Skip to main content
Powered by ShareScore

Find research datasets worth reusing

Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.

1,034

datasets available to search

ShareScore release 0.9.0

Reset

Dataset results

1,034 results for “Empirical”

Learn how ShareScore rates datasets ↗
dryad32/100

The geometry of resource constraint: an empirical study of the golden snub-nosed monkey

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicNov 2020View details →
dryad32/100

Data for: Gene tree estimation error with ultraconserved elements: An empirical study on Pseudapis bees

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicJan 2021View details →
dryad32/100

When form does not predict function: empirical evidence violates functional form hypotheses for marine macroalgae

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicSep 2020View details →
dryad32/100

Data From: Applying empirical dynamic modeling to distinguish abiotic and biotic drivers of population fluctuations in sympatric fishes

Open the record for dataset details and reuse information.

publicFeb 2022View details →
zenodo28/100

IO Islamic 1486. Tâj-almaâthir, History of the Empire of Dihlî

<p>IO Islamic 1486. T&acirc;j-alma&acirc;thir, History of the Empire of Dihl&icirc;</p>

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2019View details →
zenodo28/100

A Large Scale Empirical Study of the Impact of Spaghetti Code and Blob Anti-patterns on Program Comprehension

<p>Dataset and scripts used for the paper.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Dec 2019View details →
zenodo28/100

Code, data and results for manuscript "A parsimonious empirical approach to streamflow recession analysis and forecasting"

<p>This repository hosts the supplementary materials associated with the paper:<br> &gt; Delforge, D., Mu&ntilde;oz-Carpena, R., Van Camp, M. Vanclooster, M. (2020), A parsimonious empirical approach to streamflow recession analysis and forecasting (accepted at Water Resources Research - 29-01-2020).</p> <p>This data set contains streamflow and recession data, a python code file and a Jupyter notebook illustrating how to apply the EDM-Simplex method to forecast the recession, and the outputs of the global sensitivity analysis. All files are documented&nbsp;in the readme.md Markdown files.&nbsp;</p> <p>Streamflow data were obtained&nbsp;from the Aqualim portal (<a href="http://aqualim.environnement.wallonie.be/">http://aqualim.environnement.wallonie.be/</a>) of the &quot;Service Public de Wallonie&quot; and shared with their kind permission.&nbsp;This work is part of a Ph.D. supported by a FRIA grant from the Fund for Scientific Research (FSR-FNRS, Belgium).&nbsp;The authors acknowledge University of Florida Research Computing for providing computational resources and support that have contributed to the research results stored in this repository. URL: <a href="http://researchcomputing.ufl.edu">http://researchcomputing.ufl.edu</a>.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jan 2020View details →
zenodo28/100

IO Islamic 3319. Siyar-almta'akhkhirîn, History of the Indian Empire

<p>IO Islamic 3319. Siyar-almta&rsquo;akhkhir&icirc;n, History of the Indian Empire</p>

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2020View details →
zenodo28/100

IO Islamic 2594. Siyar-almta'akhkhirîn, History of the Indian Empire

<p>IO Islamic 2594. Siyar-almta&rsquo;akhkhir&icirc;n, History of the Indian Empire</p>

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2020View details →
zenodo28/100

Replication Package for the paper: "Behind the Intents: An In-depth Empirical Study on Software Refactoring in Modern Code Review"

<p>This is the replication package for the paper: &quot;Behind the Intents: An In-depth Empirical Study on Software Refactoring in Modern Code Review&quot;, published at the&nbsp;17th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR &rsquo;20).&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>It contains all the preliminary and final results of our empirical methodology. We highlight the manual classification of developers&#39; intents behind code changes with refactoring operations. This might be used for further studies on developers&#39; motivations when performing refactoring.&nbsp;</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Feel free to use any part of this replication package in your study, please cite as:</p> <p>Matheus Paix&atilde;o, Anderson Uch&ocirc;a, Ana Carla Bibiano, Daniel Oliveira, Alessandro Garcia, Jens Krinke, and Emilio Arvonio. 2020. Behind the In-tents: An In-depth Empirical Study on Software Refactoring in Modern Code Review. In 17th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR &rsquo;20), October 5&ndash;6, 2020, Seoul, Republic of Korea. ACM, New York, NY,USA, 11 pages.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Mar 2020View details →
zenodo28/100

