Find research datasets worth reusing
Search datasets from major research repositories and use ShareScore to quickly assess how well each record supports discovery, access, and reuse.
781
datasets available to search
ShareScore release 0.9.0
Dataset results
781 results for “earthquakes”
Earthquake Data for Kyrgyzstan (2014-2024)
<p>This dataset contains detailed information about earthquakes that occurred in Kyrgyzstan between 2014 and 2024. The data includes earthquake magnitude, location (latitude and longitude), depth, and time of occurrence. The dataset is sourced from the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Earthquake Catalog.</p>
Relocation of the 2021 Mw 7.4 Maduo Earthquake Sequence and Implications for its Seismogenic Structure
<p>This file is the relocated data of the 2021 Maduo Mw 7.4 earthquake using Double-difference algorithm. It is only used for scientific research.</p>
Data records for P and SH waves observed from three Kuril earthquakes
<h3>P and SH waveforms for the paper <em>Cui et al. A Stagnant Slab in Lower MTZ Beneath Northeast Asia Edge and Seismogenesis of Deep Outboard Earthquake</em></h3> <h1> </h1>
The results and datasets of 2024 Mw 7.5 Noto earthquake (DOI: 10.1126/science.adp0493)
<p>This file contains the dataset used for and the results file generated in the 2024 Mw7.5 Noto earthquake project.</p> <p>GNSS_list: GNSS station list used in the joint inversion.</p> <p>SAR: SAR data used in the joint inversion.</p> <p>SEBP_results: high-frequency radiators' time and location imaged by SEBP.</p> <p>Slip_model: the model inverted by the joint inversion.</p> <p>StrongMotion_list: local strong motion stations used in the joint inversion. The weights of each records are also included.</p> <p>TeleseismicSta: teleseismic station list used in the joint inversion.</p> <p>Feel free to email me (xuliuw1997@ucla.edu) if you have any questions about them. Please cite the paper "Liuwei Xu et al. ,Dual-initiation ruptures in the 2024 Noto earthquake encircling a fault asperity at a swarm edge.Science385,871-876(2024).DOI:10.1126/science.adp0493" if you used our SAR data, SEBP results, or the joint inversion model in your study.</p>
Relocated Earthquake Catalog for Eastern Indonesia (April 2009 to November 2018)
<p>Relocated Earthquake Catalog for Eastern Indonesia (April 2009 to November 2018). </p> <p>Please refer to:</p> <p>Supendi, P., Nugraha, A.D., Widiyantoro, S., Pesicek, J.D., Thurber, C.H., Abdullah, C.I., Daryono, D., Wiyono, S.H., Shiddiqi, H.A., and Rosalia, S. (2020). Relocated aftershocks and background seismicity in Eastern Indonesia shed light on the 2018 Lombok and Palu earthquake sequences, Geophysical Journal International, ggaa118, https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggaa118</p> <p> </p>
earthquake event waveforms, phase picks and catalogs in this study
<p>The uploaded repository contains the following files:</p> <ul> <li><strong>25catlog_CENC.txt</strong>: The catalog of 25 earthquakes published by the China Earthquake Networks Center (CENC) in the study area during the observation period.</li> <li><strong>25catlog_this_study.txt</strong>: The same 25 events as published by CENC, reprocessed for this study to verify the accuracy of the magnitudes obtained.</li> <li><strong>hypoDD.pha</strong>: The phase file of seismic events generated in this study.</li> <li><strong>relocated_catalog_by_hypoDD_this_study_UTC+8.txt</strong>: The final earthquake catalog relocated using hypoDD.</li> <li><strong>xindianzi & luoguanshan swarm event_waveform_data.rar</strong>: Waveform data for seismic events within the Xindianzi and Luoguanshan swarms.</li> <li><strong>xindianzi & luoguanshan swarm event_waveform_figures.rar</strong>: Figures of waveform data from the two swarms.</li> <li><strong>event_waveforms.rar</strong>: Waveform data for all seismic events identified in this study.</li> </ul>
Aseismic slip and seismic swarms leading up to the 2024 M7.3 Hualien earthquake
<p>This repository contains the dataset and slip models in Peng et al. (2025), "Aseismic slip and seismic swarms leading up to the 2024 M7.3 Hualien earthquake".</p>
An adaptable Random Forest model for the declustering of earthquake catalogs
<p>Random Forest models trained on different proportion of the synthetic earthquake catalog data set.</p> <p>The name of the model is defined as RF_XP_Y_Z.sav where:</p> <p> - X is the number of neighbor considered in the training stage;</p> <p> - Y is the number of feature considered in the training stage;</p> <p> - Z is the percentage (0-100) of the total data set used for the training stage. </p> <p>More details on how to use the model in <a href="https://github.com/florentaden/mldeclustering">this Github page</a>.</p>
Icequake and Earthquake waveforms
<p>Find the description on - https://github.com/Akashkharita/Icequake_Earthquake_Discrimination/blob/main/README.md</p>
Data archive for the 2021 Ms 6.0 Luxian earthquake
<p>Data archive for the 2021 Ms 6.0 Luxian earthquake</p>
Strong ground motion parameters of the ML 5.2 and ML 5.7 crustal earthquakes in Gorj, Romania
<p>This preliminary report presents the main ground motion parameters (GMP) for engineering applications: Acceleration, Velocity, Displacement, PGA, PGV, PGD, SA, SV, SD and Fourier Spectra.</p>
Revised kinematic slip model of the 2019 Ridgecrest (California) earthquakes
