail on crops cultivated by each household, self-reported yields and farm-gate prices. Each variable is described in the &quot;variable_descriptoin.xlsx&quot;. In addition to the datasets, we provide replication code for this study &quot;lsla_mechanisms_rep.Rmd&quot; as an R-Markdown file.</p> <p><strong>Article Abstract</strong></p> <p>Improving agricultural productivity is a major sustainability challenge of the 21<sup>st</sup> century. Large-scale land acquisitions (LSLAs) have important effects on both well-being and the environment in the Global South, but their impacts on agricultural productivity and subsequent effects on farm incomes or food-security are under-investigated. Prior studies lack data or methods to investigate the mechanistic nature of household change in agricultural practices that may vary due to LSLA conditions. To overcome this challenge, we use a novel household dataset and a quasi-experimental design to estimate household level changes in agricultural value driven by LSLAs in Tanzania. In addition, we use a causal mediation analysis to assess how contract farming arrangements, land loss, and adoption of new farming technologies around LSLAs influence agricultural productivity. We find that households near LSLAs produced 19.2% (95% CI: 3.5 &ndash; 37.2%) higher agricultural value, primarily due to increased crop prices and farmer selection of high-value crops. Importantly, effect sizes are positively and negatively mediated by different mechanisms. The presence of contract farming explains 18.1% (95% CI: 0.56%, 47%) of the effect size in agricultural value, whereas land loss reduces agricultural value by 26.8% (95% CI: -71.3%, -4.0%). We also estimate whether improvements in food-security and household incomes occur in proximity to LSLAs, as anticipated with higher agricultural value. However, we do not find increases in agricultural income and food security, which may be due to higher crop prices in proximity to LSLAs. Our results stand in contrast to assumptions that technological spillovers occur through LSLAs and are principal drivers of agrarian change, holding important implications for agricultural transformations. Instead access to output markets through contract farming enables greater agricultural value whereas land loss negatively affects the agricultural value of households. Governance strategies should focus on limiting negative impacts related to the loss of smallholder land rights enabling greater access to contract farming.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2020View details →
zenodo28/100

An Inventory of Large-Scale Landslides in Baoji City, Shaanxi Province, China

<p>An Inventory of Large-Scale Landslides in Baoji City, Shaanxi Province, China</p>

opencc-by-4.0May 2022View details →
zenodo28/100

A Large-Scale Annotated Multivariate Time Series Aviation Maintenance Dataset from the NGAFID

<p>Aviation flight records and maintenance labels.&nbsp;</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2022View details →
zenodo28/100

Realistic Large-Scale Fine-Depth Dehazing Dataset from 3D Videos

<p>Dehaze Dataset LSFD</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2022View details →
zenodo28/100

An Inventory of Large-Scale Landslides in Baoji City, Shaanxi Province, China

<p>An Inventory of Large-Scale Landslides in Baoji City, Shaanxi Province, China.</p>

opencc-by-4.0May 2022View details →
zenodo28/100

Source and result datasets for ""Oh SSH-it, what's my fingerprint? A Large-Scale Analysis of SSH Host Key Fingerprint Verification Records in the DNS"