­Evaluating the Agreement among Technical Debt Measurement Tools: Building an Empirical Benchmark of Technical Debt Liabilities

<p>Dataset containing TD measurements, at file level,&nbsp;from three TD tools. The Dataset served as the input for Archetypal Analysis.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2020View details →
zenodo28/100

An empirical study of automatically-generated tests from the perspective of test smells

<p>Developing software test code can be as or more expensive than developing software production code. Commonly, developers use automated unit test generators to speed up software testing. The purpose of such tools is to shorten production time without decreasing code quality. Nonetheless, unit tests usually do not have a quality check layer above testing code, which might be hard to guarantee the quality of the generated tests. An emerging strategy to verify the tests quality is to analyze the presence of test smells in software test code. Test smells are characteristics in the test code that possibly indicate weaknesses in test design and implementation. The presence of test smells in unit test code could be used as an indicator of unit test quality. In this paper, we present an empirical study aimed to analyze the quality of unit test code generated by automated test tools. We compare the tests generated by two tools (Randoop and EvoSuite) with the existing unit test suite of open-source software projects. We analyze the unit test code of twenty-one open-source Java projects and detected the presence of nineteen types of test smells. The results indicated significant differences in the unit test quality when comparing data from both automated unit test generators and existing unit test suites.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Jul 2020View details →
zenodo28/100

Replication Package for the paper: "How Does Modern Code Review Impact Software Design Degradation? An In-depth Empirical Study"

<p>This is the replication package for the paper: &quot;How Does Modern Code Review Impact Software Design Degradation? An In-depth Empirical Study&quot;, published at the&nbsp;36th International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME&#39; 20).</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>It contains all the preliminary and final results of our empirical methodology. We highlight the manual classification of design-related and&nbsp;design-unrelated reviews, according to the developers&rsquo; intent of improving the structural design of the system. This might be used for further studies on the impact of design discussions on the structural quality of design.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p>Feel free to use any part of this replication package in your study, please cite as:</p> <p>Anderson Uch&ocirc;a, Caio Barbosa, Willian Oizumi, Publio Blen&iacute;lio, Rafael Lima, Alessandro Garcia, and&nbsp;Carla Bezerra. How Does Modern Code Review Impact Software Design Degradation? An In-depth Empirical Study. Proceedings&nbsp;of the 36th International Conference on Software Maintenance and Evolution (ICSME), Adelaide, Australia, September 2020.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2020View details →
zenodo28/100

Replication package with data used in the study: "The effect of code smells on the relationship between design patterns and defects. An empirical study"

<p>This is a replication package with data used in a study by T. Alkhaeir and B. Walter &quot;The effect of code smells on the relationship between design patterns and defects. An empirical study&quot;</p> <p>This dataset contains the following folders:</p> <ul> <li> <p>&quot;Analyzed systems&quot; folder:</p> <ul> <li> <p>For each subject system (Ant-1.7, JEdit-4.2, Lucene-2.4, Camel-1.6, Log4j-1.2, Xalan-2.7, Poi-3.0, Ivy-2.0, Xerces-2.0, Velocity-1.6), we identify the following datasets: SDP, nSDP, SnDP, and nSnDP. Each dataset is represented by a separate csv file.</p> </li> <li> <p>Those csv files include raw data about every class in every release. Each file includes columns which represent:</p> <ul> <li> <p>System:&nbsp; The analyzed system</p> </li> <li> <p>className: A fully qualified class name</p> </li> <li> <p>Pattern: if the class is part of any pattern the cell contains the name of the pattern, and &ldquo;null&rdquo; otherwise</p> </li> <li> <p>Smell: if the class is part of affected by any smell&nbsp; the cell contains the name of the smell, and &ldquo;null&rdquo;&nbsp; otherwise</p> </li> <li> <p>Bugs: Number of defects reported inside the class (extracted from the PROMISE dataset)</p> </li> </ul> </li> </ul> </li> <li> <p>A &quot;detailed analysis&quot; folder:</p> <ul> <li> <p>For each pattern, we report all the classes which participate in it in all the analyzed systems. The csv files inside this folder follow&nbsp;the same structure as the other csv files reported above</p> </li> </ul> </li> </ul> <p><br> &nbsp;</p>