<p>The published slip model of Jin and Fialko (2020) features a complex rupture geometry in the shallow crust, including a “flower structure” formed by intersecting splay faults. Slip inversions were performed using the first-order Tikhonov regularization to moderate extreme variation in slip between the adjacent slip patches, including between slip patches that belonged to different sub-faults. This resulted in a highly peaked along-strike averaged normalized coseismic slip at the bottom of the inferred flower structure (3-4 km, Figure 15a in Jin and Fialko, 2020). However, in case of bifurcating faults, or “Y-shaped” fault intersections, a more appropriate regularization would be to preserve the slip budget between the bifurcated fault strands and a “parent” fault segment such that <span class="math-tex">\(U_s^1 + U_s^2 = U_p\)</span>, where <span class="math-tex">\(U_s^1, U_s^2\)</span> are slip components that belong to two (or more) splay faults, and <span class="math-tex">\(U_p \)</span> is the respective slip component on the parent fault (Jin and Fialko, 2021). We re-run inversions of space geodetic data for the Ridgecrest earthquakes, as described in Jin and Fialko (2020), but with the imposed “slip budget” constraint for the intersecting faults. </p> <p> </p> <p>References:</p> <p>Jin, Z., & Fialko, Y. (2020). Finite slip models of the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence constrained by space geodetic data and aftershock locations. Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 110, 1660–1679.</p> <p>Jin, Z., & Fialko, Y. (2021). Coseismic and early postseismic deformation due to the 2021 M7.4 Maduo (China) earthquake. Geophys. Res. Lett., 48, e2021GL095213.</p>
The surface coordinates of the Zemuhe fault and the surface dislocations of the 1850 Xichang earthquake
<p>These datasets accompany the Zemuhe fault surface coordinates that were used for construction of the fault geometry model, the observational fault surface slip of the 1850 Xichang M 7.5 earthquake and the intensity distribution in Estimation of the nucleation location and rupture extent of the 1850 Xichang, Sichuan, China, earthquake by dynamic rupture simulations on a multi-segment stepover structure submitted to Earth and Space Science by Yu et al. (2023). The data is structured as follows:</p> <p>Once unzipped the data within the archive are six txt files: fault_surface_slip_Feng.txt, which is from Feng et al. (2000); fault_surface_slip_Ren.txt, which is from Ren and Lin (2010), fault_surface_slip_Yu.txt, which is from Yu et al., (2001); intensity.txt, which is from Feng et al. (2000); landslides.txt, which is from Guo et al. (2014) and Cao (2015); zemuhe_fault_surface_coordinates.txt, which is from Working group for geologic mapping on Zemuhe fault (2000). The file folder stress_configuration contains the initial stress setup for the model in Figure 5c.</p>
Relocation of the 8 January 2022 Menyuan (Ms 6.9), China, earthquake sequence: A conjugated type of rupturing event with a seismic gap in the Haiyuan fault in northeast Tibet
<p>This file is the relocated data of the 2022 Menyuan Ms 6.9 and 2016 Menyuan Ms 6.4 earthquake using Double-difference algorithm. It is only used for scientific research.</p>
Recurrence Time and Size of Chilean Earthquakes Influenced by Geological Structure
<p>Data related with the publication of "Recurrence Time and Size of Chilean Earthquakes Influenced by Geological Structure". Temperature model files are uploaded as .h5 .xdmf and .csv to visualize in paraview or your preferred software. The coseismic slip inversion for the Valdivia earthquake files are in .dat extension, please note that uncertainties are in the sigmainv.dat. Finally, we have uploaded all the input files necessary to run the quasi-dynamic model using Unicycle.</p>
Earthquakes - 2010 & 2011 - Animation
The animated version of the [Earthquake map for the years 2010 and 2011](https://skfb.ly/6Mnsn) ([this model](https://skfb.ly/6MnyD) showing every earthquake since the year 2000 might also interest you ;) ). The animation spans on the whole two years: a frame represents 6 days, and at 0.5x speed (the default value), one second is therefore equivalent to three months of data. Although the main seismic zones are more easily visible on the static version of the visualization, the animation clearly helps to identify the earthquakes of February 2010 in Chile and March 2011 in Japan, which appear as bright "flashes". Their respective aftershocks - spanning on a few weeks/months - are also visible and clearly showcase the relaxing of mechanical constraints in the subduction zones. Colored by magnitude (blue=low to red=high). Source: Objaverse 1.0 / Sketchfab
Evaluation of the Effect of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Individuals Exposed to Earthquakes
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06174350. IPD Sharing: NO. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Intervention for Earthquake Survivors
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT06207695. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
The Effects of Earthquake on Fear of Movement and Fear of Falling
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT05881499. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
Response of Psychiatric Outpatients to the Great East Japan Earthquake
ClinicalTrials.gov study NCT01533064. IPD Sharing: Not stated. Countries: 1. Publications: 0.
ScienceDex guides
Understand access before you commit
These curated guides explain access requirements, typical timelines, costs, and reuse considerations for widely used research datasets.
Allen Brain Atlas
Allen Brain Atlas is an Allen Institute collection of brain map atlases, datasets, APIs, and analysis tools covering mouse, human, and non-human primate brain resources.
Annotated Behaviour and Observability Dataset (ABODe)
ABODe is a University of Edinburgh DataShare dataset for behavior classification in group-housed mice using home-cage video, identities, bounding boxes, ground-plate positions, and annotator labels.
DANDI Archive for NWB datasets
DANDI is a BRAIN Initiative archive for publishing and sharing neurophysiology data, including electrophysiology, optophysiology, and behavioral data packaged as NWB and related standards.
International Brain Laboratory public data
The International Brain Laboratory public data releases expose standardized mouse decision-making experiments, including Neuropixels recordings, widefield calcium imaging, behavior, and session metadata accessed through the ONE API.
OpenNeuro
OpenNeuro is a free, open platform for sharing neuroimaging datasets, with public search, dataset pages, and download paths for web, S3, DataLad, and the OpenNeuro CLI.