<p>These files are the LRZip [0] compressed datasets used in the research paper &#39;Oh SSH-it, what&#39;s my fingerprint? A Large-Scale Analysis of SSH Host Key Fingerprint Verification Records in the DNS&#39; [1]. The code can be found on Github [2].</p> <p>ls 2021-12-22-10\:49\:40<br> total 21M<br> drwxr-xr-x&nbsp; 2 sneef sneef 4.0K Aug 15 15:38 .<br> drwxr-xr-x 62 sneef sneef 4.0K Aug 15 15:51 ..<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 7.7M May 25 12:10 domainfile.log.new.gz<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp; 17K May 24 20:53 parser.log.new.gz<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp; 13M May 24 20:52 query.log.new.gz<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp; 125 Dec 22&nbsp; 2021 README<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp; 27K May 24 20:52 server.log.new.gz</p> <p>ls 2021-12-22-15\:04\:21<br> total 11G<br> drwxr-xr-x&nbsp; 2 sneef sneef 4.0K Aug 15 15:43 .<br> drwxr-xr-x 62 sneef sneef 4.0K Aug 15 15:51 ..<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 4.2G May 23 12:43 certstream.log.new.gz<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 3.3M May 23 12:37 parser.log.new.gz<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 6.0G May 23 12:52 query.log.new.gz<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp; 104 Dec 22&nbsp; 2021 README<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 6.3M May 23 12:37 server.log.new.gz</p> <p><br> ls results_certstream<br> total 17G<br> drwxr-xr-x&nbsp; 2 sneef sneef 4.0K Jun&nbsp; 8 19:26 .<br> drwxr-xr-x 11 sneef sneef 4.0K Aug 15 13:24 ..<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 1.3K Jun&nbsp; 8 22:54 certstream_analysis_scanned_domains.txt<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 1.2K Jun&nbsp; 8 22:39 certstream_analysis_skipped_domains.txt<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 4.5G May 23 13:21 certstream_counted_unique_domains.json<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp; 450 May 23 13:22 certstream_counted_unique_domains_otherlines.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 602M May 23 13:22 certstream_counted_unique_domains_skipped_domains.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 3.6G May 23 13:22 certstream_counted_unique_domains_unique_domains.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 6.1K Jun&nbsp; 3 16:48 parserlog_analysis_errors_and_sshfps.txt<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp; 39K Jun&nbsp; 3 16:48 parserlog_analysis_errors_and_sshfps.txt_errors.txt<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 3.1M Jun&nbsp; 8 19:20 parserlog_analysis_v6.json<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp;&nbsp; 94 Jun&nbsp; 8 19:26 parserlog_analysis_v6_out.txt<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp; 37K May 23 13:41 parserlog_structured_data_errors.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp; 45M May 23 13:41 parserlog_structured_data_structued_data.json<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp; 22M May 23 13:41 parserlog_structured_data_timesorted_sshpfs.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 2.1K Jun&nbsp; 8 23:09 querylog_analysis_err_label.txt<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 1.2K Jun&nbsp; 8 23:09 querylog_analysis_err_no_answer.txt<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 1.4K Jun&nbsp; 8 23:09 querylog_analysis_err_no_queryname.txt<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 1.3K Jun&nbsp; 8 23:08 querylog_analysis_err_no_sshfp.txt<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 1.1K Jun&nbsp; 8 23:09 querylog_analysis_err_timeout.txt<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 1.1K Jun&nbsp; 8 23:09 querylog_analysis_found_sshfp.txt<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 2.6K May 23 13:41 querylog_counted_messages_err_label.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp; 76M May 23 13:41 querylog_counted_messages_err_no_answer.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 206M May 23 13:41 querylog_counted_messages_err_no_queryname.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 3.4G May 23 13:41 querylog_counted_messages_err_no_sshfp.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 7.0M May 23 13:41 querylog_counted_messages_err_timeout.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 423K May 23 13:41 querylog_counted_messages_found_sshfp.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 3.9G May 23 13:40 querylog_counted_messages.json<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 6.0K Jun&nbsp; 9 15:57 serverlog_analysis_all.txt<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp; 259 Jun&nbsp; 8 00:51 serverlog_analysis_ptr.txt<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 305K Jun&nbsp; 8 00:24 serverlog_ptr_mapping.json<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 1.4M May 23 22:41 serverlog_structured_data_dnssec.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp; 63K May 23 22:41 serverlog_structured_data_error_dns_no_a_record.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp;&nbsp; 74 May 23 22:41 serverlog_structured_data_error_dns_not_exist.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 9.1K May 23 22:41 serverlog_structured_data_error_dns_servfail.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp; 239 May 23 22:41 serverlog_structured_data_error_dns_timeout.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 1.7M May 23 22:41 serverlog_structured_data_error_server_no_fp.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 1.7K May 23 22:41 serverlog_structured_data_error_server_nxdomain.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp; 17K May 23 22:41 serverlog_structured_data_error_server_servfail.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp;&nbsp; 79 May 23 22:41 serverlog_structured_data_error_server_wrongresponse.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp; 70M May 23 22:41 serverlog_structured_data_structued_data.json</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>ls results_tranco1m<br> total 79M<br> drwxr-xr-x&nbsp; 2 sneef sneef 4.0K Jun&nbsp; 8 17:03 .<br> drwxr-xr-x 11 sneef sneef 4.0K Aug 15 13:24 ..<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp; 850 Jun&nbsp; 8 22:38 domainfile_analysis_scanned_domains.txt<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp; 21M May 25 12:28 domainfile_counted_unique_domains.json<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp; 19M May 25 12:28 domainfile_counted_unique_domains_unique_domains.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 4.0K May 27 03:03 parserlog_analysis_errors_and_sshfps.txt<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp; 16K Jun&nbsp; 8 16:32 parserlog_analysis_v6.json<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp;&nbsp; 83 Jun&nbsp; 8 17:04 parserlog_analysis_v6_out.txt<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp; 226 May 25 12:28 parserlog_structured_data_errors.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp; 66K May 25 12:28 parserlog_structured_data_structued_data.json<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp; 31K May 25 12:28 parserlog_structured_data_timesorted_sshpfs.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 0 Jun&nbsp; 8 22:38 querylog_analysis_err_label.txt<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp; 900 Jun&nbsp; 8 22:38 querylog_analysis_err_no_answer.txt<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp; 915 Jun&nbsp; 8 22:38 querylog_analysis_err_no_queryname.txt<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp; 909 Jun&nbsp; 8 22:38 querylog_analysis_err_no_sshfp.txt<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp; 844 Jun&nbsp; 8 22:38 querylog_analysis_err_timeout.txt<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp; 829 Jun&nbsp; 8 22:38 querylog_analysis_found_sshfp.txt<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp;&nbsp; 27 May 25 12:28 querylog_counted_messages_err_label.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 589K May 25 12:28 querylog_counted_messages_err_no_answer.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 269K May 25 12:28 querylog_counted_messages_err_no_queryname.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp; 18M May 25 12:28 querylog_counted_messages_err_no_sshfp.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp; 58K May 25 12:28 querylog_counted_messages_err_timeout.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 1.8K May 25 12:28 querylog_counted_messages_found_sshfp.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp; 21M May 25 12:28 querylog_counted_messages.json<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 4.4K Jun&nbsp; 9 15:57 serverlog_analysis_all.txt<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp; 241 Jun&nbsp; 8 11:45 serverlog_analysis_ptr.txt<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 5.4K Jun&nbsp; 7 23:58 serverlog_ptr_mapping.json<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 2.0K Jun&nbsp; 7 15:57 serverlog_structured_data_dnssec.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp;&nbsp; 22 Jun&nbsp; 7 15:57 serverlog_structured_data_error_dns_no_a_record.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp;&nbsp; 22 Jun&nbsp; 7 15:57 serverlog_structured_data_error_dns_not_exist.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp;&nbsp; 69 Jun&nbsp; 7 15:57 serverlog_structured_data_error_dns_servfail.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp;&nbsp; 22 Jun&nbsp; 7 15:57 serverlog_structured_data_error_dns_timeout.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 1.5K Jun&nbsp; 7 15:57 serverlog_structured_data_error_server_no_fp.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp;&nbsp; 22 Jun&nbsp; 7 15:57 serverlog_structured_data_error_server_nxdomain.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp;&nbsp; 22 Jun&nbsp; 7 15:57 serverlog_structured_data_error_server_servfail.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef&nbsp;&nbsp; 22 Jun&nbsp; 7 15:57 serverlog_structured_data_error_server_wrongresponse.csv<br> -rw-r--r--&nbsp; 1 sneef sneef 129K Jun&nbsp; 7 15:57 serverlog_structured_data_structued_data.json<code> </code></p> <p><br> <br> [0] https://github.com/ckolivas/lrzip<br> [1] TBD<br> [2] https://github.com/gehaxelt/sshfp-dns-measurement</p>