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2020View details →
zenodo28/100

It Takes a Village to Build a Robot: An Empirical Study of The ROS Ecosystem - Replication Package

<p>Over the past eleven years, the Robot Operating System (ROS), has grown from a&nbsp;small research project into the most popular framework for robotics&nbsp;development. Composed of packages released on the Rosdistro&nbsp;package&nbsp;manager, ROS aims to simplify development by providing reusable libraries,&nbsp;tools and conventions for building a robot. Still, developing a complete&nbsp;robot is a difficult task that involves bridging many technical disciplines.&nbsp;Experts who create computer vision packages, for instance, may need to rely&nbsp;on software designed by mechanical engineers to implement motor control. As&nbsp;building a robot requires domain expertise in software, mechanical, and&nbsp;electrical engineering, as well as artificial intelligence and robotics, ROS&nbsp;faces knowledge based barriers to collaboration.</p> <p>In this paper, we examine how the necessity of domain specific knowledge&nbsp;impacts the open source collaboration model. We create a comprehensive corpus&nbsp;of package metadata and dependencies over three years in the ROS ecosystem,&nbsp;analyze how collaboration is structured, and study the dependency network&nbsp;evolution. We find that the most widely used ROS packages belong to a small&nbsp;cluster of foundational working groups (FWGs), each organized around a&nbsp;different domain in robotics. We show that the FWGs are growing at a slower&nbsp;rate than the rest of the ecosystem, in terms of their membership and number&nbsp;of packages, yet the number of dependencies on FWGs&nbsp;is increasing at a faster rate. In addition, we mined all ROS&nbsp;packages on GitHub, and showed that 82% rely exclusively on functionality&nbsp;provided by FWGs.&nbsp;Finally, we investigate these highly influential groups and describe the&nbsp;unique model of collaboration they support in ROS.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2020View details →
zenodo28/100

An Empirical Study of Refactorings and Technical Debt in Machine Learning Systems

<p>Machine Learning (ML), including Deep Learning (DL), systems, i.e., those with ML capabilities, are pervasive in today&#39;s data-driven society. Such systems are complex; they are comprised of ML models and many subsystems that support learning processes. As with other complex systems, ML systems are prone to classic technical debt issues, especially when such systems are long-lived, but they also exhibit debt specific to these systems. Unfortunately, there is a gap of knowledge in how ML systems actually evolve and are maintained. In this paper, we fill this gap by studying refactorings, i.e., source-to-source semantics-preserving program transformations, performed in real-world, open-source software, and the technical debt issues they alleviate. We analyzed 26 projects, consisting of 4.2 MLOC, along with 327 manually examined code patches. The results indicate that developers refactor these systems for various reasons, both specific and tangential to ML; some refactorings correspond to established technical debt categories. In contrast, others do not, and code duplication is a major cross-cutting theme that particularly involved ML configuration and model code, which was also the most refactored. We also introduce 14 and 7 new ML-specific refactorings and technical debt categories, respectively, and put forth several recommendations, best practices, and anti-patterns. The results can potentially assist practitioners, tool developers, and educators in facilitating long-term ML system usefulness.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Aug 2020View details →
dryad28/100

Disentangling the determinants of transposable elements dynamics in vertebrate genomes using empirical evidences and simulations

The interactions between transposable elements (TEs) and their hosts constitute one of the most profound co-evolutionary processes found in nature. The population dynamics of TEs depends on factors specific to each TE families, such as the rate of transposition and insertional preference, the demographic history of the host and the genomic landscape. How these factors interact has yet to be investigated holistically. Here we are addressing this question in the green anole ( Anolis carolinensis ) whose genome contains an extraordinary diversity of TEs (including non-LTR retrotransposons, SINEs, LTR-retrotransposons and DNA transposons). We observe a positive correlation between recombination rate and TEs frequencies and densities for LINEs, SINEs and DNA transposons. For these elements, there was a clear impact of demography on TE frequency and abundance, with a loss of polymorphic elements and skewed frequency spectra in recently expanded populations. On the other hand, some LTR-retrotransposons displayed patterns consistent with a very recent phase of intense amplification. To determine how demography, genomic features and intrinsic properties of TEs interact we ran simulations using SLiM3. We determined that i) short TE insertions are not strongly counter-selected, but long ones are, ii) neutral demographic processes, linked selection and preferential insertion may explain positive correlations between average TE frequency and recombination, iii) TE insertions are unlikely to have been massively recruited in recent adaptation. We demonstrate that deterministic and stochastic processes have different effects on categories of TEs and that a combination of empirical analyses and simulations can disentangle these mechanisms.