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2022View details →
zenodo28/100

"A Lot Takes Place Digitally Now, so It Can Be Good to Train on It'': A Large-Scale Repeated Cross-Sectional Study on Recording Live-Streamed Educational Activities among Health, Social, and Education Students

<p>Research article</p>

opencc-by-4.0Sep 2022View details →
zenodo28/100

Optimal Experimental Design for Large-Scale Inverse Problems via Multi-PDE-constrained Optimization - supplementary files

<p>The file data.xlsx contains information about four experiments defined in: A. Petrocchi, M.K. Scharrer, F. Pichler, S. Volkwein, Optimal Experimental Design for Large-Scale Inverse Problems via Multi-PDE-constrained Optimization, 2024, Submitted. Preprint available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.15797.</p> <p>Some information is included in the file data.pdf.</p>

opencc-by-4.0May 2024View details →
zenodo28/100

Uncertainties Inherent from Large-Scale Climate Projections in the Statistical Downscaling Projection of North Atlantic Tropical Cyclone Activity

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2024View details →
zenodo28/100

Do Developers Use Static Application Security Testing (SAST) Tools Straight Out of the Box? A large-scale Empirical Study

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

opencc-by-4.0Jun 2024View details →
zenodo28/100

Dataset belonging to "The Influence of Large-scale Spatial Warming on Jet Stream Extreme Waviness on an Aquaplanet"

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2023View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

ScienceDex for faculty

Your academic CV and NIH biosketch

Make your CV in your school's format and your NIH biosketch from it, then download both as Word files.