opencc-zeroAug 2020View details →
dryad28/100

Thermal effects vary predictably across levels of organization: empirical results and theoretical basis

Thermal performance curves have provided a common framework to study the impact of temperature in biological systems. However, few generalities have emerged to date. Here we combine an experimental approach with theoretical analyses to demonstrate that performance curves are expected to vary predictably with the levels of biological organization. We measured rates of enzymatic reactions, organismal performance and population viability in Drosophila acclimated to different thermal conditions and show that performance curves become narrower with thermal optima shifting towards lower temperatures at higher levels or organization. We then explain these results on theoretical grounds, showing that this pattern reflects the cumulative impact of asymmetric thermal effects that piles up with complexity. These results and the proposed framework are important to understand how organisms, populations and ecological communities might respond to changing thermal conditions.

opencc-zeroOct 2020View details →
zenodo28/100

An empirical study of automatically-generated tests from the perspective of test smells

<p>Developing software test code can be as or more expensive than developing software production code. Commonly, developers use automated unit test generators to speed up software testing. The purpose of such tools is to shorten production time without decreasing code quality. Nonetheless, unit tests usually do not have a quality check layer above testing code, which might be hard to guarantee the quality of the generated tests. A strategy to verify the tests quality is to analyze the presence of test smells in software test code. Test smells are characteristics in the test code that possibly indicate weaknesses in test design and implementation. Their presence in test code could be used as a quality indicator. In this paper, we present an empirical study to analyze the quality of unit test code generated by automated test tools. We compare the tests generated by two tools (Randoop and EvoSuite) with the existing unit test suite of twenty-one open-source Java projects. We analyze the unit test code to detect the presence of nineteen types of test smells. The results indicated significant differences in the unit test quality when comparing data from the automated unit test generators and existing unit test suites.</p>

opencc-by-4.0Oct 2020View details →
zenodo28/100

Replication Package for the Paper: "Code Smells Detection via Code Review: An Empirical Study"

<p>This&nbsp;repository&nbsp;contains&nbsp;the&nbsp;data&nbsp;and&nbsp;results&nbsp;from&nbsp;the&nbsp;paper&nbsp;&quot;Code&nbsp;Smells&nbsp;Detection&nbsp;via&nbsp;Code&nbsp;Review:&nbsp;An&nbsp;Empirical&nbsp;Study&quot;&nbsp;submitted&nbsp;to&nbsp;ESEM&nbsp;2020.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>1. data&nbsp;folder</strong></p> <p>The&nbsp;data&nbsp;folder&nbsp;contains&nbsp;the&nbsp;retrieved&nbsp;269&nbsp;reviews&nbsp;that&nbsp;discuss&nbsp;code&nbsp;smells.&nbsp;Each&nbsp;review&nbsp;includes&nbsp;four&nbsp;parts:&nbsp;Code&nbsp;Change&nbsp;URL,&nbsp;Code&nbsp;Smell&nbsp;Term,&nbsp;Code&nbsp;Smell&nbsp;Discussion,&nbsp;and&nbsp;Source&nbsp;Code&nbsp;URL.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>2. scripts&nbsp;floder</strong></p> <p>The&nbsp;scripts&nbsp;folder&nbsp;contains&nbsp;the&nbsp;Python&nbsp;script&nbsp;that&nbsp;was&nbsp;used&nbsp;to&nbsp;search&nbsp;for&nbsp;code&nbsp;smell&nbsp;terms&nbsp;and&nbsp;the&nbsp;list&nbsp;of&nbsp;code&nbsp;smell&nbsp;terms.</p> <ul> <li><em>smell-term/general_smell_terms.txt</em>&nbsp;contains&nbsp;general&nbsp;code&nbsp;smell&nbsp;terms,&nbsp;such&nbsp;as&nbsp;&quot;code&nbsp;smell&quot;.</li> <li><em>smell-term/specific_smell_terms.txt</em>&nbsp;contains&nbsp;specific&nbsp;code&nbsp;smell&nbsp;terms,&nbsp;such&nbsp;as&nbsp;&quot;dead&nbsp;code&quot;.</li> <li><em>smell-term/misspelling_terms_of_smell.txt</em>&nbsp;contains&nbsp;the&nbsp;misspelling&nbsp;terms&nbsp;of&nbsp;&#39;smell&#39;,&nbsp;such&nbsp;as&nbsp;&quot;ssell&quot;.</li> <li><em>get_changes.py</em>&nbsp;is&nbsp;used&nbsp;for&nbsp;getting&nbsp;code&nbsp;changes&nbsp;from&nbsp;OpenStack.</li> <li><em>get_comments.py</em>&nbsp;is&nbsp;used&nbsp;for&nbsp;getting&nbsp;review&nbsp;comments&nbsp;for&nbsp;each&nbsp;code&nbsp;change.</li> <li><em>smell_search.py</em>&nbsp;is&nbsp;used&nbsp;for&nbsp;searching&nbsp;review&nbsp;comments&nbsp;that&nbsp;contain&nbsp;code&nbsp;smell&nbsp;terms.</li> </ul> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>3. project&nbsp;folder</strong></p> <p>The&nbsp;project&nbsp;folder&nbsp;contains&nbsp;the&nbsp;MAXQDA&nbsp;project&nbsp;files.&nbsp;The&nbsp;files&nbsp;can&nbsp;be&nbsp;opened&nbsp;by&nbsp;MAXQDA&nbsp;12&nbsp;or&nbsp;higher&nbsp;versions,&nbsp;which&nbsp;are&nbsp;available&nbsp;at&nbsp;https://www.maxqda.com/&nbsp;for&nbsp;download.&nbsp;You&nbsp;may&nbsp;also&nbsp;use&nbsp;the&nbsp;free&nbsp;14-day&nbsp;trial&nbsp;version&nbsp;of&nbsp;MAXQDA&nbsp;2018,&nbsp;which&nbsp;is&nbsp;available&nbsp;at&nbsp;https://www.maxqda.com/trial&nbsp;for&nbsp;download.</p> <ul> <li><em>Data&nbsp;Labeling&nbsp;&amp;&nbsp;Encoding&nbsp;for&nbsp;RQ2.mx12</em>&nbsp;is&nbsp;the&nbsp;results&nbsp;of&nbsp;data&nbsp;labeling&nbsp;and&nbsp;encoding&nbsp;for&nbsp;RQ2,&nbsp;which&nbsp;were&nbsp;analyzed&nbsp;by&nbsp;the&nbsp;MAXQDA&nbsp;tool.</li> <li><em>Data&nbsp;Labeling&nbsp;&amp;&nbsp;Encoding&nbsp;for&nbsp;RQ3.mx12</em>&nbsp;is&nbsp;the&nbsp;results&nbsp;of&nbsp;data&nbsp;labeling&nbsp;and&nbsp;encoding&nbsp;for&nbsp;RQ3,&nbsp;which&nbsp;were&nbsp;analyzed&nbsp;by&nbsp;the&nbsp;MAXQDA&nbsp;tool.</li> </ul>

opencc-by-4.0May 2020View details →

ScienceDex guides

Understand access before you commit

These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.

Compare curated datasets

Allen Brain Atlas

Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.

allen-brain-atlas
neuroscienceopenDocumentation, web resources, and API references are available online.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)

ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.

abode-home-cage
behavioral-neuroscienceopenThe DataShare record exposes download links for annotations, documentation, license text, and the zipped per-snippet data directory.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

DANDI Archive for NWB datasets

DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.

dandi-nwb
electrophysiologyopenPublished Dandiset metadata and archive endpoints are available through the production DANDI API.
Last verified 2026-04-30Open record

International Brain Laboratory public data

The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.

ibl
behavioral-neuroscienceopenPublic sessions can be searched and loaded from the IBL public data server through ONE.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

OpenNeuro

OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.

openneuro
neuroscienceopenPublished datasets are available on demand over the internet.
Last verified 2026-04-29Open record

ScienceDex for faculty

Your academic CV and NIH biosketch

Make your CV in your school's format and your NIH biosketch from it, then download both as Word files.